基于DEA-Malmquist指数的河北省耕地利用效率及其影响因素研究

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2021.04.28

干旱区研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 1162-1171.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2021.04.28

基于DEA-Malmquist指数的河北省耕地利用效率及其影响因素研究

赵倩石^1,²(),潘佩佩^1,²(),王晓旭³,王雪然^1,²,王晓萌^1,²,李宁⁴,王新云⁵

1.河北师范大学资源与环境科学学院,河北石家庄 050024
2.河北省环境演变与生态建设实验室,河北石家庄 050024
3.河北雄安新区管理委员会规划建设局,河北保定 071799
4.黑龙江省农垦科学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150038
5.宁夏大学西北土地退化与生态恢复省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,宁夏银川 750021

收稿日期:2020-07-08 修回日期:2020-09-15 出版日期:2021-07-15 发布日期:2021-08-03
通讯作者: 潘佩佩
作者简介:赵倩石(1994-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土地利用变化研究. E-mail: 407674049@qq.com
基金资助:
河北省社会科学基金(HB20GL042)

A study of cultivated land utilization efficiency and its influencing factors in Hebei Province based on DEA-Malmquist index

ZHAO Qianshi^1,²(),PAN Peipei^1,²(),WANG Xiaoxu³,WANG Xueran^1,²,WANG Xiaomeng^1,²,LI Ning⁴,WANG Xinyun⁵

1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, Hebei, China
2. Hebei Laboratory of Environmental Evolution and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, Hebei, China
3. Planning and Construction Bureau of Hebei Xiong’an New Area Management Committee, Xiong’an 071799, Hebei, China
4. Heilongjiang Academy of Land Reclamation Science, Harbin 150038, Heilongjiang, China
5. Breeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China

Received:2020-07-08 Revised:2020-09-15 Online:2021-07-15 Published:2021-08-03
Contact: Peipei PAN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

城镇化带来的耕地快速非农化背景下耕地利用效率提高对确保粮食主产区粮食安全意义重大。运用Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)模型、Malmquist指数和Geographically Weighted Regression(GWR)模型,从县域尺度分析了2000—2015年河北省耕地利用效率的时空特征、动态规律及影响因素。结果表明:从时间上看,2000年以来河北省耕地利用综合效率、纯技术效率和规模效率均处于0.8~1,保持较高水平,其中耕地利用综合效率先由0.9减少到0.8,2003年后波动上升,在2015年其值达到1。从空间上看,区域间耕地利用综合效率空间变化明显,区域同质性增强。从动态变化看,河北省耕地利用全要素生产率指数由1.03波动上升到1.18,其中耕地利用综合提高型主要分布在省域北部,技术进步提高型分布于冀中南部地区,技术变化提高型仅存在于衡水市辖区,综合下降型零散分布在中南部区域。从影响因素看,在一定概率水平下,河北省耕地利用综合效率与农业产值占比和复种指数呈正相关,与高程、坡度、农业人口占比以及非粮占比呈负相关。其中高程、坡度、复种指数和农业人口占比影响较小,农业产值占比和非粮占比影响较为明显,非粮占比影响最为显著,其相关系数为-0.520249。最后从耕地利用影响因素出发依据不同区域情况对如何提高耕地利用效率提出优化建议。

关键词: 耕地利用效率, DEA-Malmquist, 时空格局, 影响因素, 河北省

Abstract:

The improvement of arable land use efficiency is of great significance to ensure food security in the main grain production areas, given the rapid non-agriculturalization of arable land brought on by urbanization. This study used the DEA model, the Malmquist index, and the GWR model to analyze the temporal and spatial characteristics, dynamics, and influencing factors of the cultivated land use efficiency in Hebei Province, China from 2000 to 2015 at the county scale. The results showed the comprehensive efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency of arable land use was maintained at a relatively high level of 0.8-1. The comprehensive efficiency of arable land use first decreased from 0.9 to 0.8 by 2003, then had a volatility increase to reach 1 in 2015. From a spatial point of view, the overall efficiency of cultivated land utilization between regions changed significantly, and the regional homogeneity increased. In regards to dynamic changes, the total factor productivity index of arable land use fluctuated from 1.03 to 1.18. The comprehensive improvement of arable land use was mainly distributed in the northern part of the province, whereas the improvement of technological progress was distributed in central and southern Hebei, and the improvement of technological change only existed in the Hengshui City district, and the comprehensive descending type was scattered in the central and southern regions. From the perspective of influencing factors, the comprehensive efficiency of arable land under a certain probability level was positively correlated with the proportion of agricultural output value and the multiple crop index, and was negatively correlated with the elevation, slope, proportion of agricultural population, and proportion of non-grain crops. Among them, elevation, slope, the multiple cropping index, and the proportion of agricultural population had little influence. The proportion of agricultural output value and the proportion of non-grain were more obvious, with the proportion of non-grain having the most significant influence with a correlation coefficient of -0.520249. Based on these results, suggestions are given to improve the arable land use efficiency.

Key words: cultivated land use efficiency, DEA-Malmquist, spatiotemporal pattern, influencing factors, Hebei Province

赵倩石,潘佩佩,王晓旭,王雪然,王晓萌,李宁,王新云. 基于DEA-Malmquist指数的河北省耕地利用效率及其影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1162-1171.

ZHAO Qianshi,PAN Peipei,WANG Xiaoxu,WANG Xueran,WANG Xiaomeng,LI Ning,WANG Xinyun. A study of cultivated land utilization efficiency and its influencing factors in Hebei Province based on DEA-Malmquist index[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 1162-1171.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

表2

参考文献 27

[1]	胡琼, 吴文斌, 项铭涛, 等. 全球耕地利用格局时空变化分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(6):1091-1105.
	[ Hu Qiong, Wu Wenbin, Xiang Mingtao, et al. Spatio-temporal changes in global cultivated land over 2000-2010[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(6):1091-1105. ]
[2]	赵晓丽, 张增祥, 汪潇, 等. 中国近30 a耕地变化时空特征及其主要原因分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(3):1-11.
	[ Zhao Xiaoli, Zhang Zengxiang, Wang Xiao, et al. Analysis of Chinese cultivated land’s spatial-temporal changes and causes in recent 30 years[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(3):1-11. ]
[3]	何洪盛, 田青, 王理德, 等. 青土湖退耕地植被群落特征与土壤理化性质分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(1):223-232.
	[ He Hongsheng, Tian Qing, Wang Lide, et al. Study on vegetation community characteristics and soil physical and chemical properties of abandoned land in Qingtu Lake[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(1):223-232. ]
[4]	尚二萍, 许尔琪, 张红旗, 等. 中国粮食主产区耕地土壤重金属时空变化与污染源分析[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(10):280-293.
	[ Shang Erping, Xu Erqi, Zhang Hongqi, et al. Spatial-temporal trends and pollution source analysis for heavy metal contamination of cultivated soils in five major grain producing regions of China[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(10):280-293. ]
[5]	欧阳玲, 王宗明, 贾明明, 等. 基于遥感的吉林省中西部耕地数量和质量空间格局变化分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(13):234-242.
	[ Ouyang Ling, Wang Zongming, Jia Mingming, et al. Spatial pattern analysis on quantity and quality of cultivated land in mid-west Jilin Province based on remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(13):234-242. ]
[6]	周利颖, 李瑞平, 苗庆丰, 等. 内蒙古河套灌区紧邻排干沟土壤盐渍化与肥力特征分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(1):114-122.
	[ Zhou Liying, Li Ruiping, Miao Qingfeng, et al. Characteristics of salinization and fertility of saline-alkali soil adjacent to drainage ditch in Hetao irrigation area of Inner Mongolia[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(1):114-122. ]
[7]	柯映明, 沈占锋, 白洁, 等. 水资源约束下的渭干河流域耕地适宜规模[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(3):551-561.
	[ Ke Yingming, Shen Zhanfeng, Bai Jie, et al. Suitable scale of arable land in the Weigan River Basin under the constraints of water resources[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(3):551-561. ]
[8]	陈晨, 伍国勇. 基于四阶段DEA的安徽省耕地利用效率分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(4):294-300.
	[ Chen Chen, Wu Guoyong. An analysis on efficiency of arable land utilization in Anhui Province based on four-stage DEA model[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4):294-300. ]
[9]	黄晶, 马蓓蓓, 薛东前. 基于SE-DEA模型的西安市土地利用效率及优化对策[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(3):630-636.
	[ Huang Jing, Ma Beibei, Xue Dongqian. Research on land use efficiency and optimal strategies in Xi’an based on SE-DEA model[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2015, 32(3):630-636. ]
[10]	黄祥芳. 面源污染视角下江西省耕地利用效率研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(12):177-183.
	[ Huang Xiangfang. A study on efficiency of cultivated land use of Jiangxi Province from the perspective of non-point source pollution[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(12):177-183. ]
[11]	陈丹玲, 卢新海, 匡兵. 基于随机森林的耕地利用效率测度模型构建及其应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(6):1331-1344.
	[ Chen Danling, Lu Xinhai, Kuang Bing. Measurement of cultivated land utilization efficiency: Construction and application of random forest[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(6):1331-1344. ]
[12]	徐秋, 雷国平, 杨厚翔. 黑龙江省耕地利用效率时空差异及影响因素研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(12):33-40.
	[ Xu Qiu, Lei Guoping, Yang Houxiang. Spatial-temporal difference and influencing factors of cultivated land use efficiency in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2017, 38(12):33-40. ]
[13]	谢花林, 张道贝, 王伟, 等. 鄱阳湖生态经济区耕地利用效率时空差异及其影响因素分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(5):214-221.
	[ Xie Hualin, Zhang Daobei, Wang Wei, et al. Analysis of cultivated land use efficiency and its influencing factors for Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(5):214-221. ]
[14]	吴冬林, 何伟, 李政, 等. 基于DEA-ESDA的四川省耕地利用效率时空分异及影响因素研究[J]. 四川师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 43(2):270-276.
	[ Wu Donglin, He Wei, Li Zheng, et al. Research on the spatial-temporal differentiation and influencing factors of cultivated land use efficiency in Sichuan Province based on DEA-ESDA[J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Natural Science), 2020, 43(2):270-276. ]
[15]	王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12):2784-2795.
	[ Wang Haili, Han Guangzhong, Xie Xianjian. Spatiotemporal pattern evolvement based on the DEA model and its driving factors of arable land utilization efficiency of the Southwest Region in China[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(12):2784-2795. ]
[16]	盖兆雪, 孙萍, 张景奇. 环境约束下的粮食主产区耕地利用效率时空演变特征[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(12):163-171.
	[ Gai Zhaoxue, Sun Ping, Zhang Jingqi. Cultivated land utilization efficiency and its difference with consideration of environmental constraints in major grain producing area[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(12):163-171. ]
[17]	张荣天, 焦华富. 中国省际耕地利用效率时空格局分异与机制分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(2):277-287.
	[ Zhang Rongtian, Jiao Huafu. Spatial-temporal pattern differentiation and its mechanism analysis of using efficiency for provincial cultivated land in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(2):277-287. ]
[18]	张立新, 朱道林, 谢保鹏, 等. 中国粮食主产区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素——基于180个地级市的实证研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(4):608-619.
	[ Zhang Lixin, Zhu Daolin, Xie Baopeng, et al. Spatiotemporal pattern evolvement and driving factors of cultivated land utilization efficiency of the major grain producing area in China[J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(4):608-619. ]
[19]	王刚, 廖和平, 李涛, 等. 精准扶贫背景下贫困农户识别对耕地利用效率的影响——以重庆市石柱土家族自治县为例[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(1):1-9.
	[ Wang Gang, Liao Heping, Li Tao, et al. The impact of poor farmer household identification on cultivated land use efficiency under the background of targeted poverty alleviation: A case study of Shizhu County of Chongqing[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 41(1):1-9. ]
[20]	Odeck J. Statistical precision of DEA and Malmquist indices: A bootstrap application to Norwegian grain producers[J]. Omega, 2009, 37(5):1007-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2008.11.003
[21]	盖兆雪, 孙萍, 张景奇. 环境约束下的粮食主产区耕地利用效率时空演变特征[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(12):163-171.
	[ Gai Zhaoxue, Sun Ping, Zhang Jingqi. A study on with the cultivated land utilization efficiency and its difference with consideration of environmental constraints in major grain producing area[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(12):163-171. ]
[22]	Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6):429-444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
[23]	彭建, 刘志聪, 刘焱序, 等. 京津冀地区县域耕地景观多功能性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(8):2274-2285.
	[ Peng Jian, Liu Zhicong, Liu Yanxu, et al. Assessment of farmland landscape multifunctionality at county level in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(8):2274-2285. ]
[24]	陈振, 李佩华. 基于灰色Malmquist-DEA的中国粮食生产效率分析[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2017, 47(15):155-162.
	[ Chen Zhen, Li Peihua. Analysis of grain production efficiency in Chinese based on grey Malmquist-DEA[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2017, 47(15):155-162. ]
[25]	王文刚, 李汝资, 宋玉祥, 等. 吉林省区域农地生产效率及其变动特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(2):225-231. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.02.225
	[ Wang Wengang, Li Ruzi, Song Yuxiang, et al. The various components of agricultural land production efficiency in Jilin Province, China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(2):225-231. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.02.225
[26]	马世五, 谢德体, 张孝成, 等. 三峡库区重庆段土地生态状况时空格局演变特征[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(23):8512-8525.
	[ Ma Shiwu, Xie Deti, Zhang Xiaocheng, et al. Spatiotemporal variation in the ecological status of the Three Gorges Reservoir area in Chongqing, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(23):8512-8525. ]
[27]	聂普璇, 方圣辉, 龚龑, 等. 基于GWR模型的河北省土壤水分空间分异研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(1):98-105.
	[ Nie Puxuan, Fang Shenghui, Gong Yan, et al. Research on spatial variation of soil moisture in Hebei Province based on GWR model[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(1):98-105. ]

名称	技术变化指数(Effch)	技术进步指数(Techch)	全要素生产率指数(Tfpech)
综合提高型	>1	>1	>1
技术进步提高型	≤1	>1	>1
技术变化提高型	>1	≤1	>1
综合下降型	-	-	≤1

影响因子	最小值	上四分位值	中位数	下四分位值	最大值	平均数	标准差
高程	-0.000078	-0.000038	-0.00001	0.000049	0.000117	0.000006	0.000053
坡度	-0.002776	-0.001159	-0.00329	0.000347	0.001079	-0.000508	0.001012
农业人口占比	-0.197040	-0.089225	-0.064907	-0.03058	0.034840	-0.059553	0.043180
农业产值占比	-0.128603	0.139115	0.193860	0.262672	0.429362	0.201939	0.091901
复种指数	0.001081	0.002264	0.002937	0.003626	0.003984	0.002714	0.000804
非粮占比	-0.571803	-0.487234	-0.520249	-0.547638	-0.345963	-0.508701	0.047439

基于DEA-Malmquist指数的河北省耕地利用效率及其影响因素研究

A study of cultivated land utilization efficiency and its influencing factors in Hebei Province based on DEA-Malmquist index

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘军彦,王世杰. 基于ICESat-2卫星测高数据的呼伦湖水位变化监测[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(9): 1438-1445.
[2]	海龙, 周梅, 张嘉開, 洪光宇, 李凤滋, 费菲. 毛乌素沙地不同林龄杨柴灌木林土壤呼吸及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1107-1116.
[3]	齐润泽, 潘竟虎. 河湟地区生态脆弱性时空演变及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 1002-1013.
[4]	马晓蕾,乔雅琦,王婕,焦士兴,张曼. 陕西省水生态足迹深度与广度时空格局及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 469-480.
[5]	孙贯芳,高照良,朱焱,杨金忠,屈忠义. 时空克里金评估河套灌区土壤盐分时空格局[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(2): 182-193.
[6]	董翰林, 王文婷, 谢云, 阿依达娜·叶斯那力, 江源天, 徐嘉淇. 新疆气候干湿变化特征及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(12): 1875-1884.
[7]	贺军奇,拜寒伟,徐轶玮,倪莉莉. 陕西黄土区农田土壤主要养分特征及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(12): 1907-1917.
[8]	吴万民, 刘涛, 陈鑫. 西北干旱半干旱区NDVI季节性变化及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(12): 1969-1981.
[9]	程红霞, 林粤江, 陈鹏, 梁凤超, 王勇. 塔里木盆地沙尘天气日数变化及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1707-1717.
[10]	裴宏泽, 赵亚超, 张廷龙. 2000—2020年黄土高原NEP时空格局与驱动力[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1833-1844.
[11]	党慧, 荣丽华, 李伊彤, 赵名君. 农牧交错区三生空间时空演变特征与影响因素——以内蒙古呼和浩特市为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1698-1706.
[12]	王娇娇, 尹小君, 刘陕南, 王帝盟. 基于深度学习的玛纳斯土地利用时空格局变化与预测[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(1): 69-77.
[13]	龙志,孙颖琦,郎丽霞,陈兴鹏,张子龙,庞家幸. 黄土高原典型县域碳排放特征与时空格局——以庆城县为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1631-1641.
[14]	郭茵,雷加强,范敬龙,王海峰,吕振涛. 近20 a蒙古国土壤风蚀变化特征及主要影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1200-1211.
[15]	张云霞,张金茜,巩杰. 半干旱区湖盆景观格局脆弱性及其影响因素——以凉城县为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1259-1269.