基于RS和PCA的荒漠化现状综合评价

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2015.02.19

干旱区研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 342-346.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2015.02.19

基于RS和PCA的荒漠化现状综合评价

梁文琼¹, 田淑芳², 周家晶²

1.海口市土地测绘院,海南海口 570125;
2.中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2013-04-22 修回日期:2013-05-27 出版日期:2015-03-15 发布日期:2015-04-16
作者简介:梁文琼(1987-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为遥感与地理信息系统.E-mail: liangwenqiong@sina.com
基金资助:
国土资源部地质调查局华北地区基础地质调查及数据更新项目(1212010811001);黄河流域基础地质环境变迁遥感调查项目(1212010510511)

Comprehensive Assessment of Desertification Status Based on Remote Sensing and Principle Component Analysis

LIANG Wen-qiong¹, TIAN Shu-fang², ZHOU Jia-jing²

1. Haikou Land Surveying and Mapping Institute, Haikou 570125, Hainan, China;
2. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Received:2013-04-22 Revised:2013-05-27 Published:2015-03-15 Online:2015-04-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对一些荒漠化评价指标无法通过遥感手段直接获取,且简单目视判读或直接分类等评价方法主观性强等问题,提出一种基于遥感与主成分分析相结合的荒漠化现状综合评价方法。研究遵循代表性、综合性、主导性及遥感手段可操作性原则,选取5个荒漠化评价指标,由ETM⁺数据直接反演得到;并基于先验数据进行主成分分析,确定指标权重,建立综合评价模型,对整个研究区荒漠化现状进行综合评价。研究认为,该方法体现了遥感在大面积环境评价中的优势,且基于统计结果的评价方法更客观,更适用于区域尺度荒漠化评价。

关键词: 荒漠化, 评价指标, 遥感反演, 主成分分析, 黄河流域

Abstract: Because some of the desertification evaluation indices cannot be directly obtained by remote sensing, and simple visual interpretation or direct classification evaluation methods have strong subjectivity, a comprehensive evaluation method of the desertification status based on remote sensing in combination with principal component analysis was put forward. Five desertification evaluation indices were selected following the representative, comprehensive, predominant and operable principles. These indices were directly obtained from inversed ETM⁺ data. Comprehensive evaluation model was set up based on principal component analysis of priori data and the determination of indices weight. The present desertification status of the whole study area was evaluated by the model. Results indicate that the model is more objective than that method of analysis and is more suitable for the desertification evaluation at regional scale. And the evaluation effects of the model reflected the superiority of the remote sensing method at large environmental scale.

Key words: desertification evaluation, index inversion, principle component analysis

梁文琼, 田淑芳, 周家晶. 基于RS和PCA的荒漠化现状综合评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(2): 342-346.

LIANG Wen-qiong, TIAN Shu-fang, ZHOU Jia-jing. Comprehensive Assessment of Desertification Status Based on Remote Sensing and Principle Component Analysis[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2015, 32(2): 342-346.

参考文献

〔1〕胡文康,李久进.坚持不懈地向荒漠化作斗争:荒漠化动态与防治荒漠化进展综述〔J〕.干旱区研究,1995,12(3):67-70.〔Hu Wenkang,Li Jiujin.Diligently to fight desertification:Dynamic desertification and desertification progress review〔J〕.Arid Zone Research,1995,12(3):67-70.〕
〔2〕蒋德明,李雪华,武健伟,等.科尔沁沙地乌兰敖都地区荒漠化动态监测〔J〕.干旱区研究,2008,25(6):877-881.〔Jiang Deming,Li Xuehua,Wu Jianwei,et al.Dynamic monitoring of desertification in the Ulan’aodu Region in Horqin Sandland〔J〕.Arid Zone Research,2008,25(6):877-881.〕
〔3〕王葆芳,刘星晨,王君厚,等.沙质荒漠化土地评价指标体系研究〔J〕.干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(4):23-27.〔Wang Baofang,Liu Xingchen,Wang Junhou,et al.Study on monitoring and assessment indicator systems of sandy desertification in China〔J〕.Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2004,18(4):23-27.〕
〔4〕张东,丁国栋,马士龙.浑善达克沙地荒漠化灾害预警指标体系的研究〔J〕.水土保持研究,2005,12(6):79-82.〔Zhang Dong,Ding Guodong,Ma Shilong.Research on indicator system of early-warning of desertification damages in Hunshandake Sand〔J〕.Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(6):79-82.〕
〔5〕曾永年,向南平,冯兆东,等.Albedo-NDVI特征空间及沙漠化遥感监测指数研究〔J〕.地理科学,2006,26(1):75-81.〔Zeng Yongnian,Xiang Nanping,Feng Zhaodong,et al.Albedo-NDVI space and remote sensing synthesis index models for desertification monitoring〔J〕.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2006,26(1):75-81.〕
〔6〕毛晓利,赵鹏祥,王德祥,等.非监督数字化分类与GIS在土地沙漠化动态监测中的应用〔J〕.西北林学院学报,2005,20(3):6-9.〔Mao Xiaoli,Zhao Pengxiang,Wang Dexiang,et al.Non supervising digital classification and GIS in the dynamic monitoring of soil desertification application〔J〕.Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2005,20(3):6-9.〕
〔7〕买买提·沙吾提,塔西甫拉提·特依拜,丁建丽,等.BP神经网络的沙漠化土地信息提取研究〔J〕.干旱区研究,2008,25(5):647-651.〔Mamat Sawut,Tashpolat Tiyip,Ding Jianli,et al.Study on extracting the information about desertified lands based on principal component fusion and BP neural network〔J〕.Arid Zone Research,2008,25(5):647-651.〕
〔8〕王涛.正确理解荒漠化、沙漠化的概念和看待沙漠化形势〔N〕.科学时报,2009-06-17.〔Wang Tao.A correct understanding of desertification,the concept of desertification and the situation〔N〕.Science Times,2009-06-17.〕
〔9〕郭玉川,何英,李霞.基于MODIS的干旱区植被覆盖度反演及植被指数优选〔J〕.国土资源遥感,2011(2):115-118.〔Guo Yuchuan,He Ying,Li Xia.Remote sensing inversion of vegetation coverage and optimization of vegetation index based on MODIS data in arid area〔J〕.Remote Sensing for Land & Resources,2011(2):115-118.〕
〔10〕文军,王介民.一种由卫星遥感资料获得的修正的土壤调整植被指数〔J〕.气候与环境研究,1997,2(3):302-309.〔Wen Jun,Wang Jiemin.A modified soil-adjusted vegetation index obtained from satellite remote sensing data〔J〕.Climatic and Environmental Ressarch,1997,2(3):302-309.〕
〔11〕张亚峰,王新平,潘颜霞,等.荒漠地区地表反照率与土壤湿度相关性研究〔J〕.中国沙漠,2011,31(5):1 141-1 148.〔Zhang Yafeng,Wang Xinping,Pan Yanxia,et al.The dependence of surface albedo on soil moisture in an arid desert area〔J〕.Journal of Desert Research,2011,31(5):1 141-1 148.〕
〔12〕王介民,高峰.关于地表反照率遥感反演的几个问题〔J〕.遥感技术与应用,2004,19(5):295-300.〔Wang Jiemin,Gao Feng.Discussion on the problems on land surface albedo retrieval by remote sensing data〔J〕.Remote Sensing Technology and Application,2004,19(5):295-300.〕
〔13〕 Liang S L,Shuey C J.Narrowband to broadband conversions of land surface albedo:Ⅱ.validation〔J〕.Remote Sensing of Environment,2002,84(1):25-41.
〔14〕 Sobrino J A,Raissouni N,Li Z L.A comparative study of land surface emissivity retrieval from NOAA data〔J〕.Remote Sensing of Environment,2001,75(2):256-266.
〔15〕李宝富,李卫红.TM影像反射率对干旱区土壤含水量的响应特征〔J〕.光谱学与光谱分析,2011,31(10):2 824-2 828.〔Li Baofu,Li Weihong.The response characteristics of TM image reflectance to the arid region of soil moisture〔J〕.Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis,2011,31(10):2 824-2 828.〕

[1]	张艳, 杨维新, 吕韬. 基于GeoDetector-MCCA的土地利用变化驱动因素分析与多情景模拟——以黄河流域甘肃段为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(4): 668-681.
[2]	孟庆帅, 巩钰, 刘小燕, 童新, 王东民, 谢国英, 刘廷玺. 水资源-社会经济-生态环境耦合协调度关系研究及预测——以黄河流域内蒙古段为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(4): 682-694.
[3]	栾奎峰, 薛家盛, 冯贵平, 胡健聪, 管志豪, 朱卫东, 元建胜. 基于GRACE/GRACE-FO的黄河流域水储量及干旱特征研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(2): 246-257.
[4]	李豪, 张蕾, 梁晓磊, 刘庚. 基于GeoSOM网络的生态修复分区——以黄河流域山西段为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(2): 321-332.
[5]	刘志飞, 杨雪梅, 王景瑞, 黄轲盼, 徐浩杰. 基于高光谱反射特征的荒漠类型可分性评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(1): 141-153.
[6]	袁征, 张志高, 闫瑾, 刘嘉毅, 胡柱钰, 王赟, 蔡茂堂. 1960—2020年黄河流域不同等级降水时空特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(8): 1259-1271.
[7]	吴思源, 郝利娜. 2001—2021年黄河流域植被覆盖变化及其驱动因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(8): 1373-1384.
[8]	张宏伟, 别强, 石莹, 苏晓杰, 李欣璋. 黄河流域上游植被覆盖变化特征及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(8): 1385-1394.
[9]	李冰洁, 范志韬, 曲芷程, 姚顺予, 宿夏姝, 刘东伟, 王立新. 基于InVEST-PLUS模型的黄河流域内蒙古段生态系统碳储量评价及预测[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(7): 1217-1227.
[10]	张华, 押海廷, 徐存刚. 兰州市南北两山土壤水分遥感反演及植被需水量估算[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(4): 566-580.
[11]	刘如龙, 赵媛媛, 陈国清, 迟文峰, 刘正佳. 内蒙古黄河流域1990—2020年生境质量评估[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(4): 674-683.
[12]	徐铭璟, 冯强, 吕萌. 生态系统服务权衡及其影响因素——以黄河流域山西段为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(3): 467-479.
[13]	王若凡, 刘雨欣, 李佩钢, 唐悦, 谢微. 黄河兰州段河岸带沉积物磷的形态分布及释放风险[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(12): 2035-2044.
[14]	杨晓娟, 韩立新, 吕超. 环境条件对黄河流域植被干旱状态的影响特征分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(12): 2083-2093.
[15]	王市委, 张浩斌, 郭文兵, 马超. 气候和采矿活动对荒漠化草原露天矿区植被的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(11): 1921-1935.

基于RS和PCA的荒漠化现状综合评价

Comprehensive Assessment of Desertification Status Based on Remote Sensing and Principle Component Analysis

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0