干旱区研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 882-889.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2015.05.08

• 土壤及土壤保护 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于InVEST模型的榆林市土壤保持生态效益研究

李苒   

  1. 西安文理学院经济管理学院,陕西 西安 710065
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-20 修回日期:2015-05-05 出版日期:2015-09-15 发布日期:2015-10-14
  • 作者简介:李苒(1980-),女,博士,讲师,从事生态经济方面研究. E-mail: 44056637@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科技厅基金项目(2006K08-G01);陕西省重大科技攻关项目“陕西省可持续发展实验区建设关键技术集成研究”(JI12310);西北大学研究生自主创新项目(YZZ13003)

Research on the Ecological Benefits of Soil Conservation of Yulin City Based on InVEST Model

LI Ran   

  1. College of Economics and Management, Xi’an University, Xi’an 710065, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2014-03-20 Revised:2015-05-05 Published:2015-09-15 Online:2015-10-14

摘要: 水土流失是黄土高原最严重的生态问题,正确评估黄土高原土壤保持生态效益具有重大意义。以榆林市为研究对象,采用生态系统服务和交易的综合评估模型(InVEST),对2000—2010年榆林市土壤保持生态效益进行了评估,明确了10 a土壤保持生态效益的演变规律及空间格局特点。结果表明:① 2000—2010年,榆林市土壤保持量呈先减少后增加的特点,土壤保持生态效益呈现持续减少的趋势,多年平均土壤保持生态效益为1.19×1011元,无论是土壤保持量还是土壤保持效益,神木县均最大,吴堡县最小。② 榆林市土壤保持生态效益大致呈现西北高东南低的空间分布格局,河流中上游地区土壤保持生态效益比下游地区高,北部6县远远高于南部6县。③ 土壤保持量和保持效益的高低与流域内部地形地貌因素、土地利用方式、土壤理化性质、生态系统类型、植被覆盖以及国土面积有很大关系,尤其是国土面积的大小对土壤保持总量和效益影响较大,这也是南部6县总量上偏小的重要原因。

关键词: InVEST模型, 土壤保持, 生态效益, 榆林市

Abstract: As is well known to all that water and soil loss is the most serious ecological problems in the Loess Plateau, so it is of great significance to evaluate ecological benefits of soil conservation. Taking Yulin as an example, InVEST model was used to evaluate ecological benefits of soil conservation of Yulin city from 2000 to 2010 in the paper. And its evolution law and spatial pattern characteristics has been found. The results showed that: ① From 2000 to 2010, it has showed that the soil conservation quantity increased firstly and then decreased, and the soil conservation ecological benefit had a declining trend. For the annual mean soil conservation ecological benefits, it had more than 1.19×1011 billion yuan. Both soil conservation quantity and soil conservation benefits, Shenmu County was the biggest, and Wubu County was the minimal. ② The soil conservation ecological benefit space distribution in Yulin exhibited a decreasing trend from northwest to southeast and the value of river upstream and midstream is higher than downstream. The value of northern six counties was much higher than that of southern counties. ③ Soil conservation quantity and its ecological benefit had obvious difference, which difference may attribute to several factors as topography, land-use pattern, soil physical and chemical properties, ecosystem type and vegetation cover, as well as land area. Especially, the size of the land area had a great effect on both the total soil conservation quantity and soil conservation ecological benefit. That was why the total of the six counties in the south was smaller than north.

Key words: InVEST model, soil conservation, ecological benefits, Yulin city