Arid Zone Research ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 275-282.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2021.01.29
• Others • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Lihong1,2(),ZHANG Hongzhi1,2,LI Jianfeng1,2,WANG Zhong1,2,GAO Xin1,2,SHI Jia1,2,ZHANG Yueqiang1,2,FAN Zheru1,2,ZHAO Qi1,2()
Received:
2020-05-26
Revised:
2020-08-07
Online:
2021-01-15
Published:
2021-03-05
Contact:
Qi ZHAO
E-mail:1498877605@qq.com;zhaoqi@xaas.ac.cn
WANG Lihong,ZHANG Hongzhi,LI Jianfeng,WANG Zhong,GAO Xin,SHI Jia,ZHANG Yueqiang,FAN Zheru,ZHAO Qi. Analysis of canopy light interception and dry matter distribution characteristics of different winter wheat yield groups in Xinjiang[J].Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(1): 275-282.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Tab. 1
Soil basic fertility before sowing"
试验区 | 处理 | 有机质/(g·kg-1) | 全氮/(g·kg-1) | 全磷/(g·kg-1) | 全钾/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮/(mg·kg-1) | 速效磷/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
军户 | SH | 14.044 | 0.839 | 0.924 | 21.648 | 50.858 | 16.371 | 153 |
HH | 12.273 | 0.827 | 0.926 | 21.725 | 44.018 | 14.819 | 132 | |
FP | 11.352 | 0.807 | 1.004 | 22.078 | 43.311 | 14.262 | 136 | |
CK | 10.499 | 0.738 | 0.906 | 22.672 | 35.250 | 7.208 | 125 | |
奇台 | SH | 33.100 | 1.747 | 1.448 | 18.787 | 81.367 | 8.183 | 365 |
HH | 30.198 | 1.729 | 1.451 | 19.566 | 89.778 | 24.130 | 327 | |
FP | 29.962 | 1.673 | 1.481 | 20.371 | 145.735 | 15.147 | 331 | |
CK | 17.094 | 1.637 | 1.414 | 18.871 | 82.074 | 6.939 | 282 |
Tab. 2
Fertilization application in the field experiments"
试验区 | 处理 | 基肥 | 返青期(春3叶) | 起身期(春4叶) | 拔节期(第一节1.5~2 cm) | 拔节期(拔节后10~12 d) | 孕穗期(旗叶展开) | 开花期(中部小穗开花) | 灌浆期(开花后10~12 d) | 灌浆期(间隔8~10 d) | 灌浆期(间隔8~10 d) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机肥+二胺/(kg·hm-2) | 尿素+硫酸钾/(kg·hm-2) | 尿素+磷酸二氢钾/(kg·hm-2) | ||||||||||||
军户 | SH | 7500+375 | 90+0 | 90+0 | 150+30 | 90+30 | 90+0 | 90+0 | 75+30 | 0+15 | 0+15 | |||
HH | 3000+300 | 75+0 | 75+0 | 90+30 | 75+15 | 75+0 | 75+0 | 60+30 | 0+15 | - | ||||
FP | 1500+225 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 75+30 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 45+30 | 0+15 | - | ||||
CK | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
奇台 | SH | 7500+375 | - | 90+0 | 150+30 | 90+30 | 90+0 | 75+0 | 45+30 | 0+15 | - | |||
HH | 3000+300 | - | 75+0 | 90+30 | 75+15 | 75+0 | 60+0 | 45+30 | 0+15 | - | ||||
FP | 1500+225 | - | 45+0 | 75+30 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 45+30 | 0+15 | - | ||||
CK | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Tab. 3
Yield and yield components of Xinjiang winter wheat under different yield levels"
试验区 | 处理 | 收获穗数/(104 穗·hm-2) | 穗粒数 | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
军户 | SH | 535.67 ±43.88a | 42.18±1.79a | 52.39±0.69a | 9342.80±823.22a |
HH | 502.00±33.15ab | 38.55±1.75b | 52.44±0.39a | 8137.20±453.53b | |
FP | 494.33±25.11ab | 33.45±3.19c | 48.09±3.03b | 6860.20±515.24c | |
CK | 474.00±14.48b | 19.07±3.38d | 44.48±1.28c | 2719.40±563.69d | |
奇台 | SH | 522.75±45.81a | 40.80±3.74a | 47.58±0.30b | 9003.81±788.97a |
HH | 468.25±16.86b | 37.40±3.81b | 48.82±0.59a | 7869.54±283.35b | |
FP | 422.75±14.57b | 36.20±3.05b | 46.35±1.09c | 6029.65±207.79c | |
CK | 335.50±36.24c | 17.60±1.78c | 45.77±0.43c | 2558.47±276.40d |
Tab. 4
Analysis of canopy light interception characteristics of populations with different yield levels at flowering stage"
指标 | 试验区 | 处理 | 上层 | 中层 | 下层 | 总冠层 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CaR/% | 军户 | SH | 62.23±6.37a | 26.51±6.09ab | 5.18±0.97a | 93.93±0.87a |
HH | 36.69±12.60b | 34.34±8.49a | 19.78±5.72a | 90.82±2.11a | ||
FP | 31.22±17.19b | 36.71±13.95a | 17.13±15.79a | 85.05±10.47a | ||
CK | 19.11±14.47b | 16.36±4.82b | 16.45±15.02a | 51.92±11.56b | ||
奇台 | SH | 68.72±4.11a | 12.33±5.3 a | 6.82±5.21a | 87.86±4.27a | |
HH | 43.94±0.34b | 15.81±2.05a | 15.37±3.72a | 75.12±2.02a | ||
FP | 34.35±5.39bc | 14.90±0.57a | 5.86±3.58a | 55.11±1.23b | ||
CK | 29.56±6.54c | 1.59±0.63b | 12.07±8.30a | 43.22±9.39b | ||
PeR/% | 军户 | SH | 34.66±7.37b | 19.96±0.80c | 6.29±9.25a | 1.48±0.44c |
HH | 63.31±12.60a | 45.89±7.96b | 15.46±20.38a | 9.18±2.11bc | ||
FP | 68.78±17.19a | 45.19±18.94b | 19.40±18.27a | 14.95±10.47b | ||
CK | 80.89±14.47a | 79.55±5.29a | 22.87±37.80a | 48.08±11.56a | ||
奇台 | SH | 31.28±4.11c | 59.11±22.55b | 66.76±10.87a | 12.14±4.27b | |
HH | 56.06±0.34b | 71.81±3.48ab | 61.98±7.64a | 24.88±2.02b | ||
FP | 65.65±5.39ab | 77.27±0.99ab | 79.43±19.15a | 44.89±1.23a | ||
CK | 70.44±6.54a | 97.77±0.69a | 83.36±20.79a | 56.78±9.39a | ||
IPAR/(MJ·m-2) | 军户 | SH | 4.82±0.49a | 2.05±0.47ab | 0.40±0.07a | 7.28±0.07a |
HH | 2.86±0.98b | 2.68±0.67a | 1.54±0.44a | 7.07±0.20a | ||
FP | 2.43±1.49b | 2.87±1.22a | 1.23±1.02a | 6.54±1.08a | ||
CK | 1.57±1.18b | 1.35±0.39b | 1.37±1.25a | 4.30±0.95b | ||
奇台 | SH | 5.62±0.33a | 1.01±0.44a | 0.56±0.43a | 7.19±0.34a | |
HH | 3.60±0.03b | 1.30±0.17a | 1.26±0.31a | 6.15±0.17a | ||
FP | 2.82±0.45bc | 1.22±0.05a | 0.48±0.29a | 4.53±0.11b | ||
CK | 1.43±0.54c | 1.13±0.05a | 0.99±1.26a | 3.55±0.77b |
Tab. 5
Dry matter accumulation and distribution in different canopy layers of different yield levels"
试验区 | 处理 | 上层干物质/(g·m-2) | 中层干物质/(g·m-2) | 下层干物质/(g·m-2) | 干物质总和/(g·m-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
军户 | SH | 622.58±53.75a | 501.95±27.88a | 651.42±25.16a | 1775.95±106.95a |
HH | 500.39±14.43b | 452.46±27.70a | 594.97±24.15a | 1547.82±80.31b | |
FP | 382.48± 9.00c | 379.23±27.38b | 590.91±24.45a | 1352.61±60.83b | |
CK | 235.63±23.59d | 234.56±2.94c | 363.53±16.42b | 833.72±42.95c | |
奇台 | SH | 561.28± 9.89a | 391.70± 5.39a | 489.08± 2.41a | 1442.06±17.69a |
HH | 459.58± 5.46b | 333.71± 1.40b | 401.24± 2.32b | 1194.54±9.18b | |
FP | 318.75± 3.75c | 256.16± 6.51c | 303.12± 3.80c | 878.04±14.06c | |
CK | 178.84±14.55d | 125.89± 3.00d | 168.71± 0.16d | 473.43±11.72d |
Tab. 6
Correlation analysis of each index and canopy dry matter accumulation"
指标 | 上层干物质/(g·m-2) | 中层干物质/(g·m-2) | 下层干物质/(g·m-2) | 总干物质/(g·m-2) | 开花期LAI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
收获穗数/(104 穗·hm-2) | 0.83** | 0.90** | 0.91** | 0.91** | 0.83** |
穗粒数 | 0.91** | 0.85** | 0.71* | 0.85** | 0.90** |
千粒重/g | 0.81** | 0.87** | 0.79* | 0.85** | 0.67* |
籽粒产量/(kg·hm-2) | 0.97** | 0.90** | 0.78* | 0.91** | 0.96** |
开花期LAI | 0.97** | 0.87** | 0.76* | 0.89** | - |
CaR总层/% | 0.93** | 0.97** | 0.94** | 0.98** | 0.91** |
PeR总层/% | -0.94** | -0.98** | -0.95** | -0.99** | -0.91** |
IPAR总层/(MJ·m-2) | 0.95** | 0.96** | 0.91** | 0.97** | 0.94** |
[1] | 王立红, 张宏芝, 王重, 等. 新疆冬小麦不同产量水平群体特性分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020,40(5):594-600. |
[ Wang Lihong, Zhang Hongzhi, Wang Zhong, et al. Population characteristics of different yield levels of winter wheat in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Wheat Crops, 2020,40(5):594-600. ] | |
[2] | 梁鹏, 郭德胜, 刘德峻, 等. 拔节期渍水后施用尿素对小麦产量和光合物质生产的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020,40(2):202-209. |
[ Liang Peng, Guo Desheng, Liu Dejun, et al. Effects of urea application after water logging at stem elongation stage on grain yield and photosynthetic production in wheat[J]. Journal of Wheat Crops, 2020,40(2):202-209. ] | |
[3] | 胡延吉, 兰进好. 山东省冬小麦品种冠层结构及光截获的研究[J]. 中国农业气象, 2001,22(3):29-33. |
[ Hu Yanji, Lan Jinhao. Canopy architecture and light interception of winter wheat cultivars in Shandong province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Meteorology, 2001,22(3):29-33. ] | |
[4] | 陈素英, 张喜英, 毛任钊, 等. 播期和播量对冬小麦冠层光合有效辐射和产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009,17(4):681-685. |
[ Chen Suying, Zhang Xiying, Mao Renzhao, et al. Effect of sowing date and rata on canopy intercepted photo-synthetically active radiation and yield of winter wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009,17(4):681-685. ] | |
[5] | 郑雪娇, 于振文, 张永丽, 等. 施氮量对测墒补灌小麦冠层不同层次光截获和干物质分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(2):531-537. |
[ Zheng Xuejiao, Yu Zhenwen, Zhang Yongli, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on light interception and dry matter distribution at different layers in wheat canopy under supplemental irrigation based on measuring soil moisture[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018,29(2):531-537. ] | |
[6] |
岳俊芹, 张德奇, 李向东, 等. 氮钾配施下施磷对冬小麦群体发育特性、冠层光截获及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(5):840-851.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.05.004 |
[ Yue Junqin, Zhang Deqi, Li Xiangdong, et al. Effects of phosphorus on winter wheat population characteristics, canopy intercepted photosynthetically active radiation and yield under certain nitrogen-potassium rates[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016,49(5):840-851. ]
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.05.004 |
|
[7] | 郭培武, 赵俊晔, 石玉, 等. 水肥一体化条件下施氮量对小麦冠层光截获特性和产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018,50(8):81-85. |
[ Guo Peiwu, Zhao Junye, Shi Yu, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on canopy photosynthetic active radiation interception and yield of wheat under integration of water and fertilizer[J]. Shandong Agriculture Science, 2018,50(8):81-85. ] | |
[8] | 蒋阿宁, 高聚林, 管建慧, 等. 变量施肥对开花后冬小麦冠层光辐射性能及产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015,28(1):255-259. |
[ Jiang Aning, Gao Julin, Guan Jianhui, et al. Effects of variable nitrogen application on character of light radiation and yield in canopy of winter wheat after anjournal[J]. Journal of Southwest Agriculture, 2015,28(1):255-259. ] | |
[9] | 杨传邦, 于振文, 张永丽, 等. 测墒补灌深度对济麦22冠层光截获和荧光特性及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017,43(2):253-262. |
[ Yang Chuanbang, Yu Zhenwen, Zhang Yongli, et al. Effect of soil depth with supplemental irrigation on canopy photosynthetically active radiation interception and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in Jimai 22[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017,43(2):253-262. ] | |
[10] | 刘海红, 于志青, 毕建杰, 等. 干旱与灌溉处理对冬小麦冠层内光分布的影响[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2016,39(3):38-43. |
[ Liu Haihong, Yu Zhiqing, Bi Jianjie, et al. Influence of drought and irrigation treatment on the distribution of light in winter wheat canopy[J]. Meteorological and Environmental Sciences, 2016,39(3):38-43. ] | |
[11] | 王月超, 李传兴, 代兴龙, 等. 栽培模式对冬小麦光能利用和产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(9):2707-2713. |
[ Wang Yuechao, Li Chuanxing, Dai Xinglong, et al. Effects of cultivation patterns on the radiation use and grain yield of winter wheat[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,26(9):2707-2713. ] | |
[12] |
李志勇, 王小东. 优化水肥与传统水肥对冬小麦叶片生长、群体光分布及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2005(3):55-57.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2005.03.017 |
[ Li Zhiyong, Wang Xiaodong. Effects of the optimized irrigation-optimized fertilization and traditional irrigation-traditional on leaf growth, population light distribution and grain yield of winter wheat[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2005(3):55-57. ]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2005.03.017 |
|
[13] | 崔月, 张宏芝, 赵奇, 等. 水肥运筹对滴灌冬小麦干物质积累和产量调控效应研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018,55(4):618-626. |
[ Cui Yue, Zhang Hongzhi, Zhao Qi, et al. Effect of irrigation and fertilization on dry matter accumulation and yield control of drip irrigation winter wheat[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018,55(4):618-626. ] | |
[14] | 张振, 于振文, 张永丽, 等. 氮肥基追比例对测墒补灌小麦冠层不同层次光能利用及干物质转运的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(1):97-105. |
[ Zhang Zhen, Yu Zhenwen, Zhang Yongli, et al. Effects of basal/topdressing nitrogen ratios on light interception and dry matter transport at different layers of wheat canopy under supplemental irrigation based on soil moisture[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Journal of Materials Science, 2019,25(1):97-105. ] | |
[15] | Sourav Maity, Puspendu Dutta, Saikat Das. Impact of pre-anjournal photosynthetic traits on yield of wheat cultivars under in vivo condition: Insight based on biochemical models[J]. Vegetos: An International Journal of Plant Research, 2020,33(12):106-116. |
[16] | 陈雨海, 余松烈, 于振文. 小麦生长后期群体光截获量及其分布与产量的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2003,29(5):730-734. |
[ Chen Yuhai, Yu Songlie, Yu Zhenwen. Relation between amount or distribution of PAR interception and grain output of wheat communitie[J]. Acta Crops Sinica, 2003,29(5):730-734. ] | |
[17] |
张艳敏, 李晋生, 钱维朴, 等. 小麦冠层结构与分光分布研究[J]. 华北农学报, 1996,11(1):54-58.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1996.01.010 |
[ Zhang Yanmin, Li Jinsheng, Qian Weipu, et al. Canopy structure and light distribution in winter wheat[J]. North China Agricultural Journal, 1996,11(1):54-58. ]
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1996.01.010 |
|
[18] |
Salvagiotti F, Miralles I D J. Radiation interception, biomass production and grain yield as affected by the interaction of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in wheat[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008,28(3):282-290.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.08.002 |
[1] | LI Xiaofeng, HUI Tingting, LI Yaoming, MAO Jiefei, WANG Guangyu, FAN Lianlian. Effects of different grazing management strategies on plant diversity in the mountain grassland of Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 124-134. |
[2] | CAO Ziqi, LU Zhanyuan, REN Yongfeng, ZHAO Xiaoqing, WANG Jianguo, HOU Zhihui, HAN Yunfei, WANG Dengyun, SHANG Xueyan, DUAN Rui. Effects of different nitrogen levels on the apparent soil nutrient balance and tuber yield of Cyperus esculentus farmland [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 71-79. |
[3] | WANG Xiang, LYU Haishen, ZHU Yonghua, GUO Chenyu. Application and comparison of two channel flood routing methods in Xinjiang mountainous areas [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1240-1247. |
[4] | WANG Chao, MA Zhancang, PAN Chengnan, WU Xingyue, SONG Wendan, YAN Ping. New records of Amaranthus in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1280-1288. |
[5] | Gulistan ANWAR, Turgun NURDIN, Dilhumar ABDUKERIM, Mamtimin SULAYMAN. New records of mosses of Leskeaceae to Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1289-1293. |
[6] | LI Hong, LI Zhongqin, CHEN Puchen, PENG Jiajia. Spatio-temporal variation of snow cover in Altai Mountains of Xinjiang in recent 20 years and its influencing factors [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(7): 1040-1051. |
[7] | XU Junli, HAN Haidong, WANG Jian. Recharge sources and potential source areas of atmospheric PM2.5 in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(6): 874-884. |
[8] | XUE Yibo, HUANG Shuangyan, ZHANG Xiaoxiao, LEI Jiaqiang, LI Shengyu. Study on the strong winter airborne dustfall mixed rain and snow events in Xinjiang, China in 2018 [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(5): 681-690. |
[9] | ZHAO Keming, SUN Mingjing, LI Xia, SHI Junjie, AN Dawei, XU Tingting. Comparison of the distribution and applicability of two typical atmospheric diffusion indices in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(5): 691-702. |
[10] | ZHAO Yuzhi,YANG Jianjun. Spatio-temporal pattern of water resource carrying capacity, coupling and coordination of subsystems in southern Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(2): 213-223. |
[11] | DONG Hanlin, WANG Wenting, XIE Yun, Aydana YESINALI, JIANG Yuantian, XU Jiaqi. Climate dry-wet conditions, changes, and their driving factors in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(12): 1875-1884. |
[12] | MA Yifan, LYU Desheng, WANG Zhenghua, LI Yanqiang, LIU Jian, WEN Yue, ZHU Yan. Effects of magnetic and nitrogen coupling on the yield and water and fertilizer usage efficiency of processed tomatoes under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(11): 1855-1864. |
[13] | JI Qianqian, PAN Huanhuan, WU Shurong, WU Zhitao, DU Ziqiang. Effect of spatial reconstruction of “production-living-ecology” space and precipitation changes on water yield services in the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi Province [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(1): 132-142. |
[14] | WU Xiaodan,LUO Min,MENG Fanhao,SA Chula,YIN Chaohua,BAO Yuhai. New characteristics of spatio-temporal evolution of extreme climate events in Xinjiang under the background of warm and humid climate [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(6): 1695-1705. |
[15] | JIANG Lei,ZHAO Yi,ZHANG Pengwei,HE Liang,BAI Xiang. Study on influence degree of phreatic evaporation based on hydrogen and oxygen isotope characteristics [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(6): 1793-1800. |
|