毛乌素沙地不同立地条件沙柳生物量异速生长规律

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2025.02.09

干旱区研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 289-298.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2025.02.09 cstr: 32277.14.AZR.20250209

毛乌素沙地不同立地条件沙柳生物量异速生长规律

王岳¹^,²^,³(), 刘中华⁴, 于明含⁴, 贺宇⁵, 郝蕾²^,³, 刘学瑶²^,³, 安骁⁴

1.安徽省通源环境节能股份有限公司，安徽合肥 230000
2.内蒙古财经大学资源与环境经济学院，内蒙古呼和浩特 010070
3.祖国北疆资源利用与环境保护协调发展院士专家工作站，内蒙古呼和浩特 010070
4.北京林业大学水土保持学院，水土保持国家林业局重点实验室，北京 100083
5.内蒙古自治区水利事业发展中心，内蒙古呼和浩特 010020

收稿日期:2024-06-23 修回日期:2024-12-10 出版日期:2025-02-15 发布日期:2025-02-21
作者简介:王岳（1989-），男，博士，副教授，主要从事沙区资源高效利用等方面研究. E-mail: wyue@imufe.edu.cn
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(2023YFHH0068);国家自然科学基金项目(31700439);国家自然科学基金项目(U23A2014);内蒙古自治区“五大任务”研究专项(NCXWD2472)

Biomass allocation in Salix psammophila and the response to different site conditions in the Mu Us Sandy Land

WANG Yue¹^,²^,³(), LIU Zhonghua⁴, YU Minghan⁴, HE Yu⁵, HAO Lei²^,³, LIU Xueyao²^,³, AN Xiao⁴

1. Anhui Tongyuan Environment Energy Saving Co., Ltd., Hefei 230000, Anhui, China
2. School of Resources and Environmental Economics, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010070, Inner Mongolia, China
3. Resource Utilization and Environmental Protection Coordinated Development Academician Expert Workstation in the North of China, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010070, Inner Mongolia, China
4. Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
5. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Water Conservancy Development Center, Hohhot 010020, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2024-06-23 Revised:2024-12-10 Published:2025-02-15 Online:2025-02-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为从生物量积累和分配的角度探究沙柳（Salix psammophila）对不同沙地环境条件的适应策略，揭示影响沙柳生物量分配的主要环境因子，为沙柳种群稳定性建设和可持续经营提供参考,选取沙丘迎风坡、背风坡、丘间地和平坦沙地4种立地类型的沙柳林为研究对象，测定各样地内沙柳代表株的丛生枝基径、长度和茎叶生物量，用标准主轴回归建立茎、叶生物量与基径、枝长的异速生长方程，以探明沙柳丛生枝尺度上茎叶生物量积累分配与个体尺寸的依赖关系；进一步通过主轴漂移的方法，检验茎叶生物量异速生长方程在不同立地类型条件下的差异，进而探讨环境条件对沙柳生物量积累和分配的影响。结果表明：（1）随丛生枝个体增大，沙柳茎生物量积累速率高于叶生物量积累速率，这一规律在各个立地类型间表现一致；（2）沙柳丛生枝茎、叶生物量分配在不同立地类型间差异显著，沙丘（迎风坡、背风坡）的叶生物量占丛生枝条生物量的比例显著高于丘间地和平坦沙地（P<0.05）；（3）造成沙柳生物量及其分配出现立地类型差异的主要土壤因子是土壤含水率，其中全剖面含水率（0~100 cm）与丛生枝生物量显著相关（P<0.01），深层土壤含水率（60~100 cm）与丛生枝地上生物量分配显著相关。沙柳的生物量积累与分配在不同立地类型间具有显著差异，深层土壤含水率比全剖面土壤含水率对生物量分配的影响更显著，基于本研究结果，未来可以通过适当人工干预以满足沙柳生长的水分要求，实现沙柳人工林种群的稳定发展。

关键词: 毛乌素沙地, 沙柳, 生物量分配, 立地类型, 异速生长

Abstract:

This study aimed to clarify the adaptability strategies of Salix psammophila to different environments from the perspective of resource allocation for the stable construction and sustainable management of S. psammophila plantations. S. psammophila plantations in four types of sites (windward slope, leeward slope, interdune land, and flat sand land) were surveyed in the Mu Us Sandy Land in Ningxia. The characteristics of the S. psammophila population, including morphological parameters like basal diameter, branch length, and stem and leaf biomass, were recorded. The effects of topography on the biomass accumulation and distribution between the S. psammophila organs were studied based on the allometric growth model. (1) With growth, S. psammophila tends to reduce the proportion of leaf resources and increase the proportion of stem resources. (2) The site factors significantly impact biomass and its distribution between the S. psammophila organs. The average biomass of branches in the dune (windward and leeward slopes) is significantly higher than that in the interdune land (P<0.05), and the allometric growth index of leaf-stem biomass is significantly higher in the dune than in the interdune and flat sand lands (P<0.05). (3) The main soil factor that affects biomass and its distribution between the S. psammophila organs is soil moisture. Soil moisture of the whole section (0-100 cm) determines the biomass, and soil moisture of the deep layer moisture content (60-100 cm) affects the biomass distribution trade-off between the stem and leaf. The biomass accumulation and allocation of S. psammophila displayed significant differences among different site types, and the effect of deep soil moisture on biomass allocation was more significant than that of full-profile soil moisture. In the future, artificial intervention can be adopted to satisfy the water requirement for S. psammophila growth and realize the stable development of the S. psammophila plantation population.

Key words: Mu Us Sandy Land, Salix psammophila, biomass allocation, site type, allometric growth

王岳, 刘中华, 于明含, 贺宇, 郝蕾, 刘学瑶, 安骁. 毛乌素沙地不同立地条件沙柳生物量异速生长规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(2): 289-298.

WANG Yue, LIU Zhonghua, YU Minghan, HE Yu, HAO Lei, LIU Xueyao, AN Xiao. Biomass allocation in Salix psammophila and the response to different site conditions in the Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2025, 42(2): 289-298.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

表2

图6

表3

表4

参考文献 31

[1]	Xu W, Wan S. Water and plant mediated responses of soil respiration to topography, fire, and nitrogen fertilization in a semiarid grassland in North China[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40: 679-687.
[2]	Liu W, Xu W, Hong J, et al. Interannual variability of soil microbial biomass and respiration in responses to topography, annual burning and N addition a semiarid temperature steppe[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 158: 259-267.
[3]	Suter M. Reproductive allocation of care flava reacts differently to competition and resources in designed plant mixture of five species[J]. Plant Ecology, 2008, 201: 481-489.
[4]	李雪华, 李晓兰, 蒋德明, 等. 科尔沁沙地70种草本植物个体和构件生物量比较研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2009, 26(2): 54-59.
	[Li Xuehua, Li Xiaolan, Jiang Deming, et al. Acomparative study of the individual biomass and modular biomass of 70 herbaceous species found in the Horqin Sandy Land[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2009, 26(2): 54-59. ]
[5]	Wijk M T V, Williams M, Gough L, et al. Luxury consumption of soil nutrients: A possible competitive strategy in above-ground and belowground biomass allocation and root morphology for slow-growing arctic vegetation?[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2003, 91: 664-676.
[6]	Schrader J A, Gardner S J, Graves W R. Resistance to water stress of Alnusmaritima: Intraspecific variation and comparisons to other alders[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2005, 53: 281-298.
[7]	Enquist B J, Niklas K J. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants[J]. Science, 2002, 295: 1517-1520. pmid: 11859193
[8]	陈国鹏, 赵文智, 何世雄, 等. 沙柳丛生枝生物量最优分配与异速生长[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(2): 357-363. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00157
	[Chen Guopeng, Zhao Wenzhi, He Shixiong, et al. Biomass allocation and allometric relationship in aboveground components of Salix psammophila branches[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2016, 36(2): 357-363. ] doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00157
[9]	Berger U, Hildenbrandt H, Grimm V. Age-related decline in forest production: Modeling the effects of growth limitation, neighborhood competition and self-thinning[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2004, 92: 846-853.
[10]	Brown J F. Effects of experimental burial on survival, growth, and resource allocation of three species of dune plants[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1997, 85: 151-158.
[11]	高凯, 张丽娟, 于永奇, 等. 沙地土壤pH值、养分含量对地形变化的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016, 36(1): 88-92.
	[Gao Kai, Zhang Lijuan, Yu Yongqi, et al. Effects of micro-topography on soil pH value, nutrient content in sandy land[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 36(1): 88-92. ]
[12]	李民青, 周乐, 王喜勇, 等. 7种荒漠木本植物枝干与叶片光合特征及其影响因素[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2637-2643. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.007
	[Li Minqing, Zhou Le, Wang Xiyong, et al. Stem and leaf photosynthesis of seven desert woody species and its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(10): 2637-2643. ] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.007
[13]	King J S, Giardana C P, Pregitzer K S, et al. Biomass partitioning in red pine (Pinusresinosa) along a chronosequence in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2007, 37: 93-102.
[14]	贾美玉, 李雪华, 吴忠铉, 等. 科尔沁沙地流动沙丘3种常见植物的空间分布格局与异速生长[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(10): 2953-2960.
	[Jia Meiyu, Li Xuehua, Wu Zhongxuan, et al. Spatial distribution pattern and allometric growth of three common species on moving sand dunes in Horqin Sandy Land, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(10): 2953-2960. ] pmid: 26995902
[15]	海龙, 王晓江, 张文军, 等. 毛乌素沙地人工沙柳(Salix Psammophila)林平茬复壮技术[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(1): 131-136. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00091
	[Hai Long, Wang Xiaojiang, Zhang Wenjun, et al. Stumping rejuvenation technology of Salix psammophila artificial shrubbery in the Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2016, 36(1): 131-136. ] doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00091
[16]	李阳, 裴志永, 秦伟, 等. 区域性皆伐抚育作业对沙柳林地土壤养分空间异质性的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(18): 161-165.
	[Li Yang, Pei Zhiyong, Qin Wei, et al. Regional clear cutting operation on soil nutrient of Salix Psammophila forest short-term disturbance characteristics[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(18): 161-165. ]
[17]	Huang J, Zhou Y, Yin L, et al. Climatic controls on sap flow dynamics and used water sources of Salix psammophila in a semi-arid environment in Northwest China[J]. Environmental Earth Science, 2015, 73: 289-301.
[18]	Niklas K J. Plant allometry: The Scaling of Plant Form and Process[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
[19]	Weiner J. Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2004, 6: 207-215.
[20]	Xiang S, Wu N, Sun S. Within-twig biomass allocation in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved species along an altitudinal gradient: Allometric Scaling Analysis[J]. Trees, 2009, 23: 637-647.
[21]	Gower S T, McMurtrie R, Murty D. Aboveground net primary production decline with stand age: Potential causes[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1996, 11: 378-382.
[22]	Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology[M]. 5th ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, 2010.
[23]	张志永, 时忠杰, 张晓, 等. 浑善达克沙地不同地形的土壤物理性质和草本群落分布及其相关性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2017, 26(1): 69-76.
	[Zhang Zhiyong, Shi Zhongjie, Zhang Xiao, et al. Soil physical properties and herbaceous community distribution in different microtopographies of Otindag Sandy Land and their correlation analysis[J]. Journal of Plant Resource and Environment, 2017, 26(1): 69-76. ]
[24]	Li S L, Zuidema P A, Yu F H, et al. Effects of denudation and burial on growth and reproduction of Artemisia ordosica in Mu Us Sandland[J]. Ecologicol Research, 2010, 25: 655-661.
[25]	She W, Bai Y, Zhang Y, et al. Plasticity in meristem allocation as an adaptive strategy of a desert shrub under contrasting environments[J]. Frontier in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1933.
[26]	Kiær L P, Weisbach A N, Weiner J. Root and shoot competition: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2013, 101: 1298-1312.
[27]	原鹏飞, 丁国栋, 王炜炜, 等. 毛乌素沙地降雨入渗和蒸发特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6(4): 23-27.
	[Yuan Pengfei, Ding Guodong, Wang Weiwei, et al. Characteristics of rainwater infiltration and evaporation in Mu Us Sandland[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 6(4): 23-27. ]
[28]	张军红, 吴波, 杨文斌, 等. 不同演替阶段油蒿群落土壤水分特征分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2012, 32(6): 1597-1603.
	[Zhang Junhong, Wu Bo, Yang Wenbin, et al. Soil moisture characteristics of Artemisia ordosica community at different succession stages in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2012, 32(6): 1597-1603. ]
[29]	艾绍水, 李秧秧, 陈佳村, 等. 陕北沙地3种典型灌木根木质部解剖结构及水力特性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(11): 3277-3284.
	[Ai Shaoshui, Li Yangyang, Chen Jiacun, et al. Root anatomical structure and hydraulic traits of three typical shrubs on the sandy lands of northern Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(11): 3277-3284. ] pmid: 26915180
[30]	卜崇峰, 刘国彬, 张文辉. 黄土丘陵沟壑区狼牙刺的生长特征研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(10): 1792-1797.
	[Bu Chongfen, Liu Guobin, Zhang Wenhui. Growth of characteristics of Sophoraviciifolia population in the hilly and gully region of Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2004, 24(10): 1792-1797. ]
[31]	陈文思, 朱清科, 刘蕾蕾, 等. 陕北半干旱黄土区沙棘人工林的死亡率及适宜地形因子[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(5): 9-16.
	[Chen Wensi, Zhu Qingke, Liu Leilei, et al. Mortality and appropriate topographical conditions of seabuckthorn plantation in semi-arid region of Loess Plateau in North Shaanxi, China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(5): 9-16. ]

参数	微环境	异速生长检验				主轴漂移检验
参数	微环境	α	logβ	R²	P	迎风坡	背风坡	丘间地	平坦沙地
Y=B₀ X=D	迎风坡	2.51	1.91	0.90	<0.01	1
	背风坡	2.88	1.82	0.93	<0.01	*	1
	丘间地	2.53	1.87	0.91	<0.01	NS	*	1
	平坦沙地	2.65	1.88	0.87	<0.01	NS	NS	NS	1
Y=B_s X=D	迎风坡	2.32	1.69	0.88	<0.01	1
	背风坡	2.64	1.62	0.92	<0.01	NS	1
	丘间地	2.58	1.61	0.93	<0.01	NS	NS	1
	平坦沙地	2.61	1.68	0.88	<0.01	NS	NS	NS	1
Y=B_l X=D	迎风坡	2.91	0.97	0.66	<0.01	1
	背风坡	3.01	0.83	0.78	<0.01	*	1
	丘间地	2.37	1.08	0.65	<0.01	NS	*	1
	平坦沙地	2.56	0.94	0.72	<0.01	NS	NS	NS	1

参数	地形	异速生长模型拟合结果			等速生长检验	主轴漂移检验
参数	地形	α	logβ	R²	P	WS	LS	DI	SL
Y=B_l X=B_s	迎风坡	0.96	0.19	0.72	0.25	1
	背风坡	1.05	0.09	0.88	0.13	NS	1
	丘间地	0.82	0.43	0.81	<0.01	**	*	1
	平坦沙地	0.81	0.34	0.71	<0.01	**	*	NS	1

指标	土壤深度/cm	含量	叶片-茎干异速生长指数α	相关性检验
土壤含水率/%	0~20	2.48±0.04	0.654	1.09
	20~40	1.84±0.07		0.47
	40~60	1.43±0.09		0.89
	60~80	0.91±0.11		0.03^*
	80~100	0.42±0.03		0.02^*
土壤速效磷 /（g·kg^-1）	0~20	2.365±0.891		1.24
	20~40	2.485±0.120		1.81
	40~60	1.762±0.173		2.87
	60~80	0.148±0.059		3.46
	80~100	0.187±0.078		1.98
土壤速效氮 /（g·kg^-1）	0~20	50.245±0.215		2.55
	20~40	41.147±1.037		1.86
	40~60	38.265±1.857		3.07
	60~80	24.344±1.664		2.69
	80~100	27.068±2.078		4.28

参数		异速生长模型拟合结果				异速生长检验
参数		α	logβ	R²		P
Y=L	X=D	0.61	2.31	0.70		<0.01

毛乌素沙地不同立地条件沙柳生物量异速生长规律

Biomass allocation in Salix psammophila and the response to different site conditions in the Mu Us Sandy Land

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	史天艺, 张萌萌, 蒲阳, 刘硕元. 毛乌素沙地植被NDVI动态及对降水的多时空响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(8): 1395-1404.
[2]	海龙, 周梅, 张嘉開, 洪光宇, 李凤滋, 费菲. 毛乌素沙地不同林龄杨柴灌木林土壤呼吸及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1107-1116.
[3]	张泽宇, 吴晓静, 梁一鹏, 张晓霞, 查同刚. 乌拉山废弃矿山生态恢复的近自然植被空间配置模式[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1164-1171.
[4]	莫秋霞, 宋炜, 卜崇峰, 王春, 王鹤鸣, 李亚红. 油蒿与沙柳灌木地藓结皮发育差异研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 979-987.
[5]	康利刚, 曹生奎, 曹广超, 杨羽帆, 严莉, 王有财. 青海湖沙柳河流域蒸散发时空变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 358-372.
[6]	石麟, 李红悦, 赵雨兴, 任余艳, 何金军, 于凤强, 哈斯额尔敦. 毛乌素沙地流动沙丘不同沙障组合措施的防风固沙效益评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(2): 268-279.
[7]	胡晶华,刘静,白潞翼,张欣,兰鹏波,袁亚楠. 沙柳直根抗拉特性对循环荷载的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 900-907.
[8]	张媛媛,孟欢欢,周晓兵,尹本丰,周多奇,陶冶. 不同生境/萌发类型尖喙牻牛儿苗生物量分配特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 541-550.
[9]	华兆晖,陶冶,闫景明,周晓兵,张静,张元明. 氮添加对新疆野苹果幼苗枝叶大小的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 210-219.
[10]	王荣女. 毛乌素沙地不同类型生物土壤结皮-土壤呼吸的季节变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 961-972.
[11]	洪光宇,王晓江,刘果厚,张雷,高孝威,李卓凡,刘铁山,刘辰明,李梓豪. 毛乌素沙地沙柳液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(3): 794-801.
[12]	李宗英,罗庆辉,许仲林. 西天山雪岭云杉林分密度对森林生物量分配格局和异速生长的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2): 545-552.
[13]	郭春秀, 刘开琳, 马俊梅, 王理德, 何芳兰, 赵鹏, 付贵全, 赵艳丽. 石羊河下游不同立地类型黑果枸杞种群分布格局[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(1): 178-184.
[14]	江沙沙, 孙宗玖, 崔雨萱, 董乙强. 伊犁绢蒿（Seriphidium transiliense）个体功能性状对短期禁牧的可塑性响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(6): 1528-1536.
[15]	毛丽, 苏志珠, 王国玲, 马义娟, 李想. 毛乌素沙地不同土地利用类型的土壤粒度及有机质特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(3): 589-598.