陕北固沙林恢复过程中土壤碳氮组分库特征与固存效应

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2019.04.06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取陕北毛乌素沙地从半固定沙地到恢复23~54 a的灌木和乔木固沙林地,采用密度分组法分析表层土壤轻、重组分碳氮含量、C/N的演变及累积速率、固定碳氮贡献率特征。结果表明:固沙林从恢复23~54 a,乔木和灌木林土壤轻组碳分别增加了14.0~40.6倍和8.8~19.2倍,显著高于对应重组碳3.2~7.7倍和3.5~8.1倍的增幅;对应轻组氮分别增加了14.5~40.9倍和11.8~29.1倍,也显著高于重组氮4.6~8.5倍和4.4~12.6倍的增幅,说明轻组碳氮相对重组碳氮对固沙林恢复更加敏感。土壤轻重组碳氮含量增加使得乔木和灌木林轻组碳密度增速分别达0.57 mg·hm^-2·a^-1和0.26 mg·hm^-2·a^-1,重组碳密度增速则仅为0.18 mg·hm^-2·a^-1和0.20 mg·hm^-2·a^-1;同时,轻组氮密度增速分别达0.03 mg·hm^-2·a^-1和0.02 mg·hm^-2·a^-1,重组氮密度增速则分别达0.02 mg·hm^-2·a^-1和0.04 mg·hm^-2·a^-1。按此碳氮组分增速,到固沙林恢复54 a时,乔木林和灌木林土壤轻组碳可分别贡献75.9%和59.4%的全有机碳增量;土壤重组氮则可贡献44.6%和63.9%的全氮增量。另外,恢复54 a两种林地土壤重组C/N分别比半固定沙地降低11.4%和38.5%。但轻组C/N在乔木林并无显著变化,在灌木林恢复23~54 a土壤轻组C/N降低了21.7%~31.0%,显著改变了土壤碳库性质。表明陕北固沙林恢复土壤表现出显著的固定碳氮效应,并且乔木林有更好的固碳能力,灌木林则有较好的固氮效应。

关键词: 固沙林, 恢复过程, 土壤碳氮, 固碳, 毛乌素沙地

Abstract: The soil samples were collected from 0-10 cm topsoil in the semi-fixed sand land and fixed sand land under the shrubberies and arbor forests regenerated for 23-54 years in the MU US sandy land in North Shaanxi Province. Each soil sample was separated as the light and heavy fractions by density grouping method,and the evolution and accumulation rates of organic carbon and total nitrogen,C/N and the characteristics of contribution proportion for sequestrating carbon and nitrogen in these two soil fractions were analyzed. The results indicated that the organic carbon contents in soil light fraction under the shrubberies and arbor forests regenerated for 23-54 years increased by 14.0-40.6 times and 8.8-19.2 times respectively,which were significantly higher than those in the corresponding heavy fractions (3.2-7.7 times and 3.5-8.1 times). In the same period of vegetation regeneration,the total nitrogen contents in soil light fraction under the arbor forests and shrubberies were increased by 14.5-40.9 times and 11.8-29.1 times respectively,which were also significantly higher than those of the corresponding heavy fractions (4.6-8.5 times and 4.4-12.6 times). These results indicated that the soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in light fraction were more sensitive to the desertification reversion than that in heavy fraction. Increase of the contents of organic carbon and total nitrogen in the light fraction and heavy fraction of soil also made the growth rates of organic carbon density of light fraction under the forests and shrubberies reach to 0.57 mg·hm^-2·a^-1 and 0.26 mg·hm^-2·a^-1 respectively. The growth rates of the organic carbon density in heavy fraction under the forests and shrubberies were only 0.18 mg·hm^-2·a^-1 and 0.20 mg·hm^-2·a^-1 respectively. Moreover,the growth rates of the total nitrogen density in light fraction reached to 0.03 mg·hm^-2·a^-1 and 0.02 mg·hm^-2·a^-,and they in heavy fraction reached to 0.02 mg·hm^-2·a^-1 and 0.04 mg·hm^-2·a^-1,respectively. According to these growth rates of carbon and nitrogen fractions,the carbon of light fraction under the forests and shrubberies could contribute 75.9% and 59.4% of the total organic carbon increment respectively during the 54-year restoration. The nitrogen in heavy fraction could contribute 44.6% and 63.9% of total nitrogen increment respectively. In addition,the C/N ratios of soil heavy fraction under the two woodlands regenerated for 54 years were significantly reduced by 11.4% and 38.5% respectively compared with those in semi-fixed sand land. However,there was no significant change of C/N in the light fraction under the forests,and the C/N in the light fraction under the shrubberies regenerated for 23-54 years was decreased by 21.7%-31.0%. As a result the quality of soil carbon pool was improved significantly. Therefore,the soil of restoration under the sand-fixing forests in North Shaanxi affected significantly the sequestration of carbon and nitrogen. Moreover,arbor forests has better carbon sequestration ability and shrubberies has better nitrogen sequestration effect.

Key words: sand-fixing forest, restoration process, soil carbon and nitrogen, carbon sequestration, Mu Us sandy land

哈斯尔, 郑嗣蕊, 涂伊南, 万家鸣, 杨咪咪, 黄悦, 余可, 佟小刚. 陕北固沙林恢复过程中土壤碳氮组分库特征与固存效应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(4): 835-843.

Hasier, ZHENG Si-rui, TU Yi-nan, WAN Jia-ming, YANG Mi-mi, HUANG Yue, YU Ke, TONG Xiao-gang. Sequestration Efficiency and Component Characteristics of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Contents during Restoration of Sand-Fixing Forests in North Shaanxi Province[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(4): 835-843.

参考文献

[1] 屠志方,李梦先,孙涛.第五次全国荒漠化和沙化监测结果及分析[J].林业资源管理,2016(1):1-5,13.
[Tu Zhifang,Li Mengxian,Sun Tao.The status and trend analysis of desertification and sandification[J].Forest Resources Management,2016(1):1-5,13.]
[2] 王涛.荒漠化治理中生态系统、社会经济系统协调发展问题探析——以中国北方半干旱荒漠区沙漠化防治为例[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7045-7048.
[Wang Tao.Study on the coordinated development of ecosystem and socio-economic system in desertification control:A case study of desertification control in semiarid area in North China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(22):7045-7048.]
[3] 陈泳.“沙进人退”到“人进沙退”的壮举——甘肃省防沙治沙工作综述[J].甘肃林业,2017(4):11-12.
[Chen Yong.“Sand in people retreat” to “people into the sand retreat” feat:Summarization of anti-desertification control in Gansu province[J].Forestry of Gansu,2017(4):11-12.]
[4] Murty D,Muf K,Mcmurtrie R E,et al.Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen:A review of the literature[J].Global Change Biology,2010,8(2):105-123.
[5] Post W M,Kwon K C.Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change:Processes and potential[J].Global Change Biology,2000,6(3):317-327.
[6] 佟小刚,韩新辉,李娇,等.黄土丘陵区不同退耕还林土壤颗粒结合态碳库分异特征[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(21):170-176.
[Tong Xiaogang,Han Xinhui,Li Jiao,et al.Variances of carbon storage in soil particle-sized fractions following conversion of cropland to forest in Loess Hilly Region[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(21):170-176.]
[7] 王迎菊,靳正忠,雷加强,等.人工防护林对风沙土有机碳动力学的影响[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(3):495-503.
[Wang Yingju,Jin Zhengzhong,Lei Jiaqiang,et al.Effects of artificial shelter forest on dynamic change of organic carbon pool of aeolian sandy soil[J].Arid Zone Research,2017,34(3):495-503.]
[8] 张玉兰,陈利军.沙漠化逆转过程中土壤性质演变综述[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(7):1440-1450.
[Zhang Yulan,Chen Lijun.Evolvement of soil properties during reversal of desertification:Research progress[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2010,29(7):1440-1450.]
[9] 武天云,Jeff J S,李凤民,等.土壤有机质概念和分组技术研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):717-722.
[Wu Tianyun,Jeff J S,Li Fengming,et al.Concepts and relative analytical techniques of soil organic matter[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2004,15(4):717-722.]
[10] Mvon L,Kögel-Knabner I,Ekschmitt K,et al.SOM fractionation methods:Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2007,39(9):2183-2207.
[11] Leifeld J,Kögel-Knabner I.Soil organic matter fractions as early indicators for carbon stock changes under different land-use[J].Geoderma,2005,124(1-2):143-155.
[12] 孙宗玖,李培英,杨合龙,等.短期放牧对昭苏草甸草原土壤轻组及颗粒碳氮的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(5):147-152.
[Sun Zongjiu,Li Peiying,Yang Helong,et al.Effects of short-period grazing on soil light fraction and particulate carbon and nitrogen in Zhaosu meadow steppe[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,28(5):147-152.]
[13] 蓝家程,肖时珍,林俊清,等.土壤利用方式对岩溶山地土壤轻组和重组有机碳的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2017,29(10):1720-1725.
[Lan Jiacheng,Xiao Shizhen,Lin Junqing,et al.Effect of land use types on soil light and heavy fraction organic carbon in Karst mountain area[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2017,29(10):1720-1725.]
[14] 王合云,董智,郭建英,等.不同放牧强度对大针茅草原土壤全土及轻组碳氮储量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):101-107.
[Wang Heyun,Dong Zhi,Guo Jianying,et al.Effects of different grazing intensities on total and light fraction organic carbon and nitrogen storages of soil in stipa grandis steppe[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,29(6):101-107.]
[15] 闫峰,吴波.近40 a毛乌素沙地荒漠化过程研究[J].干旱区地理,2013,36(6):987-996.
[Yan Feng,Wu Bo.Desertification progress in Mu Us Sandy Land over the past 40 years[J].Arid Land Geography,2013,36(6):987-996.]
[16] 刘娟,刘华民,卓义,等.毛乌素沙地1990—2014年景观格局变化及驱动力[J].草业科学,2017,34(2):255-263.
[Liu Juan,Liu Huaming,Zhuo Yi,et al.Dynamics and driving forces of landscape patterns in Mu Us Sandy Land,from 1990 to 2014[J].Pratacultural Science,2017,34(2):255-263.]
[17] 熊好琴,段金跃,王妍,等.围栏禁牧对毛乌素沙地土壤理化特征的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(3):150-155.
[Xiong Haoqin,Duan Jingyue,Wang Yan,et al.Effects of continuous grazing and livestock exclusion on soil properties in a degraded Mu Us Sandy Grassland,Inner Mongolia,Northern China[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2012,26(3):150-155.]
[18] Li J,Tong X G,Mukesh K A,et al.Dynamics of soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities along a chronosequence of desertified land revegetation[J].Ecological Engineering,2018,111:22-30.
[19] Strickland T C,Sollins P.Improved method for separating light-and heavy-fraction organic material from soil[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1987,51(5):1390-1393.
[20] Zhang C,Liu G,Xue S,et al.Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen storage as affected by land use in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau,China[J].European Journal of Soil Biology,2013,54:16-24.
[21] 淑敏,姜涛,王东丽,等.科尔沁沙地不同林龄樟子松人工林土壤生态化学计量特征[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(4):789-795.
[Shu Min,Jiang Tao,Wang Dongli,et al.Soil ecological stoichiometry under the planted of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica forests with different stand ages in the Horqin Sandy Land[J].Arid Zone Research,2018,35(4):789-795.]
[22] 刘玉林,朱广宇,邓蕾,等.黄土高原植被自然恢复和人工造林对土壤碳氮储量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(7):2163-2172.
[Liu Yulin,Zhu Guangyu,Deng Lei,et al.Effects of natural vegetation restoration and afforestation on soil carbon and nitrogen storage in the Loess Plateau,China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2018,29(7):2163-2172.]
[23] 吴建平,韩新辉,任成杰,等.黄土丘陵区不同恢复年限退耕林地土壤碳氮差异及其影响因素[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(6):123-133.
[Wu Jianping,Han Xinhui,Ren Chengjie,et al.Differences in soil carbon and nitrogen and the influencing factors in abandoned cultivated lands for different years in Loess Hilly Area[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition),2017,45(6):123-133.]
[24] 贾晓红,李新荣,李元寿.干旱沙区植被恢复中土壤碳氮变化规律[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(1):66-74.
[Jia Xiaohong,Li Xinrong,Li Yuansou.Soil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics during the re-vegetation process in the arid desert region[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2007,31(1):66-74.]
[25] Han X H,Zhao F Z,Tong X G,et al.Understanding soil carbon sequestration following the afforestation of former arable land by physical fractionation[J].Catena,2017,150:317-327.
[26] 郭胜利,马玉红,车升国,等.黄土区人工与天然植被对凋落物量和土壤有机碳变化的影响[J].林业科学,2009,45(10):14-18.
[Guo Shengli,Ma Yuhong,Che Shengguo,et al.Effects of artificial and natural vegetations on litter production and soil organic carbon change in Loess Hilly areas[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2009,45(10):14-18.]
[27] 韩晓日,苏俊峰,谢芳,等.长期施肥对棕壤有机碳及各组分的影响[J].土壤通报,2008,39(4):730-733.
[Han Xiaori,Su Junfeng,Xie Fang,et al.Effect of long-term fertilization on organic carbon and the different soil organic fractions of brown earth[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2008,39(4):730-733.]
[28] Grüneberg E,Schöning I,Hessenmöller D,et al.Organic layer and clay content control soil organic carbon stocks in density fractions of differently managed German beech forests[J].Forest Ecology & Management,2013,303(5):1-10.
[29] 马建业,佟小刚,李占斌,等.毛乌素沙地沙漠化逆转过程土壤颗粒固碳效应[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(11):3487-3494.
[Ma Jianye,Tong Xiaogang,Li Zhanbin,et al.Carbon sequestration in soil particle-sized fractions during reversion of desertification at Mu Us Sand Land[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2016,27(11):3487-3494.]