水分和养分添加对内蒙古荒漠草原沙生针茅生长与生理特性及其敏感性的影响

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2021.02.20

干旱区研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 487-493.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2021.02.20

水分和养分添加对内蒙古荒漠草原沙生针茅生长与生理特性及其敏感性的影响

胡亚^1,²(),郭新新^1,²,岳平¹,李香云^1,²,赵生龙^1,²,郭爱霞^1,²,左小安^1,³()

1.中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,乌拉特荒漠草原研究站,甘肃兰州 730000
2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
3.中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,奈曼沙漠化研究站,甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2020-06-08 修回日期:2020-08-20 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-04-25
通讯作者: 左小安
作者简介:胡亚（1993-）,女,博士研究生,研究方向为植物生理生态. E-mail:huya@lzb.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41571106);国家自然科学基金(41622103);国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0500506)

Effects of water and nutrient addition on the growth and physiology of Stipa glareosa in a desert steppe in Inner Mongolia

HU Ya^1,²(),GUO Xinxin^1,²,YUE Ping¹,LI Xiangyun^1,²,ZHAO Shenglong^1,²,GUO Aixia^1,²,ZUO Xiao’an^1,³()

1. Urat Desert-grassland Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. Naiman Desertification Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000 Gansu, China

Received:2020-06-08 Revised:2020-08-20 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-04-25
Contact: Xiao’an ZUO

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了探究荒漠草原优势植物对水分和养分输入的响应特征和适应规律,通过设置2个水分水平（自然降雨、水分添加）和3个养分水平（无养分添加、N添加、NPK添加）,共6个处理,研究水分与养分添加对荒漠草原优势植物沙生针茅（Stipa glareosa）生长、生理及其敏感性的影响。双因素方差分析结果表明：水分主效应、养分主效应及水分和养分的交互作用对沙生针茅的生长生理特性具有显著影响（P<0.05）。水分添加显著增加了沙生针茅的叶片鲜重、干重、株高和相对电导率,降低了SOD酶活性;养分添加增加沙生针茅的叶面积,N添加增加了丙二醛含量,NPK添加降低了叶绿素a/b（Ca/Cb）和SOD酶活性;水分和养分的交互作用对叶面积、叶片厚度、叶绿素a（Ca）、脯氨酸、蛋白质含量和SOD酶活性具有显著影响。敏感性分析表明,叶面积和Ca含量对同时添加水分和NPK处理较为敏感,而Ca/Cb对水分添加处理更为敏感。综上所述,沙生针茅可以通过改变特定的生长生理特性适应水分和养分的变化,这对于揭示荒漠草原植物对全球变化的响应机制具有重要意义。

关键词: 养分添加, 水分添加, 氮素, 敏感性, 荒漠草原

Abstract:

To explore the adaptive responses of dominant species in a desert steppe to environmental changes,we tested the effects of six treatments with two water levels (natural precipitation andartificial irrigation) and three nutrient levels (no nutrient addition, N addition and NPK addition) on the growth and physiology of Stipa glareosain Inner Mongolia. The results of two-wayANOVAshowed that the main factors(water andnutrients) and water × nutrientinteraction had significant effects on some of the growth and physiological parametersof S. glareosa (P<0.05). Water supplementation significantly increased the leaf fresh weight, leaf dry weight, plant height and relative electrical conductivity but decreased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. Both N and NPK addition increased leaf area. N addition increased malondialdehyde content, whereasNPK addition decreased chlorophyll a/b and SOD activity. The water × nutrient interaction factor had significant effects on leaf area, leaf thickness, chlorophyll a, proline and protein contents and SOD activity. Moreover, the leaf area and chlorophyll a content of S. glareosawere more sensitive to water and NPK addition, whereas thechlorophyll a/bwas more sensitive to water addition treatments. In conclusion, our results suggest that S. glareosacould adapt to fluctuations in water and nutrient availability by changing specific growth and physiological characteristics, which is important for revealingthe response mechanism of plantsin a desert steppe to climate changes.

Key words: nutrient addition, water addition, nitrogen, sensitivity, desert steppe

胡亚,郭新新,岳平,李香云,赵生龙,郭爱霞,左小安. 水分和养分添加对内蒙古荒漠草原沙生针茅生长与生理特性及其敏感性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2): 487-493.

HU Ya,GUO Xinxin,YUE Ping,LI Xiangyun,ZHAO Shenglong,GUO Aixia,ZUO Xiao’an. Effects of water and nutrient addition on the growth and physiology of Stipa glareosa in a desert steppe in Inner Mongolia[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(2): 487-493.

图/表 4

表1

图1

图2

图3

参考文献 38

[1]	Zhang Y, Moran M S, Nearing M A, et al. Extreme precipitation patterns and reductions of terrestrial ecosystem production across biomes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2013,118(1):148-157.
[2]	Ding Y, Ren G, Zhao Z, et al. Detection, causes and projection of climate change over China: An overview of recent progress[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2007,24(6):954-971.
[3]	姚俊强, 杨青, 毛炜峄, 等. 西北干旱区大气水分循环要素变化研究进展[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018,35(2):269-276.
	[ Yao Junqiang, Yang Qing, Mao Weiyi, et al. Characteristics of water cycle in atmosphere in the arid region of northwestern China[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018,35(2):269-276. ]
[4]	Yang H, Wu M, Liu W, et al. Community structure and composition in response to climate change in a temperate steppe[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011,17(1):452-465.
[5]	Wu Z, Dijkstra P, Koch G W, et al. Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: A meta-analysis of experimental manipulation[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011,17:927-942.
[6]	Voesenek L A C J, Colmer T D, Pierik R, et al. How plants cope with complete submergence[J]. New Phytologist, 2006,170(2):213-226.
[7]	Panda D, Sharma S G, Sarkar R K. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, CO₂ photosynthetic rate and regeneration capacity as a result of complete submergence and subsequent re-emergence in rice (Oryza sativa L. )[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2008,88(2):127-133.
[8]	Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide[J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 2013,61(3):167-234.
[9]	苏原, 罗艳, 耿凤展, 等. 天山高寒草原植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征对氮沉降的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019,36(2):430-436.
	[ Su Yuan, Luo Yan, Geng Fengzhan, et al. Response of stoichiometric characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in plant leaves in an alpine grasslands to nitrogen deposition in the Tianshan Mountains[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019,36(2):430-436. ]
[10]	Matson P, Lohse K A, Hall S J. The globalization of nitrogen deposition: Consequences for terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Ambio, 2002,31(2):113-119. pmid: 12077999
[11]	杨路存, 刘何春, 李长斌, 等. 氮磷钾不同施肥配方对退化高寒草原植物群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015,34(1):25-32.
	[ Yang Lucun, Liu Hechun, Li Changbin, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer applications on plant community structure in a degraded alpine steppe[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015,34(1):25-32. ]
[12]	Wang C, Wan S, Xing X, et al. Temperature and soil moisture interactively affected soil net N mineralization in temperate grassland in Northern China[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006,38(5):1101-1110.
[13]	Han J, Chen J, Xia J, et al. Grazing and watering alter plant phenological processes in a desert steppe community[J]. Plant Ecology, 2015,216(4):599-613.
[14]	杨新国, 古君龙, 王兴, 等. 荒漠草原中间锦鸡儿(Caragana intermedia)冠层穿透雨的发生与分布特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019,36(1):131-138.
	[ Yang Xinguo, Gu Junlong, Wang Xing, et al. Occurrence and distribution of throughfall under Caragana intermedia canopy in desert steppe[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019,36(1):131-138. ]
[15]	Wang Z, Li Y, Hao X, et al. Responses of plant community coverage to simulated warming and nitrogen addition in a desert steppe in Northern China[J]. Ecological Research, 2015,30(4):605-614.
[16]	康静. 增温和氮素添加对荒漠草原植物养分回收的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2019.
	[ Kang Jing. Effects of Warming and Nitrogen Addition on Plant Nutrient Resorption in a Desert Steppe[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019. ]
[17]	白春利. 荒漠草原优势植物养分利用及化学计量特征研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2013.
	[ Bai Chunli. Study on Nutrient use and Stoichiometry of Dominant Plants in Desert Steppe[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2013. ]
[18]	Tang H L, Shen J B, Zhang F S, et al. Interactive effects of phosphorus deficiency and exogenous auxin on root morphological and physiological traits in white lupin (Lupinus albus L. )[J]. Science China Life Sciences, 2013,56:313-323. pmid: 23504274
[19]	Inostroza L, Acuna H, Mendez J. Multi-physiological-trait selection indices to identify Lotus tenuis genotypes with high dry matter production under drought conditions[J]. Crop and Pasture Science, 2015,66(1):90-99.
[20]	Arnon D I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. polyphenoloxidases in Beta vulgaris[J]. Plant Physiology, 1949,24:1-15. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1 pmid: 16654194
[21]	Bates L S, Waldren R P, Teare I D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies[J]. Plant Soil, 1973,39:205-207.
[22]	Snyder J C, Desborough S L. Rapid estimation of potato tuber total protein content with coomassie brilliant blue G-250[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1978,52(3):135-139. pmid: 24317460
[23]	Dipierro S, De Leonardis S. The ascorbate system and lipid peroxidation in stored potato (Solanum tuberosum L. ) tubers[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1997,48(3):779-783.
[24]	Zhao D Y, Shen L, Fan B, et al. Physiological and genetic properties of tomato fruits from 2 cultivars differing in chilling tolerance at cold storage[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2009,74(5):348-352.
[25]	Spychalla J P, Desborough S L. Superoxide dismutase, catalase, and α-tocopherol content of stored potato tubers[J]. Plant Physiology, 1990,94:1214-1218. pmid: 16667819
[26]	Hameed A, Iqbal N, Malik S A. Effect of D-mannose on antioxidant defense and oxidative processes in etiolated wheat coleoptiles[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2014,36(1):161-167.
[27]	Xia J, Wan S. The effects of warming-shifted plant phenology on ecosystem carbon exchange are regulated by precipitation in a semi-arid grassland[J]. Plos One, 2012,7(2):e32088. pmid: 22359660
[28]	Sarangi D, Irmak S, Lindquist J, et al. Effect of water stress on the growth and fecundity of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis)[J]. Weed Science, 2015,64(1):42-52.
[29]	张永峰, 殷波. 混合盐碱胁迫对苗期紫花苜蓿抗氧化酶活性及丙二醛含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009,18(1):46-50.
	[ Zhang Yongfeng, Yin Bo. Influences of salt and alkali mixed stresses on antioxidative activity and MDA content of Medicago sativa at seedling stage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009,18(1):46-50. ]
[30]	Moriwaki T, Falcioni R, Tanaka F, et al. Nitrogen-improved photosynjournal quantum yield is driven by increased thylakoid density, enhancing green light absorption[J]. Plant Science, 2019,278:1-11. pmid: 30471722
[31]	Craine J M, Morrow C, Stock W D. Nutrient concentration ratios and co-limitation in South African grasslands[J]. New Phytologist, 2008,179(3):829-836.
[32]	Liang X, Zhang T, Lu X, et al. Global response patterns of plant photosynjournal to nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology, 2020,26(6):3585-3600. pmid: 32146723
[33]	王强, 金则新, 郭水良, 等. 濒危植物长叶榧的光合生理生态特性[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(22):6460-6470.
	[ Wang Qiang, Jin Zexin, Guo Shuiliang, et al. Photosynthetic traits of the endangered plant species Torreya jackii[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(22):6460-6470. ]
[34]	Wang J, Liu W Z, Dang T H, et al. Nitrogen fertilization effect on soil water and wheat yield in the Chinese loess plateau[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2013,105(1):143-149.
[35]	宋成军, 马克明, 傅伯杰, 等. 岷江干旱河谷土壤水、氮和磷对小马鞍羊蹄甲幼苗生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009,20(8):17-24.
	[ Song Chengjun, Ma Keming, Fu Bojie, et al. Influence of soil moisture, nitrogen and phosphorus contents on Bauhinia faberi seedlings growth characteristics in arid valley of Minjiang River[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009,20(8):17-24. ]
[36]	Roa-Fuentes L L, Templer P H, Campo J. Effects of precipitation regime and soil nitrogen on leaf traits in seasonally dry tropical forests of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico[J]. Oecologia, 2015,179(2):585-597. pmid: 26013874
[37]	Markesteijn L, Poorter L. Seedling root morphology and biomass allocation of 62 tropical tree species in relation to drought-and shade-tolerance[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2009,97(2):311-325.
[38]	Lemke I, Kolb A, Graae B, et al. Patterns of phenotypic trait variation in two temperate forest herbs along a broad climatic gradient[J]. Plant Ecology, 2015,216(11):1523-1536.

变量	水分	养分	水分×养分
面积	0.23	6.42^*	8.90^**
叶鲜重	12.68^**	0.13	1.82
叶干重	31.89^***	2.14	0.28
叶厚度	0.62	0.30	3.94^*
株高	10.27^**	0.47	2.47
叶绿素a(Ca)	0.06	0.44	5.60^*
叶绿素b(Cb)	0.28	1.43	0.88
类胡萝卜素(Cx)	0.25	0.75	2.13
叶绿素a/b(Ca/Cb)	2.70	3.59^*	0.22
脯氨酸	2.55	3.05	4.08^*
蛋白质	0.26	0.90	5.27^*
相对电导率(REC)	15.09^**	3.00	1.00
超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)	11.38^**	10.50^**	15.22^***
过氧化物酶(POD)	3.91	0.43	1.52
丙二醛(MDA)	0.09	5.850^**	0.210

水分和养分添加对内蒙古荒漠草原沙生针茅生长与生理特性及其敏感性的影响

Effects of water and nutrient addition on the growth and physiology of Stipa glareosa in a desert steppe in Inner Mongolia

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	乐芳军, 罗永忠, 郭艳俊, 罗昕, 桂杰. 沙封区农户生计资本对生计策略选择敏感性影响——以临泽县为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1194-1202.
[2]	薛栋元, 胡海珠, 张锦宁, 任嘉伟. 牧区河岸潜流带硝酸盐氮和氨氮浓度对水文过程的响应机制[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 937-948.
[3]	乔静娟, 左小安, 岳平, 王国林, 王景圆, 王泽宙. 养分添加与干扰对荒漠草原群落组成及构建的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 958-970.
[4]	他富源, 张弘扬, 勾文山, 马维新, 胡桂馨. 民勤温性荒漠草原拟步甲昆虫多样性调查[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(5): 840-848.
[5]	王娟, 王钊, 郭斌, 何慧娟, 董金芳. 陕西黄河流域植被碳利用率时空特征及对气候的敏感性研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(12): 1959-1968.
[6]	杨霜奇, 宋乃平, 王兴, 陈晓莹, 常道琴. 荒漠草原灰钙土与风沙土水分时空特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1625-1636.
[7]	牟红霞,刘秉儒,李子豪,李国旗,麻冬梅. 矿井水对荒漠草原土壤微生物群落结构及多样性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1618-1630.
[8]	余洋,张志浩,杨建明,柴旭田,曾凡江. 疏叶骆驼刺叶、根生态化学计量特征对水氮添加的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 551-559.
[9]	娄泊远,王永东,闫晋升,艾柯代·艾斯凯尔. 亚寒带荒漠草原不同树种人工林土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1385-1392.
[10]	尉迟文思,苗恒录,王星天,高天明,邬佳宾. 阴山北麓荒漠草原干旱气象因子分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1327-1334.
[11]	王荣女. 毛乌素沙地不同类型生物土壤结皮-土壤呼吸的季节变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 961-972.
[12]	张雅柔,安慧,王波,文志林,杜忠毓,吴秀芝,李巧玲. 短期N、P添加对荒漠草原土壤非保护性有机碳的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(1): 95-103.
[13]	桑钰,高文礼,再努尔·吐尔逊,范雪,马晓东. 干旱胁迫下AMF对多枝柽柳幼苗和疏叶骆驼刺根系生长和氮素吸收分配的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(1): 247-256.
[14]	曹媛, 杨新国, 陈林, 王兴, 宋乃平, 王磊. 柠条引入对沙化草地土壤颗粒组分的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(6): 1437-1446.
[15]	李香云, 岳平, 程欢, 郭新新, 赵生龙, 张森溪, 王少昆, 左小安. 乌拉特荒漠草原红砂生物量预测模型 [J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(2): 462-469.