不同矿化度的微咸水滴灌对红枣根区土壤碱解氮的影响

干旱区研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 424-429.

不同矿化度的微咸水滴灌对红枣根区土壤碱解氮的影响

李发永¹, 王兴鹏¹, 林杰², 李宁³

1. 塔里木大学水利与建筑工程学院，新疆阿拉尔 843300； 2. 喀什地区水利水电勘测设计院，新疆喀什 844000；
3 .新疆生产建设兵团灌溉中心试验站，新疆乌鲁木齐 830002

收稿日期:2012-06-11 修回日期:2012-09-06 出版日期:2013-05-15 发布日期:2013-05-16
通讯作者: 王兴鹏.E-mail： sjywxp@taru.edu.cn
作者简介:李发永（1982-），男，讲师，主要从事极端干旱区农业水土环境方面的研究工作.E-mail： lisen8279@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然基金项目（51169024，31060084）；水利部公益性行业专项（201101050）

Effect of Drip Irrigation with Brackish Water with Different Salinities on Soil Alkali-hydrolyzable Nitrogen Content in Rhizosphere of Ziziphus jujuba Trees

LI Fa-Yong¹, WANG Xing-Peng¹, LIN Jie², LI Ning³

1. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Tarim University, Aral 843300, Xinjiang, China;
2. Kashgar Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Survey and Design, Kashgar 844000, Xinjiang, China;
3. Experiment Station of Irrigation Center, Xinjiang Corps of Production and Construction, Urumqi 830002, China

Received:2012-06-11 Revised:2012-09-06 Online:2013-05-15 Published:2013-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用高矿化度的咸水与淡水按一定比例进行混合灌溉，分析不同矿化度的微咸水滴灌对枣树根区土壤碱解氮的影响模型。结果表明：当枣树根区土壤碱解氮的运移转化时间相同时，随着灌溉水矿化度的增加，土壤碱解氮的含量也随之增加，变化量越低，转化率越小。当矿化度相同时，土壤碱解氮平均值随运移转化时间先增大后减小，碱解氮的变化量呈递增趋势，而碱解氮变化率却呈现递减趋势。在分析不同矿化度的微咸水对土壤碱解氮影响的基础上，建立了微咸水的矿化度、碱解氮的运移转化时间与土壤碱解氮平均含量、变化量以及变化率之间的相互定量关系，并得到了相应的回归方程。

关键词: 碱解氮, 矿化度, 微咸水, 滴灌, 红枣（Ziziphus jujuba）, 枣树根区, 影响模型

Abstract: This paper analyzed the effect of drip irrigation with brackish water with different salinities on the content of soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen in rhizosphere of Ziziphus jujuba trees based on the experiment of irrigation with mixed salty water and fresh water. The results showed that the content of soil alkalihydrolyzable nitrogen in rhizosphere of Z. jujuba trees was increased with the increase of salinity of irrigation water when the migration and transformation time of soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen was the same. The average value of soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content was increased at first and then decreased with the migration and transformation time of soil alkalihydrolyzable nitrogen when the salinity of irrigation water was the same. Under the same salinity of irrigation water, the change extent of soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content was in an increase trend, but the change rate was in a decrease trend. Based on analyzing the effect of irrigation brackish water with different salinities on soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content, the quantitative relationships among the salinity of brackish water and the migration and transformation time, average content, change extent and change rate of soil alkalihydrolyzable nitrogen were developed, and the regression equations were also derived in this study.

Key words: alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, salinity, brackish water, drip irrigation, rhizosphere of Ziziphus jujuba trees, effect model

李发永, 王兴鹏, 林杰, 李宁. 不同矿化度的微咸水滴灌对红枣根区土壤碱解氮的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(3): 424-429.

LI Fa-Yong, WANG Xing-Peng, LIN Jie, LI Ning. Effect of Drip Irrigation with Brackish Water with Different Salinities on Soil Alkali-hydrolyzable Nitrogen Content in Rhizosphere of Ziziphus jujuba Trees[J]. , 2013, 30(3): 424-429.

参考文献

杨淑莉,朱安宁,张佳宝，等.不同施氮量和施氮方式下田间氨挥发损失及其影响因素〔J〕.干旱区研究,2010,27(3):415-427.
Trewavas A J.Nitrate as a Plant hormone〔C〕//Jackson M B.British Plant Growth Regulator Group Monograph.Oxford:British Plant Growth Regulator Group,1983:97-110.[ZK）]
Bar-Yosef B,Shelkholslami M R.Distribution of water and ions in soils irrigated and fertilized from a trickle source〔J〕.Soil Science Society of America Journal,1976,40:575-582.
Bresler E.Trickle drip irrigation,principles and application to soilwater management〔J〕.Advances in Agronomy,1977,29:343-383.
Brandt A,Bresler E,BenAsheretc I.Infiltration from a trickle Source I:Mathematical models〔J〕.Soil Science Society of America Journal,1971,35:675-682.
Bergstrom L.Nitrate leaching and drainage from annual perennial crop in thedrainage plots and lyzimeters〔J〕.Journal of Environmental Quality,1987,16:11-18.
Pier J W,Doerge T A.Nitrogen and water interactions in trickleirrigated Watermelon〔J〕.Soil Science Society of America Journal,1995,59:145-150.
Munna K J,Evansb J,Chalk P M.Mineralization of soil and legume nitrogen in soils treated with metal contaminated sewage sludge〔J〕.Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2000,32:2 031-2 043.
钱炬炬.污水灌溉条件下作物生长及氮素运移试验研究〔D〕.北京：中国农业科学院,2006.
甘露.污水灌溉与施肥条件下氮素在土壤中迁移转化动态的初步研究〔D〕.北京：中国农业大学，2002.
黄冠华,杨建国,黄权中.污水灌溉对草坪土壤与植株氮含量影响的试验研究〔J〕.农业工程学报,2002,18（3）:22-25.
王红旗,陈家军.城市污水不同土地处理条件下土壤—作物系统中氮净化模拟模型与模拟分析〔J〕.北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,1998,34(3):414-420.
Smith C J,Chalk P M,Noble C L.Nitrogen fixation in a white clovergrass pasture irrigated with saline groundwater〔J〕.Irrigation Science,1993,13:189-194.
张鸿义，曾凡江，安海棠.中国干旱区浅层地下水的形成、分布与运移〔J〕.干旱区研究，2011，28（1）：67-73.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析〔M〕.北京:中国农业出版社,2000：56-57.

[1]	李燕强, 王振华, 叶含春, 宋利兵, 刘健, 温越, 武小荻. 灌溉水矿化度对棉田土壤呼吸速率的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 392-402.
[2]	马怡璠, 吕德生, 王振华, 李燕强, 刘健, 温越, 朱艳. 磁氮耦合对膜下滴灌加工番茄产量及水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1855-1864.
[3]	刘延雪, 乔长录. 干旱区绿洲膜下滴灌棉田蒸散发[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(1): 152-162.
[4]	崔佳琪,李仙岳,史海滨,孙亚楠,马红雨,菅文浩. 节水改造前后永济灌域地下水环境时空变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 841-852.
[5]	刘玲,罗剑洪,李丙文,徐新文,范敬龙,马志国. 咸水滴灌对肉苁蓉寄生体系盐离子分配及品质的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 908-915.
[6]	谭明东,王振华,王越,李文昊,宗睿,邹杰. 长期滴灌棉田非灌溉季节土壤盐分累积特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 485-492.
[7]	王东旺,王振华,陈林,李文昊. 应用膜下灌排联动技术对提高土壤淋洗效果的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1010-1019.
[8]	朱金儒,李文昊,王振华,宗睿,王天宇. 覆膜滴灌棉田地膜残留量对棉花生长的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2): 570-579.
[9]	王京伟, 王磊元, 李元, 牛文全. 覆膜滴灌对温室番茄土壤理化性状及其生物学特性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(4): 870-880.
[10]	刘军, 齐广平, 康燕霞, 马彦麟, 栗志. 土壤水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿光合特性及其生物量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(4): 893-900.
[11]	孙池涛, 张俊鹏, 张谦, 冯棣, 冯国艺, 孙景生, 林永增. 起垄沟播和常规平播下滴灌棉田土壤水盐的运移[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(2): 307-313.
[12]	靳志锋, 虎胆·吐马尔白, 牟洪臣, 马合木江, 李文娟. 土壤冻融温度影响下棉田水盐运移规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(4): 623-627.
[13]	王成, 李宁, 王兴鹏, 张军, 姜倩, 王亮. 不同生育阶段咸水滴灌对红枣根区土壤有机碳垂直分布特性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(5): 883-889.
[14]	杨传杰, 罗毅, 孙林, 甘容, 吉力力·阿不都外力, 张艳. 水分胁迫对覆膜滴灌棉花根系活力和叶片生理的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(5): 802-810.
[15]	李丙文, 邱永志, 周宏伟, 徐新文, 王强, 范敬龙, 靳正忠, 常青, 许波, 张忠良. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地滴灌种植肉苁蓉的试验研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(5): 751-756.