金沙江干热河谷银合欢人工林对土壤养分的影响

干旱区研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 229-234.

金沙江干热河谷银合欢人工林对土壤养分的影响

方海东¹, 魏雅丽², 刘刚才², 杨艳鲜¹, 潘志贤¹, 纪中华¹

1. 云南省农业科学院热区生态农业研究所, 云南元谋 651300;
2. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2010-05-21 修回日期:2010-09-26 出版日期:2011-04-25 发布日期:2011-09-06
通讯作者: 纪中华.E-mail:rjsjzh@163.com
作者简介:方海东(1979-),男,黑龙江海伦人,硕士,助理研究员,现从事生态恢复研究工作.E-mail: rqsfhd@163.com
基金资助:
国家"十二五"科技支撑计划(2010BAE00739);云南省自然科学基金(2007C235M)

Effects of Soil Nutrients on Planted Leucaena leucocephala Forest in the Dry-hot Jinshajiang River Valley

FANG Hai-dong¹, WEI Ya-li², LIU Gang-cai², YANG Yan-xian¹, PAN Zhi-xian¹, JI Zhong-hua¹

1. Institute of Tropical Eco-agriculture, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmou 651300, Yunnan Province, China;
2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chcngdu 610041, China

Received:2010-05-21 Revised:2010-09-26 Online:2011-04-25 Published:2011-09-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过干热河谷银合欢人工林对土壤改良效应5年的研究,结果表明:银合欢林具有很好的土壤改良效应,土壤有机质明显高于CK,在0~20cm,20~40cm和40~60cm的土层中,比CK分别高52.61%,51.09%和43.52%,土壤有机质随着土壤深度的增加而减少。pH在0~20cm,20~40cm和40~60cm的土层中,比CK分别低8.28%,2.41%和2.19%。全N含量上层土壤明显高于下层,水解N比CK高43.75%,随着土壤深度的增加,水解N呈现下降趋势,并具有显著性相关关系。全P含量比CK高0.05mg/kg,相差不是很明显。有效P含量与CK相差不是很明显,在不同土层深度有效P含量的变化非常一致。全K含量比CK高0.98mg/kg,银合欢的生长对土壤全K含量的影响并不明显。速效K含量平均为136.79mg/kg,变化幅度较大,比CK高69.45mg/kg,银合欢的生长对土壤速效K含量的影响明显。

关键词: 银合欢, 人工林, 土壤养分, 干热河谷, 金沙江

Abstract: The soil improvement effect on the planted Leucaena leucocephala forest in the dry-hot Jinshajiang River Valley was researched for five years. The results show that the soil improvement effect on the forest was obvious. Soil organic matter content was obviously higher than CK, its values at soil depths of 0-20 cm, 20-40 cm and 40-60 cm under the forest were 52.61%, 51.09% and 43.52% higher than CK respectively, and it decreased with the increase of soil depth. At soil depths of 0-20 cm, 20-40 cm and 40-60 cm, the pH values of forest soil were 8.28%, 2.41% and 2.19% lower than CK respectively. Total soil N content was 43.75% higher than CK, it decreased with the increase of soil depth, and there was a significant correlation between total soil N content and soil depth. Total soil P content was 0.05 mg/kg higher than CK only. The difference of available P content between the forest soil and CK was not obvious. Total soil K content was 0.98 mg/kg higher than CK, and the effect of total K content on the forest was not obvious. The available K content in the forest soil was 136.79 mg/kg, and it was 69.45 mg/kg higher than CK.

Key words: Leucaena leucocephala, planted forest, soil nutrient, dry-hot valley, Jinshajiang River

中图分类号:

S153.6

方海东, 魏雅丽, 刘刚才, 杨艳鲜, 潘志贤, 纪中华. 金沙江干热河谷银合欢人工林对土壤养分的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2011, 28(2): 229-234.

FANG Hai-dong, WEI Ya-li, LIU Gang-cai, YANG Yan-xian, PAN Zhi-xian, JI Zhong-hua. Effects of Soil Nutrients on Planted Leucaena leucocephala Forest in the Dry-hot Jinshajiang River Valley[J]. , 2011, 28(2): 229-234.

参考文献

[1] 方海东,纪中华,杨艳鲜,等.金沙江干热河谷新银合欢人工林枯落物层持水特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(5):52－54.[Fang Haidong,Ji Zhonghua,Yang Yanxian,et al.Study on litter water retaining capacity of Leucaena leucocephal plantation in Jinsha River hot and dry valley[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,19(5):52－54.]

[2] 钟祥浩.干热河谷区生态系统退化及恢复与重建途径[J].长江流域资源与环境,2000,9(3):376-682.[Zhong Xianghao.Degradation of ecosystem and ways of its rehabilitation and reconstruction in dry and hot valley[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2000,9(3):376-682.]

[3] 郑科,郎南军,杨新民,等.干热河谷山合欢、加勒比松林地雨季中末期水文侵蚀效应的研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):84-88.[Zhen Ke,Lang Nanjun,Yang Xinmin,et al.Research of hydrology erosion effect of Albizia kalkora and Pinus caribaea woodland in mid-end rainy season in dry-hot valley[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,17(2):84-88.]

[4] 蒋德明,曹成有,押田敏雄,等.科尔沁沙地小叶锦鸡儿人工林防风固沙及改良土壤效应研究[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(5):653-658.[Jiang Deming,Cao Chengyou,Toshio Oshida,et al.Study on the effects of protection against wind,sand-fixation and soil improvement of Caragana microphylla plantations in Horqin sand land[J].Arid Zone Research,2008,25(5):653-658.]

[5] 王军,傅伯杰,邱扬,等.黄土高原小流域土壤养分的空间异质性[J].生态学报,2002,22(8):1 174-1 178.[Wang Jun,Fu Bojie,Qiu Yang,et al.Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in a small catchments of the Loess Plateau[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2002,22(8):1 174-1 178.]

[6] 陈立明,满秀玲.云冷杉林土壤酶活性与土壤养分的研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(4):94-99.[Chen Liming,Man Xiuling.Soil enzymes activities and soil nutrient of Picea and Abies forest[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,7(4):94-99.]

[7] 尹娜,魏天兴,张晓娟.黄土丘陵区人工林土壤养分效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):209-214.[Yin Na,Wei Tianxing,Zhang Xiaojuan.The characteristics of soil Nutrient in artificial forest land in the Hilly Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(2):209-214.]

[8] 李昆,张昌顺,马姜明,等.元谋干热河谷不同人工林土壤肥力比较研究[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(5):574-579.[Li Kun,Zhang Changshun,Ma Jiangming,et al.Comparative research on soil fertility of different artificial plantations in Yuanmou dry-hot valley,Yunnan Province[J].Forest Research,2006,19(5):574-579.]

[9] 焦菊英,焦峰,温仲明.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同恢复方式下植物群落的土壤水分和养分特征[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(5):667-674.[Jiao Juying,Jiao Feng,Wen Zhongming.Soil water and nutrients of vegetation communities under different restoration types on the hilly-gullied Loess Plateau[J].Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science,2006,12(5):667-674.]

[10] 梁丽丽,陈红跃,黄丽铭,等.东江水源涵养林土壤养分变化分析[J].华南农业大学学报,2009,30(1):113-115.[Liang Lili,Chen Hongyue,Huang Liming,et al.Changes of soil fertility of water conservation forest in Dongjiang River[J].Journa1 of South China Agricultural University,2009,30(1):113-115.]

[11] 王震洪,段昌群,文传浩,等.滇中三种人工林群落控制土壤侵蚀和改良土壤效应[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(2):23-29.[Wang Zhenhong,Duan Changqun,Wen Chuanghao,et al.Soil erosion and soil improvement of three artificial forest communities in middle Yunnan Province[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,21(2):23-29.]

[12] 李明辉,彭少麟,申卫军,等.丘塘景观植被恢复与土壤养分空间分异规律研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(增刊):72-75.[Li Minghui,Peng Shaolin,Shen Weijun,et al.Vegetation research and spatial of soil nutrient in a hill-pond landscape[J].Transactions of CSAE,2005,21(Suppl.):72-75.]

[13] 王海燕,雷相东,张会儒,等.近天然落叶松云冷杉林土壤养分特征[J].东北林业大学学报,2009,37(11):69-73.[Wang Haiyang,Lei Xiandong,Zhang Huiru,et al.Soil nutrient characteristics of semi-natural mixed larch-spruce-fir stands in Northeast China[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2009,37(11):69-73.]

[14] 林德喜,樊后保,苏兵强,等.马尾松林下套种阔叶树土壤理化性质的研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(4):655-659.[Lin Dexi,Fan Houbao,Su Bingqiang,et al.Effect of interplantation of broad-leaved trees in Pinus massoniana forest on physical and chemical properties of the soil[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2004,41(4):655-659.]

[15] 吴彦,刘庆,乔永康,等.亚高山针叶林不同恢复阶段群落物种多样性变化及其对土壤理化性质的影响[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(6):648-655.[Wu Yan,Liu Qing,Qiao Yongkan,et al.Species diversity changes in subalpine coniferous foresrs of different restoration stages and their effects on soil properties[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,2001 25(6):648-655.]

[16] 彭少麟,陆宏芳.恢复生态学焦点问题[J].生态学报,2003,23(7):1 249-1 257.[Peng Shaolin,Lu Hongfang.Some key points of restoration ecology[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2003,23(7) :1 249-1 257.]