干旱区研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 1615-1626.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.10.01

• 天气与气候 • 上一篇    下一篇

祁连山北坡一次秋季对流性降水雨滴谱特征分析

付双喜1(), 王伏村2(), 李宝梓1, 方春刚3, 陈添宇3   

  1. 1.甘肃省人工影响天气办公室,甘肃 兰州 730000
    2.甘肃省张掖市气象局,甘肃 张掖 734000
    3.中国气象局人工影响天气中心,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-25 修回日期:2024-07-15 出版日期:2024-10-15 发布日期:2024-10-14
  • 通讯作者: 王伏村. E-mail: wangfucun3@yahoo.com.cn
  • 作者简介:付双喜(1973-),男,正高级工程师,主要从事人工影响天气和祁连山地形云外场试验研究. E-mail: fusx1997@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金气象联合基金重点项目(U2142208);国家重点研发计划课题(2019YFC1510302);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(21JR7RA711);中国气象局创新发展专项(CXFZ2023J040);甘肃省气象局气象科研项目(Ms2021-10);甘肃省气象局气象科研项目(2122rczx-十人计划-05)

Raindrop spectral characteristics of an autumn convective precipitation on the north slope of the Qilian Mountains

FU Shuangxi1(), WANG Fucong2(), LI Baozi1, FANG Chungang3, CHEN Tianyu3   

  1. 1. Gansu Weather Modification Office, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
    2. Zhangye Meteorological Bureau, Zhangye 734000, Gansu, China
    3. CMA Weather Modification Centre(WMC), Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2023-12-25 Revised:2024-07-15 Published:2024-10-15 Online:2024-10-14

摘要:

利用Parsivel2激光雨滴谱仪观测数据,分析了祁连山北坡2020年9月21日发生的一次对流性降水天气的雨滴谱特征。结果表明:雨水含量W和降水强度R的时间演变一致,各站点雨滴数浓度N(D)最大时对应雨滴直径D均<1 mm,出现在层状云降水期间。在对流云雨增强至最大阶段,雨滴直径D迅速增大,各站点最大雨滴直径D在2.75~3.75 mm之间。高海拔站总数浓度NT平均值大于低海拔站,低海拔站质量加权平均直径Dm平均值大于高海拔站。对流云降水Dm显著大于层状云降水且分布相对集中,层状云降水Dm分布有更大谱宽。对流云降水logNw分布相对集中,层状云降水logNw分布有更大谱宽。Gamma函数能较好拟合祁连山区对流云和层状云降水平均谱。对流云、层状云µ-λ有很好的拟合关系。Dm-R拟合系数和指数均为正数,DmR增强而增大,并在雨强达到一定值后变化有变缓的趋势。层状云降水logNwR增强变化较快,对流云降水logNwR增大缓慢。业务雷达默认使用的夏季对流云降水和经典大陆性层状云降水Z-R关系对祁连山区对流云、层状云降水估测值偏低。

关键词: 雨滴谱, 数浓度, 质量加权平均直径, Z-R关系, 祁连山

Abstract:

This study analyzed the influence system, characteristics of the raindrop spectrum of a convective precipitation process that occurred on September 21, 2020, in the northern slopes of the Qilian Mountains using upper-air and ground data, Doppler weather radar products, and Parsivel2 laser raindrop spectrometer observation data. Results demonstrated that precipitation was affected by a short-wave trough moving eastward over the plateau and the northern border region. Liquid water content W was consistent with rain rate R, and the corresponding raindrop diameter D was <1 mm when the particle number concentration N(D) was maximum at each site, which occurs during stratiform precipitation. The raindrop diameter increased rapidly during the maximum rain intensity of convective precipitation, with the maximum diameter D being in the range of 2.75-3.75 mm at each site. The mean raindrop number concentration NT was larger at higher elevation sites than at lower elevation sites, whereas the mean mass weighted average diameter Dm was larger at lower altitude sites than at higher altitude sites. The Dm of convective precipitation was significantly larger than that of stratiform precipitation. The distributions of Dm and logNw were relatively concentrated for convective precipitation, whereas they showed larger spectral width for stratiform precipitation. The gamma function could better fit the average raindrop spectrum of convective precipitation and stratiform precipitation in the Qilian Mountains. The shape parameter µ and the slope parameter λ of the gamma fitting function satisfied the good fitting relationship in convective precipitation and stratiform precipitation. Positive fitting coefficient and exponent were observed in the relationship of Dm-R. Dm increased with the improvement of R and stabilized after the rain rate reached a certain value. The logNw of stratiform precipitation changed faster with improvement of R, and the logNw of convective precipitation increased slowly with improvement of R. The precipitation estimates of convective precipitation and stratiform precipitation were lower in the Qilian Mountains when the default Z-R relationship was used to estimate precipitation in the operational radar application.

Key words: raindrop spectrum, raindrop number concentration, mass weighted average diameter, Z-R relationship, Qilian Mountains