Arid Zone Research ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 193-203.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2019.01.22

• Climate and Climatic Resources • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation on the Sensitivity of WRF Model in the Tianshan Mountains

CHEN Shu-ying1,2, HU Qi3, ZHANG Chi1, CHEN Xi1, QIU Yuan1,2, DU Hao-yang1,2, WEI Cai-xia1,2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology,Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Urumqi 830011,Xinjiang,China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;
    3. School of Natural Resources and Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68583,USA
  • Received:2018-04-28 Revised:2018-08-12 Published:2025-10-17

Abstract: In this study,a sensitivity analysis of the weather research and forecasting model (WRF) to different physical options in the Tianshan Mountains was carried out to seek the best performance combination.Yearly simulations at seasonal scale from 28th November,2014 to 1st December,2015 were carried out.The station observations and GPM (Global Precipitation Measurement) satellite precipitation data (R≥0.6) were used to validate the simulated daily extreme temperatures and precipitation.This work showed that temperature was modeled by WRF well,the simulated results of daily maximum temperature (T2max,0.8<R<0.95) were better than that of daily minimum temperature (T2min,0.62<R<0.88),and T2min was sensitive to land surface model and cloud-microphysical model.The simulated results of precipitation by WRF were not so ideal with low correlation coefficients about 0.6 (R≈0.6),and they were different from different schemes.The cloud-microphysical scheme WSM 6-class could be used to simulate precipitation well.Kain-Fristch cumulus/convective scheme could not be used to describe the strong convection and complex terrain in the Tianshan Mountains as we got the very large T2min biases and negative values of precipitation in summer.The best performance combination was WSM 6-class (Cloud-microphysics),Betts-Miller-Janjic (Cumulus/Convective scheme),Mellor-Yamada-Janjic scheme/Monin-Obukhov (Janjic Eta) scheme (Planetary boundary layer/Surface layer scheme),NOAH (Land surface model),and Community Atmosphere Model (Longwave and shortwave radiation).

Key words: WRF, climate simulation, physical parameterisation, sensitive evaluation, Tianshan Mountains, Central Asia