面向生态系统服务供需的开都-孔雀河流域生态安全格局研究

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2023.05.15

干旱区研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 829-839.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.05.15

面向生态系统服务供需的开都-孔雀河流域生态安全格局研究

闫豫疆¹(),李建贵²(),李均力³,蒋腾⁴

1.新疆农业大学经济管理学院，新疆乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农业大学林学与风景园林学院，新疆乌鲁木齐 830052
3.中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所，荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室，新疆乌鲁木齐 830011
4.新疆林业科学院，新疆乌鲁木齐 830018

收稿日期:2023-01-27 修回日期:2023-02-14 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-30
通讯作者: 李建贵. E-mail: lijiangui1971@163.com
作者简介:闫豫疆（1986-），男，博士研究生，主要从事区域生态与环境管理研究. E-mail: 330730542@qq.com
基金资助:
中国科学院创新交叉团队(JCTD-2019-20);国家自然科学基金(U203201);国家自然科学基金(41671034);第三次新疆综合科学考察项目(2021xjk-k1400)

Construction of ecological security patterns in the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services

YAN Yujiang¹(),LI Jiangui²(),LI Junli³,Jiang Teng⁴

1. College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, Xinjiang, China
2. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, Xinjiang, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China
4. Xinjiang Academy of Forestry Sciences, Urumqi 830018, Xinjiang, China

Received:2023-01-27 Revised:2023-02-14 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-05-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

构建干旱区生态安全格局有利于促进区域生态系统服务供应与需求之间的动态平衡。以干旱区开都-孔雀河流域为研究区，利用InVEST模型、RWEQ模型和Getis-Ord Gi^*模型分析生态供给源地，以土地利用程度、地均GDP、人口密度和夜间灯光指数分析生态需求源地，并基于最小累积阻力模型确定供给源地与需求源地之间的生态廊道，从而构建研究区生态安全格局。研究结果表明：（1）开都-孔雀河流域生态供给源地14个，占研究区面积的21.46%，重点生态需求源地共9个斑块，占流域总面积4.63%；生态廊道126条，重要廊道17条，总长度654.68 km；生态节点65个，重点生态节点24个。（2）开都-孔雀河流域生态系统服务供给与需求空间错位明显，高供给区域与高需求区域呈现出以城镇边界为分界线的明显特征。（3）结合研究区自然地理特征和景观生态系统服务流动性，运用阻力面模型，构建“两核心、两片区、三横四纵多节点”的开都-孔雀河流域生态安全格局可为保障区域生态系统服务功能和可持续发展政策的制定提供科学参考。

关键词: 生态系统服务供给与需求, 生态廊道, 生态安全网络, 开都-孔雀河流域

Abstract:

The construction of an ecological security pattern in arid zones is conducive to promoting a dynamic balance between the supply and demand of regional ecosystem services. This study involves the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin in an arid zone and uses the InVEST model, the RWEQ model, and the Getis-Ord Gi^* model to analyze the ecological supply sources, degree of land use, GDP per km², population density, and the nighttime light index. This approach was used to analyze the ecological demand sources and determine the ecological corridors between supply and demand sources based on the minimum cumulative resistance model so as to construct an ecological security pattern of the study area. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There are 14 ecological supply source areas in the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin, accounting for 21.46% of the study area, and a total of 9 patches of key ecological demand source areas, accounting for 4.63% of the total area of the basin; 126 ecological corridors, including a total of 17 important corridors with a total length of 654.68 km; 65 ecological nodes, including 24 key ecological nodes. (2) The spatial mismatch between supply and demand of ecosystem services in Kaidu-Kongque River Basin is obvious, and the high supply area and high demand area show obvious characteristics with urban boundary as the dividing line. (3) Combining the natural geographic characteristics and the mobility of landscape ecosystem services in the study area, the resistance surface model is used to construct “two cores, two zones, three horizons, four verticals, and multiple nodes” of the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin. In conclusion, the ecological security pattern of the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin can provide a scientific reference for protecting regional ecosystem service functions and formulating sustainable development policies.

Key words: ecosystem service supply and demand, ecological corridor, ecological safety network, Kaidu-Kongque River Basin

闫豫疆, 李建贵, 李均力, 蒋腾. 面向生态系统服务供需的开都-孔雀河流域生态安全格局研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(5): 829-839.

YAN Yujiang, LI Jiangui, LI Junli, Jiang Teng. Construction of ecological security patterns in the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(5): 829-839.

图/表 9

图1

表1

生态系统服务供给量计算方法"

生态系统服务	计算公式	变量解释
食物供给	$G i = G s u m × N D V I i N D V I s u m$	$G i$ 为i栅格分配的粮食、肉类、水果和水产品的产量（t）； $G s u m$ 分别为研究区粮食总产量、肉类、水果和水产品总产量（t）； $N D V I i$ 为i栅格的归一化植被指数； $N D V I s u m$ 为研究区NDVI值之和
碳固持	$C t o t = C a b o v e + C b e l o w + C s o i l + C d e a d$	$C t o t$ 为总碳储量； $C a b o v e$ 为地上碳储量； $C b e l o w$ 为地下碳储量； $C s o i l$ 为土壤碳储量； $C d e a d$ 为死亡有机物碳储量。单位均为t·hm^-2
生境质量	$D x j = ∑ 1 r ∑ 1 y w r ∑ r = 1 n w r r y i r x y β x S j r$ $Q x j = H x j 1 - D x j 2 D x j 2 + k 2$	$D x j$ 为生境退化度，取值为0~1，其值越大代表生境退化程度越高；r为威胁因子；y为威胁因子r对应的栅格数量；w_r为威胁因子的权重；r_y为威胁因子的胁迫值； $β x$ 为生境受保护水平； $S j r$ 为生境j对威胁因子r的敏感性；i_rxy为栅格y中的威胁因子r对栅格x的影响；Q_xj为生境质量；H_xj为生境适宜度；D_xj为生境退化度；k为半饱和参数，通常取生境退化度最大值的一半
防风固沙	$S R = S L p - S L$ $S L p = 2 Z S p 2 × Q p m a x × e - z / S p 2$ $Q p m a x = 109.8 × (W F × E F × S C F × K')$ $S p = 150.71 × (W F × E F × S C F × K' ） - 0.3711$ $S L = 2 Z s p 2 × Q r m a x × e - z / S r 2$ $Q r m a x = 109.8 × (W F × E F × S C F × K' × C)$ $S r = 150.71 × (W F × E F × S C F × K' × C ） - 0.3711$	$S R$ 为固沙量（kg·m^-2）； $S L p$ 为潜在风蚀量（kg·m^-2）； $S L$ 为实际风力侵蚀量（kg·m^-2）； $Q p m a x$ 为潜在风力的最大输沙能力（kg·m^-1）； $S p$ 为潜在关键地块长度（m）； $z$ 表示所计算下风向距离（m），本次计算取50 m； $W F$ 为气候因子；EF为土壤可蚀性百分比（%）； $S C F$ 为土壤结皮因子（无量纲）； $K'$ 为土壤糙度因子（无量纲）； $Q r m a x$ 为实际风力的最大输沙能力（kg·m^-1）；S_r为实际关键地块长度（m）；C为植被因子（无量纲）

表1

表2

图2

图3

图4

表3

图5

图6

参考文献 29

[1]	杨凯, 曹银贵, 冯喆, 等. 基于最小累积阻力模型的生态安全格局构建研究进展[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(5): 555-565.
	[Yang Kai, Cao Yingui, Feng Zhe, et al. Research progress of ecological security pattern construction based on minimum cumulative resistance model[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2021, 37(5): 555-565. ]
[2]	杨亮洁, 王晶, 魏伟, 等. 干旱内陆河流域生态安全格局的构建及优化——以石羊河流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(17): 5915-5927.
	[Yang Liangjie, Wang Jing, et al. Ecological security pattern construction and optimization in Arid Inland River Basin: A case study of Shiyang River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(17): 5915-5927. ]
[3]	俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(1): 8-15.
	[Yu Kongjian. Landscape ecological safety patterns for biological conservation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(1): 8-15. ]
[4]	易丹, 肖善才, 韩逸, 等. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究评述及框架体系构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3942-3952. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.011
	[Yi Dan, Xiao Shancai, Han Yi, et al. Review on supply and demand of ecosystem service and systematic framework construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11): 3942-3952. ] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.011
[5]	周浪, 李明慧, 周启刚, 等. 基于电路理论的特大山地城市生态安全格局构建以重庆市都市区为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(2): 319-325, 334.
	[Zhou Lang, Li Minghui, Zhou Qigang, et al. Construction of ecological security patterns in mega-mountain cities based on circuit theory: Taking Chongqing metropolitan area as an example[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(2): 319-325, 334. ]
[6]	吴金华, 刘思雨, 白帅. 基于景观生态安全的神木市生态廊道识别与优化[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1120-1127.
	[Wu Jinhua, Liu Siyu, Bai Shuai. Identification and optimization of ecological corridor in Shenmu City based on landscape ecological security[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 1120-1127. ]
[7]	赵宇豪, 罗宇航, 易腾云, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需匹配的深圳市生态安全格局构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2475-2484. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202209.026
	[Zhao Yuhao, Luo Yuhang, Yi Tengyun, et al. Constructing an ecological security pattern in Shenzhen, China, by matching the supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(9): 2475-2484. ] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202209.026
[8]	陈昕, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等. 基于“重要性-敏感性-连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 471-484. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703006
	[Chen Xin, Peng Jian, Liu Yanxu, et al. Constructing ecological security patterns in Yunfu City based on the framework of importance-sensitivity-connectivity[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 471-484. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703006
[9]	张豆, 渠丽萍, 张桀滈. 基于生态供需视角的生态安全格局构建与优化——以长三角地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7525-7537.
	[Zhang Dou, Qu Liping, Zhang Jiehao. Ecological security pattern construction method based on the perspective of ecological supply and demand: A case study of Yangtze River Delta[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7525-7537. ]
[10]	刘春芳, 王韦婷, 刘立程, 等. 西北地区县域生态系统服务的供需匹配——以甘肃古浪县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2177-2190. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200911
	[Liu Chunfang, Wang Weiting, Liu Licheng, et al. Supply-demand matching of county ecosystem services in Northwest China: A case study of Gulang County[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(9): 2177-2190. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200911
[11]	徐洁, 肖玉, 谢高地, 等. 防风固沙型重点生态功能区防风固沙服务的评估与受益区识别[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(16): 5857-5873.
	[Xu Jie, Xiao Yu, Xie Gaodi, et al. Assessment of wind erosion prevention service and its beneficiary areas identification of national key ecological function zone of windbreak and sand fixation type in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(16): 5857-5873. ]
[12]	岳文泽, 侯丽, 夏皓轩, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需平衡的宁夏固原生态修复分区与优化策略[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 149-158. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.024
	[Yue Wenze, Hou Li, Xia Haoxuan, et al. Territorially ecological restoration zoning and optimization strategy in Guyuan City of Ningxia, China: Based on the balance of ecosystem service supply and demand[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(1): 149-158. ] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.024
[13]	王文辉, 黄粤, 刘铁, 等. 开都-孔雀河流域水资源优化配置[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(5): 1030-1039.
	[Wang Wenhui, Huang Yue, Liu Tie, et al. Optimized redistribution of water resources in the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018, 35(5): 1030-1039. ]
[14]	李玉焦, 陈亚宁, 张齐飞, 等. 1960—2018年博斯腾湖水位变化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(1): 48-58.
	[Li Yujiao, Chen Yaning, Zhang Qifei, et al. Analysis of the change in water level and its influencing factors on Bosten Lake from 1960 to 2018[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(1): 48-58. ]
[15]	胡汝骥, 姜逢清, 王亚俊, 等. 论中国干旱区湖泊研究的重要意义[J]. 干旱区研究, 2007, 24(2): 137-140.
	[Hu Ruji, Jiang Fengqing, Wang Yajun, et al. On the importance of research on the lakes in arid land of China[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2007, 24(2): 137-140. ]
[16]	陈亚宁, 杜强, 陈跃滨. 博斯腾湖流域水资源可持续利用研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
	[Chen Yaning, Du Qiang, Chen Yuebin. Study on the Sustainable use of Water Resources in the Bosten Lake Basin[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. ]
[17]	荣月静, 严岩, 王辰星, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需的雄安新区生态网络构建与优化[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20): 7197-7206.
	[Rong Yuejing, Wang Chenxing, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological network in Xiong’an New Area based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20): 7197-7206. ]
[18]	王蓓, 赵军, 胡秀芳. 基于InVEST模型的黑河流域生态系统服务空间格局分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(10): 2783-2792.
	[Wang Bei, Zhao Jun, Hu Xiufang. Spatial pattern analysis of ecosystem services based on InVEST in Heihe River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology 2016, 35(10): 2783-2792. ]
[19]	和娟, 师学义, 付扬军. 基于生态系统服务的汾河源头区域生态安全格局优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 814-825. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200406
	[He Juan, Shi Xueyi, Fu Yangjun. Optimization of ecological security pattern in the source area of Fenhe River Basin based on ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(4): 814-825. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200406
[20]	位宏, 徐丽萍, 李晓蕾. 基于最小累计阻力面模型的博斯腾湖流域景观格局的分析与优化[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 36(2): 169-175.
	[Wei Hong, Xu Liping, Li Xiaolei. Analysis and optimization of landscape pattern in Boston Lake Basin based on minimum cumulative resistance[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2018, 36(2): 169-175. ]
[21]	王雅, 蒙吉军. 黑河中游土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2017, 34(1): 200-207.
	[Wang Ya, Meng Jijun. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services in the middlereaches of Heihe River[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2017, 34(1): 200-207. ]
[22]	胡其玉, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务供需的厦漳泉地区生态网络空间优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 342-355. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210206
	[Hu Qiyu, Chen Songlin. Optimizing the ecological networks based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services in Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou Region[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(2): 342-355. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210206
[23]	刘立程, 刘春芳, 王川, 等. 黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201909016
	[Liu Licheng, Liu Chunfang, Wang Chuan, et al. Supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: A case study of Lanzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201909016
[24]	岑晓腾. 土地利用景观格局与生态系统服务价值的关联分析及优化研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016.
	[Cen Xiaoteng. Correlation Analysis and Optimization between Land use Landscape Pattern and Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of South Coast of Hangzhou Bay[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016. ]
[25]	刘维, 周忠学, 郎睿婷. 城市绿色基础设施生态系统服务供需关系及空间优化——以西安市为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(5): 1500-1513.
	[Liu Wei, Zhou Zhongxue, Lang Ruiting. Supply-demand relations of ecosystem services of urban green infrastructure and its spatial optimization: A case study of Xi’an[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(5): 1500-1513. ]
[26]	易浪, 孙颖, 尹少华, 等. 生态安全格局构建: 概念、框架与展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 845-856. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.023
	[Yi Lang, Sun Ying, Yin Shaohua, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern: Concept, framework and prospect[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(4): 845-856. ] doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.023
[27]	王正伟, 王宏卫, 杨胜天, 等. 基于生态系统服务功能的新疆绿洲生态安全格局识别及优化策略——以拜城县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(1): 91-104.
	[Wang Zhengwei, Wang Hongwei, Yang Shengtian, et al. Identification of optimization strategies of ecological security patterns of Oasis in Xinjiang based on ecosystem service function: Taking Baicheng County as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(1): 91-104. ]
[28]	李凯, 侯鹰, Hans Skov-Petersen, 等. 景观规划导向的绿色基础设施研究进展——基于“格局-过程-服务-可持续性”研究范式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 435-448. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210213
	[Li Kai, Hou Ying, Hans Skov-Petersen, et al. Research progress of green infrastructure oriented by landscape planning: From the perspective of “pattern-process-services-sustainability” research paradigm[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(2): 435-448. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210213
[29]	周璟, 王宏卫, 谈波, 等. 开都河流域生态安全格局构建与生态修复分区识别[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(24): 10127-10137.
	[Zhou Jing, Wang Hongwei, Tan Bo, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern and identification of ecological restoration zones in the Kaidu River Basin[J] Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(24): 10127-10137. ]

阻力面分量	权重	阻力值
阻力面分量	权重	10	30	50	70	100
景观类型	0.30	水域、湿地、林地	草地	耕地	未利用地	建设用地
高程/m	0.15	600~1200	1200~2000	2000~2800	2800~3400	3400~4900
坡度/（°）	0.25	0~6	6~12	12~22	22~33	33~80
地均GDP/（元·km^-2）	0.30	0~727	727~2373	2373~4632	4632~6852	6852~9761

供给源点	需求源点
供给源点	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1	0.9	0.3	0.5	0.1	0.1	1.0	3.3	0.3	0.8
2	3.1	2.2	2.1	2.4	15.8	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.2
3	0.5	0.2	1.2	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
4	2.0	0.4	0.6	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.1
5	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
6	2.4	4.2	9.6	0.4	0.5	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.1
7	4.6	18.1	2.1	0.6	0.6	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.1
8	1.6	0.3	0.4	0.1	0.1	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.1
9	0.8	0.2	0.3	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.1
10	1.5	1.3	6.0	0.2	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.1
11	0.4	0.1	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
12	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
13	0.9	0.2	0.3	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0
14	0.2	0.2	0.4	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

面向生态系统服务供需的开都-孔雀河流域生态安全格局研究

Construction of ecological security patterns in the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 29

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	孙茂森,王让会,宁虎森. 阿克苏河流域生态网络构建[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(9): 1509-1516.
[2]	吴金华,刘思雨,白帅. 基于景观生态安全的神木市生态廊道识别与优化[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1120-1127.