额济纳盆地地下水时空变化特征

干旱区研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 592-601.

额济纳盆地地下水时空变化特征

席海洋^1,2, 冯起^1,2, 司建华^1,2, 包银花³, 王林帮⁴

1. 阿拉善荒漠生态-水文试验研究站, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 甘肃兰州 730000;
3. 内蒙古阿拉善盟额济纳旗草原站, 内蒙古额济纳旗 735400;
4. 阿右旗巴丹吉林自然保护区雅不赖管理站, 内蒙古右旗 737300

收稿日期:2010-10-09 修回日期:2010-11-15 出版日期:2011-08-25 发布日期:2011-09-06
作者简介:席海洋(1982-),男,黑龙江五大连池人,助理研究员,主要从事干旱区水文水资源研究.E-mail: xihy@lzb.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所人才基金项目(51Y084891)和杰青基金(40725001)

Study on Spatiotemporal Change of Groundwater in the Ejin Basin

XI Hai-yang^1,2, FENG Qi^1,2, SI Jian-hua^1,2, BAO Yin-hua³, WANG Lin-bang⁴

1. Alxa Desert Eco-hydrology Experimental Research Station, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3. Erjina Banner Grassland Station, Erjina Banner 735400, Alxa League, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China;
4. Yabulai Management Station, Badain Juran Desert Nature Reserve, Right Banner 737300, Alxa League, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China

Received:2010-10-09 Revised:2010-11-15 Published:2011-08-25 Online:2011-09-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 依据1988-2006年地下水位长期观测资料和近年来在额济纳盆地开展的地下水位调查资料,结合地质统计学方法,分析额济纳盆地地下水位时空变化,探讨地下水埋深的地统计变化特征和异质性,并用地统计模型对地下水埋深变化的异质性进行拟合。结果表明:额济纳盆地地下水位自20世纪40年代开始整体上呈不断下降趋势,且河流下段区域的下降幅度高于上段;近年来,随着河道输水量的增加,潜水水位开始回升,而深层承压水水位仍持续下降,且潜水水位年内波动幅度较深层承压水水位大。在空间变化上,地下水埋深从南到北先增加后减小,从西向东逐渐减小,地下水位高程从南向北逐渐降低,从西向东呈"U"字型;地下水埋深的空间分布在整体上具有中等的空间相关性,而在4个不同方向上具有较强烈的空间相关性,额济纳盆地地下水埋深的变程为0.406°(经、纬度单位,约为33.7 km),在此变程范围内存在空间自相关性。

关键词: 地下水位, 时空变化, 地统计模型, 异质性, 承压水, 潜水, 额济纳盆地

Abstract: In this paper, the spatiotemporal change of groundwater level in the Ejin Basin is analyzed based on the long-term monitoring data of groundwater level during the period from 1988 to 2006 and the groundwater level survey data in recent years using the geostatistical analysis method, the geostatistical characteristics and heterogeneity of groundwater depth are discussed, and the geostatistical model is used to fit the heterogeneity of groundwater depth. The results show that a continuous decline of groundwater level in the Ejin Basin had occurred since the 1940s, and it was more serious in the downstream area than that in the upstream area; the phreatic water level has started to rise again along with the increase of river discharge in recent years, but the deep confined water level is continually dropped, and the annual fluctuation range of phreatic water is higher than that of confined water. Spatially, groundwater depth increases at first and then decreases from the south to the north and decreases gradually from the west to the east. The groundwater level elevation decreases gradually from the south to the north, and it is U-shaped from the west to the east, that is the groundwater level elevation decreases at first and then increases. There is holistically a moderate spatial correlation of groundwater depth in spatial distribution, but there is a strong spatial correlation at four different directions in the Ejin Basin. The variable range of groundwater depth is 0.406° (longitude and latitude unit, about 33.7 km), that means there is a spatial autocorrelation in such variable range of groundwater depth.

Key words: groundwater level, spatiotemporal change, geostatistical model, heterogeneity, confined water, phreatic water, Ejin Basin

中图分类号:

P641

席海洋, 冯起, 司建华, 包银花, 王林帮. 额济纳盆地地下水时空变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2011, 28(4): 592-601.

XI Hai-yang, FENG Qi, SI Jian-hua, BAO Yin-hua, WANG Lin-bang. Study on Spatiotemporal Change of Groundwater in the Ejin Basin[J]. , 2011, 28(4): 592-601.

参考文献

[1] 马金珠.塔里木盆地南缘地下水脆弱性评价[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(2):170-174.

[2] Von A J R,Mass K.The method of impulse response moments:A new method integrating groundwater and eco-hydrological modeling[J].Impact of Human Activity on Groundwater Dynamics,2001,269:51-58.

[3] 王仕琴,宋献方,王勤学,等.华北平原浅层地下水水位动态变化[J].地理学报,2008,63(5):462-472.

[4] 李凯,卞玉梅,杨静,等.下辽河平原地下水多年动态变化特征分析[J].地质与资源,2009,18(2):140-143.

[5] 李和平,郭英杰,胡顺军,等.尉犁县生态园区地下水位年变化规律及其影响因素分析[J].干旱区地理,2005,28(5):592-596.

[6] 徐海量,宋郁东,陈亚宁.塔里木河下游生态输水后地下水变化规律研究[J].水科学进展,2004,15(2):223-226.

[7] 蒋良群,陈曦,包安明.塔里木河下游地下水变化动态分析[J].干旱区地理,2005,28(1):33-37.

[8] 席海洋,冯起,司建华.实施分水方案后对黑河下游地下水影响的分析[J].干旱区地理,2007,30(4):487-495.

[9] 杨鹏年,邓铭江,李霞,等.塔里木河下游间歇输水下地下水响应宽度:以塔里木河下游英苏断面为例[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(3):331-335.

[10] 陈永金,陈亚宁,李卫红.输水作用下的地下水水质变化与胡杨林更新:以塔里木河下游英苏断面为例[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(1):101-105.[Chen Yongjin,Chen Yaning,Li Weihong.Change of groundwater quality and restoration of the forests of Populus euphratica under transfusing stream water to the lower reaches of the Tarim River :A case study along Yengisu section[J].Arid Zone Research,2005,22(1):101-105.]

[11] 张光辉,石迎新,聂振龙.黑河流域生态环境的脆弱性及其对地下水的依赖性[J].安全与环境学报,2002,2(3):31-33.

[12] 刘少玉,卢耀如,程旭学,等.黑河中、下游盆地地下水系统与水资源开发的资源环境效应[J].地理学与国土资源,2002,18(4):90-96.

[13] 聂振龙,陈宗宇,程旭学,等.黑河干流浅层地下水与地表水相互转化的水化学特征[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2005,35(1):48-53.

[14] 钱云平,秦大军,庞忠和,等.黑河下游额济纳盆地深层地下水来源的探讨[J].水文地质工程地质,2006,28(3):25-29.

[15] 武选民,史胜生,黎智恒,等.西北黑河下游额济纳盆地地下水系统研究:上[J].水文地质与工程地质,2002,29(1):16-20.

[16] Matheron G.Principles of geostatistics[J].Economic Geology,1963,58:1 246-1 266.

[17] Palmer M W.Fractal geometry:A toll for describing spatial patterns of plant communities[J].Vegetation,1988,75:91-102.

[18] 姚荣江,杨劲松,刘广明.黄河三角洲地区典型地块地下水特征的空间变异性研究[J].土壤通报,2006,37(6):1 071-1 075.

[19] Li H B,Reynolds J F.On definition and quantification of heterogeneity[J].Oikos,1995,73(2):280-284.

[20] Webster R.Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field[J].Advance in Soil Science,1985,3:1-70.

[21] Cynthia S A,Joseph M W,Stephen R Y.Characterizing the spatial structure of vegetation communities in the Mojave Desert using geostatistical techniques[J].Computers & Geoscience,2000,26:397-410.

[22] Cambardella C A,Moorman T B,Novak J M,et al.Field-scale variability of soil properties in central lowa soils[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1994,58:1 501-1 511.

[23] 李世明,程国栋,李元红,等.河西走廊水资源合理利用与生态环境保护[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2002:238-249.