玛纳斯河流域两种典型土地利用变化分析

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2018.04.25

干旱区研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 954-962.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2018.04.25

玛纳斯河流域两种典型土地利用变化分析

贺可^1,2，吴世新¹，周宏飞¹，杨中惠³，杨怡¹

(1. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所 LUCC与全球变化实验室，新疆乌鲁木齐，830011；2. 中国科学院大学，北京，100049；3.新疆兵团勘测设计院（集团）有限责任公司新疆乌鲁木齐， 830002 )

收稿日期:2017-11-15 修回日期:2018-03-19 出版日期:2018-07-15 发布日期:2018-07-19
通讯作者: 吴世新. E-mail：wushixin@ms.xjb.ac.cn
作者简介:贺可（1993-），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为遥感应用. E-mail：heke_ke@163.com
基金资助:
中国科学院野外站联盟项目“新疆兵团农垦生态成效评估”（KFJ-SW-YW027）资助

The Study of Two Typical Land Use Model in Manas River Basin

HE Ke^1,2, WU Shi-xin¹，ZHOU Hong-fei¹，YANG Zhong-hui³，YANG Yi¹

(1.Laboratory of LUCC and global change, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang,China;
2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China；3.XPCC Surveying & Designing Institute (Group) Co.Ltd, Urumqi 830002, Xinjiang,China;3. XPCC Surveying & Designing Institute (Group) Co.Ltd, Urumqi 830002, Xinjiang,China;)

Received:2017-11-15 Revised:2018-03-19 Online:2018-07-15 Published:2018-07-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对比分析兵团和地方两种土地经营管理模式下两种典型土地利用变化的差异，对认识不同人类活动方式对土地利用的影响有重大意义。以新疆玛纳斯河流域兵团、地方为研究对象，利用1972—2015年Landsat MSS/TM/OLI以及CBERS-02B遥感影像数据，综合分析两种典型土地利用变化，结果表明：①兵团、地方土地利用变化差异主要体现在耕地、建设用地上，兵团耕地变化更为显著，地方建设用地变化更为显著。②不同于地方小规模自主经营模式，地块规模有限，破碎度较高；兵团实行大规模统一管理的土地利用模式，土地整合频率较高，地块不断集中，景观格局趋于简单。③兵团与地方土地利用变化程度及景观格局存在显著差异的主要原因在于土地经营管理模式的不同。

关键词: 土地经营与管理模式, 土地利用变化, 景观格局, 兵团, 玛纳斯河流域

Abstract: Xinjiang has two basic management modes, “farm management mode” developmented by Xinjiang Production and Construction Gorps and “local mode” foremd by local goverments. The comparison and analysis of the differences between the two types of two typical land use changes is of great significance to the understanding of the impact of different human activities on land use. This paper takes the Manasi River Basin in Xinjiang as the research area, the corps and the local areas as the research object. Using the land use data set of Manas River Basin is constructed. In this study, we investigated the different between farm management mode and local mode on land use change pattern and landscape pattern by using land use index and Landscape pattern index. The results are as follows: ①The land-use process are some differences in different modes. The difference of the land use change of the corps and the local land is mainly reflected in the cultivated and the construction type. The change of arable land in the Corps is more significant, and the change of local construction land is more significant. ②BINGTUAN is different from the local area. The Corps carry out large-scale unified management of land use mode, with higher land consolidation frequency, land constantly concentrated and landscape pattern tends to be simple. The local model of small scale independent operation is carried out, the scale of land block is limited and the degree of breakage is high. ③compared with the local communities, there are significant differences in land use change degree and landscape pattern. The difference is mainly due to the difference between the corps and the local land management mode. The comparative analysis of the differences in land use change between the corps and the local government plays an important role in the rational use of land and the sustainable development of the region.

Key words: land use model, management model, comparative analysis, landscape pattern, Manas River Basin

贺可，吴世新，周宏飞，杨中惠，杨怡. 玛纳斯河流域两种典型土地利用变化分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(4): 954-962.

HE Ke, WU Shi-xin，ZHOU Hong-fei，YANG Zhong-hui，YANG Yi. The Study of Two Typical Land Use Model in Manas River Basin[J]. , 2018, 35(4): 954-962.

参考文献

[1] Peng J, Xu Y Q, Cai Y L, et al. The role of policies in land use/cover change since the 1970s in ecologically fragile karst areas of Southwest China: A case study on the Maotiaohe watershed[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2011, 14(4): 408-418.
[2] Turner B L, Skole D, Sanderson S, et al. Land-use and Land-cover Change: Science/Research Plan[M]. Stockholm：International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, 1995.
[3] 刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥, 等. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 3-14. [ Liu Jiyuan, Kuang Wenhui, Zhang Zengxiang, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(1): 3-14. ]
[4] 刘芳, 闫慧敏, 刘纪远, 等. 21世纪初中国土地利用强度的空间分布格局[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1 130-1 143. [LiuFang, Yan Huimin, Liu Jiyuan, et al. Spatial pattern of land use intensity in China in 2000[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(7): 1 130-1 143. ]
[5] 姚远, 丁建丽, 张芳,等. 土地利用变化的人文驱动因子对新疆生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(5):298-304. [ Yao Yuan, Ding Jianli, Zhang Fang, et al. Impact of human driving factors for land use change on ecosystem service values in Xinjiang wei autonomous region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(5):298-304. ]
[6] Turner B L, Lambin E F, Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(52): 20 666-20 671.
[7] 宋文杰, 张清, 刘莎莎,等. 基于LUCC的干旱区人为干扰与生态安全分析——以天山北坡经济带绿洲为例[J]. 干旱区研究,2018,(1):235-242. [ Song Wenjie, Zhang Qing, Liu Shasha, et al. LUCC-based human disturbance and ecological security in arid area:A case study in the economic zone on northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018, 35(1):235-242. ]
[8] 罗格平, 张百平. 干旱区可持续土地利用模式分析——以天山北坡为例[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(11): 1 160-1 170. [ Luo Geping, Zhang Baiping. Sustainable land use models for arid lands:A case study of the northern Tianshan Mountain areas[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(11): 1 160-1 170. ]
[9] 陈曦. 中国干旱区土地利用与土地覆被变化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社，2008: 409-423. [Chen Xi. Land Use and Land Cover Change in Arid Regions of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 409-423. ]
[10] 张飞, 塔西甫拉提·特依拜, 丁建丽,等. 干旱区绿洲土地利用/覆被及景观格局变化特征——以新疆精河县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3):1 251-1 263. [Zhang Fei, Tashpolat Tiyip, Ding Jianli, et al. The change of land use/cover and characteristics of land scape pattern in arid areas oasis: A case study of Jinghe County, Xinjiang Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3):1 251-1 263. ]
[11] 巩杰, 钱彩云, 钱大文. 1977—2013年疏勒河中下游土地利用变化与环境响应[J]. 干旱区研究,2017,34(4):775-781. [Gong Jie, Qian Caiyun, Qian Dawen. Land use change and response of environment in the middle-lower reaches of the shule river basin during the period of 1977-2013[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2017,34(4):775-781. ]
[12] Yan H, Liu F, Liu J, et al. Status of land use intensity in China and its impacts on land carrying capacity[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(4): 387-402.
[13] 张琪, 罗格平, 李龙辉, 等. 基于土地利用/覆被变化表征的现代绿洲演变过程——以天山北坡三工河流域为例[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1 157-1 171. [Zhang Qi, Luo Geping, Li Longhui, et al. Modern oasis evolution analysis based on land-use and land-cover change:A case study in Sangong Rive Basin on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(7): 1 157-1 171. ]
[14] 陈平星. 新疆兵团土地管理系统建设的研究[J]. 中国西部科技, 2012, 11(6):72-73. [Chen Pingxing. Research of land management system in Xinjiang Corps[J]. Science and Technology in Western China, 2012, 11(6):72-73.]
[15] 谢志辉. 新疆兵团行政管理体制改革探析[J]. 中国农垦, 2010(2):32-34. [Xie Zhihui. An analysis of the administrative system reform of the Xinjiang Corps[J]. China State Farms, 2010(2):32-34.]
[16] 齐子鉴. 兵团行政管理体制演变与改革[J]. 兵团党校学报, 2011(4):24-27. [Qi Zijian. The evolution and reform of the administration system of the Corps[J]. Journal of the Party School, 2011(4):24-27.]
[17] 吴娜琳 ,胡晓江, 乔家君. 不同体制下农户农田生产活动差异分析——新疆地方村庄与兵团连队的对比[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(8): 1 469-1 476. [Wu Nalin, Hu Xiaojiang, Qiao Jiajun. Production activity differences of farmland among rural households under different administrative systems：Comparative analysis between local villages in Xinjiang and Xinjiang production and construction Corps [J]. Resources Science, 2012, 34(8): 1 469-1 476. ]
[18] Luo G P, Zhou C H, Chen X, et al. A methodology of characterizing status and trend of land changes in oases: A case study of Sangong River watershed, Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 88(4): 775-783.
[19] 冯异星, 罗格平, 周德成, 等. 近50a土地利用变化对干旱区典型流域景观格局的影响——以新疆玛纳斯河流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(16): 4 295-4 305. [Feng Yixing, Luo Geping, Zhou Decheng, et al. Effects of land use change on landscape pattern of a typical arid watershed in the recent 50 years: A case study on Manas river watershed in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(16): 4 295-4 305. ]
[20] 邬建国. 景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社，2007: 17-170. [Wu Jianguo. Landscape Ecology: Patterns, Processes, Scales and Grades[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007: 17-170]

玛纳斯河流域两种典型土地利用变化分析

The Study of Two Typical Land Use Model in Manas River Basin

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	康文辉,周殷竹,孙英,周金龙,曹月婷,鲁涵,涂治. 新疆玛纳斯河流域地下水砷氟分布及共富集成因[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(9): 1425-1437.
[2]	邹易, 蒙吉军. 干旱区绿洲-城镇-荒漠景观演变及生态环境效应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 988-1001.
[3]	张云霞,张金茜,巩杰. 半干旱区湖盆景观格局脆弱性及其影响因素——以凉城县为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1259-1269.
[4]	宋奇,史舟,冯春晖,马自强,纪文君,彭杰,高琪,蒋学玮. 基于1990—2019年多时相影像的干旱区绿洲景观格局分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 594-604.
[5]	王让会,赵文斐,彭擎,刘春伟,周丽敏,田畅. 气候变化及景观格局与生态系统碳储存的耦合关系——以祁连山为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 250-257.
[6]	王毓芳,赵成章,曾红霞,康满萍,赵婷婷,唐玉瑞. 疏勒河中游湿地景观时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 282-291.
[7]	刘畅,张红,张霄羽,杨国婷,刘勇. 半干旱地区矿区土地利用时空演变与预测[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 292-300.
[8]	曾红霞,赵成章,王毓芳,李晓雅,赵婷婷,唐玉瑞. 盐池湾高寒湿地景观格局演变及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(6): 1771-1781.
[9]	吝静,赵成义,马晓飞,施枫芝,吴世新,朱建. 基于生态系统服务价值的塔里木河干流土地利用结构优化[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1140-1151.
[10]	王晓峰,延雨,李月皓,张兴,符鑫鑫. 银川市湿地景观演变及其驱动因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(3): 855-866.
[11]	秦埼瑞, 李雪梅, 陈庆伟, 田亚林. 基于FLUS模型的天山山区未来土地利用变化预估 [J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(5): 1270-1279.
[12]	黄犁, 徐丽萍. 玛纳斯河流域绿洲时空演变及其景观格局变化 [J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(5): 1261-1269.
[13]	李海防, 卫伟, 陈瑾, 李旭春, 张佰林. 定西关川河流域退耕还林还草对景观格局演变的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014, 31(3): 410-415.
[14]	孟优, 张滢. 吐鲁番周边历史文化资源景观格局动态演变[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(6): 1081-1086.
[15]	白元, 徐海量, 刘新华, 凌红波, 傅荩仪. 塔里木河干流景观格局梯度分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(6): 1064-1072.