基于活力-组织力-恢复力的黑河源区高寒湿地景观生态健康评估

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2024.02.13

Abstract

Abstract:

The Heihe River source area National Wetland Park, representing a typical alpine wetland, is key for measuring the current and future development of such ecosystems. This study uses land use data to introduce the landscape ecology vulnerability index and establish a comprehensive assessment system of the alpine wetland ecological health based on four aspects: ecosystem vitality, organization, resilience, and ecosystem service value. It quantitatively assesses the spatiotemporal change characteristics of ecological health in the Heihe River source area from 2014 to 2021. The findings reveal that (1) grassland in the Heihe River source area is the main land use type, with high, medium, and low coverage grasslands distributed in a mosaic pattern. The second type is unused land, mainly distributed on both banks of the river and in the northwest; (2) the Heihe River source area consists of both low- and low-vulnerability areas, resulting in an overall low landscape ecology vulnerability; and (3) the Heihe River source area is predominantly rated as healthy and moderately healthy, indicating a relatively high overall ecological environment health level. Throughout 2014 to 2021, the ecosystem of the Heihe River source area was relatively healthy. In the future, the Heihe River source area should prioritize ecological functions, balancing animal husbandry production and ensure the ecosystem’s healthy progression toward achieving “ecological harmony.”

Key words: alpine wetland, landscape index, ecological health, land use, VOR model, the Heihe River source area

SUN Weijie, QIAO Bin, YU Hongyan, ZHAO Tong, CHEN Qi. Ecological health assessment of the alpine wetland landscape in the Heihe River source area based on vigor, organization, and resilience[J].Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(2): 301-313.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

The formula and significance of landscape ecological index"

景观格局指数	公式	参数意义
景观适应度( $L A I$ )	$L A I = P R D × S H E I × S H D I$ $P R D = 106 × m A$ $S H D I = - ∑ i = 1 k P i × l n (P i)$ $S H E I = - 1 l n m × ∑ i = 1 m (P i × l n P i)$	$P R D$ 表示斑块丰富度指数； $S H D I$ 表示香农多样性指数； $S H E I$ 表示香农均匀度指数。 $P i$ 表示斑块类型 $i$ 占面积比； $m$ 表示景观中斑块类型的总数；k表示景观斑块的个数
景观干扰度( $U i$ )	$U i = a C i + b F i + c D$ $C i = N i A i$ $F i = A 2 A i N i A i$ $D = 2 l n (P / 4) l n (A)$	$C i$ 表示景观破碎度指数； $F i$ 表示景观分维度指数； $D$ 表示景观分离度指数。 $A i$ 表示土地利用类型 $i$ 的面积； $N i$ 表示土地利用类型 $i$ 的斑块个数； $P$ 表示斑块周长； $A$ 表示斑块面积。a、b、c表示相应景观指数的权重，a+b+c=1
景观易损度( $V i$ )	专家咨询法并归一化获得	表示不同生态系统的易损性，生态系统的脆弱性与其在景观自然演替过程中所处的阶段有关。通常，未利用地取值为7，林地、草地取值为5，建设用地、水域取值为1
景观敏感度( $L S I$ )	$L S I = ∑ i = 1 n A k i A k U i × V i$	$n$ 为景观类型数量； $i$ 为某一景观类型； $A k i$ 表示第 $k$ 个小区域内第 $i$ 类景观类型在网格内所占面积； $A k$ 为第 $k$ 个小区域的面积
景观格局脆弱性( $L S V$ )	$L S V = L S I × (1 - L A I)$	$L S I$ 表示景观敏感度指数； $L A I$ 表示景观适应度指数
景观功能脆弱性( $L F V$ )	$L F V = ∑ i m A i A × E S V i$	$A i$ 表示第 $i$ 类景观类型在网格内所占面积； $m$ 表示景观类型数量； $A$ 表示网格面积； $E S V i$ 表示第 $i$ 类景观类型生态系统服务
景观生态脆弱性( $L E V$ )	$L E V = L S V × L F V$	$L S V$ 表示景观格局脆弱性； $L F V$ 表示景观功能脆弱性

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Evaluation index system of ecosystem health in the Heihe River source area"

目标层	准则层	指标层	指标计算方法	参数意义	指标类型
黑河源区生态系统健康评价	活力	归一化植被指数（NDVI）	$N D V I = N I R - R E D N I R + R E D$	$N I R$ 为近红外波段； $R E D$ 为红外波段	积极
	组织力	植被覆盖度（FVC）	$F V C = N D V I - N D V I s o i l N D V I v e g - N D V I s o i l$	$N D V I s o i l$ 为完全裸土或无植被覆盖像元的 $N D V I$ 值； $N D V I v e g$ 为完全被植被覆盖像元的 $N D V I$ 值	积极
		景观生态脆弱性（LEV）	根据表1进行计算	-	消极
		平均斑块面积（MPS）	$M P S = A N × 106$	$A$ 为斑块总面积； $N$ 为斑块总数	积极
	恢复力	海拔（DEM）	-	-	消极
	恢复力	生态系统弹性度（E）	$E = ∑ i = 1 n (P i R i)$	$P i$ 为景观类型 $i$ 所占面积比； $R i$ 为景观 $i$ 的生态弹性度分值；n为景观类型数量	积极
	生态系统服务价值	生态系统服务价值（EVS）	利用价值当量法计算不同土地类型单位面积的生态系统服务价值	-	积极

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Tab. 4

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

References 35

[1]	乔斌, 王乃昂, 王义鹏, 等. 山地-绿洲“共轭型”生态牧场理念源起、概念框架与发展模式——以祁连山牧区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(21): 1-16.
	[Qiao Bin, Wang Nai’ang, Wang Yipeng, et al. Concept origin conceptual framework and development mode of Mountain-Oasis “Conjugate” Ecological Pasture: Empirical demonstration in Qilian Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(21): 1-16.] doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.07.007
[2]	邢宇. 青藏高原32年湿地对气候变化的空间响应[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2015, 27(3): 99-107.
	[Xing Yu. Spatial responses of wetland change to climate in 32 years in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 2015, 27(3): 99-107.]
[3]	Gina Holguin, Patricia Gonzalez-Zamorano, Luz E De-Bashan, et al. Mangrove health in an arid environment encroached by urban development: A case study[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 363(1-3): 260-274. pmid: 16112715
[4]	燕守广, 李辉, 李海东, 等. 基于土地利用与景观格局的生态保护红线生态系统健康评价方法——以南京市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1109-1118. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200508
	[Yan Shouguang, Li Hui, Li Haidong, et al. Ecosystem health assessment method of eco-redline based on land use and landscape pattern in Nanjing[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(5): 1109-1118.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200508
[5]	张月琪, 张志, 江鎞倩, 等. 城市红树林生态系统健康评价与管理对策——以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(5): 2352-2369.
	[Zhang Yueqi, Zhang Zhi, Jiang Biqian, et al. Ecosystem health assessment and management strategies of urban mangrove: A case study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022, 42(5): 2352-2369.]
[6]	Rapport David J. What constitutes ecosystem health[J]. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1989, 33: 120-132. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1990.0004
[7]	刘焱序, 彭建, 汪安, 等. 生态系统健康研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(18): 5920-5930.
	[Liu Yanxu, Peng Jian, Wang An, et al. New research progress and trends in ecosystem health[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(18): 5920-5930.]
[8]	周静, 万荣荣. 湿地生态系统健康评价方法研究进展[J]. 生态科学, 2018, 37(6): 209-216.
	[Zhou Jing, Wan Rongrong. Advances in methods of wetland ecosystem health evaluation[J]. Ecological Science, 2018, 37(6): 209-216.]
[9]	Whitall David, Bricker Suzanne, Ferreira Joao. Assessment of eutrophication in estuaries: Pressure-state-response and nitrogen source apportionment[J]. Environ Manage, 2007, 40(4): 678-690. pmid: 17661131
[10]	李雪宁, 徐先英, 郑桂恒, 等. 石羊河下游人工梭梭林健康评价体系构建及应用研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 872-882.
	[Li Xuening, Xu Xianying, Zheng Guiheng, et al. A health evaluation of a Haloxylon ammodendron plantation in the Shiyang river lower reaches[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(3): 872-882.]
[11]	Robert Costanza, Ralph d’Arge, Rudolf de Groot, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(15): 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[12]	Datzberger Simone. Why education is not helping the poor. Findings from Uganda[J]. World Development, 2018, 110: 124-139. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.022
[13]	Rapport David J, Singh Ashbindu. An eco-health based framework for status of environment reporting[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2006, 6(2): 409-428. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.05.003
[14]	张藜. 基于景观生态理论的三江源湿地生态健康评价[D]. 西安: 陕西科技大学, 2016.
	[Zhang Li. The Ecological Health Based on the Theory of Landscape Ecology of the Three Rivers Wetlands[D]. Xi’an: Shanxi University of Science and Technology, 2016.]
[15]	朱捷缘, 卢慧婷, 王慧芳, 等. 汶川地震重灾区恢复期生态系统健康评价[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(24): 9001-9011.
	[Zhu Jieyuan, Lu Huiting, Wang Huifang, et al. Ecosystem health assessment of the Wenchuan earthquake hard-hit disaster areas during the recovery period[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(24): 9001-9011.]
[16]	Yan Yan, Zhao Chunli, Wang Chenxing, et al. Ecosystem health assessment of the Liao River Basin upstream region based on ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(4): 294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2016.06.005
[17]	周启刚, 彭春花, 刘栩位, 等. 基于VOR模型的三峡库区消落带2010—2020年生态系统健康评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(5): 310-318.
	[Zhou Qigang, Peng Chunhua, Liu Xuwei, et al. Ecosystem health assessment of water level fluctuating zone in Three Gorges Reservoir Area based on VOR model[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(5): 310-318.]
[18]	Bao Zhongcong, Eshetu Shifaw, Deng Chengbo, et al. Remote sensing-based assessment of ecosystem health by optimizing vigor-organization-resilience model: A case study in Fuzhou City, China[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2022, 72: 101889. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101889
[19]	乔斌, 曹晓云, 孙玮婕, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值和景观生态风险的生态分区识别与优化策略——以祁连山国家公园青海片区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(3): 986-1004.
	[Qiao Bin, Cao Xiaoyun, Sun Weijie, et al. Ecological identification and optimization strategies based on ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk: Taking Qinghai area of Qilian Mountain National Park as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(3): 986-1004.]
[20]	刘梦, 周爱国, 补建伟, 等. 黑河源多金属矿区地质环境承载力评价[J]. 中国矿业, 2018, 27(9): 114-120.
	[Liu Meng, Zhou Aiguo, Bu Jianwei, et al. Geo-environmental carrying capacity assessment of polymetallic mining area in the headwater regions of Heihe river[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2018, 27(9): 114-120.]
[21]	Breiman Leo. Random forest[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
[22]	杨露. 祁连山地区生态环境质量时空变化及其驱动机制分析[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
	[Yang Lu. Study on the Spatio-Temporal Change of Eco-Environmental Quality and Its Driving Mechanism in Qilian Mountains[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2021.]
[23]	张行, 陈海, 史琴琴, 等. 陕西省景观生态脆弱性时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(2): 496-505.
	[Zhang Hang, Chen Hai, Shi Qinqin, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of landscape ecological vulnerability in Shaanxi Province[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(2): 496-505.]
[24]	张晓瑶, 虞虎, 张潇, 等. 基于多源数据的三江源国家公园土地生态安全综合评价[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(14): 5665-5676.
	[Zhang Xiaoyao, Yu Hu, Zhang Xiao, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of land ecological security in the Sanjiangyuan National Park based on multi-source data[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(14): 5665-5676.]
[25]	李鹏, 俞国燕. 多指标综合评价方法研究综述[J]. 机电产品开发与创新, 2009, 22(4): 24-28.
	[Li Peng, Yu Guoyan. Survey on the multi-index comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Development & Innovation of Machinery & Electrical Products, 2009, 22(4): 24-28.]
[26]	付建新, 曹广超, 郭文炯. 1980—2018年祁连山南坡土地利用变化及其驱动力[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2699-2709. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.017
	[Fu Jianxin, Cao Guangchao, Guo Wenjiong. Land use change and its driving force on the southern slope of Qilian Mountains from 1980 to 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(8): 2699-2709.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.017
[27]	宋长春. 湿地生态系统对气候变化的响应[J]. 湿地科学, 2003, 1(2): 122-127.
	[Song Changchun. Influence of global climate change on wetlands[J]. Wetland Science, 2003, 1(2): 122-127.]
[28]	叶伟林, 黄钰涵, 周自强, 等. 祁连山地区近60年气温时空变化特征[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(4): 1344-1353.
	[Ye Weilin, Huang Yuhan, Zhou Ziqiang, et al. Temporaland spatial variations of air temperature in the Qilian Mountains during the past 60 years[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(4): 1344-1353.]
[29]	徐亚男, 刘学录, 李晓丹, 等. 祁连山东段生态敏感性对景观动态变化的响应[J]. 生态科学, 2019, 38(5): 160-167.
	[Xu Yanan, Liu Xuelu, Li Xiaodan, et al. Response of ecological sensitivity to landscape dynamic change in the eastern section of Qilian Mountain[J]. Ecological Science, 2019, 38(5): 160-167.]
[30]	刘宽梅. 祁连山自然保护区景观格局变化及其稳定性研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
	[Liu Kuanmei. Study on the Change and Stability of Landscape Pattern in Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2021.]
[31]	刘佳茹. 2005—2018年祁连山生态脆弱性遥感评价研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2021.
	[Liu Jiaru. Remote Sensing Evaluation of Ecological Vulnerability in Qilian Mountains from 2005 to 2018[D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2021.]
[32]	张应丰. 祁连山地湿地生态质量评价[J]. 林业调查规划, 2015, 40(4): 69-72.
	[Zhang Yingfeng. Evaluation on wetland eco-environmental quality of Qilian Mountains in Qinghai Province[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2015, 40(4): 69-72.]
[33]	卢成保, 侯留飞. 青海省祁连县草地退化原因分析及治理对策[J]. 今日畜牧兽医, 2018, 34(2): 62.
	[Lu Chengbao, Hou Liufei. Causes of grassland degradation and countermeasures in Qilian County, Qinghai Province[J]. Today Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2018, 34(2): 62.]
[34]	杨荣荣, 曹广超, 曹生奎, 等. 2000—2018年黑河源区草地NPP时空变化及影响因素分析[J]. 草原与草坪, 2020, 40(2): 79-86.
	[Yang Rongrong, Cao Guangchao, Cao Shengkui, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of grassland NPP and its influencing factors in Heihe source area from 2000 to 2018[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2020, 40(2): 79-86.]
[35]	马恒利. 近40年黑河流域景观生态风险演变及其与地形梯度的关系[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2021.
	[Ma Hengli. Evolution of Landscape Ecological Risk and Its Relationship with Terrain Gradient in Heihe River Basin in Recent 40 Years[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2021.]

健康等级	健康水平	生态功能
一级（≥0.13）	很健康	完好
二级[0.10~0.13）	健康	健康
三级[0.07~0.10）	中等健康	亚健康
四级[0.04~0.07）	不健康	轻度病态
五级（<0.04）	恶化	病态

	黑河源区	恢复重建区	生态保育区	合理利用区	管理服务区
2014年	0.16	0.17	0.15	0.19	0.20
2021年	0.19	0.24	0.18	0.25	0.29

Ecological health assessment of the alpine wetland landscape in the Heihe River source area based on vigor, organization, and resilience

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 35

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LIU Yidan, YAO Xiaojun, LI Zongxing, HU Jiayu. Impacts of climate change and land use/cover change on the net primary productivity of vegetation in Hexi Region, Northwest China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 169-180.
[2]	LI Yongguang, YUAN Guanghui. Biophysical effects of the different underlying factors on land the surface temperature in the Qinghai Lake Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 24-35.
[3]	MA Yaoyao, SHI Peijun, XU Wei, ZHANG Gangfeng. Remote sensing monitoring of the ecological environment of hydropower station construction and operation in arid areas： A case study of Longyangxia Hydropower Station [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(9): 1498-1508.
[4]	WANG Peng, QIN Sitong, HU Huirong. Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of land use change and habitat quality in the Lhasa River Basin over the past three decades [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(3): 492-503.
[5]	ZHANG Enyue,ZHENG Junyan,SU Yingqing,ZHANG Lei,ZHANG Pengfei,LIU Geng. Optimization of low-carbon land use pattern based on scenario simulation: A case study of Fenhe River Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(2): 203-212.
[6]	WANG Jiaojiao, YIN Xiaojun, LIU Shannan, WANG Dimeng. Study on the change and prediction of spatiotemporal pattern of land use in Manasi region based on deep learning [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(1): 69-77.
[7]	SHEN Zhibo,HAN Yaoguang,WANG Jiali,CHEN Kangyi,HU Yang,ZHU Xinping,JIA Hongtao. Nitrogen deposition increases N₂O emission in an alpine wetland in the arid region of Northwest China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(5): 1655-1662.
[8]	JIANG Xiaofang,DUAN Hanchen,LIAO Jie,SONG Xiang,XUE Xian. Land use in the Gan-Lin-Gao region of middle reaches of Heihe River Basin based on a PLUS-SD coupling model [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1246-1258.
[9]	HU Changtong,YANG Tao,WAN Xuhao,SUN Laikang,ZHENG Yiwen,YAN Xuerong. Distribution characteristics of heavy metals in river sediments and their relationship with land use types in Xi’an City [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1270-1281.
[10]	HOU Qingqing,CHEN Ying,PEI Tingting,JI Zhenxia,XIE Baopeng. Analysis of cultivated land’s spatio-temporal changes and influencing factors in Gansu Province in recent 25 years [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(3): 955-967.
[11]	SU Yingqing,ZHANG Enyue,LIU Yuan,LIU Geng,LIN Fei. Land-use change and ecological environment effects on Fenhe River Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(3): 968-977.
[12]	LIU Chang,ZHANG Hong,ZHANG Xiaoyu,YANG Guoting,LIU Yong. Spatio-temporal evolution and prediction of land use in semi-arid mining areas [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(1): 292-300.
[13]	WANG Ziwei,HUANG Laiming,SHAO Ming’an,PEI Yanwu. Soil water holding capacity under different land use patterns in the Qinghai alpine region [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(6): 1722-1730.
[14]	ZENG Hongxia,ZHAO Chengzhang,WANG Yufang,LI Xiaoya,ZHAO Tingting,TANG Yurui. Landscape pattern evolution and its influencing factors of alpine wetland in Yanchi Bay [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(6): 1771-1781.
[15]	JIN Mengting,XU Liping,XU Quan. FLUS-Markov model-based multiscenario evaluation and prediction of the landscape ecological risk in Kezhou, South Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(6): 1793-1804.