黄土高原生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响

干旱区研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 808-812.

黄土高原生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响

张侃侃¹, 卜崇峰^1,2, 高国雄¹

1. 西北农林科技大学资源与环境学院,陕西杨凌 712100
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2010-08-18 修回日期:2020-10-26 出版日期:2011-09-15 发布日期:2011-10-16
通讯作者: 卜崇峰.E-mail:buchongfeng@163.com
作者简介:张侃侃（1986-）,男,山西临汾人,在读硕士,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治研究.E-mail:zhangkan568@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40701096)；中国科学院西部之光(B28013200)；西北农林科技大学科研专项(QN2009085)

Effect of Microbiotic Crust on Soil Water Infiltration in the Loess Plateau

ZHANG Kan-Kan¹, BU Chong-Feng^1,2, GAO Guo-Xiong¹

1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi Province, China
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Water Resources, 
  Yangling 712100, Shaanxi Province, China

Received:2010-08-18 Revised:2020-10-26 Online:2011-09-15 Published:2011-10-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用圆盘入渗仪测量6种处理（无生物结皮、生物结皮、长芒草、长芒草+生物结皮、柠条、柠条+生物结皮）下水分的入渗特征，并进行对比分析。结果表明：① 无论有、无植被，生物结皮的存在都会阻碍水分的入渗，无生物结皮的稳定入渗速率和累积入渗量均大于有生物结皮；植被的存在，加剧了生物结皮的阻水性。② Kostiakov模型对无结皮、长芒草处理拟合效果好；Philip模型对无结皮、长芒草、柠条、柠条+长芒草处理拟合效果好；Horton模型对6种处理的水分入渗特征模拟效果较好，Horton模型适合描述黄土高原的水分入渗特征。

关键词: 生物结皮, 土壤水分, 入渗速率, 累积入渗量, 入渗模型, 神木县, 陕西, 黄土高原

Abstract: In this study, the disc infiltrometers were used to measure soil water infiltration under 6 kinds of treatments (the regions where there was no microbiotic crust, there was microbiotic crust, Stipa bungeana grows, S. bungeana grows with microbiotic crust, Korshinsk peashrub grows, K. peashrub grows with microbiotic crust), and the measured data were compared and analyzed. The results are as follows: (1) Microbiotic crust impeded soil water infiltration whether there was vegetation or not, and the stable infiltration rate and cumulative infiltration were higher in the regions where there was no microbiotic crust than those in the regions where there was microbiotic crust; vegetation increased the capability of resisting soil water infiltration of microbiotic crust; (2) The fitting effect with Kostiakov model under the treatment without microbiotic crust and with S. bungeana was fine; that with Philip model under the treatments without microbiotic crust, with K. peashrub and K. peashrub with S. bungeana was fine; and that of water infiltration with Horton model under all 6 kinds of treatments was fine. Therefore, Horton model can be used to describe soil water infiltration in the Loess Plateau.

Key words: microbiotic crust, soil moisture cointent, infiltration rate, cumulative infiltration, infiltration model, Shenmu County, Shaanxi Province, Loess Plateau

中图分类号:

S152.7

张侃侃, 卜崇峰, 高国雄. 黄土高原生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2011, 28(5): 808-812.

ZHANG Kan-Kan, BU Chong-Feng, GAO Guo-Xiong. Effect of Microbiotic Crust on Soil Water Infiltration in the Loess Plateau[J]. , 2011, 28(5): 808-812.

参考文献

张军,秦奋,邢昱.黄土高原水土保持措施对下垫面抗蚀力影响分析.水土保持研究，2010,17(1):50-55.
邵明安,马东豪,朱元骏,等.黄土高原土石混合介质土壤水分研究.北京:科学出版社,2010.
赵允格,许明详,王全九,等.黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮对土壤理化性状的影响.自然资源学报,2006,21(3):441-447.
王翠萍,廖超英,孙长忠,等.黄土地表生物结皮对土壤贮水性能及水分入渗特征的影响.干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(4):54-64.
李新荣,张元明,赵允格.生物土壤结皮研究：进展、前沿与展望.地球科学进展,2009,24(1):11-24.
吴楠,魏美丽,张元明.生物土壤结皮中刺叶赤藓质膜透性对脱水、复水过程的响应.自然科学进展,2009,19(9):942-951.
Giora J Kidron,Ahuva Vonshak,Aharon Abeliovich.Recovery rates of microbiotic crusts within a dune ecosystem in the Negev Desert.Geomorphology,2008,100 (3/4):444-452.
Belnap J,Lange O L.Biological Soil Crusts:Structure,Function and Management.Berlin:Springer,2003:281-286.
张元明,曹同,潘伯荣.新疆苔藓植物的研究现状与展望.干旱区研究,2001,18(2):38-41.
Gayel A G,Shtina E A.Algae on the sands of arid regions and their role in soil formation.Soviet Soil Science,1974,6:311-319.
薛英英.鄂尔多斯沙区沙漠生物结皮特征的研究.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2007.
魏江春.沙漠生物地毯工程:干旱沙漠治理的新途径.干旱区研究,2005,22(3):287-288.
吴楠,梁少民,王红玲,等.动物践踏干扰对生物结皮中微生物生态分布的影响.干旱区研究,2006,23(1):50-55.
Brotherson J D,Rushforth S R.Influence of cryptogamic crusts on moisture relationships of soil in Navajo National Monument ,Arizona.Great Basin Naturalist,1983,43:73-78.
St Clair L L,Johansen J R.Introduction to the symposium on soil crust communities.Great Basin Naturalist,1993,53 (1):1-4.
Hu C X,Liu Y D.Primary succession of algal community structure in desert soil.Acta Botanica Sinica，2003,45(8):917-924.
陈兰周,刘永定,李敦海,等.荒漠藻类及其结皮的研究.中国科学基金,2003(2):90-93.
Johansen J R.Cryptogamic crusts of semiarid and arid lands of North America.Journal Phycology,1993,29(2):140-147.
许明祥,刘国彬,卜崇峰,等.圆盘入渗仪法测定不同利用方式土壤渗透性试验研究.农业工程学报,2002,18(4):54-58.
杨晓晖,张克斌,赵云杰.生物土壤结皮:荒漠化地区研究的热点问题.生态学报,2001,21(3):474-480.
Eldridge D J ,Greene R S B.Microbiotic soil crusts:A review of their roles in soil and ecological processes in the rangelands of Australia.Australian Journal of Soil Research,1994,32:389-415.
赵西宁,吴发启.土壤水分入渗的研究进展和评述.西北林学院学报,2004,19(1):42-45.

[1]	李健男, 史海滨, 苗庆丰, 珊丹, 荣浩, 温雅琴. 环境因子对不同种类人工乔木林分蒸腾耗水的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(8): 1312-1321.
[2]	吉吉佳门, 程一本, 谌玲珑, 万鹏翔, 张祎晖, 杨文斌, 白旭赢, 王涛. 科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林土壤水分动态及其对降雨的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(5): 756-766.
[3]	薛智暄, 张丽, 王新军, 李永康, 张冠宏, 李沛尧. 古尔班通古特沙漠SMAP土壤水分产品降尺度分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(4): 583-593.
[4]	贺军奇,拜寒伟,徐轶玮,倪莉莉. 陕西黄土区农田土壤主要养分特征及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(12): 1907-1917.
[5]	杨霜奇, 宋乃平, 王兴, 陈晓莹, 常道琴. 荒漠草原灰钙土与风沙土水分时空特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1625-1636.
[6]	王琦琨,武玮,杨雪琪,桑国庆. 陕西省生境质量时空演变及驱动机制分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1684-1694.
[7]	强玉泉,徐先英,张锦春,刘虎俊,郭树江,段晓峰. 民勤青土湖梭梭茎干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1143-1154.
[8]	张鹏飞,贾小旭,赵春雷,邵明安. 初始容重对土壤水分特征曲线的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1174-1180.
[9]	杨紫唯,车子涵,刘芙梅,陈克龙. 降水梯度对青海湖河源湿地温室气体排放日变化的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 754-766.
[10]	马荣君,李潇斐,毛彦霖,薛宇桐,吴战昊. 陕西省冰雹气候变化特征及其关键影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 767-773.
[11]	周彦莉,吴海梅,周彦栋,尚旭民,逄蕾. 短期秸秆不同还田方式对土壤结构和水分影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 502-509.
[12]	张媛媛,孟欢欢,周晓兵,尹本丰,周多奇,陶冶. 不同生境/萌发类型尖喙牻牛儿苗生物量分配特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 541-550.
[13]	肖薇薇,安彬,史佳琪. 气候变化背景下1958—2017年陕西省0 cm地温时空变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1244-1253.
[14]	罗志文,王小军,刘梦洋,柯杭,万婷,尹义星. 基于地区线性矩法的陕西省极端降水时空特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1295-1305.
[15]	王静,方锋,黄鹏程,岳平,李江萍,王大为. AMSR-E土壤水分产品评价及在干旱监测中的应用[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(3): 650-664.