基于能值分析的典型农牧交错带可持续发展规模研究——以内蒙古乌兰察布市为例

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2024.04.16

Abstract

Abstract:

The emergy method was used to analyze the sustainable development status of the ecological and economic system in Ulanqab City in the agro-pastoral ecotone from 2011 to 2020, in order to determine the reasonable scale of regional development and achieve regional sustainable development. The results show that: from 2011 to 2020, the input emergy (F) of Ulanqab City’s ecological-economic system increased steadily; the output emergy (Y) continued to decrease; the environmental load rate (ELR) continued to increase; the emergy was sustainable for 10 years The indicator (ESI) experienced large fluctuations and declined overall. From 2011 to 2016, the emergy sustainable development index of Ulanqab City was higher than 1, indicating that the development of the ecological-economic system was sustainable. From 2017 to 2020, the emergy sustainable development index was lower than 1, indicating an unsustainable state. Therefore, in the short and medium term, it is necessary to increase investment in renewable resources to alleviate the ecological environment degradation and high environmental load caused by the overuse of non-renewable resources. The industry should carry out technological innovation to reduce production costs, improve production efficiency, promote the output of high-emergy value products, and seek new emerging technologies. High-emergy value output sectors replace low-emergy value output sectors; the natural growth rate of regional population needs to be increased in the long term in order to increase regional emergy demand and output. With advantageous transportation location and abundant resources, we will undertake industrial sectors with high emergy output rates and low environmental load rates in surrounding relatively developed areas to enhance regional sustainable development capabilities.

Key words: agro-pastoral ecotone, emergy analysis, sustainable development capabilities, Ulanqab City, Inner Mongolia

WANG Xin, HAI Shan. Sustainable development scale of a typical agro-pastoral ecotone based on emergy analysis: A case study of Ulanqab City, Inner Mongolia[J].Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(4): 706-715.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

Output emergy of some industrial and agricultural products in Ulanqab City from 2011 to 2020 /sej"

	2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年	2017年	2018年	2019年	2020年
谷物	2.53×10¹⁶	3.14×10¹⁶	4.17×10¹⁶	3.38×10¹⁶	3.39×10¹⁶	3.69×10¹⁶	2.59×10¹⁶	4.75×10¹⁶	5.99×10¹⁶	6.66×10¹⁶
植物油	4.65×10¹⁶	5.70×10¹⁶	6.37×10¹⁶	8.05×10¹⁶	8.05×10¹⁶	2.62×10¹⁷	3.67×10¹⁷	2.67×10¹⁷	3.13×10¹⁷	2.69×10¹⁷
羊毛	4.71×10¹⁶	4.32×10¹⁶	3.92×10¹⁶	3.80×10¹⁶	3.99×10¹⁶	3.62×10¹⁶	3.45×10¹⁶	3.70×10¹⁶	3.29×10¹⁶	2.80×10¹⁶
水果	3.77×10¹⁴	3.47×10¹⁴	4.92×10¹⁴	3.69×10¹⁴	4.34×10¹⁴	4.93×10¹⁴	3.42×10¹⁴	3.07×10¹⁴	3.10×10¹⁴	3.22×10¹⁴
蔬菜	4.52×10¹⁶	4.55×10¹⁶	4.52×10¹⁶	4.31×10¹⁶	4.34×10¹⁶	5.08×10¹⁶	2.08×10¹⁶	2.49×10¹⁶	3.04×10¹⁶	2.95×10¹⁶
牛肉	1.15×10¹⁷	1.16×10¹⁷	1.13×10¹⁷	1.18×10¹⁷	1.18×10¹⁷	1.14×10¹⁷	1.00×10¹⁷	1.01×10¹⁷	1.06×10¹⁷	8.65×10¹⁶
羊肉	3.00×10¹⁷	2.42×10¹⁷	2.35×10¹⁷	2.62×10¹⁷	2.66×10¹⁷	2.79×10¹⁷	2.41×10¹⁷	2.16×10¹⁷	2.24×10¹⁷	2.09×10¹⁷
糖	4.08×10¹⁶	4.66×10¹⁶	5.27×10¹⁶	5.04×10¹⁶	1.00×10¹⁷	8.74×10¹⁶	1.08×10¹⁷	1.46×10¹⁷	1.31×10¹⁷	1.44×10¹⁷
乳制品	8.88×10¹⁷	7.80×10¹⁷	6.43×10¹⁷	4.19×10¹⁷	3.94×10¹⁷	3.40×10¹⁷	3.55×10¹⁷	3.94×10¹⁷	4.18×10¹⁷	4.23×10¹⁷
水泥	1.91×10²³	2.12×10²³	2.50×10²³	2.93×10²³	3.02×10²³	3.32×10²³	6.08×10²²	5.80×10²²	8.21×10²²	1.08×10²³
钢材	2.51×10²²	1.94×10²²	2.30×10²²	3.31×10²²	2.57×10²²	2.75×10²²	5.59×10²¹	6.17×10²¹	8.82×10²¹	1.05×10²²
农药	1.41×10¹⁸	1.34×10¹⁸	1.47×10¹⁸	1.34×10¹⁸	1.37×10¹⁸	1.32×10¹⁸	1.46×10¹⁸	1.26×10¹⁸	1.28×10¹⁸	1.23×10¹⁸
氮肥	1.80×10²⁰	1.74×10²⁰	1.67×10²⁰	1.77×10²⁰	1.96×10²⁰	1.83×10²⁰	1.63×10²⁰	1.46×10²⁰	1.32×10²⁰	1.14×10²⁰
磷肥	4.19×10¹⁹	3.75×10¹⁹	3.53×10¹⁹	3.78×10¹⁹	5.04×10¹⁹	6.17×10¹⁹	6.85×10¹⁹	7.44×10¹⁹	7.24×10¹⁹	4.04×10¹⁹
钾肥	4.54×10¹⁸	3.94×10¹⁸	4.01×10¹⁸	4.41×10¹⁸	2.67×10¹⁸	3.74×10¹⁸	5.50×10¹⁸	8.14×10¹⁸	7.40×10¹⁸	5.30×10¹⁸
复合肥	8.28×10¹⁹	8.47×10¹⁹	8.75×10¹⁹	8.79×10¹⁹	8.54×10¹⁹	8.69×10¹⁹	9.44×10¹⁹	7.16×10¹⁹	7.08×10¹⁹	9.75×10¹⁹

Tab. 5

Tab. 6

Tab. 7

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

References 31

[1]	陈建华, 魏百刚, 苏大学. 农牧交错带可持续发展战略与对策[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2004.
	[Chen Jianhua, Wei Baigang, Su Daxue. Sustainable Development Strategies and Countermeasures in the Agro-pastoral Ecotone[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004.]
[2]	Odum H T, Odum E C, Och Blissett M. Ecology and economy: “Emergy” analysis and public policy in Texas[C]// Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs and Taxas Depart ment of Agriculture, Policy Research Project Report Number 78. Austin: Boardof Regents, The University of Texas, 1987.
[3]	刘耕源, 杨志峰. 能值分析理论与实践:生态经济核算与城市绿色管理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.
	[Liu Gengyuan, Yang Zhifeng. Emergy Theory and Practices Ecological Environmental Accounting and Urban Green Management[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2018.]
[4]	孙海燕. 基于能值分析的我国花生生产系统可持续发展研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2017.
	[Sun Haiyan. Emergy Analysis on Peanut Production Sustainable Development in China[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2017.]
[5]	Brown M T, Herendeen R A. Embodied energy analysis and emergy analysis: A comparative view[J]. Ecological Economics, 1996, 19(3): 219-235. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00046-8
[6]	Ulgiati S, Odum H T, Bastianoni S. Energy use, environmental loading and sustainability: An energy analysis of Italy[J]. Ecological Modelling, 1994, 73(3-4): 215-268. doi: 10.1016/0304-3800(94)90064-7
[7]	Brown M T, Ulgiati S. Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: Monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation[J]. Ecological Engineering, 1997, 9(1-2): 51-69. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00033-5
[8]	Bastianoni S, Marchettini N. The problem of coproduction in environmental accounting by emergy analysis[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2000, 129(2): 187-193. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00232-5
[9]	Brown M T, Ulgiati S. Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 178(1-2): 201-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.002
[10]	贾小乐, 周源, 延建林, 等. 基于能值分析的环太湖城市群生态经济系统可持续发展研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17): 6487-6499.
	[Jia Xiaole, Zhou Yuan, Yan Jianlin, et al. Sustainable development of an ecological-economic system in the Taihu Lake city cluster based on emergy analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(17): 6487-6499.]
[11]	蓝盛芳, 钦佩, 陆宏芳. 生态经济系统能值分析[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2002.
	[Lan Shengfang, Qin Pei, Lu Hongfang. Eco-economic System Emergy Analysis[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002.]
[12]	隋春花, 张耀辉, 蓝盛芳. 环境-经济系统能值评价: 介绍Odum的能值理论[J]. 重庆环境科学, 1999, 21(1): 20-22.
	[Sui Chunhua, Zhang Yaohui, Lan Shengfang. Emergy evaluation of environment economic system[J]. Chongqing Environmental Science, 1999, 21(1): 20-22.]
[13]	Lei J, Haitao L, Jinfan Y. Research on the sustainability of Afghanistan based on the emergy analysis[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(5): 508-515. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.05.008
[14]	孙晓瑞, 税伟, 郑佳瑜, 等. 基于能值分析的厦门城市代谢可持续性评估[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(11): 4342-4353.
	[Sun Xiaorui, Shui Wei, Zheng Jiayu, et al. Evaluation of metabolic sustainability in Xiamen based on emergy analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(11): 4342-4353.]
[15]	史宝娟, 赵国杰. 基于能值理论的循环经济系统评价方法初探[J]. 生态经济, 2006(4): 87-89.
	[Shi Baojuan, Zhao Guojie. On the method of circular economical system based on emergy theory[J]. Ecological Economy, 2006(4): 87-89.]
[16]	刘浩, 宋阳. 循环经济发展能值评价及实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(1): 79-83.
	[Liu Hao, Song Yang. Energy evaluation on the development of circular economy and empirical study[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(1): 79-83.]
[17]	刘茜雅, 王海兵, 左合君, 等. 基于能值分析的毛乌素沙地库伦生态经济圈结构与效益特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(3): 44-50.
	[Liu Qianya, Wang Haibing, Zuo Hejun, et al. Structure and benefit characteristics of the Kulun ecological economic circle based on the emergy analysis[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(3): 44-50.]
[18]	马文静, 刘娟. 基于能值分析的中国生态经济系统可持续发展评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 2029-2038. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202006.038
	[Ma Wenjing, Liu Juan. Evaluation of sustainable development of eco-economic systems in China based on emergy analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(6): 2029-2038.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202006.038
[19]	张志斌, 于晓曼, 刘鸣达, 等. 基于能值分析的重工业区域绿色生态一体化发展研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(8): 1963-1972.
	[Zhang Zhibin, Yu Xiaoman, Liu Mingda, et al. Evaluation of green and ecological integration development of heavy industrial region based on emergy analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42(8): 1963-1972.] doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202308.004
[20]	李双成, 蔡运龙. 基于能值分析的土地可持续利用态势研究[J]. 经济地理, 2002, 22(3): 346-350.
	[Li Shuangcheng, Cai Yunlong. Emergy-based analysis on land sustainability[J]. Economic Geography, 2002, 22(3): 346-350.]
[21]	姚成胜, 黄琳, 吕晞, 等. 基于能值理论的中国耕地利用集约度时空变化分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(8): 1-12.
	[Yao Chengsheng, Huang Lin, Lü Xi. Temporal and spatial change of cultivated land use intensity in China based on emergy theory[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(8): 1-12.]
[22]	李海涛, 李明阳. 基于能值的哈萨克斯坦可持续发展评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2218-2228. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200914
	[Li Haitao, Li Mingyang. Evaluation of Kazakhstan’s sustainability based on emergy theory[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(9): 2218-2228.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200914
[23]	樊新刚, 米文宝, 侯景伟. 扩展㶲方法在区域生态经济驱动机制及效率研究中的应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(1): 273-280. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201701.008
	[Fan Xingang, Mi Wenbao, Hou Jingwei. Application of extended exergy method in driving mechanism and efficiency of regional eco-economy[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(1): 273-280.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201701.008
[24]	樊新刚, 仲俊涛, 杨美玲, 等. 区域可持续发展能力的能值与㶲耦合分析模型构建[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2062-2077. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910008
	[Fan Xingang, Zhong Juntao, Yang Meiling, et al. Construction of an emergy and exergy coupling model for the analysis of regional sustainable development capability[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(10): 2062-2077.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910008
[25]	苏志成. 乌兰察布市国有林场森林资源现状及可持续发展对策探讨[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2020, 43(4): 17-19, 22.
	[Su Zhicheng. Current situation of forest resources and sustainable development countermeasures in state-owned forest farms in Ulanqab City[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design, 2020, 43(4): 17-19, 22. ]
[26]	马玉娟. 基于Markov的沥青路面性能评价及预测研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2021.
	[Ma Yujuan. Research on Performance Evaluation and Prediction of Asphalt Pavement Based on Markov[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2021.]
[27]	刘惠娟. 不同耕作方式下小麦和豌豆生产的能值分析[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2007.
	[Liu Huijuan. Emergy Analysis of Wheat and Pea Production under Different Farming Methods[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2007.]
[28]	王丽. 基于能值分析的宽城县农业可持续发展研究[D]. 北京: 中央民族大学, 2011.
	[Wang Li. Research on Sustainable Agricultural Development in Kuancheng County Based on Emergy Analysis[D]. Beijing: Minzu University of China, 2011.]
[29]	尚清芳. 干旱区绿洲农业生态经济系统能值分析[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2006.
	[Shang Qingfang. Emergy Analysis of Oasis Agricultural Eco-Economic System in Arid Region[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2006.]
[30]	许光清. 城市可持续发展理论研究综述[J]. 教学与研究, 2006(7): 87-92.
	[Xu Guangqing. A review of studies on theories of urban sustainable development[J]. Teaching and Research, 2006(7): 87-92.]
[31]	余焕, 雷敏, 马金晶, 等. 基于绿色GDP和生态效率的区域可持续发展研究——以陕西省为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(2): 284-293.
	[Yu Huan, Lei Min, Ma Jinjing, et al. Regional sustainable development based on green GDP and ecological efficiency: A case of Shaanxi Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(2): 284-293.]

		2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年	2017年	2018年	2019年	2020年
户籍人口		288.77	286.97	283.27	276.96	273.87	273.51	272.12	271.1	268.91	266.5
常住人口	统计局数据	213.46	212.94	212.30	211.71	211.13	210.67	210.25	209.61	209.02	169.5
常住人口	推算数据	213.46	208.58^*	203.69^*	198.81^*	193.92^*	189.04^*	184.16^*	179.27^*	174.39^*	169.5

能值指标	公式	概念
投入能值（F）	可更新资源能值	太阳能、风能、水资源等
	不可更新资源能值	农业产品、畜牧业产品、能源产品、工矿产品等
	区外输入能值	农业产品、畜牧业产品、能源产品、工矿产品、服务、旅游、劳动力等
产出能值（Y）	产业能值	以不同产业产出核算
净能值产出率（EYR）	EYR=Y/F	产出能值/投入能值
环境负载率（ELR）	ELR=(N+F)/R	投入的不可更新资源能值总量/投入的可更新资源能值总量
能值可持续指标（ESI）	ESI=EYR/ELR	净能值产出率/环境负载率

类别	项目	计算公式
可更新资源	太阳能、风能、雨水势能、雨水化学能、地球循环能	能量×能量折算系数×能值转换率
不可更新资源	土壤损耗能	耕地面积×侵蚀率×有机质含量×能量折算系数×能值转换率
可更新资源产品	谷物、植物油、羊毛、水果、蔬菜、牛羊肉、乳制品、农药等	产量（电量）×能量折算系数×能值转换率
不可更新资源产品	水泥、钢材、糖、火电、原煤、汽油、柴油、矿产资源等	产量（电量）×能量折算系数×能值转换率
输入资源	原煤、原油、天然气、氮肥、磷肥、化学农药原药	产量×能量折算系数×能值转换率
货币流	商品进口、实际利用外资、旅游外汇收入、劳务输入、商品出口	货币数额×能值/货币比率
废弃物流	废气、废水、固体废弃物	排放量×能量折算系数×能值转换率

	2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年	2017年	2018年	2019年	2020年
可更新资源
太阳能	3.19×10²⁰	3.19×10²⁰	3.19×10²⁰	3.19×10²⁰	3.19×10²⁰	3.19×10²⁰	3.19×10²⁰	3.19×10²⁰	3.19×10²⁰	3.19×10²⁰
雨水化学能	1.45×10²¹	1.45×10²¹	1.45×10²¹	1.45×10²¹	1.45×10²¹	1.45×10²¹	1.45×10²¹	1.45×10²¹	1.45×10²¹	1.45×10²¹
雨水势能	2.49×10²¹	2.49×10²¹	2.49×10²¹	2.49×10²¹	2.49×10²¹	2.49×10²¹	2.49×10²¹	2.49×10²¹	2.49×10²¹	2.49×10²¹
地球循环能	1.85×10²¹	1.85×10²¹	1.85×10²¹	1.85×10²¹	1.85×10²¹	1.85×10²¹	1.85×10²¹	1.85×10²¹	1.85×10²¹	1.85×10²¹
可更新资源总能值	6.11×10²¹	6.11×10²¹	6.11×10²¹	6.11×10²¹	6.11×10²¹	6.11×10²¹	6.11×10²¹	6.11×10²¹	6.11×10²¹	6.11×10²¹
不可更新资源
一产	1.58×10²²	1.58×10²²	1.58×10²²	1.58×10²²	1.58×10²²	1.58×10²²	1.58×10²²	1.58×10²²	1.58×10²²	1.58×10²²
二产	8.68×10²¹	9.24×10²¹	1.21×10²²	1.37×10²²	1.46×10²²	1.57×10²²	1.61×10²²	1.97×10²²	2.47×10²²	2.98×10²²
进口	7.24×10¹⁹	1.81×10¹⁹	2.98×10¹⁹	2.90×10¹⁹	7.87×10¹⁹	9.32×10¹⁹	2.90×10¹⁹	4.49×10¹⁹	2.38×10²⁰	1.56×10²⁰
不可更新资源总能值	2.46×10²²	2.51×10²²	2.79×10²²	2.95×10²²	3.05×10²²	3.16×10²²	3.20×10²²	3.55×10²²	4.07×10²²	4.57×10²²
总能值	3.07×10²²	3.12×10²²	3.40×10²²	3.56×10²²	3.66×10²²	3.77×10²²	3.81×10²²	4.17×10²²	4.68×10²²	5.18×10²²

	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020
一产（P）	6.90×10¹⁷	6.52×10¹⁷	6.60×10¹⁷	6.95×10¹⁷	7.58×10¹⁷	9.45×10¹⁷	9.76×10¹⁷	9.07×10¹⁷	9.64×10¹⁷	9.03×10¹⁷
二产（S）	2.16×10²³	2.31×10²³	2.73×10²³	3.26×10²³	3.29×10²³	3.60×10²³	6.68×10²²	6.45×10²²	9.12×10²²	1.19×10²³
三产（T）	5.11×10²¹	6.49×10²¹	8.20×10²¹	9.32×10²¹	9.49×10²¹	9.79×10²¹	1.16×10²²	1.21×10²²	1.31×10²²	1.32×10²²
总能值（T_E）	2.21×10²³	2.37×10²³	2.81×10²³	3.35×10²³	3.38×10²³	3.70×10²³	7.84×10²²	7.66×10²²	1.04×10²³	1.32×10²³

Sustainable development scale of a typical agro-pastoral ecotone based on emergy analysis: A case study of Ulanqab City, Inner Mongolia

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 31

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

年份	投入能值（F）/sej			产出能值（Y）/sej	净能值产出率（EYR）	环境负载率（ELR）	能值可持续指标（ESI）
年份	可更新能值	不可更新能值	总计	产出能值（Y）/sej	净能值产出率（EYR）	环境负载率（ELR）	能值可持续指标（ESI）
2011年	6.11×10²¹	2.46×10²²	3.07×10²²	2.21×10²³	7.20	4.03	1.79
2012年	6.11×10²¹	2.51×10²²	3.12×10²²	2.37×10²³	7.60	4.11	1.85
2013年	6.11×10²¹	2.79×10²²	3.40×10²²	2.81×10²³	8.26	4.57	1.81
2014年	6.11×10²¹	2.95×10²²	3.56×10²²	3.35×10²³	9.41	4.83	1.95
2015年	6.11×10²¹	3.05×10²²	3.66×10²²	3.38×10²³	9.23	4.99	1.85
2016年	6.11×10²¹	3.16×10²²	3.77×10²²	3.70×10²³	9.81	5.17	1.90
2017年	6.11×10²¹	3.20×10²²	3.81×10²²	7.84×10²²	2.06	5.24	0.39
2018年	6.11×10²¹	3.55×10²²	4.16×10²²	7.66×10²²	1.84	5.81	0.32
2019年	6.11×10²¹	4.07×10²²	4.68×10²²	1.04×10²³	2.22	6.66	0.33
2020年	6.11×10²¹	4.57×10²²	5.18×10²²	1.32×10²³	2.55	7.48	0.34

[1]	PEI Zhilin, CAO Xiaojuan, WANG Dong, LI Di, WANG Xin, BAI Aiyuan. Spatiotemporal variation in vegetation coverage in Inner Mongolia and its response to human activities [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(4): 629-638.
[2]	LIU Rulong, ZHAO Yuanyuan, CHEN Guoqing, CHI Wenfeng, LIU Zhengjia. Assessment of habitat quality in the Yellow River Basin in Inner Mongolia from 1990 to 2020 [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(4): 674-683.
[3]	TAO Jifeng, BAO Yulong, GUO Enliang, Jin Eerdemutu, Husile , BAO Yuhai. Characteristics of the spatial and temporal evolution of winter drought in Inner Mongolia over the past 40 years [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(3): 387-398.
[4]	YI Nana, SU Lijuan, ZHENG Xucheng, XIN Yue, CAI Min, LI Hui, JIN Yuchen. Environmental parameters and forecast models of hail events [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 13-23.
[5]	HU Yanan, PEI Hao, JIANG Yanfeng, MIAO Bailing, JIA Chengzhen. Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of precipitation pH in Inner Mongolia from 1991 to 2021 [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(4): 552-562.
[6]	DANG Hui, RONG Lihua, LI Yitong, ZHAO Mingjun. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of production-living-ecological spaces in the farming-pastoral ecotone: Taking Hohhot of Inner Mongolia as an example [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(10): 1698-1706.
[7]	HUANG Xiaolu,LI Ruiqing,LI Linhui,LIN Hongjie,YAO Lebao. Various characteristics of the mesoscale convection system of a convective rainstorm in the Hetao area of Inner Mongolia [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(6): 1728-1738.
[8]	ZHANG Haochen,SA Chula,MENG Fanhao,LUO Min,WANG Mulan,GAO Hongdou,ADIYA Saruulzaya. Dynamic changes and driving factors of the surface freeze-thaw index in Inner Mongolia [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(6): 1996-2008.
[9]	GAO Xiaoyu,TANG Pengcheng,ZHANG Sha,QU Zhongyi,YANG Wei. Drought characteristics and regression models of drought characteristics and response factors of various climatic areas in Inner Mongolia during main crop growing season [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(5): 1410-1427.
[10]	YU Shuiyan,BI Lige,SU Lijuan,LIU Jidong,SHI Jinli,YI Na’na,FAN Ruxia,XU Zhili. Movement paths and characteristics of hail clouds in Bayannur, Inner Mongolia [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1047-1055.
[11]	LI Xiaoge,ZHANG Ying,SHAN Yongjuan. Sustainable utilization of water resources in Yulin City based on an emergy ecological footprint model [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1066-1075.
[12]	LI Ruiqing,SONG Guiying,YIN Chun. Characteristics of summer climate change and its response to El Niño in Inner Mongolia during the past 60 years [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(6): 1601-1613.
[13]	ZHOU Liying,LI Ruiping,MIAO Qingfeng,DOU Xu,TIAN Feng,YU Dandan,SUN Chenyun. Characteristics of salinization and fertility of saline-alkali soil adjacent to drainage ditch in Hetao irrigation area of Inner Mongolia [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(1): 114-122.
[14]	CHEN Zhi-qing, SHAO Tian-jie, ZHAO Jing-bo, CAO Jun-ji, YUE Da-peng. Spatial-temporal differentiation of near-surface ozone concentration and dominant meteorological factors in Inner Mongolia [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(6): 1504-1512.
[15]	SHEN Lu-ting, ZHANG Fang-min, HUANG Jin, LI Yun-peng. Climate characteristics of day and night precipitation during the growing season in Inner Mongolia from 1961 to 2018 [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(6): 1519-1527.