滴灌水盐氮调控对棉田水肥盐运移及棉花产量的影响

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2024.05.15

干旱区研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 876-893.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.05.15 cstr: 32277.14.j.azr.2024.05.15

滴灌水盐氮调控对棉田水肥盐运移及棉花产量的影响

张紫淇¹^,²^,³(), 杨丽莉⁴, 何新林¹^,²^,³(), 李小龙¹^,²^,³

1.石河子大学水利建筑工程学院，新疆石河子 832003
2.寒旱区生态水利工程兵团重点实验室，新疆石河子 832003
3.现代节水灌溉兵团重点实验室，新疆石河子 832003
4.衢州学院建筑工程学院，浙江衢州 324000

收稿日期:2023-10-27 修回日期:2024-02-07 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-05-29
通讯作者: 何新林. E-mail: hexinlin2002@163.com
作者简介:张紫淇（1997-），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为农业水资源高效利用. E-mail: 1450488953@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(U1803244);兵团财政科技计划项目(2023AB059);兵团财政科技计划项目(2021DB012);第三次新疆综合科学考察(2021xjkk0804)

Effects of the regulation of water-salt-nitrogen on water-salt nutrient transport and yield in drip-irrigated cotton fields

ZHANG Ziqi¹^,²^,³(), YANG Lili⁴, HE Xinlin¹^,²^,³(), LI Xiaolong¹^,²^,³

1. College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China
2. Key Laboratory of Cold and Arid Regions Eco-Hydraulic Engineering of Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China
3. Key Laboratory of Modern Water-Saving Irrigation of Xinjiang Production & Construction Group, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China
4. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture Quzhou University, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang, China

Received:2023-10-27 Revised:2024-02-07 Published:2024-05-15 Online:2024-05-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为明析覆膜滴灌条件下水盐氮调控对土壤水盐养分运移变化、棉花生长指标及产量的影响，通过两年三因素全组合大田试验，设置灌水量三水平（W1：2700 m³·hm^-2、W2：3600 m³·hm^-2和W3：4500 m³·hm^-2）、含盐量三水平（S1：3 dS·m^-1、S2：6 dS·m^-1和S3：9 dS·m^-1）、施氮量三水平（F1：105 kg·hm^-2、F2：210 kg·hm^-2和F3：315 kg·hm^-2），研究了不同水盐氮组合对土壤水分、盐分、氮素分布及植株生长、产量的影响。结果表明：土壤水分主要聚集在30~40 cm土层，不同土层深度的含水率基本呈先增大后减小的变化趋势；蕾期和花铃期的S3F3W1和S2F3W1比S1F3W1的0~40 cm土层平均含水率增大1.3%~21.8%；同一灌溉量下S1F3组合的平均含水率比S1F2和S1F1增大1.39%~13.83%。土壤盐分生育期内呈现先减少后增加的变化趋势；S1土壤盐分随施氮量的增大而先增大后减小，S2、S3土壤盐分随施氮量的增加而减少。W2、W3处理中，氮素在40~60 cm土层中缓慢积聚；S1处理的氮素含量明显高于S2、S3。土壤水分、盐分、氮素含量交互影响，在适宜的土壤水分、氮素条件下，较低的土壤含盐量，能使植株更好地利用养分，利于植株的生长进而促进产量的形成。为获得较高的经济效益，低、中盐土壤推荐灌溉量为3600 m³·hm^-2，施氮量为210 kg·hm^-2；高盐土壤推荐灌溉量为4500 m³·hm^-2，施氮量为315 kg·hm^-2。研究为探索干旱区多年膜下滴灌棉花农田生态系统水盐养分运移机制及水肥高效利用提供科学的理论依据。

关键词: 膜下滴灌, 棉花, 水盐养分运移, 灌溉制度优化

Abstract:

The effects of water, salt, and nitrogen (N) regulation on changes in the soil water, transport of salt nutrients, and growth indices and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) were analyzed under drip irrigation covered by film. A two-year three-factor full-combination field experiment was conducted to study the effects of three levels of irrigation (W1: 2700 m³·hm^-2, W2: 3600 m³·hm^-2, and W3: 4500 m³·hm^-2), salinity (S1: 3 dS·m^-1, S2: 6 dS·m^-1, and S3: 9 dS·m^-1), and N (F1: 105 kg·hm^-2, F2: 210 kg·hm^-2, and F3: 315 kg·hm^-2). The effects of different combinations of water-salt-nitrogen on soil moisture, salinity, N distribution, plant growth, and yield were investigated. The results showed the following: the soil moisture was mainly located in the 30-40 cm soil layer, and the water content of different soil depths essentially first increased and then decreased. The average water content of the 0-40 cm soil layer in the bud and boll stages of S3F3W1 and S2F3W1 increased by 1.3%-21.8% compared with that of S1F3W1, and the average water content of the combination of S1F3 increased by 1.39%-13.83% compared with those of S1F2 and S1F1 under the same amount of irrigation. The soil salinity tended to decrease and then increase during the fertile period. The S1 treatment increased and then decreased the soil salinity as N application increased, and the soil salinity in S2 and S3 decreased as the N application increased. The N content was significantly higher with the F3 treatment than F1 or F2. In the W2 and W3 treatments, N slowly accumulated in the 40-60 cm soil layer, and the N content was significantly higher with the S1 treatment than S2 or S3. The soil moisture, salinity, and N content interacted; under appropriate soil moisture and N conditions, lower soil salinity enabled the plants to utilize nutrients more efficiently, which facilitated their growth, and thus enhanced yield. To obtain high economic benefit, the recommended rate of irrigation for low and medium saline soils is 3600 m³·hm^-2 and the rate of N is 210 kg·hm^-2. For highly saline soils, the recommended rate of irrigation is 4500 m³·hm^-2 and the rate of N is 315 kg·hm^-2. This study provides a theoretical basis to explore the mechanism of water and salt nutrient transport and the efficient use of water and fertilizer in cotton farmland ecosystems under multiyear drip irrigation under a membrane in arid areas.

Key words: drip irrigation under plastic film, cotton, water and salt nutrient transport, irrigation system optimization

张紫淇, 杨丽莉, 何新林, 李小龙. 滴灌水盐氮调控对棉田水肥盐运移及棉花产量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(5): 876-893.

ZHANG Ziqi, YANG Lili, HE Xinlin, LI Xiaolong. Effects of the regulation of water-salt-nitrogen on water-salt nutrient transport and yield in drip-irrigated cotton fields[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(5): 876-893.

图/表 16

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

参考文献 38

[1]	Abbas Ghulam, Amjad Muhammad, Saqib Muhammad, et al. Soil sodicity is more detrimental than salinity for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd. ): A multivariate comparison of physiological, biochemical and nutritional quality attributes[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2021, 207(1): 59-73.
[2]	庄庆威, 吴世新, 杨怡, 等. 近10年新疆不同程度盐渍化耕地的时空变化特征[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2021, 38(3): 341-349. doi: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2021.03.007
	[Zhuang Qingwei, Wu Shixin, Yang Yi, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics of different degrees of salinized cultivated land in Xinjiang in recent ten years[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 38(3): 341-349.] doi: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2021.03.007
[3]	谢承陶. 盐渍土改良原理与作物抗性[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1993: 21-27.
	[Xie Chengtao. Principles of Saline Soil Improvement and Crop Resistance[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1993: 21-27.]
[4]	Balasubramaniam T, Shen G, Esmaeili N, et al. Plants’ response mechanisms to salinity stress[J]. Plants, 2023, 12(12): 2253.
[5]	Acosta-Motos J R, Ortuño M F, Bernal-Vicente A, et al. Plant responses to salt stress: Adaptive mechanisms[J]. Agronomy, 2017, 7(1): 18.
[6]	Shahid M A, Sarkhosh A, Khan N, et al. Insights into the physiological and biochemical impacts of salt stress on plant growth and development[J]. Agronomy, 2020, 10(7): 938.
[7]	郭丽, 王广恩, 李义红, 等. 施氮对土壤养分特征及夏玉米养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2023, 38(3): 121-129. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20193751
	[Guo Li, Wang Guang’en, Li Yihong, et al. Effect of nitrogen on nutrient distribution in soil and nutrient accumulation and utilization in summer maize[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(3): 121-129.] doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20193751
[8]	胡越, 邵光成, 蒋傲, 等. 滴灌流量对不同质地土壤水盐运移的影响研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2021, 8(63): 133-139.
	[Hu Yue, Shao Guangcheng, Jiang Ao, et al. Research on the effect of drip irrigation flow on moisture and salt transport in different texture soils[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2021, 8(63): 133-139.]
[9]	赖善星, 张耀珑, 盛统民, 等. 干旱区微咸水覆膜灌溉棉花根系生长分布与土壤水盐运移规律及其相互作用[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2022, 29(6): 175-183.
	[Lai Shanxing, Zhang Yaolong, Sheng Tongmin, et al. Cotton root growth distribution and soil water-salt transport and their interaction under film-mulched irrigation with brackish water in arid region[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2022, 29(6): 175-183.]
[10]	Ma D K, He Z B, Wang L S, et al. Soil water and salt migration in oasis farmland during crop growing season[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2022, 23(1): 355-367.
[11]	Nema Sourabh. Effects of split application of fertilizers on soil nutrient transport and water quality parameters under laboratory conditons[J]. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 2016, 8(50): 2120-2123.
[12]	朱延凯, 王振华, 李文昊. 不同盐胁迫对滴灌棉花生理生长及产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(2): 298-305.
	[Zhu Yankai, Wang Zhenhua, Li Wenhao. Effects of different salt stress on physiological growth and yield of cotton under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(2): 298-305.]
[13]	Wang H, Wu L, Wang X, et al. Optimization of water and fertilizer management improves yield, water, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake and use efficiency of cotton under drip fertigation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 245: 106662.
[14]	孟妍君, 马鑫颖, 宋晨, 等. 水氮调控对棉花生理性状及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2023, 31(9): 1379-1391.
	[Meng Yanjun, Ma Xinying, Song Chen, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen regulation on physiological characteristics and yield of cotton[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(9): 1379-1391.]
[15]	李明思, 郑旭荣, 贾宏伟, 等. 棉花膜下滴灌灌溉制度试验研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2001, 11(43): 13-15.
	[Li Mingsi, Zheng Xurong, Jia Hongwei, et al. Experimental research on under-mulch drip irrigation regime for cotton[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2001, 11(43): 13-15.]
[16]	吴立峰, 张富仓, 周罕觅, 等. 不同滴灌施肥水平对北疆棉花水分利用率和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(20): 137-146.
	[Wu Lifeng, Zhang Fucang, Zhou Hanmi, et al. Effect of drip irrigation and fertilizer application on water use efficiency and cotton yield in North of Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(20): 137-146.]
[17]	颜安, 宁松瑞, 万江春, 等. 养分配比对盐胁迫膜下滴灌棉花生长与产量和水肥效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2021, 44(1): 1-7.
	[Yan An, Ning Songrui, Wan Jiangchun, et al. Effects of different nutrient ratios on growth and yield of cotton and its efficiency of water and fertilizer under salt stress[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021, 44(1): 1-7.]
[18]	刘蕾. 新疆土壤盐分的组成和分布特征[J]. 干旱环境监测, 2009, 23(4): 227-229.
	[Liu Lei. Constitute and distributing character of salinity in soil in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Environmental Monitoring, 2009, 23(4): 227-229.]
[19]	许志坤. 新疆盐碱土的改良[M]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社, 1980.
	[Xu Zhikun. Improvement of Saline Soil in Xinjiang[M]. Urumqi: Xinjiang People’s Publishing House, 1980.]
[20]	余天源. 盐碱地棉田水盐分布及氮素迁移规律研究[D]. 新疆石河子: 石河子大学, 2022.
	[Yu Tianyuan. Study on Water and Salt Distribution and Nitrogen Migration in Cotton Field in Saline Alkali Soil[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2022.]
[21]	李明辉, 高海英, 赵恒. 农用地土壤污染调查中采样和布点方法[J]. 农业与技术, 2023, 43(11): 31-33.
	[Li Minghui, Gao Haiying, Zhao Heng. Sampling and pointing methods in the investigation of soil contamination on agricultural land[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2023, 43(11): 31-33.]
[22]	Chen W L, Jin M G, Ferré T P A, et al. Spatial distribution of soil moisture, soil salinity, and root density beneath a cotton field under mulched drip irrigation with brackish and fresh water[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 215: 207-221.
[23]	魏小东, 尹娟, 胡朋成, 等. 滴灌施肥条件下土壤水分运移规律研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2020 10(42): 41-46, 50.
	[Wei Xiaodong, Yin Juan, Hu Pengcheng, et al. Study on soil water movement under the condition of drip irrigation and fertilization[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2020, 10(42): 41-46, 50.]
[24]	成厚亮, 张富仓, 李萌, 等. 不同生育期土壤基质势调控对棉花生长和土壤水盐分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 211-221. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.029
	[Cheng Houliang, Zhang Fucang, Li Meng, et al. Effects of soil matrix potential regulation at various growth states on cotton growth and soil water and salt distribution[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1): 211-221.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.029
[25]	张迎春, 张富仓, 范军亮, 等. 滴灌技术参数对南疆棉花生长和土壤水盐的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(24): 107-117.
	[Zhang Yingchun, Zhang Fucang, Fan Junliang, et al. Effects of drip irrigation technical parameters on cotton growth, soil moisture and salinity in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(24): 107-117.]
[26]	尔晨, 林涛, 夏文, 等. 灌溉定额和施氮量对机采棉田水分运移及硝态氮残留的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 497-510. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.04277
	[Er Chen, Lin Tao, Xia Wen, et al. Coupling effects of irrigation and nitrogen levels on yield, water distribution and nitrate nitrogen residue of machine-harvested cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 497-510.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.04277
[27]	冯泉清, 高阳, 李云峰, 等. 水盐胁迫对南疆棉花生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(10): 73-81.
	[Feng Quanqing, Gao Yang, Li Yunfeng, et al. The effects of water and salt stresses on growth, yield and quality of cotton in southern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2022, 41(10): 73-81.]
[28]	杜江涛, 张楠, 龚珂宁, 等. 基于DSSAT模型的南疆膜下滴灌棉花灌溉制度优化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(11): 3760-3768.
	[Du Jiangtao, Zhang Nan, Gong Kening, et al. Optimization of cotton irrigation schedule under mulch drip irrigation in southern Xinjiang based on DSSAT model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(11): 3760-3768.] doi: DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202111.030
[29]	周和平, 王少丽, 姚新华, 等. 膜下滴灌土壤水盐定向迁移分布特征及排盐效应研究[J]. 水利学报, 2013, 44(11): 1380-1388.
	[Zhou Heping, Wang Shaoli, Yao Xinhua, et al. Research on distribution characteristics and salt-discharging effect of directional migration of water and salt in soil through drip irrigation under plastic film[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013, 44(11): 1380-1388.]
[30]	Kang Y H, Wang R S, Wan S Q, et al. Effects of different water levels on cotton growth and water use through drip irrigation in an arid region with saline ground water of Northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, 109: 117-126.
[31]	张伟, 吕新, 李鲁华, 等. 新疆棉田膜下滴灌盐分运移规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(8): 15-19.
	[Zhang Wei, Lv Xin, Li Luhua et al. Salt transfer law for cotton field with drip irrigation under the plastic mulch in Xinjiang Region[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2008, 24(8): 15-19.]
[32]	Qadir M, Shams M. Some agronomic and physiological aspects of salt tolerance in cotton (Gossypium kirsutum L. )[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science-Zeitschrift fur Acker und Pflanzenbau, 1997, 179(2): 101-106.
[33]	Sikder R K, Wang X R, Zhang H H, et al. Influence of nitrogen on the growth and yield of cotton under salinity stress[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2022, 45(8): 1181-1197.
[34]	郭晓雯, 刘佳炜, 郑志玉, 等. 全生育期咸水滴灌对土壤盐分累积和棉花生长的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(6): 1952-1965.
	[Guo Xiaowen, Liu Jiawei, Zheng Zhiyu, et al. Effects of saline water drip irrigation on soil salt accumulation and cotton growth during the whole growth period[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(6): 1952-1965.]
[35]	陶垿, 吕新, 陈剑, 等. 不同滴灌施肥方式对棉田土壤含水率、硝态氮分布及对产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2015, 27(4): 329-336. doi: 10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201504005
	[Tao Xu, Lü Xin, Chen Jian. Effects of cotton soil moisture content, nitrate nitrogen distribution and yield by different fertigation strategies[J]. Cotton Science, 2015, 27(4): 329-336.]
[36]	忠智博, 翟国亮, 邓忠, 等. 水氮施量对膜下滴灌棉花生长及水氮分布的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(1): 67-76.
	[Zhong Zhibo, Zhai Guoliang, Deng Zhong, et al. The impact of N application and drip irrigation amount on cotton growth and water and N distributions in soil mulched with film[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020, 39(1): 67-76.]
[37]	王全九, 王康, 苏李君, 等. 灌溉施氮和种植密度对棉花叶面积指数与产量的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(12): 300-312.
	[Wang Quanjiu, Wang Kang, Su Lijun, et al. Effect of irrigation amount, nitrogen application rate and planting density on cotton Leaf Area Index and yield[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(12): 300-312.]
[38]	周永萍, 田长彦, 王平. 不同水氮处理对棉田系统氮素吸收利用及残留的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2010, 33(5): 725-731.
	[Zhou Yongping, Tian Changyan, Wang Ping. Effect of different water and nitrogen treatments on cotton nitrogen absorption, and N_min residual in soil profile[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2010, 33(5): 725-731.]

生育期	灌溉时间/月-日		灌水量/(m³·hm^-2)			施氮量/(kg·hm^-2)			磷钾肥 /（kg·hm^-2）
生育期	2022年	2023年	W1	W2	W3	N1	N2	N3	磷钾肥 /（kg·hm^-2）
苗期	06-15	06-05	108.0	144.0	180.0	6.6	13.1	19.7	6.8
苗期	06-25	06-15	108.0	144.0	180.0	6.6	13.1	19.7	6.8
蕾期	07-05	06-25	297.0	396.0	495.0	13.1	26.3	39.4	13.6
	07-12	07-10
	07-19	07-17
花铃期	07-26	07-24	275.4	367.2	459.0	10.5	21.0	31.5	16.3
	08-02	08-03
	08-12	08-10
	08-22	08-17
	08-29	08-24
吐絮期	09-12	09-02	216.0	288.0	360.0	0	0	0	0

滴灌水盐氮调控对棉田水肥盐运移及棉花产量的影响

Effects of the regulation of water-salt-nitrogen on water-salt nutrient transport and yield in drip-irrigated cotton fields

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	赖虹雨, 吕德生, 朱艳, 王振华, 温越, 宋利兵, 齐浩. 生物炭施加对微咸水滴灌棉田土壤水热盐及棉花生长的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(2): 326-338.
[2]	马怡璠, 吕德生, 王振华, 李燕强, 刘健, 温越, 朱艳. 磁氮耦合对膜下滴灌加工番茄产量及水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1855-1864.
[3]	阿热孜古力·肉孜, 买买提·沙吾提, 何旭刚, 冶晓文. 基于多植被指数组合的棉花叶片叶绿素含量估算[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1865-1874.
[4]	张慧,张凯,陈冰,杨川,柳萍. 不同灌溉量对新疆棉花生长发育及产量形成的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(6): 1976-1985.
[5]	代健敏,何庆雨,谢玲,窦巧巧,张巨松. 氮肥后移对花铃期水分亏缺棉花产量的补偿效应研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 986-995.
[6]	王旭阳,李典鹏,孙涛,孙霞,贾宏涛,李君,李新虎. 新疆干旱区作物体系土壤温室气体排放对覆膜的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 176-184.
[7]	王东旺,王振华,陈林,李文昊. 应用膜下灌排联动技术对提高土壤淋洗效果的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1010-1019.
[8]	朱金儒,李文昊,王振华,宗睿,王天宇. 覆膜滴灌棉田地膜残留量对棉花生长的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2): 570-579.
[9]	李莉，田长彦，陈冠文，李中军. 棉花打顶后倒四叶内激素变化对棉花产量和品质的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014, 31(1): 111-117.
[10]	杨淑萍, 危常州, 梁永超. 新疆主要棉花品种耐盐性筛选与鉴定[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(6): 1129-1135.
[11]	靳志锋, 虎胆·吐马尔白, 牟洪臣, 马合木江, 李文娟. 土壤冻融温度影响下棉田水盐运移规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(4): 623-627.
[12]	王江丽, 赖先齐, 帕尼古丽?阿汗别克 , 李鲁华. 中亚与新疆绿洲农业的比较[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(1): 182-187.
[13]	杨传杰, 罗毅, 孙林, 甘容, 吉力力·阿不都外力, 张艳. 水分胁迫对覆膜滴灌棉花根系活力和叶片生理的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(5): 802-810.
[14]	朱新萍, 贾宏涛, 郑春霞, 蒋平安, 王丽. 高产棉田土壤碱性磷酸酶及脲酶空间变异特征分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(4): 586-591.
[15]	刘净贤, 周石硚, 晋绿生, 王进, 杨景辉. 新疆北部膜下滴灌棉田的蒸散特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(2): 360-368.