水分对河西青贮玉米土壤化学计量比及稳态性的影响

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2022.04.31

Abstract

Abstract:

A study was conducted using irrigation treatments and changes in soil and plant carbon (OC), nitrogen (TN), and phosphorus (TP) stoichiometry and homeostasis were investigated to explore the soil nutrient limitation in farmland ecosystems in the Hexi irrigation area. The following results are presented. (1) The OC, TN, and TP concentrations of silage maize soils under different irrigation treatments reached the highest values in 0-10 cm. (2) Among four irrigation treatments, the nutrient content of plant organs was the highest under W₀ irrigation. However, at 0-30 cm soil layers, the values of soil OC, TN, and TP concentrations were the highest under W₁ irrigation treatment (i.e., traditional irrigation), soil TN and TP contents were more than those under other irrigation treatments (6.66%-26.17% and 4.67%-19.21%, respectively), and the decrease in soil and plant nutrients was more significant than that in irrigation water amount. (3) The ranges of C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios in soil and plants were at 3.60-61.2, 4.39-53.9, and 1.01-1.24, respectively. Soil C:N ratios were relatively stable among three soil layers and different irrigation treatments. The N:P ratios of leaves (11.9) and roots (7.58) were less than the threshold of plant N limitation (14), indicating that plant growth was limited by N. (4) Among four irrigation treatments, corn OC and TP and their ratios remained stable. However, the leaf N:P homeostasis was more sensitive to W₂ treatment (20% water-saving irrigation) than to W₀ treatment. Thus, 10% water-saving treatment in the Hexi irrigation area might be beneficial to the retention of soil nutrients in silage corn and maintains the stable adaptability of crop growth, realizing the purpose of water-saving and alleviating the current water scarcity situation.

Key words: silage maize, irrigation water, soil nutrient, stoichiometric ratio, homeostasis, Hexi

XIE Mingjun,LI Guang,MA Weiwei,LIU Shuainan,CHANG Haigang,DU Jia’nan,DING Ning. Effects of water treatment on stoichiometric ratio and homeostasis of silage corn soil in Hexi[J].Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1312-1321.

Figures/Tables 8

Tab. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 4

References 27

[1]	张娟, 李广, 袁建钰, 等. 水氮调控对旱作春小麦土壤、叶片养分含量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(6): 1750-1759.
	[Zhang Juan, Li Guang, Yuan Jianyu, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen regulation on soil and leaf stoichiometric characteristics of spring wheat in dry farming[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(6): 1750-1759.]
[2]	朱平宗, 张光辉, 杨文利, 等. 红壤区林地浅沟不同植被类型土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(6): 60-65.
	[Zhu Pingzong, Zhang Guanghui, Yang Wenli, et al. Characteristics of soil ecological stoichiometry of different vegetation types in ephemeral gully of forestland in red soil region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(6): 60-65.]
[3]	陈绍民, 杨硕欢, 张保成, 等. 不同水肥条件下夏玉米/冬小麦农田生态系统碳平衡研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(5): 229-238.
	[Chen Shaomin, Yang Shuohuan, Zhang Baocheng, et al. Carbon balance in summer maize/winter wheat farmland ecosystem under different water and fertilizer conditions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(5): 229-238.]
[4]	吴建平, 韩新辉, 许亚东, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同植被类型下土壤与微生物C, N, P化学计量特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 783-792.
	[Wu Jianping, Han Xinhui, Xu Yadong, et al. Ecological stoichometry of soil and soil microbial biomass C, N, P, under granin-to-green programe in loess hilly region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(4): 783-792.]
[5]	孙立青. 中国农田土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征的研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2018.
	[Sun Liqing. The Study of Farmland Soil C:N:P Stoichiometry Characteristics in China[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2018.]
[6]	原雅楠, 李正才, 王斌, 等. 不同林龄榧树根、枝、叶的C、N、P化学计量及内稳性特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(6): 135-142.
	[Yuan Ya’nan, Li Zhengcai, Wang Bin, et al. Ecological stoichiometry in leaves,branches and roots of Torreya grandis with different forest ages and its stoichiometric homoeostasis[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2021, 45(6): 135-142.]
[7]	Sun Z H, Han J C. Effect of soft rock amendment on soil hydraulic parameters and crop performance in Mu Us Sandy Land, China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 222(1): 85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.016
[8]	梁川. 河西内陆区玉米膜下滴灌高效节水供水供肥模式研究[J]. 甘肃水利水电技术, 2021, 57(7): 28-31.
	[Liang Chuan. Study on the model of high-efficiency water-saving water supply and fertilizer supply for corn under mulch drip irrigation in the inland area of Hexi[J]. Gansu Water Resources and Hydropower Technology, 2021, 57(7): 28-31.]
[9]	张雨新, 张富仓, 邹海洋, 等. 生育期水分调控对河西地区滴灌春小麦生长和水分利用的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(1): 171-177.
	[Zhang Yuxin, Zhang Fucang, Zou Haiyang, et al. Effects of soil water regulation in growing period on spring wheat growth and water use in Hexi areas under drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(1): 171-177.]
[10]	柴仲平, 王雪梅, 孙霞, 等. 水氮耦合对红枣植株养分含量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2010, 23(4): 1151-1154.
	[Chai Zhongping, Wang Xuemei, Sun Xia, et al. Effect of coupling of water and N on plant nutrient of Ziziphus jujube[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 23(4): 1151-1154.]
[11]	王攀, 余海龙, 许艺馨, 等. 宁夏燃煤电厂周边土壤、植物和微生物生态化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(16): 6513-6524.
	[Wang Pan, Yu Hailong, Xu Yixin, et al. C:N:P ecological stoichiometry in soils, plants, microbes, and their influencing factors around the coal-fired power plants in Ningxia[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(16): 6513-6524.]
[12]	王虎兵, 曹红霞, 郝舒雪. 温室番茄植株养分和光合对水肥耦合的响应及其与产量关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(10): 1761-1771.
	[Wang Hubing, Cao Hongxia, Hao Shuxue. Responses of plant nutrient and photosynthesis in greenhouse tomato to water-fertilizer coupling and their relationship with yield[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(10): 1761-1771.]
[13]	Mohannadi M, Shabanpour M, Mohannadi M H, et al. Characterizing spatial variability of soil textural fractions and fractal parameters derived from particle size distributions[J]. Pedosphere, 2019, 29(2): 224-234. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60425-9
[14]	赵如梦, 张炳学, 王晓霞, 等. 黄土高原不同种植年限苜蓿草地土壤与植物化学计量特征[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(5): 1189-1199.
	[Zhao Rumeng, Zhang Bingxue, Wang Xiaoxia, et al. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soil and plant of alfalfa with different growing years on the Loess Plateau[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(5): 1189-1199.]
[15]	李菊, 张富仓, 王艳丽, 等. 灌水量和滴灌频率对甘肃省河西地区春玉米生长和水分利用的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(10): 8-20.
	[Li Ju, Zhang Fucang, Wang Yanli, et al. Effects of irrigation amount and dirp irrigation frequency on spring maize growth and water use in Hexi area of Gansu Province[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(10): 8-20.]
[16]	刘七军, 曲玮, 李昭楠, 等. 耕地细碎化对干旱绿洲区作物生产和农户收入影响效应调查分析——以甘肃省民乐县为例[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(3): 191-198.
	[Liu Qijun, Qu Wei, Li Zhaonan, et al. A survey and analysis of the impacts of land fragmentation on crops production and farmers’ income in arid oasis regions: A case from Minle County of Gansu Province[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(3): 191-198.]
[17]	Zhang G Q, Shen D P, Ming B, et al. Using irrigation intervals to optimize water-use efficiency and maize yield in Xinjiang, Northwest China[J]. The Crop Journal, 2019, 7(3): 322-334. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2018.10.008
[18]	刘帅楠, 李广, 宋良翠, 等. 早播及耕作措施对黄土高原半干旱区春小麦土壤氮磷元素的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1367-1375.
	[Liu Shuainan, Li Guang, Song Liangcui, et al. Effects of early sowing and tillage measures on nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil supporting spring wheat in the semi-arid area of the Loess Plateau[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(5): 1367-1375.]
[19]	蒋宇新, 郑旭荣, 王振华. 滴灌时长对伊犁河流域土壤理化性质及作物产量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(3): 645-651.
	[Jiang Yuxin, Zheng Xurong, Wang Zhenhua. Effects of drip irrigation duration on soil physical and chemical properties and wheat yield in the Yili River Basin[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(3): 645-651.]
[20]	邓健, 张丹, 张伟, 等. 黄土丘陵区刺槐叶片-土壤-微生物碳氮磷化学计量学及其稳态性特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(15): 5527-5535.
	[Deng Jian, Zhang Dan, Zhang Wei, et al. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry and homeostasis characteristics of leaves, soil, and microbial biomass of Robinia pseudoacacia forests in the loess hilly region of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(15): 5527-5535.]
[21]	王建程. 水分胁迫对玉米生理生态特性影响研究[D]. 太原: 山西农业大学, 2004.
	[Wang Jiancheng. Effect of Water Stress on the Physiological and Ecological Characteristics of Maize Abstract[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2004.]
[22]	江叶枫, 叶英聪, 郭熙, 等. 江西省耕地土壤氮磷生态化学计量空间变异特征及其影响因素[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(6): 1527-1539.
	[Jiang Yefeng, Ye Yingcong, Guo Xi, et al. Spatial variability of ecological stoichiometry of soil nitrogen and phosphorus in farmlands of Jiangxi Province and its influencing factors[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(6): 1527-1539.]
[23]	刘帅楠, 李广, 杨传杰, 等. 植被类型对黄土丘陵区土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征的季节变异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(6): 343-349, 360.
	[Liu Shuainan, Li Guang, Yang Chuanjie, et al. Seasonal variation of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichometry under different vegetation types in loess hilly region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(6): 343-349, 360.]
[24]	娄泊远, 王永东, 闫晋升, 等. 亚寒带荒漠草原不同树种人工林土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1385-1392.
	[Lou Boyuan, Wang Yongdong, Yan Jinsheng, et al. Characteristics of soil ecological stoichiometry of different tree spcies in sub-frigid desert steppe[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(2): 1385-1392.]
[25]	温晨, 杨智姣, 杨磊, 等. 半干旱黄土小流域不同植被类型植物与土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(5): 1824-1834.
	[Wen Chen, Yang Zhijiao, Yang Lei, et al. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of plants and soil under different vegetation types in the semi-arid loess small watershed[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(5): 1824-1834.]
[26]	蔡倩, 白伟, 郑家明, 等. 水分胁迫对春玉米光合特性及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2021, 21(5): 1-6.
	[Cai Qian, Bai Wei, Zheng Jiaming, et al. Effect of water stress on photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of spring maize[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 21(5): 1-6.]
[27]	宁志英, 李玉霖, 杨红玲, 等. 科尔沁沙地优势固沙灌木叶片氮磷化学计量内稳性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(1): 46-54. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0100
	[Ning Zhiying, Li Yulin, Yang Hongling, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometric homoeostasis in leaves of dominant sand-fixing shrubs in Horqin Sandy Land, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2019, 43(1): 46-54.] doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0100

	W₀		W₁		W₂		W₃
	次数/次	灌水量/（m³·hm^-2）	次数/次	灌水量/（m³·hm^-2）	次数/次	灌水量/（m³·hm^-2）	次数/次	灌水量/（m³·hm^-2）
幼苗期	2	297.00	2	267.30	2	237.60	2	207.90
拔节前	2	825.00	2	742.50	2	660.00	2	577.50
拔节期	5	1875.15	5	1687.64	5	1500.12	5	1312.60
抽雄期	9	2643.90	9	2379.50	9	2115.12	9	1850.73
吐丝期	3	472.50	3	425.25	3	378.00	3	330.75
成熟期	1	36.45	1	32.81	1	29.16	1	25.52
总灌水量/（m³·hm^-2）	6150		5535		4920		4305

指标		灌水处理
指标		W₀	W₁	W₂	W₃
C:N	土壤	3.46±0.08a	3.41±0.23a	3.71±0.02a	3.82±0.12a
	植株根	15.04±1.36a	11.41±0.44a	12.75±0.20a	12.26±2.60a
	植株叶	67.37±2.93a	60.66±1.79a	59.62±3.83a	56.97±7.75a
C:P	土壤	4.39±0.09a	4.33±0.15a	4.17±0.23a	4.66±0.20a
	植株根	14.27±0.631a	12.49±0.30b	12.33±0.17b	11.29±0.24b
	植株叶	71.44±3.64a	66.10±5.874a	65.83±5.77a	66.06±9.95a
N:P	土壤	1.29±0.06a	1.30±0.04a	1.14±0.06a	1.23±0.04a
	植株根	0.97±0.10a	1.10±0.07a	0.97±0.00a	0.99±0.17a
	植株叶	1.07±0.07a	1.09±0.08a	1.11±0.07a	1.16±0.02a

	指标	土壤				植株根
	指标	OC	TN	TP		OC	TN	TP
植株叶	OC	0.23	0.13	0.02		0.86^**	0.40	0.82^**
	TN	0.46	0.36	0.17		0.70^*	0.71^*	0.54
	TP	0.43	0.22	0.18		0.59^*	0.51	0.48
土壤	OC	1.00	0.91^**	0.93^**		0.17	-0.19	0.15
	TN		1.00	0.91^**	0.38		0.08	0.36
	TP			1.00	0.28		-0.23	0.28

器官	变量		W₀			W₁			W₂			W₃
器官	x	y	H	P	等级	H	P	等级	H	P	等级	H	P	等级
叶片	OC_土壤	OC_叶片	131.58	0.78	绝对稳态	5.16	0.84	绝对稳态	14.86	0.84	绝对稳态	11.57	0.89	绝对稳态
	TN_土壤	TN_叶片	-1.60	0.16		3.40	0.38		20.66	0.32		-7.58	0.83
	TP_土壤	TP_叶片	18.52	0.94		14.07	0.96		-1.68	0.21		-4.08	0.71
	C:N_土壤	C:N_叶片	0.59	0.25		-2.69	0.30		0.13	0.52		-5.78	0.98
	C:P_土壤	C:P_叶片	0.95	0.75		-0.94	0.76		0.94	0.50		-0.34	0.44
	N:P_土壤	N:P_叶片	0.66	0.27		0.81	0.69		0.79	<0.05	敏感态	-2.65	0.47
根	OC_土壤	OC_根	35.46	0.78	绝对稳态	17.24	0.84	绝对稳态	158.73	0.84	绝对稳态	34.48	0.89	绝对稳态
	TN_土壤	TN_根	0.78	0.06		-58.82	0.59		22.42	0.758		-0.50	0.34
	TP_土壤	TP_根	7.40	0.78		24.51	0.92		11.82	0.68		-29.41	0.97
	C:N_土壤	C:N_根	0.32	0.41		-13.70	0.92		-0.92	0.73		0.26	0.61
	C:P_土壤	C:P_根	0.79	0.62		-2.23	0.55		-14.93	0.82		2.46	0.42
	N:P_土壤	N:P_根	0.41	0.09		-0.77	0.55		-1.00	0.94		0.20	0.20

Effects of water treatment on stoichiometric ratio and homeostasis of silage corn soil in Hexi

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 27

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LIU Yidan, YAO Xiaojun, LI Zongxing, HU Jiayu. Impacts of climate change and land use/cover change on the net primary productivity of vegetation in Hexi Region, Northwest China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 169-180.
[2]	LI Yanqiang, WANG Zhenhua, YE Hanchun, SONG Libing, LIU Jian, WEN Yue, WU Xiaodi. Effect of the salinity of irrigation water on soil respiration rate in cotton field [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(3): 392-402.
[3]	ZHANG Tong,LIU Jing,HAN Xu,TONG Yuqiang,WEI Yawei. Effects of grazing on soil nutrients and microbial community of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest in sandy land [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(2): 194-202.
[4]	MA Junmei,MA Jianping,MAN Duoqing,GUO Chunxiu,ZHANG Yunian,ZHAO Peng,WANG Fei,LI Yuanxing. Distribution and regeneration characteristics of natural Populus euphratica forests in Hexi Corridor and their relationship with soil factors [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(2): 224-234.
[5]	HOU Wenbing, LI Kaiming, HUANG Zhuo. Characterization of spatial and temporal changes in the oasis effect and attribution analysis of the Hexi region in the last 20 years [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(12): 2031-2042.
[6]	HUI Rong, TAN Huijuan, HUANG Lei, LI Xinrong. Characteristics of nutrient and enzyme activity in salt-affected soils of the Qaidam Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(11): 1776-1784.
[7]	ZHANG Hui,ZHANG Kai,CHEN Bing,YANG Chuan,LIU Ping. Effects of different irrigation rates on cotton growth and yield formation in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(6): 1976-1985.
[8]	LI Xiaole,WEI Yajuan,DANG Xiaohong,DAI Yuzhi,ZHAI Bo,CHI Xu,WU Huimin. Soil mechanical composition and soil nutrient content of Reaumuria soongorica nebkhas [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(3): 933-942.
[9]	SHI Shiling,REN Xiaomeng,ZHANG Xiaowei,MENG Zhongju,WANG Tao. Soil nutrients and stoichiometric characteristics of the Elaeagnus angustifolia shelterbelt in the Hobq Desert [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(2): 469-476.
[10]	LOU Boyuan,WANG Yongdong,YAN Jinsheng,Akida Askar. Characteristics of soil ecological stoichiometry of different tree spcies in sub-frigid desert steppe [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(5): 1385-1392.
[11]	FAN Xianglong,LYU Xin,ZHANG Ze,GAO Pan,ZHANG Qiang,YIN Caixia,YI Xiang. Soil nutrient evaluation of cotton field based on distance clustering and K-means dynamic clustering [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 980-989.
[12]	QI Zhengchao,CHANG Peijing,LI Yongshan,TIAN Xuemei,LI Xudong,GUO Ding,NIU Decao. Effects of grazing intensity on soil aggregates composition, stability, nutrients and C/N in desert shrubland [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(1): 87-94.
[13]	CHENG Wen-ju, XI Hai-yang, SI Jian-hua, LI Ai-lin. Study of evapotranspiration estimation and drought characteristics of watershed in low coteau area of Hexi inland river [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(5): 1105-1115.
[14]	LI Ling-ping, LI Yan-ying, SUN Zhan-feng, WANG Rong-zhe. Sandstorm and Its Affecting Meteorological Factors in East Hexi Corridor [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(6): 1457-1465.
[15]	GOU Qian-qian, LI Qiao-qiao, QU Jian-jun, WANG Guo-hua. Variation of Soil Temperature in the Desert-Oasis Ecotone [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(4): 809-815.