陕西黄土区农田土壤主要养分特征及影响因素

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2023.12.04

干旱区研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 1907-1917.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.12.04

陕西黄土区农田土壤主要养分特征及影响因素

贺军奇^1,^2,³(),拜寒伟^1,^2,³,徐轶玮⁴,倪莉莉⁵

1.长安大学水利与环境学院，陕西西安 710054
2.长安大学旱区地下水文与生态效应教育部重点实验室，陕西西安 710054
3.长安大学水利部旱区生态水文与水安全重点实验室，陕西西安 710054
4.陕西省科技交流中心，陕西西安 710054
5.陕西省耕地质量与环境保护工作站，陕西西安 710003

收稿日期:2023-06-06 修回日期:2023-09-11 出版日期:2023-12-15 发布日期:2023-12-18
作者简介:贺军奇（1978-)，男，副教授，主要从事干旱区农田水利研究. E-mail: hejunqi@chd.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41901034);国家自然科学基金项目(42001033);陕西省哲学社会科学研究专项(2022HZ1859)

Main nutrient characteristics and influencing factors of farmland soil in the Loess Plateau of the Shaanxi Province

HE Junqi^1,^2,³(),BAI Hanwei^1,^2,³,XU Yiwei⁴,NI Lili⁵

1. School of Water and Environmental, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China
2. Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecological Effects in Arid Region of Ministry of Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China
3. Key Laboratory of Ecological Hydrology and Water Security in Arid Areas, Ministry of Water Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China
4. Shaanxi Science and Technology Exchange Center, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China
5. Shaanxi Province Farmland Quality and Agricultural Environmental Protection Workstation, Xi’an 710003, Shaanxi, China

Received:2023-06-06 Revised:2023-09-11 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2023-12-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了探究陕西黄土区农田主要土壤养分特征及其影响因素，基于研究区5096个农田0~20 cm耕层采样点数据，利用GIS与地统计学方法对有机质（SOM）、全氮（TN）、有效磷（AP）和速效钾（AK）含量进行空间分析，并应用地理探测器模型探究18种影响因素对养分空间变异的解释程度。结果表明：SOM、TN、AP和AK含量均值分别为14.43 g·kg^-1、0.92 g·kg^-1、18.21 mg·kg^-1和190.28 mg·kg^-1，呈现中等程度变异；4种养分最佳拟合模型均为指数模型，各养分呈现中等程度空间相关性，结构性与随机性因素的共同作用导致了养分含量的空间差异；养分全局空间相关性大小表现为：TN>SOM>AK>AP；养分含量区域差异明显，呈现由北向南逐渐递增的趋势；年日照时长、年均气温、化肥用量和地貌类型等单因子作用对各养分含量空间变异具有更强的解释力，两因子交互作用对养分的解释力强于其单因子解释力。研究表明，陕北地区宜适当增加肥料投入，关中地区宜进行精耕细作，农田建设应考虑多方面因素。

关键词: 土壤主要养分, 空间变异, 影响因素, 地理探测器模型, 陕西黄土区

Abstract:

To explore the main soil nutrient characteristics and influencing factors of farmland in the Loess Plateau of Shaanxi, spatial analysis was conducted on the content of SOM, TN, AP, and AK using GIS and geostatistics methods based on the data from 5096 farmland sampling points with a depth of 0-20 cm in the study area. A geographic detector model was used to explore the degree to which 18 influencing factors explained the spatial variation of nutrients. The results showed that the average contents of SOM, TN, AP, and AK were 14.43 g·kg^?1, 0.92 g·kg^?1, 18.21 mg·kg^?1, and 190.28 mg·kg^?1, respectively, showing moderate variation. The four best-fit models for nutrients were all exponential models, with moderate spatial correlation among each nutrient. The combined effect of structural and random factors causes spatial differences in the nutrient content. The global spatial correlation of nutrients is TN > SOM > AK > AP. The regional differences in nutrient content are significant, indicating a gradually increasing trend from north to south. The single-factor effects of annual sunshine duration, annual average temperature, fertilizer use, and geomorphic type have stronger explanatory power for spatial variation in nutrient content but lesser than that of the interaction between the two factors. Research has shown that it is necessary to increase fertilizer input in the northern Shaanxi region, perform intensive cultivation in the Guanzhong region, and consider multiple factors in farmland construction.

Key words: main nutrients in soil, spatial variation, influencing factors, geological detector model, the Loess Plateau of Shaanxi Province

贺军奇,拜寒伟,徐轶玮,倪莉莉. 陕西黄土区农田土壤主要养分特征及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(12): 1907-1917.

HE Junqi,BAI Hanwei,XU Yiwei,NI Lili. Main nutrient characteristics and influencing factors of farmland soil in the Loess Plateau of the Shaanxi Province[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(12): 1907-1917.

图/表 10

图1

表1

表2

表3

表4

图2

图3

图4

表5

图5

参考文献 31

[1]	贾鲁净, 杨联安, 封涌涛, 等. 宝鸡市农耕区土壤养分空间变异及其影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(12): 135-143.
	[Jia Lujing, Yang Lian’an, Feng Yongtao, et al. Spatial variation of soil nutrients and its influencing factors in Baoji City[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(12): 135-143. ]
[2]	Cai A D, Xu M G, Wang B, et al. Manure acts as a better fertilizer for increasing crop yields than synthetic fertilizer does by improving soil fertility[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2019, 189: 168-175.
[3]	杨静涵, 刘梦云, 张杰, 等. 黄土高原沟壑区小流域土壤养分空间变异特征及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 743-754. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200318
	[Yang Jinghan, Liu Mengyun, Zhang Jie, et al. Spatial variability of soil nutrients and its affecting factors at small watershed in gully region of the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(3): 743-754. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200318
[4]	Sun G J, Liu H J, Cui D, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in Yili River Valley[J]. Peerj, 2022, 10: e13311. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13311
[5]	张婵婵, 张瑞芳, 张建恒, 等. 高阳县农田土壤速效养分空间变异特征研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(6): 758-764. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.00758
	[Zhang Chanchan, Zhang Ruifang, Zhang Jianheng, et al. Spatial variability of available nutrients contents in cropland soils in Gaoyang County of Hebei Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(6): 758-764. ] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.00758
[6]	Liu W J, Su Y Z, Yang Q, et al. Temporal and spatial variability of soil organic matter and total nitrogen in a typical oasis cropland ecosystem in arid region of Northwest China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2011, 64(8): 2247-2257. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1053-5
[7]	Ji C H, Liu H L, Cha Z G, et al. Spatial-temporal variation of N, P, and K stoichiometry in cropland of Hainan Island[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(1): 39. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12010039
[8]	余慧敏, 朱青, 傅聪颖, 等. 江西鄱阳湖平原区农田土壤微量元素空间分异特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(1): 172-184.
	[Yu Huimin, Zhu Qing, Fu Congying, et al. Spatial variability characteristics and impacting factors of soil trace elements in Poyang Lake plain, Jiangxi of China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(1): 172-184. ]
[9]	夏凡, 王永东, 郑子成, 等. 小尺度下茶园土壤有效态微量元素空间变异特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(6): 1047-1054.
	[Xia Fan, Wang Yongdong, Zheng Zicheng, et al. Spatial variability of soil microelements in a small scale tea garden and the influencing factors[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2022, 28(6): 1047-1054. ]
[10]	王婕, 牛文全, 张文倩, 等. 农田表层土壤养分空间变异特性研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(15): 37-46.
	[Wang Jie, Niu Wenquan, Zhang Wenqian, et al. Spatial variability of soil nutrients in topsoil of cultivated land[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(15): 37-46. ]
[11]	范声浓, 李华东, 王烁衡, 等. 基于IDW和因子分析的海南省火龙果园土壤养分空间分布预测[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(3): 602-611.
	[Fan Shengnong, Li Huadong, Wang Shuoheng, et al. Prediction of spatial distribution of soil nutrients in pitaya orchards in Hainan provinve based on IDW and factor analysis[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 36(3): 602-611. ]
[12]	解文艳, 周怀平, 杨振兴, 等. 黄土高原东部潇河流域农田土壤有机质时空变异及影响因素[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(1): 96-104.
	[Xie Wenyan, Zhou Huaiping, Yang Zhenxing, et al. The spatial-temporal variation of soil organic matter and its influencing factors in Xiaohe River Basin in eastern Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2019, 36(1): 96-104. ]
[13]	赵越, 罗志军, 廖牧鑫, 等. 泰和县耕地土壤养分空间分布及影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5): 296-303.
	[Zhao Yue, Luo Zhijun, Liao Muxin, et al. Study on the spatial distribution of soil nutrients and influencing factors in the cultivated land of Taihe county[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(5): 296-303. ]
[14]	胡贵贵, 杨联安, 封涌涛, 等. 基于地理探测器的宝鸡市农田土壤养分影响因子分析[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(1): 71-78.
	[Hu Guigui, Yang Lian’an, Feng Yongtao, et al. Influencing factors of soil nutrients in farmland of Baoji based on geographical detector[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2020, 51(1): 71-78. ]
[15]	王琦, 常庆瑞, 黄勇, 等. 基于Geo-D的陕西省STN空间变异因子交互影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(11): 161-169.
	[Wang Qi, Chang Qingrui, Huang Yong, et al. Driving factors and interaction of STN spatial variation in Shaanxi Province based on Geo-D[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(11): 161-169. ]
[16]	Deng X J, Xu X L, Wang S H. The tempo-spatial changes of soil fertility in farmland of China from the 1980s to the 2010s[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 146: 109913. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109913
[17]	王学寅, 黄益灵, 全斌斌, 等. 浙江省瑞安市耕作层土壤养分元素有效态含量空间变异特征及其影响因素[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(3): 963-971.
	[Wang Xueyin, Huang Yiling, Quan Binbin, et al. Spatial variability characteristics and influencing factors of available contents of nutritive elements in tillage layer soil of Ruian, Zhejiang Province[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(3): 963-971. ]
[18]	赵晴月, 许世杰, 张务帅, 等. 中国玉米主产区土壤养分的空间变异及影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(15): 3120-3133. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.012
	[Zhao Qingyue, Xu Shijie, Zhang Wushuai, et al. Spatial regional variability and influential factors of soil fertilities in the major regions of maize production of China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(15): 3120-3133. ] doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.012
[19]	高浩然, 周勇, 王丽, 等. 基于Geodetector模型的鄂北岗地土壤有机质空间格局及影响因素分析——以枣阳市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(1): 166-178.
	[Gao Haoran, Zhou Yong, Wang Li, et al. Spatial pattern andinfluencing factors of soil organic matter based on Geodetector model: Taking Zaoyang City as an example[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(1): 166-178. ]
[20]	王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器:原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
	[Wang Jinfeng, Xu Chengdong. Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
[21]	尉芳, 刘京, 夏利恒, 等. 陕西渭北旱塬区农田土壤有机质空间预测方法[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(2): 1097-1107.
	[Wei Fang, Liu Jing, Xia Liheng, et al. Environmental Science[J]. Spatial prediction method of farmland soil organic matter in Weibei Dryland of Shaanxi Province, 2022, 43(2): 1097-1107. ]
[22]	雷琪, 蒋洪丽, 吴淑芳, 等. 西北地区有机质空间分布及其影响因素研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(3): 274-279, 293.
	[Lei Qi, Jiang Hongli, Wu Shufang, et al. Spatial distribution of organic matter and its influencing factors in Northwest China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(3): 274-279, 293. ]
[23]	陈桂香, 高灯州, 曾从盛, 等. 福州市农田土壤养分空间变异特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(2): 216-224. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2017.00216
	[Chen Guixiang, Gao Dengzhou, Zeng Congsheng, et al. Characteristics of the spatial variation of soil nutrients in farmland of Fuzhou City[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2017, 19(2): 216-224. ] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2017.00216
[24]	郑然, 郑宝林. 冀北栗钙土区耕层土壤有机质和全氮的空间变异特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(5): 123-129.
	[Zheng Ran, Zheng Baolin. Spatial variation of organic matter and total nitrogen in cultivated soil in northern Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(5): 123-129. ]
[25]	童童, 梅帅, 刘莹, 等. 基于GIS的环巢湖地区土壤养分空间变异特征研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2023, 42(7): 1522-1531.
	[Tong Tong, Mei Shuai, Liu Ying, et al. Study on the spatial variation of soil nutrients in Chaohu Lake based on GIS[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2023, 42(7): 1522-1531. ]
[26]	王强, 郑梦蕾, 叶治山, 等. 基于Moran’s I的菜地土壤属性空间分布格局分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(10): 2297-2306.
	[Wang Qiang, Zheng Menglei, Ye Zhishan, et al. Analysis of spatial distribution pattern of vegetable soil properties based on Moran’s I[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(10): 2297-2306. ]
[27]	顾思博, 周金龙, 曾妍妍, 等. 新疆民丰县农田土壤微量营养元素含量及分布[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(1): 142-149.
	[Gu Sibo, Zhou Jinlong, Zeng Yanyan, et al. Content and distribution of trace elements in farmland soil in Minfeng County, Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(1): 142-149. ]
[28]	姜霓雯, 童根平, 叶正钱, 等. 浙江清凉峰自然保护区土壤肥力指标空间变异及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(6): 2430-2441.
	[Jiang Niwen, Tong Genping, Ye Zhengqian, et al. Spatial variation of soil properties and its affecting factors of Qingliangfeng Nature Reserve, Zhejiang[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(6): 2430-2441. ]
[29]	赵倩倩, 赵庚星, 董超, 等. 高密市农田土壤养分空间变异特征研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(3): 643-650.
	[Zhao Qianqian, Zhao Gengxing, Dong Chao, et al. Spatial variability of soil nutrients of cultivated land in Gaomi Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2012, 43(3): 643-650. ]
[30]	姚瑶, 罗朋, 李京玲, 等. 运城市夹马口引黄灌区土壤养分空间变异特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(2): 134-141.
	[Yao Yao, Luo Peng, Li Jingling, et al. Spatial variation of soil nutrients in the Jiamakou Yellow River irrigation area, Yuncheng City[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023, 37(2): 134-141. ]
[31]	严玉梅, 李水利, 李茹, 等. 陕西省耕地土壤养分现状与分布特征[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(6): 1298-1305.
	[Yan Yumei, Li Shuili, Li Ru, et al. Current situation and distribution characteristics of soil nutrients in cultivated land of Shaanxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2019, 50(6): 1298-1305. ]

类型	变量	影响因子	单位/分类
土壤属性	pH	X1	-
	土壤容重	X2	g·cm^-3
	土壤类型	X3	潮土、风沙土、黄绵土、新积土、褐土、黑垆土、红黏土、水稻土
	成土母质	X4	黄土母质、风沙母质、冲积母质、湖积母质、残积母质、坡积母质、红土母质
	土壤质地	X5	砂土、砂壤土、轻壤土、中壤土、重壤土、黏壤土、黏土
气候因素	年日照时长	X6	h
	年降雨量	X7	mm
	年平均气温	X8	℃
	年蒸发量	X9	mm
地形因素	高程	X10	m
	坡度	X11	°
	坡向	X12	阳坡（0°~45°、315°~360°）、半阳坡（45°~90°、270°~315°）、半阴坡（90°~135°、225°~270°）、阴坡（135°~225°）（以正北方向为基准）
	地表起伏度	X13	m
	地貌类型	X14	长城沿线风沙滩区、陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区、渭北黄土台塬区、关中平原区
人为活动	化肥用量	X15	kg·hm^-2
	灌溉方式	X16	无灌溉、漫灌、畦灌、滴灌、沟灌、喷灌
	作物类型	X17	谷类作物、果蔬作物、薯类作物、药用作物、豆类作物、油料作物、其他
	熟制	X18	一年一熟、一年两熟、一年三熟、两年三熟、多年生

判断依据	交互作用
q（X₁∩X₂）>q（X₁）+q（X₂）	非线性增强
q（X₁）+q（X₂）>q（X₁∩X₂）>max[q（X₁），q（X₂）]	双因子增强
q（X₁∩X₂）=q（X₁）+q（X₂）	相互独立
max[q（X₁），q（X₂）]>q（X₁∩X₂）>min[q（X₁），q（X₂）]	单因子非线性减弱
q（X₁∩X₂）<min[q（X₁），q（X₂）]	非线性拮抗

指标	样本数	最大值	最小值	平均值	标准差	变异系数/%	分布类型	偏度	峰度
SOM/（g·kg^-1）	5079	32.97	1.26	14.43	6.10	42.27	正态分布	-0.10	2.52
TN/（g·kg^-1）	5084	2.10	0.04	0.92	0.39	42.39	正态分布	-0.18	2.50
AP/（mg·kg^-1）	4995	71.28	0.04	18.21	14.55	79.90	对数正态	-0.42	3.50
AK/（mg·kg^-1）	5020	550.00	18.00	190.28	108.24	56.88	对数正态	0.04	2.56

指标	理论模型	块金值C₀	基台值C₀+C	块金系数C₀/(C₀+C)	变程A/km	决定系数R²	残差平方和RSS	全局Moran’s I	Z
SOM	指数模型	0.1941	0.3892	0.4987	40.8	0.979	3.79×10^-4	0.58	86.31
TN	指数模型	0.0134	0.0231	0.5931	58.9	0.995	3.31×10^-6	0.61	90.90
AP	指数模型	0.3530	0.7070	0.4993	92.4	0.994	5.56×10^-4	0.31	44.79
AK	指数模型	0.1573	0.2299	0.6842	67.3	0.964	2.46×10^-4	0.36	53.40

交互作用	SOM		TN		AP		AK
交互作用	q	交互类型	q	交互类型	q	交互类型	q	交互类型
交互作用1	X1∩X6 0.496	双因子增强	X1∩X6 0.535	双因子增强	X8∩X15 0.229	双因子增强	X8∩X15 0.303	双因子增强
交互作用2	X14∩X15 0.492	双因子增强	X6∩X15 0.512	双因子增强	X10∩X14 0.227	双因子增强	X10∩X15 0.299	双因子增强
交互作用3	X6∩X18 0.487	双因子增强	X2∩X6 0.506	双因子增强	X1∩X8 0.226	双因子增强	X6∩X10 0.298	双因子增强
交互作用4	X1∩X12 0.479	双因子增强	X5∩X6 0.505	双因子增强	X1∩X10 0.225	双因子增强	X7∩X8 0.295	双因子增强
交互作用5	X1∩X15 0.478	双因子增强	X6∩X9 0.498	双因子增强	X15∩X16 0.222	双因子增强	X6∩X8 0.294	双因子增强

陕西黄土区农田土壤主要养分特征及影响因素

Main nutrient characteristics and influencing factors of farmland soil in the Loess Plateau of the Shaanxi Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘军彦,王世杰. 基于ICESat-2卫星测高数据的呼伦湖水位变化监测[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(9): 1438-1445.
[2]	海龙, 周梅, 张嘉開, 洪光宇, 李凤滋, 费菲. 毛乌素沙地不同林龄杨柴灌木林土壤呼吸及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1107-1116.
[3]	齐润泽, 潘竟虎. 河湟地区生态脆弱性时空演变及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 1002-1013.
[4]	马晓蕾,乔雅琦,王婕,焦士兴,张曼. 陕西省水生态足迹深度与广度时空格局及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 469-480.
[5]	董翰林, 王文婷, 谢云, 阿依达娜·叶斯那力, 江源天, 徐嘉淇. 新疆气候干湿变化特征及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(12): 1875-1884.
[6]	吴万民, 刘涛, 陈鑫. 西北干旱半干旱区NDVI季节性变化及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(12): 1969-1981.
[7]	程红霞, 林粤江, 陈鹏, 梁凤超, 王勇. 塔里木盆地沙尘天气日数变化及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1707-1717.
[8]	刘新, 郝媛媛, 花立民. 石羊河下游民勤盆地土壤盐分空间分异特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1615-1624.
[9]	党慧, 荣丽华, 李伊彤, 赵名君. 农牧交错区三生空间时空演变特征与影响因素——以内蒙古呼和浩特市为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1698-1706.
[10]	郭茵,雷加强,范敬龙,王海峰,吕振涛. 近20 a蒙古国土壤风蚀变化特征及主要影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1200-1211.
[11]	张云霞,张金茜,巩杰. 半干旱区湖盆景观格局脆弱性及其影响因素——以凉城县为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1259-1269.
[12]	曹永香,毛东雷,薛杰,苏松领,开买尔古丽·阿不来提,蔡富艳. 绿洲-沙漠过渡带植被覆盖动态变化及其驱动因素——以新疆策勒为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 510-521.
[13]	王毓芳,赵成章,曾红霞,康满萍,赵婷婷,唐玉瑞. 疏勒河中游湿地景观时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 282-291.
[14]	王振,李均力,包安明,张久丹,白洁. 1995—2020年新疆巴里坤湖面积时序变化及归因[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(6): 1514-1523.
[15]	王紫薇,黄来明,邵明安,裴艳武. 青海高寒区不同土地利用方式下土壤持水能力及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(6): 1722-1730.