山西中部城市群生态系统服务对土地利用格局变化的响应

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2024.07.07

干旱区研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 1153-1166.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.07.07 cstr: 32277.14.j.azr.2024.07.07

山西中部城市群生态系统服务对土地利用格局变化的响应

吴朝巧¹^,²(), 林菲²^,³, 牛俊杰²^,³(), 耿甜伟¹^,²

1.太原师范学院地理科学学院，山西晋中 030619
2.太原师范学院，汾河流域科学发展研究中心，山西晋中 030619
3.太原师范学院，汾河流域地表过程与资源生态安全山西省重点实验室，山西晋中 030619

收稿日期:2024-03-06 修回日期:2024-04-10 出版日期:2024-07-15 发布日期:2024-08-01
通讯作者: 牛俊杰. E-mail: junjieniu@foxmail.com
作者简介:吴朝巧（1999-），女，硕士研究生，主要从事生态系统服务与国土空间修复研究. E-mail: 18869429352@163.com
基金资助:
山西省哲学社会科学规划课题(2022YJ098);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(19YJAZH066);山西省基础研究计划(202203021222243);山西省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(20200133)

Response of ecosystem service to land use pattern change in the Shanxi central urban agglomeration

WU Zhaoqiao¹^,²(), LIN Fei²^,³, NIU Junjie²^,³(), GENG Tianwei¹^,²

1. Institute of Geographical Sciences, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, Shanxi, China
2. Research Center for Scientific Development in Fenhe River Valley, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, Shanxi, China
3. Shanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology Security in Fenhe River Valley, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, Shanxi, China

Received:2024-03-06 Revised:2024-04-10 Published:2024-07-15 Online:2024-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

山西中部城市群是山西省经济发展态势最好的区域，这种经济增长却伴随着生态系统不同程度的破坏。本文基于土地利用格局演变，运用InVEST模型、ArcGIS技术、像元统计分析和四象限模型等方法，评估2000—2020年产水、粮食供给、土壤保持和碳储量服务的时空格局及权衡/协同关系，并深入分析了土地利用格局对生态系统服务的影响。结果表明：（1）山西中部城市群产水量、粮食供给和土壤保持逐年增加，而碳储量则缓慢递减，不同地类和行政区所提供的生态系统服务能力存在显著差异。（2）空间格局上，生态系统服务整体以协同关系为主，粮食供给、产水量和土壤保持三者互为协同关系，而与碳储量均为权衡关系。（3）建设用地扩张对产水服务产生正向影响，林地增加促进土壤保持，而林地和草地减少对碳储量产生负向影响；土地利用强度与产水量、粮食供给、土壤保持之间整体呈正相关关系，但对碳储量的影响却呈现负向趋势。这些结果为山西中部城市群及其他类似地区的生态安全建设和可持续发展提供重要参考。

关键词: 生态系统服务, InVEST模型, 土地利用强度, 权衡和协同, 山西中部城市群

Abstract:

The Shanxi central urban agglomeration is the region with the best economic development in that province. However, this economic growth is accompanied by varying degrees of damage to the ecosystem. Based on the evolution of land use patterns, methods such as the InVEST model, ArcGIS, pixel statistical analysis and the four-quadrant model to assess the spatiotemporal patterns and trade-offs/synergies of water yield, food provision, soil conservation, and carbon storage services from 2000 to 2020, and to analyze in depth the impact of land use patterns on ecosystem services. The results showed that (1) Shanxi central urban agglomeration services of water yield, food supply, and soil retention elevated over the years, while carbon storage diminished marginally, with significant discrepancies in the ecosystem service capacities across various land types and administrative regions. (2) Ecosystem services overall are primarily characterized by synergistic relationships; food supply, water yield, and soil conservation are synergistic, whereas all maintain a trade-off relationship with carbon storage. (3) Expansion of built-up land positively impacts water yield, increased forest land promotes soil conservation, while reduction of forest and grassland negatively impacts carbon storage. Land use intensity was positively correlated with water yield, food supply, and soil retention, yet adversely affected carbon storage. These findings provide critical reference points for the ecological security and sustainable development of Shanxi central urban agglomeration and other similar regions.

Key words: ecosystem services, InVEST model, land use intensity, trade-off and synergies, Shanxi central urban agglomeration

吴朝巧, 林菲, 牛俊杰, 耿甜伟. 山西中部城市群生态系统服务对土地利用格局变化的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(7): 1153-1166.

WU Zhaoqiao, LIN Fei, NIU Junjie, GENG Tianwei. Response of ecosystem service to land use pattern change in the Shanxi central urban agglomeration[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(7): 1153-1166.

图/表 12

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表2

图9

图10

参考文献 36

[4]	[Shen Jiashu, Li Shuangcheng, Liang Ze, et al. Research progress and prospect for the relationship between ecosystem services supplies and demands[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(8): 1909-1922.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210801
[5]	戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(11): 1250-1259. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.11.1250
	[Dai Erfu, Wang Xiaoli, Zhu Jianjia, et al. Progress and perspective on ecosystem services trade-offs[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2015, 30(11): 1250-1259.] doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.11.1250
[6]	于德永, 郝蕊芳. 生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(8): 804-815. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2020.069
	[Yu Deyong, Hao Ruifang. Research progress and prospect of ecosystem services[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2020, 35(8): 804-815.] doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2020.069
[7]	王军, 顿耀龙. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响研究综述[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(5): 798-808.
	[Wang Jun, Dun Yaolong. A review on the effects of land-use change on ecosystem services[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(5): 798-808.]
[8]	Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D, et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(3): 333-346.
[9]	谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.
	[Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Lu Chunxia, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.05.019
[10]	刘珺, 俞博云, 杨文府. 多尺度地理加权回归模型支持下的汾河流域生态系统服务关系演化机理研究[J]. 遥感学报, 2023, 27(7): 1667-1679.
	[Liu Jun, Yu Boyun, Yang Wenfu. Evolution mechanism of ecosystem service relationship in the Fenhe River Basin based on multiscale geographically weighted regression[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2023, 27(7): 1667-1679.]
[11]	万虹麟, 王凤春, 李佳亮, 等. 雄安新区土地利用变化驱动生态系统服务时空变化及权衡协同分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2023, 38(5): 1978-1998.
	[Wan Honglin, Wang Fengchun, Li Jialiang, et al. Analysis of spatiotemporal changes and trade-offs/synergies of ecosystem services driven by land use change in Xiong’an New Area[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2023, 38(5): 1978-1998.]
[12]	钱红运, 陈爽. 特大城市新区土地利用变化对生态系统服务权衡-协同关系影响: 以南京江北新区为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(9): 1123-1132.
	[Qian Hongyun, Chen Shuang. Effects of land use change on trade-off synergy relationship of ecosystem services in New Area of Megacity: The case of Nanjing Jiangbei New Area[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(9): 1123-1132.]
[13]	韩增林, 孟琦琦, 闫晓露, 等. 近30年辽东湾北部区土地利用强度与生态系统服务价值的时空关系[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(8): 2555-2566.
	[Han Zenglin, Meng Qiqi, Yan Xiaolu, et al. Spatial and temporal relationships between land use intensity and the value of ecosystem services in northern Liaodong Bay over the past 30 years[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 2555-2566.]
[14]	Peng J, Tian L, Liu Y, et al. Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: Thresholds identification[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2017, 46(31): 706-714.
[15]	方露露, 许德华, 王伦澈, 等. 长江、黄河流域生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系研究[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 821-838. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200044
	[Fang Lulu, Xu Dehua, Wang Lunche, et al. The study of ecosystem services and the comparison of trade-off and synergy in Yangtze River Basin and Yellow River Basin[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(3): 821-838.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200044
[16]	Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes W R, et al. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration[J]. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40(2): 3-7.
[1]	Dasgupta P. EconomicValue of Biodiversity, Overview[M]. London: Routledge, 2001.
[2]	Assessment M E. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision Makers[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2005.
[3]	傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 441-446. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
	[Fu Bojie, Zhang Liwei. Land use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
[4]	申嘉澍, 李双成, 梁泽, 等. 生态系统服务供需关系研究进展与趋势展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(8): 1909-1922. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210801
[17]	杨洁. 黄河流域草地生态系统服务功能及其权衡协同关系研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2021.
	[Yang Jie. Study on Grassland Ecosystem Service and Its Trade-off and Synergy in The Yellow River Basin[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2021.]
[18]	秦伟, 朱清科, 张岩. 基于GIS和RUSLE的黄土高原小流域土壤侵蚀评估[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(8): 157-163.
	[Qin Wei, Zhu Qingke, Zhang Yan. Soil erosion assessment of small watershed in Loess Plateau based on GIS and RUSLE[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(8): 157-163.]
[19]	李军玲, 郭其乐, 彭记永. 基于MODIS数据的河南省冬小麦产量遥感估算模型[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(10): 1665-1669. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906(2012)10-1665-05
	[Li Junling, Guo Qile, Peng Jiyong. Remote sensing estimation model of Henan Province winter wheat yield based on MODIS data[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2012, 21(10): 1665-1669.
[20]	戴路炜, 唐海萍, 张钦, 等. 北方农牧交错带多伦县生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(9): 2863-2876.
	[Dai Luwei, Tang Haiping, Zhang Qin, et al. The trade-off and synergistic relationship among ecosystem services: A case study in Duolun County, the agro-pastoral ecotone of Northern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 2863-2876.]
[21]	刘立程, 刘春芳, 王川, 等. 黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201909016
	[Liu Licheng, Liu Chunfang, Wang Chuan, et al. Supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: A case study of Lanzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201909016
[22]	李妙宇, 上官周平, 邓蕾. 黄土高原地区生态系统碳储量空间分布及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(17): 6786-6799.
	[Li Miaoyu, Shangguan ZhouPing, Deng Lei. Spatial distribution of carbon storages in the terrestrial ecosystems and its influencing factors on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(17): 6786-6799.]
[23]	张燕, 师学义, 唐倩. 不同土地利用情景下汾河上游地区碳储量评估[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(1): 360-373.
	[Zhang Yan, Shi Xueyi, Tang Qian. Carbon storage assessment in the upper reaches of Fenhe River under different land use scenarios[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(1): 360-373.]
[24]	李瑾璞, 夏少霞, 于秀波, 等. 基于InVEST模型的河北省陆地生态系统碳储量研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(7): 854-861.
	[Li Jinpu, Xia Shaoxia, Yu Xiubo, et al. Evaluation of carbon storage on terrestrial ecosystem in Hebei Province based on InVEST Model[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36(7): 854-861.]
[25]	刘永婷, 杨钊, 徐光来, 等. 基于四象限模型的生态系统服务与人类活动强度关联性分析——以皖南国际旅游文化示范区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(13): 5200-5210.
	[Liu Yongting, Yang Zhao, Xu Guanglai, et al. Correlation between ecosystem services value and human activity intensity based on the four-quadrant model: A case study in the International Tourism and Culture Demonstration Area, the South Anhui Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(13): 5200-5210.]
[26]	胡秀芳, 赵军, 王蓓, 等. 黑河流域生态系统服务空间协同与权衡变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(3): 580-588.
	[Hu Xiufang, Zhao Jun, Wang Bei, et al. Changes of spatial synergies or trade-off of ecosystem services in the Heihe River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41(3): 580-588.]
[27]	Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B, et al. Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data[J]. Global Biogeochem Cycle, 1993, 7(4): 811-841.
[28]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 等. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202311.019
	[Hao Jiayuan, Zhi Liehui, Li Xiaowen, et al. Temporal and spatial variations and the relationships of land use pattern and ecosystem services in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202311.019
[29]	任娟, 赵雪雁, 徐省超, 等. 黄河中游地区生态系统服务的时空演变及权衡与协同关系研究[J]. 地球环境学报, 2022, 13(4): 477-490.
	[Ren Juan, Zhao Xueyan, Xu Shengchao, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution, tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in the middle Yellow River[J]. Journal of Earth Environment, 2022, 13(4): 477-490.]
[30]	殷宝库, 苏鹏飞, 张建国, 等. 1985—2020年黄河中游多沙粗沙区水土流失动态变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(5): 123 -126.
	[Yin Baoku, Su Pengfei, Zhang Jianguo, et al. Dynamic changes of soil and water loss in rich and coarse sediment areas of middle Yellow River Basin from 1985 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 123-126.]
[31]	杨晓楠, 李晶, 秦克玉, 等. 关中—天水经济区生态系统服务的权衡关系[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(11): 1762-1773. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201511006
	[Yang Xiaonan, Li Jing, Qin Keyu, et al. Trade-off between ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(11): 1762-1773.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201511006
[32]	孙泽祥, 刘志锋, 何春阳, 等. 中国快速城市化干燥地区的生态系统服务权衡关系多尺度分析——以呼包鄂榆地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(15): 4881-4891.
	[Sun Zexiang, Liu Zhifeng, He Chunyang, et al. Multi-scale analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs in urbanizing dylands of China: A case study in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Yulin region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(15): 4881-4891.]
[33]	朱俊俊, 高周冰, 王君櫹, 等. 南京都市圈生态系统服务时空变化及权衡协同关系[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(3): 383-394.
	[Zhu Junjun, Gao Zhoubing, Wang Junxiao, et al. Spatiotemporal changes and trade-off/synergy relationship of ecosystem services in Nanjing metropolitan area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(3): 383-394.]
[34]	李益敏, 李驭豪, 赵筱青, 等. 云南省文山市生态系统服务的权衡/协同关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(11): 2545-2555.
	[Li Yimin, Li Yuhao, Zhao Xiaoqing, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns and interrelationships of ecosystem services in Wenshan City, Yunnan Province[J]. Resources and Environment in The Yangtze basin, 2022, 31(11): 2545-2555.]
[35]	杨洁, 谢保鹏, 张德罡. 黄河流域生态系统服务权衡协同关系时空异质性[J]. 中国沙漠, 2021, 41(6): 78-87. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00088
	[Yang Jie, Xie Baopeng, Zhang Degang. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-off synergy in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 78-87.] doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00088
[36]	韩磊, 杨梅丽, 刘钊, 等. 黄土高原典型退耕区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究——以延安市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(20): 8115-8125.
	[Han Lei, Yang Meili, Liu Zhao, et al. Ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies in typical farmland conversion area of the Loess Plateau: Taking Yan’an City as an example[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2022, 42(20): 8115-8125.]

土地利用类型	2000年		2010年		2020年		2000— 2010年	2010—2020年	2000— 2020年
土地利用类型	面积/km²	占比/%	面积/km²	占比/%	面积/km²	占比/%	2000— 2010年	2010—2020年	2000— 2020年
耕地	23892.18	32.21	22451.25	30.27	22361.75	30.15	-1440.93	-89.5	-1530.43
林地	22044.32	29.72	21832.14	29.44	21723.50	29.29	-212.18	-108.64	-320.82
草地	25970.25	35.01	25874.22	34.88	25619.66	34.54	-96.03	-254.56	-350.59
水域	613.53	0.83	571.41	0.77	574.46	0.77	-42.12	3.05	-39.07
建设用地	1625.35	2.19	3416.67	4.61	3865.09	5.21	1791.32	448.42	2239.74
未利用地	24.98	0.04	24.93	0.03	26.16	0.04	-0.05	1.23	1.18

生态系统服务	WY和FP	WY和CS	WY和SR	FP和CS	FP和SR	CS和SR
2000年相关系数	0.28^**	-0.80^**	-0.31^**	-0.47^**	-0.37^**	0.50^**
2010年相关系数	0.08^**	-0.59^**	-0.08^**	-0.46^**	-0.36^**	0.46^**
2020年相关系数	0.24^**	-0.77^**	-0.29^**	-0.46^**	-0.37^**	0.47^**

山西中部城市群生态系统服务对土地利用格局变化的响应

Response of ecosystem service to land use pattern change in the Shanxi central urban agglomeration

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李冰洁, 范志韬, 曲芷程, 姚顺予, 宿夏姝, 刘东伟, 王立新. 基于InVEST-PLUS模型的黄河流域内蒙古段生态系统碳储量评价及预测[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(7): 1217-1227.
[2]	张顺鑫, 吴子豪, 闫庆武, 李桂娥, 牟守国. 基于PLUS-InVEST模型的天山北坡生态系统碳储量时空变化与预测[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(7): 1228-1237.
[3]	周建伟, 罗君, 马雪洋. 拉萨河流域土地利用与生态系统服务价值时空演变及驱动因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(6): 1021-1031.
[4]	董彭蓓, 任宗萍, 李鹏, 王凯博, 贺国凯, 王璞. 土地利用变化下宁夏生态系统服务权衡协同关系研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(6): 1032-1044.
[5]	高雅玉, 宋玉, 赵廷红, 高金芳, 何文博, 李泽霞. 马莲河下游产水量时空演变特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(5): 776-787.
[6]	刘如龙, 赵媛媛, 陈国清, 迟文峰, 刘正佳. 内蒙古黄河流域1990—2020年生境质量评估[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(4): 674-683.
[7]	徐铭璟, 冯强, 吕萌. 生态系统服务权衡及其影响因素——以黄河流域山西段为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(3): 467-479.
[8]	李佳珂, 邵战林. 基于PLUS和InVEST模型的乌鲁木齐市碳储量时空演变与预测[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(3): 499-508.
[9]	严莉, 曹广超, 康利刚, 刘梦琳, 叶得力. 基于InVEST模型的共和县生境质量时空变化及驱动因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(2): 314-325.
[10]	申草,任宗萍,李鹏,王凯博,鲁克新,任正龑,魏小燕. 宁夏水土保持生态补偿优先区识别[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(9): 1527-1536.
[11]	张晓敏, 张东梅, 张伟. 人类活动对额尔齐斯河流域碳储量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(8): 1333-1345.
[12]	包玉斌,王耀宗,路锋,刘自增,马大为,杨勇,吴娟,张永康. 六盘山区国土空间生态安全格局构建与分区优化[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1172-1183.
[13]	闫豫疆, 李建贵, 李均力, 蒋腾. 面向生态系统服务供需的开都-孔雀河流域生态安全格局研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(5): 829-839.
[14]	王鹏, 秦思彤, 胡慧蓉. 近30 a拉萨河流域土地利用变化和生境质量的时空演变特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 492-503.
[15]	陈实, 黄银兰, 金云翔. 退耕还林（草）工程实施前后黄河中游生境质量时空变化分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 456-468.