“双碳”目标下新疆“三生”空间时空演变特征及碳效应

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2024.07.15

Abstract

Abstract:

The study of the spatial-temporal evolution of the “production-living-ecological” space and the effect of carbon emission under carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals target is of practical significance for the sustainable development of ecological economies in arid areas and the realization of green and low-carbon development in land space. This study examined remote sensing monitoring data and energy consumption data for the Xinjiang in five periods: 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020. Using the “production-living-ecological” spatial dynamic index, transfer matrix, and carbon emission coefficient, the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and carbon effects of “production-living-ecological” in Xinjiang in the past 20 years were analyzed using the ArcGIS spatial analysis functions. The results show that: (1) the comprehensive dynamic index of the study area reached 0.11% in the past 20 years, with the highest from 2005 to 2010. (2) in the past 20 years, the area of the “production-living-ecological” space has changed greatly, revealing the rapid expansion of “living-production” space and declining trend in “ecological space”. and (3) “living-production” space is the main contributor to carbon emissions in the study area, and underwent continuous growth. In terms of carbon absorption, the contribution of the “ecological-production” space to carbon absorption is relatively high. The study provides scientific support for the construction of a spatial classification system for the “production-living-ecological” space that meets the emissions reduction needs of Xinjiang; thus, it is of great significance for the construction of high-quality “Belt and Road” and the realization of low-carbon development, carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals in arid regions.

Key words: “production-living-ecological” space, spatiotemporal evolution, carbon sources and sinks, carbon effect, Xinjiang

JIAN Zhengbo, LUO Hao, SHAN Nana. A study on the spatial and temporal evolution and carbon effects of production-living-ecological in Xinjiang under carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals[J].Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(7): 1238-1248.

Figures/Tables 11

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 4

Fig. 3

Tab. 5

Fig. 4

Tab. 6

Tab. 7

References 40

[1]	郭莉, 白丽芳, 王超越, 等. 基于“三生空间” 的重庆市碳排放增长机理及趋势预测[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2022, 44(6): 816-823.
	[Guo Li, Bai Lifang, Wang Chaoyue, et al. Growth mechanism and trend prediction of carbon emission in Chongqing based on production-living-ecological space[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2022, 44(6): 816-823.]
[2]	朱志强, 马晓双, 胡洪. 基于耦合FLUS-InVEST模型的广州市生态系统碳储量时空演变与预测[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(2): 222-229, 239.
	[Zhu Zhiqiang, Ma Xiaoshuang, Hu Hong. Spatial and temporal evolution and prediction of ecosystem carbon stocks in Guangzhou based on the coupled FLUS-InVEST models[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 222-229, 239.]
[3]	Watson R T, Noble I R, Bolin B, et al. Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the IPCC[R]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 189-217.
[4]	时振钦, 邓伟, 张少尧. 近25年横断山区国土空间格局与时空变化研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(3): 607-621. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201803012
	[Shi Zhenqin, Deng Wei, Zhang Shaoyao. Spatial pattern and spatio-temporal change of territory space in Hengduan Mountains region in recent 25 years[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(3): 607-621.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201803012
[5]	郑艺文, 刘晓煌, 熊茂秋, 等. 1990—2018年新疆“三生用地” 时空变化特征及其碳排放效应[J]. 草业科学, 2022, 39(12): 2565-2577.
	[Zheng Yiwen, Liu Xiaohuang, Xiong Maoqiu, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics of ecological-living-productive land and its carbon emissions in Xinjiang from 1990 to 2018[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(12): 2565-2577.]
[6]	王剑, 关士钦, 严维斌, 等. 青海省“三生用地” 时空演变特征及其碳排放效应[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2021, 44(4): 212-218.
	[Wang Jian, Guan Shiqin, Yan Weibin, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and carbon emission effect of three-generation land in Qinghai Province[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 44(4): 212-218.]
[7]	刘继来, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞. 中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1290-1304. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201707013
	[Liu Jilai, Liu Yansui, Li Yurui. Classification evaluation and spatial-temporal analysis of production-living-ecological spaces in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(7): 1290-1304.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201707013
[8]	卢燕. 乌鲁木齐城市生活空间研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2018.
	[Lu Yan. Study on the City Life Space of Urumqi[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2018.]
[9]	李宗阳. “三生空间” 视角下西北干旱城市综合承载力研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019.
	[Li Zongyang. Study on Urban Comprehensive Carrying Capacity of Arid Areas in Northwest China from the Perspective of Production-Life-Ecological Space[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019.]
[10]	IPCC. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[M]. Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), 2006.
[11]	彭文甫, 周介铭, 徐新良, 等. 基于土地利用变化的四川省碳排放与碳足迹效应及时空格局[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7244-7259.
	[Peng Wenfu, Zhou Jieming, Xu Xinliang, et al. Effect of land use changes on the temporal and spatial patterns of carbon emissions and carbon footprints in the Sichuan Province of Western China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22): 7244-7259.]
[12]	阿依吐尔逊·沙木西, 艾力西尔·亚力坤, 刘晓曼, 等. 乌鲁木齐土地利用碳排放强度时空演变研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(2): 139-146.
	[Aytursun Shamxi, Alxir Yalkun, Liu Xiaoman, et al. Carbon intensity of land use in Urumqi City based on spatial-temporal evolution[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(2): 139-146.]
[13]	翟玉鑫, 张飞云, 马丽娜. 近40年新疆三生用地转型及其生态环境效应演变[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(3): 514-523.
	[Zhai Yuxin, Zhang Feiyun, Ma Lina. Changes of production-living-ecology land transformation and eco-environmental effects in Xinjiang in last 40 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(3): 514-523.]
[14]	韦绍音, 陆汝成, 张利国, 等. 碳中和目标下的广西边境地区“三生” 空间转型及碳储量效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023, 43(1): 399-408.
	[Wei Shaoyin, Lu Rucheng, Zhang Liguo, et al. Transition of productional-living-ecology space and carbon storage effect in Guangxi border area under carbon neutrality goal[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 2023, 43(1): 399-408.]
[15]	王向东, 王康龙, 单娜娜, 等. 国土空间规划背景下的新疆国土空间综合发展区划[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(11): 176-185.
	[Wang Xiangdong, Wang Kanglong, Shan Nana, et al. Comprehensive development regionalization of territorial space in Xinjiang under the background of territoral space planning[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(11): 176-185.]
[16]	杜佳倩, 刘彤, 王寒月, 等. 新疆荒漠一年生植物区系组成、分布及资源类型[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 185-209.
	[Du Jiaqian, Liu Tong, Wang Hanyue, et al. Floristic composition, distribution, and resource types of desert annual plants in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(1): 185-209.]
[17]	王萍,新疆能源发展、节能减排标准现状及建议[C]// 中国标准化协会, 中国标准化年度优秀论文(2022)论文集. 南京: 中国标准化大会, 2022: 550-556.
	[Wang Ping, Xinjiang Energy Development, Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Standards and Recommendations[C]// China Standardization Association, China Standardization Annual Standing Papers (2022). Nanjing: China Standardization Congress, 2022: 550-556.]
[18]	Wang S, Fang C, Wang Y. Spatiotemporal variations of energy-related CO₂ emissions in China and its influencing factors: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 55(1): 505-515.
[19]	章仁彪. 城市文明、城市功能与城市精神[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2005(2): 29-36.
	[Zhang Renbiao. Urban civilization, urban function and urban spirit[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Edition), 2005(2): 29-36.]
[20]	黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 378-391. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.014
	[Huang Jinchuan, Lin Haoxi, Qi Xiaoxiao. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(3): 378-391.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.014
[21]	江曼琦, 刘勇. “三生” 空间内涵与空间范围的辨析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(4): 43-48, 61.
	[Jiang Manqi, Liu Yong. Discussion on the concept definition and spatial boundary classification of production-living-ecological space[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020, 27(4): 43-48, 61.]
[22]	张红旗, 许尔琪, 朱会义. 中国“三生用地” 分类及其空间格局[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(7): 1332-1338.
	[Zhang Hongqi, Xu Erqi, Zhu Huiyi. An Ecological-living-industrial land classification system and its spatial distribution in China[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(7): 1332-1338.]
[23]	王娟娟, 毋兆鹏. 乌鲁木齐市2000—2018年“三生” 空间格局演变及其风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(6): 318-326, 335.
	[Wang Juanjuan, Wu Zhaopeng. Evolution on patterns and risk assessment of productive-living-ecological space in Urumqi City during 2000-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 318-326, 335.]
[24]	徐健, 周寅康, 金晓斌, 等. 基于生态保护对土地利用分类系统未利用地的探讨[J]. 资源科学, 2007, 29(2): 137-141.
	[Xu Jian, Zhou Yinkang, Jin Xiaobin, et al. Discussing virgin land classification subsystem based on the protection of the eco-environment[J]. Resources Science, 2007, 29(2): 137-141.]
[25]	Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[26]	满卫东, 刘明月, 王宗明, 等. 1990—2015年东北地区草地变化遥感监测研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(5): 2246-2253.
	[Man Weidong, Liu Mingyue, Wang Zongming, et al. Remote sensing investigation of grassland change in Northeast China during 1990-2015[J]. Chinese Environmental Science, 2020, 40(5): 2246-2253.]
[27]	孟梅, 崔雪莹, 王志强. 乌鲁木齐市土地利用结构与碳排放的关联测度研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(2): 178-182, 188.
	[Meng Mei, Cui Xueying, Wang Zhiqiang. Correlation between land use structure and carbon emission in Urumqi City[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 178-182, 188.]
[28]	唐洪松, 马惠兰, 苏洋, 等. 新疆不同土地利用类型的碳排放与碳吸收[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(3): 486-492.
	[Tang Hongsong, Ma Huilan, Su Yang, et al. Carbon emissions and carbon absorptions of different land use types in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(3): 486-492.]
[29]	和海秀, 周洪华, 白如霄. 基于土地利用变化的新疆塔城地区碳排放特征分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(3): 373-380.
	[He Haixiu, Zhou Honghua, Bai Ruxiao. Characteristics of carbon emissions based on land use changes in Tacheng Area of Xinjiang[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 373-380.]
[30]	Cai Zucong, Kang Guoding, Tsuruta H, et al. Estimate of CH₄ emissions from year-round flooded rice fields during rice growing season in China[J]. Pedosphere, 2005, 15(1): 66-71.
[31]	方精云, 陈安平. 中国森林植被碳库的动态变化及其意义[J]. 植物学报, 2001, 50(9): 967-973.
	[Fang Jingyun, Chen Anping. Dynamic forest biomass carbon pools in China and their significance[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2001, 50(9): 967-973.]
[32]	赖力. 中国土地利用的碳排放效应研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2010.
	[Lai Li. Study on the Carbon Emission Effect of Land Use in China[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2010.]
[33]	李颖, 黄贤金, 甄峰. 江苏省区域不同土地利用方式的碳排放效应分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(增刊): 102-107.
	[Li Ying, Huang Xianjin, Zhen Feng. Effects of land use patterns on carbon emission in Jiangsu Province[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, (Suppl. ): 102-107.]
[34]	郑永超, 文琦. 宁夏自治区土地利用变化及碳排放效应[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 207-212.
	[Zheng Yongchao, Wenqi. Change of land use and the carbon emission effect of Ningxia autonomous region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(1): 207-212.]
[35]	Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)[R]. Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2007.
[36]	Friedlingstein P, Jones M, O’Sullivan, et al. Global Carbon Budget 2019[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2019, 11: 1783-2019. doi: 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
[37]	徐丽萍, 李鹏辉, 李忠勤, 等. 新疆山地冰川变化及影响研究进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(6): 946-959.
	[Xu Liping, Li Penghui, Li Zhongqin, et al. Advances in research on changes and effects of glaciers in Xinjiang mountains[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2020, 31(6): 946-959.]
[38]	李彦旻, 沈育生, 王世航. 基于土地利用变化的安徽省陆地碳排放时空特征及效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(1): 182-188.
	[Li Yanmin, Shen Yusheng, Wang Shihang. Spatio-temporal characteristics and effects of terrestrial carbon emissions based on land use change in Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(1): 182-188.]
[39]	Nijdam D, Rood T, Westhoek H. The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes[J]. Food Policy, 2012, 37(6): 760-770.
[40]	孔冬艳, 陈会广, 吴孔森. 中国“三生空间” 演变特征、生态环境效应及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(5): 1116-1135. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210503
	[Kong Dongyan, Chen Huiguang, Wu Kongsen. The evolution of production-living-ecological space, eco-environmental effects and its influencing factors in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(5): 1116-1135.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210503

“三生”空间类型	用途	一级分类	二级分类
生活生产空间	用于居住生活和提供二、三产业生产的空间	建设用地	居民点、工矿用地、交通用地等
生产生态空间	以农业生产为主，并可提供生态功能的空间	耕地	绿洲中正在使用的农田、轮歇地、弃耕地
生态生产空间	具备生态环境质量提高和农业生产发展作用，但生态效益高于生产效益	水域	河流、湖泊、水库
生态生产空间	具备生态环境质量提高和农业生产发展作用，但生态效益高于生产效益	林地	自然林带及人工林带
生态空间	人类利用相对较少，对区域生态环境质量起到主要提升作用	草地	天然草地、人工草地及改良草地
生态空间	人类利用相对较少，对区域生态环境质量起到主要提升作用	未利用地	盐碱地、沙地、裸岩石砾地带等

土地类型	参数值/(t·hm^-2·a^-1)	数据来源	本文参考值/(t·hm^-2·a^-1)
耕地	0.4970	[27, 30]	0.4970
林地	-0.5810	[27, 31]	-0.5810
草地	-0.0210	[33, 34]	-0.0210
水域	-0.2530	[31, 32]	-0.2530
未利用地	-0.0050	[32, 34]	-0.0050

能源类型	折标准煤系数/(tce·t^-1)	碳排放系数/(t·tce^-1)
煤炭	0.7143	0.7559
焦炭	0.9714	0.8550
原油	1.4286	0.5857
汽油	1.4714	0.5538
柴油	1.4571	0.5921
燃料油	1.4286	0.6185
煤油	1.4714	0.5714
天然气	1.2143	0.4483

时期	生活生产空间	生产生态空间	生态生产空间	生态空间
2000—2005年	0.01	0.08	0.01	0.09
2005—2010年	0.04	0.20	0.30	0.14
2010—2015年	0.02	0.07	0.01	0.09
2015—2020年	0.01	0.04	0.01	0.04
2000—2020年	0.01	0.09	0.09	0.02

时期	“三生”空间类型
时期	空间分类	生活生产空间	生产生态空间	生态生产空间	生态空间
2000—2005年	生活生产空间	-	0.00	0.00	0.00
	生产生态空间	0.01	-	0.00	0.05
	生态生产空间	0.00	0.06	-	0.08
	生态空间	0.03	0.73	0.13	-
2005—2010年	生活生产空间	-	0.15	0.01	0.07
	生产生态空间	0.20	-	0.18	0.63
	生态生产空间	0.02	0.29	-	4.87
	生态空间	0.33	1.97	2.18	-
2010—2015年	生活生产空间	-	0.00	0.00	0.00
	生产生态空间	0.04	-	0.00	0.08
	生态生产空间	0.01	0.03	-	0.09
	生态空间	0.10	0.66	0.11	-
2015—2020年	生活生产空间	-	0.04	0.00	0.24
	生产生态空间	0.07	-	0.03	0.27
	生态生产空间	0.00	0.03	-	0.31
	生态空间	0.17	0.66	0.37	-
2000—2020年	生活生产空间	-	0.15	0.01	0.05
	生产生态空间	0.27	-	0.16	0.45
	生态生产空间	0.03	0.39	-	4.83
	生态空间	0.37	3.40	2.29	-

A study on the spatial and temporal evolution and carbon effects of production-living-ecological in Xinjiang under carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 40

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

年份	碳排放与碳吸收强度/(t·km^-2)
年份	生活生产空间	生产生态空间	生态生产空间	生态空间
2000年	6264.30	49.70	-39.20	-1.02
2005年	8364.26	49.70	-39.10	-1.02
2010年	8947.96	49.70	-40.32	-1.02
2015年	14050.06	49.70	-40.21	-1.02
2020年	19607.67	49.70	-39.84	-1.02

年份	生活生产空间	生产生态空间	生态生产空间	生态空间	净碳排放
2000年	2734.13	294.58	-352.16	-150.03	2526.51
2005年	4014.74	330.31	-350.78	-148.87	3845.40
2010年	7170.86	400.11	-248.41	-151.55	7171.01
2015年	13260.78	428.63	-247.29	-150.36	13291.75
2020年	17706.70	446.59	-247.14	-150.54	17755.61

[1]	SUN Linlin, LIU Qiong, HUANG Guan, CHEN Yonghang, WEI Xin, GUO Yulin, ZHANG Taixi, GAO Tianyi, XU Yunhong. Analysis of surface solar radiation under different cloud conditions in Xinjiang and the surrounding “Belt and Road” regions [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(9): 1480-1490.
[2]	LIU Huaqing, WANG Bo, JIA Yanyan, XIE Xinran, ZHANG Wei. Characterization of the freezing injury to Juglans regia at different slope positions in the West Tianshan valley of Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(6): 1079-1088.
[3]	MA Yuanzhi, QIN Xiaolin, LING Hongbo, YAN Junjie, ZHANG Guangpeng. Spatio-temporal characteristics and trends of area changes in the small and medium-sized lakes in Xinjiang, China, from 1991 to 2020 [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(6): 905-916.
[4]	ZHANG Haozhe, XUE Yayong, MA Yuanyuan, XUE Guoxuan. Carbon sequestration potential of oasis ecosystem in Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(6): 998-1009.
[5]	GAO Yayu, SONG Yu, ZHAO Tinghong, GAO Jinfang, HE Wenbo, LI Zexia. Spatiotemporal evolution of water yield in the lower Malian River Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(5): 776-787.
[6]	XU Chaojie, DOU Yan, MENG Qilin. Prediction of the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index in the Xinjiang region using the EMD-GWO-LSTM model [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(4): 527-539.
[7]	SI Qi, FAN Haoran, DONG Wenming, LIU Xinping. Landscape ecological risk assessment and prediction for the Yarkant River Basin, Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(4): 684-696.
[8]	BAO Jiayu, LI Xianglong, HU Qiwen, LI Tao. Spatiotemporal characteristics of carbon emissions from energy consumption and the approach to energy structure adjustment in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(3): 490-498.
[9]	YAO Junqiang. Change in atmospheric and surface water resource in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(2): 181-190.
[10]	XU Yunhong, LIU Qiong, CHEN Yonghang, WEI Xin, LIU Xin, ZHANG Taixi, SHAO Weiling, YANG Hequn, ZHANG Chengming. Impact of land cover variations on surface albedo in Xinjiang and its surrounding Central Asian region [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(10): 1649-1661.
[11]	JIN Chenyang, DU Hongru. Characteristics of spatial and temporal changes and zoning of cultivated land resilience in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(10): 1778-1788.
[12]	LI Xiaofeng, HUI Tingting, LI Yaoming, MAO Jiefei, WANG Guangyu, FAN Lianlian. Effects of different grazing management strategies on plant diversity in the mountain grassland of Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 124-134.
[13]	WANG Xiang, LYU Haishen, ZHU Yonghua, GUO Chenyu. Application and comparison of two channel flood routing methods in Xinjiang mountainous areas [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1240-1247.
[14]	WANG Chao, MA Zhancang, PAN Chengnan, WU Xingyue, SONG Wendan, YAN Ping. New records of Amaranthus in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1280-1288.
[15]	Gulistan ANWAR, Turgun NURDIN, Dilhumar ABDUKERIM, Mamtimin SULAYMAN. New records of mosses of Leskeaceae to Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1289-1293.