干旱砾漠区防护绿地植物群落配置模式研究

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2021.03.23

Abstract

Abstract:

We investigated 27 different plant community allocation modes for a protection greenbelt in the alluvial fan gravel desert area in southern Urumqi. The ecological effects of different plant community allocation modes were evaluated and ranked using the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model. We found that the allocation of several species was beneficial: Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica-Atriplex cana-Chondrilla piptocoma+Seriphidium transiliense, Ulmus pumila-Hippophae rhamnoides-Chondrilla piptocoma+Clematis songorica, Ulmus laciniata-Hippophae rhamnoides-Chondrilla piptocoma+Acroptilon repens, and Elaeagnus angustifolia-Atriplex cana-Chondrilla piptocoma. The expansion of these optimal allocation modes was analyzed based on the similarity of ecological effects of plant communities and landscapes. The allocation modes composed of high tridimensional green biomass, high coverage, and strong adaptability are proposed as being optimal. This study provides a theoretical basis and technical support for the construction of a protection greenbelt in an arid gravel desert region.

Key words: plant community, ecological effect, optimized allocation mode, gravel desert region, Urumqi

ZHOU Jing,YAN Cheng,GUO Ruizeng,YAN Ziyan. Plant community allocation modes of protection greenbelt in an arid gravel desert region[J].Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(3): 812-820.

Figures/Tables 5

Tab. 1

Overview of plots with different plant community allocations"

群落结构	样地号	群落主要种类
乔灌草	1	白榆+大叶榆（Ulmus laevis）-紫枝玫瑰（Rose rugose ‘purple branch’）-准噶尔铁线莲（Clematis songorica）+粉苞菊
	2	白榆+大叶榆-金露梅（Potentilla fruticosa）-粉苞菊
	3	白榆+沙枣-榆叶梅（Amygdalus triloba）-粉苞菊+伊犁绢蒿
	4	白榆+中华金叶榆（Ulmus pumila ‘jinye’）-紫穗槐+白滨藜-粉苞菊+囊果薹草（Carex physodes）
	5	白榆+裂叶榆（Ulmus laciniata）-毛樱桃（Cerasus tomentosa）-囊果臺草+顶羽菊（Rhaponticum repens）
	6	白榆+大叶白蜡（Fraxinus rhynchophylla）-毛樱桃-蓝亚麻（Linum perenne）+伊犁绢蒿
	7	红叶海棠（Malus yunnanensis var. veitchii）+黄果山楂（Crataegus chlorocarpa）-月季（Rosa chinensis）-马蔺（Iris lactea）+蓝亚麻
	8	小叶白蜡（Fraxinus sogdiana）-紫枝玫瑰-粉苞菊+顶羽菊
	9	大叶榆-紫枝玫瑰+白滨藜-粉苞菊
	10	白榆-黄刺玫（Rosa xanthina）-蓝亚麻+粉苞菊
	11	白柳（Salix alba）-珍珠梅（Sorbaria sorbifolia）-顶羽菊+准噶尔铁线莲
	12	白榆-紫穗槐+白滨藜-伊犁绢蒿
	13	大叶榆-红瑞木（Cornus alba）+白滨藜-伊犁绢蒿
	14	裂叶榆-中亚沙棘（Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. turkestanica）-粉苞菊+顶羽菊
	15	白榆-中亚沙棘-粉苞菊+铁线莲
	16	白榆-紫丁香+白滨藜-伊犁绢蒿+准噶尔铁线莲
	17	樟子松-白滨藜-粉苞菊+伊犁绢蒿
	18	苹果-白滨藜-粉苞菊+顶羽菊
	19	沙枣-白滨藜-粉苞菊
	20	复叶槭（Acer negundo）-白滨藜—伊犁绢蒿
乔草	21	五角枫-拂子茅（Calamagrostis epigeios）
	22	白榆-粉苞菊+伊犁绢蒿
	23	山桃（Amygdalus davidiana）-粉苞菊+铁线莲+盐生假木贼
	24	火炬树（Rhus typhina）-粉苞菊+盐生假木贼
	25	卫矛（Euonymus alatus）-粉苞菊
灌草	26	紫穗槐+白滨藜-顶羽菊+伊犁绢蒿
灌草	27	中亚沙棘+荒漠锦鸡儿-伊犁绢蒿+大籽蒿（Artemisia sieversiana）

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Membership matrix for comprehensive evaluation of ecological effect of plant communities"

样地号	准则层	隶属度			样地号	准则层	隶属度			样地号	准则层	隶属度
样地号	准则层	良好	一般	差	样地号	准则层	良好	一般	差	样地号	准则层	良好	一般	差
1	B₁	0.85	0.15	0.00	10	B₁	0.85	0.15	0.00	19	B₁	0.78	0.23	0.00
	B₂	0.26	0.56	0.18		B₂	0.33	0.50	0.17		B₂	0.26	0.53	0.21
	B₃	0.02	0.75	0.24		B₃	0.00	0.71	0.29		B₃	0.50	0.50	0.00
	B₄	1.00	0.00	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00
	B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00		B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00		B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00
2	B₁	0.73	0.28	0.00	11	B₁	0.33	0.68	0.00	20	B₁	0.00	1.00	0.00
	B₂	0.26	0.56	0.18		B₂	0.02	0.44	0.53		B₂	0.16	0.70	0.15
	B₃	0.00	0.65	0.35		B₃	0.00	0.36	0.64		B₃	0.00	0.50	0.50
	B₄	0.72	0.28	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.00	0.40
	B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00		B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00		B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00
3	B₁	0.80	0.20	0.00	12	B₁	0.40	0.60	0.00	21	B₁	0.00	0.85	0.15
	B₂	0.36	0.58	0.06		B₂	0.12	0.59	0.29		B₂	0.16	0.64	0.20
	B₃	0.17	0.69	0.14		B₃	0.00	1.00	0.00		B₃	0.00	0.14	0.86
	B₄	0.80	0.20	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.20	0.20
	B₅	0.20	0.80	0.00		B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00		B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00
4	B₁	0.15	0.63	0.23	13	B₁	0.78	0.23	0.00	22	B₁	0.93	0.08	0.00
	B₂	0.19	0.40	0.41		B₂	0.09	0.58	0.34		B₂	0.37	0.58	0.05
	B₃	0.00	0.60	0.40		B₃	0.00	1.00	0.00		B₃	0.00	1.00	0.00
	B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00
	B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00		B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00		B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00
5	B₁	0.55	0.45	0.00	14	B₁	0.78	0.23	0.00	23	B₁	0.00	1.00	0.00
	B₂	0.16	0.77	0.08		B₂	0.75	0.20	0.05		B₂	0.16	0.11	0.73
	B₃	0.00	0.86	0.14		B₃	0.14	0.86	0.00		B₃	0.00	0.29	0.71
	B₄	0.80	0.20	0.00		B₄	0.80	0.20	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00
	B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00		B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00		B₅	1.00	0.00	0.00
6	B₁	0.40	0.60	0.00	15	B₁	0.85	0.15	0.00	24	B₁	0.00	0.85	0.15
	B₂	0.10	0.57	0.34		B₂	0.79	0.19	0.02		B₂	0.06	0.31	0.63
	B₃	0.00	0.71	0.29		B₃	0.14	0.86	0.00		B₃	0.00	0.00	1.00
	B₄	0.80	0.20	0.00		B₄	0.80	0.20	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00
	B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00		B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00		B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00
7	B₁	0.00	0.55	0.45	16	B₁	1.00	0.00	0.00	25	B₁	0.00	0.78	0.23
	B₂	0.18	0.50	0.32		B₂	0.16	0.79	0.05		B₂	0.16	0.11	0.73
	B₃	0.00	0.29	0.71		B₃	0.00	1.00	0.00		B₃	0.00	0.29	0.71
	B₄	0.80	0.20	0.00		B₄	0.80	0.20	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00
	B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00		B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00		B₅	1.00	0.00	0.00
8	B₁	0.40	0.60	0.00	17	B₁	1.00	0.00	0.00	26	B₁	0.00	0.78	0.23
	B₂	0.00	0.73	0.27		B₂	0.68	0.08	0.23		B₂	0.32	0.52	0.17
	B₃	0.00	0.71	0.29		B₃	0.86	0.14	0.00		B₃	0.00	0.36	0.64
	B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00		B₄	0.80	0.00	0.20		B₄	0.60	0.20	0.20
	B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00		B₅	0.00	0.75	0.25		B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00
9	B₁	0.40	0.60	0.00	18	B₁	0.00	0.63	0.38	27	B₁	0.37	0.63	0.00
	B₂	0.08	0.59	0.34		B₂	0.16	0.15	0.69		B₂	0.00	0.75	0.25
	B₃	0.21	0.79	0.00		B₃	0.00	0.29	0.71		B₃	0.00	0.64	0.36
	B₄	0.80	0.20	0.00		B₄	0.60	0.20	0.20		B₄	0.60	0.40	0.00
	B₅	0.25	0.75	0.00		B₅	1.00	0.00	0.00		B₅	0.00	1.00	0.00

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

References 39

[1]	杨发相, 桂东伟, 岳健, 等. 干旱区荒漠分类系统探讨——以新疆为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2015,29(11):145-151.
	[ Yang Faxiang, Gui Dongwei, Yue Jian, et al. A discussion on classification system of desert in arid land[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015,29(11):145-151. ]
[2]	Hessel R, Reed M S, Geeson N, et al. From framework to action: the desire approach to combat desertification[J]. Environmental Management, 2014,54(5):935-950. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0346-3 pmid: 25156863
[3]	杜宏茹, 刘毅. 我国干旱区绿洲城市研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005,24(2):69-79.
	[ Du Hongru, Liu Yi. Progress on the study of oasis cities in arid zone of China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2005,24(2):69-79. ]
[4]	王策, 尹林克. 干旱区绿洲城市生态绿地防护体系规划布局探索——以乌鲁木齐市为例[C]// 中国公园协会2009年论文集. 北京, 2009: 22-27.
	[ Wang Ce, Yin Linke. Planning and layout of ecological green space protection system of oasis cities in arid areas: A case study of Urumqi city[C]// Proceedings of China Park Association in 2009. Beijing, 2009: 22-27. ]
[5]	宋薇, 程平. 砾石戈壁区乔木造林技术[J]. 农村科技, 2017(6):58-59.
	[ Song Wei, Cheng Ping. Afforestation technology of arbor in gravel gobi area[J]. Rural Science & Technology, 2017(6):58-59. ]
[6]	陈艳瑞, 刘康, 陈启民, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘防护林树种适宜性评价[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011,25(11):152-156.
	[ Chen Yanrui, Liu Kang, Chen Qimin, et al. Suitability evaluation on trees species of shelter belt on the southern edge of Xinjiang Junggar basin[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2011,25(11):152-156. ]
[7]	昝少平, 朱颖, 魏月霞. 乌鲁木齐市已建园林绿地系统现状及其特点分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2006,23(1):177-182.
	[ Zan Shaoping, Zhu Ying, Wei Yuexia. Study on the actuality and characteristics of the built greenbelt systems in Urumqi[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2006,23(1):177-182. ]
[8]	孙化蓉. 城市防护绿地的布局与结构[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2006.
	[ Sun Huarong. Layout and Structure of Urban Protection Green Buffer[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2006. ]
[9]	葛佩琳, 郭利平, 邓伟. 城市绿地植物群落优化配置方法初探[J]. 林业调查规划, 2019,44(2):203-208, 215.
	[ Ge Peiling, Guo Liping, Deng Wei. Preliminary study on plant community optimization of urban green space[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2019,44(2):203-208, 215. ]
[10]	毛齐正, 罗上华, 马克明, 等. 城市绿地生态评价研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(17):5589-5600.
	[ Mao Qizheng, Luo Shanghua, Ma Keming, et al. Research advances in ecological assessment of urban green space[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(17):5589-5600. ]
[11]	史久西, 王小明, 阙国宁, 等. 绍兴市城市森林人工群落配置模式研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2005,18(4):398-405.
	[ Shi Jiuxi, Wang Xiaoming, Que Guoning, et al. Study on urban forest community models of Shaoxing city[J]. Forest Research, 2005,18(4):398-405. ]
[12]	施翌, 汤晓敏. 上海环城绿带百米林带植物群落综合评价研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2018,36(5):28-35.
	[ Shi Yi, Tang Xiaomin. Evaluation on plant community in Shanghai 100-meter green belt[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Agricultural Science Edition), 2018,36(5):28-35. ]
[13]	宋晨晨, 刘时彦, 赵娟娟, 等. 基于功能特征的城市植物群落生态功能评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020,39(2):703-704.
	[ Song Chenchen, Liu Shiyan, Zhao Juanjuan, et al. Evaluation of ecological function for urban plant communities based on functional traits[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020,39(2):703-704. ]
[14]	韦小霞. 乌鲁木齐市东山生态防护林体系建设研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2009.
	[ Wei Xiaoxia. Construction of Ecology Protective Forest System of Dongshan in Urumqi[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2009. ]
[15]	王健铭, 王文娟, 李景文, 等. 中国西北荒漠区植物物种丰富度分布格局及其环境解释[J]. 生物多样性, 2017,25(11):52-61.
	[ Wang Jianming, Wang Wenjuan, Li Jingwen, et al. Biogeographic patterns and environmental interpretation of plant species richness in desert regions of northwest China[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2017,25(11):52-61. ]
[16]	董鸣. 陆地生物群落调查观测与分析[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1997.
	[ Dong Ming. Survey, Observation and Analysis of Terrestrial Biocommunities[M]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1997. ]
[17]	刘滨谊, 姜允芳. 中国城市绿地系统规划评价指标体系的研究[J]. 城市规划汇刊, 2002(2):27-29, 79.
	[ Liu Binyi, Jiang Yunfang. The research on indices system of the urban green space system planning in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2002(2):27-29, 79. ]
[18]	徐晓红, 尹林克, 胡秀琴, 等. 干旱区绿洲城市园林绿地系统健康的评价方法——以新疆克拉玛依市为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2008,25(4):464-469.
	[ Xu Xiaohong, Yin Linke, Hu Xiuqin, et al. Study on the evaluation methods of the health of green-land system in the oasis cities in arid areas: A case study in Karamay[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2008,25(4):464-469. ]
[19]	韩轶, 李吉跃, 高润宏, 等. 包头市城市绿地现状评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2005,27(1):64-69.
	[ Han Yi, Li Jiyue, Gao Runhong, et al. Assessment of current status of the urban forest in Baotou city[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005,27(1):64-69. ]
[20]	韩利, 梅强, 陆玉梅, 等. AHP-模糊综合评价方法的分析与研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004,14(7):86-89.
	[ Han Li, Mei Qiang, Lu Yumei, et al. Analysis and study on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2004,14(7):86-89. ]
[21]	徐伟, 林立, 祝浩翔, 等. 重庆市核心区半自然林地群落物种组成及其更新演替研究[J]. 林业调查规划, 2016,41(2):23-28.
	[ Xu Wei, Lin Li, Zhu Haoxiang, et al. Succession and species composition of semi-natural forest communities in core district of Chongqing[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2016,41(2):23-28. ]
[22]	刘常富, 何兴元, 陈玮, 等. 沈阳城市森林三维绿量测算[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006,28(3):32-37.
	[ Liu Changfu, He Xingyuan, Chen Wei, et al. Tridimensional green biomass measures of Shenyang urban forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006,28(3):32-37. ]
[23]	杨纶标, 高英仪, 凌卫新. 模糊数学原理及应用[M]. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2011.
	[ Yang Lunbiao, Gao Yingyi, Ling Weixin. Principle and Application of Fuzzy Mathematics[M]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology Press, 2011. ]
[24]	王举位, 张征, 闫国振, 等. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价的中亚沙棘生态服务功能研究[J]. 生态科学, 2011,30(4):393-398.
	[ Wang Juwei, Zhang Zheng, Yan Guozhen, et al. Ecosystem services of seabuckthorn based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Ecological Science, 2011,30(4):393-398. ]
[25]	徐基平, 郑路, 李艳红, 等. 克拉玛依城市防护绿地稳定性现状评价与分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015,43(28):202-205.
	[ Xu Jiping, Zheng Lu, Li Yanhong, et al. Evaluation and analysis of urban protective greenbelt stability in Karamay[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2015,43(28):202-205. ]
[26]	王宇超, 王得祥, 彭少兵, 等. 干旱胁迫对木本滨藜生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2010,46(1):64-70.
	[ Wang Yuchao, Wang Dexiang, Peng Shaoping, et al. Effects of drought stress on physiological characteristics of woody saltbush[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010,46(1):64-70. ]
[27]	Lanta V, Hyvonen T, Norrdahl K. Non-native and native shrubs have differing impacts on species diversity and composition of associated plant communities[J]. Plant Ecology, 2013,214(12):1517-1528. doi: 10.1007/s11258-013-0272-0
[28]	杨洁, 谢颂华, 喻荣岗, 等. 红壤侵蚀区水土保持植物配置模式[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2010,8(1):40-45, 70.
	[ Yang Jie, Xie Songhua, Yu Ronggang, et al. Disposition pattern of soil and water conservation plant in red soil erosion area[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010,8(1):40-45, 70. ]
[29]	王思琪, 武曙红, 朱晓梅, 等. 我国樟子松人工林天然更新研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018,31(3):58-62.
	[ Wang Siqi, Wu Shuhong, Zhu Xiaomei, et al. Research progress in natural regeneration of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation[J]. World Forestry Research, 2018,31(3):58-62. ]
[30]	Du Sheng, Li Guoqing, Zhang Xiaoqin. Simulating the potential distribution of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. based on climatic constraints in China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2018,113(3):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.01.009
[31]	易治伍. 乌鲁木齐市园林植物适宜性评价[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2008.
	[ Yi Zhiwu. Suitability Evaluation of Landscape Plants in Urumqi[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2008. ]
[32]	Gilliam F S. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems[J]. Bioscience, 2007,57(10):845-858. doi: 10.1641/B571007
[33]	袁蕾, 周华荣, 宗召磊, 等. 乌鲁木齐地区典型灌木群落结构特征及其多样性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014,34(3):595-603.
	[ Yuan Lei, Zhou Huarong, Zong Zhaolei, et al. Structural characteristics and diversity of typical shrub plant community in the Urumqi region[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2014,34(3):595-603. ]
[34]	张日升, 贾树海, 徐贵军, 等. 营林措施对沙地樟子松人工林土壤养分、酶活性及微生物量碳的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2011,42(1):65-69.
	[ Zhang Risheng, Jia Shuhai, Xu Guijun, et al. Effects of silvicultural measures on soil nutrient, enzyme activity and microbial biomass carbon in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in sandy area[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011,42(1):65-69. ]
[35]	方敏彦, 章明, 张德罡. 宝钢车间防护绿地不同配置模式环境效益评价[J]. 草地学报, 2009,17(3):365-370.
	[ Fang Minyan, Zhang Ming, Zhang Degang. Environmental benefit evaluation of different plant allocation patterns in the greening areas surrounding baosteel workshops[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2009,17(3):365-370. ]
[36]	古丽巴衣那, 王利江. 乌鲁木齐市园林树种的调查、评价与规划[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(18):128-132.
	[ Gulibanya, Wang Lijiang. Investigation and distribution, planning on the garden trees in Urmqi city[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010,26(18):128-132. ]
[37]	赵晨, 韩冰, 康君. 混交林的研究进展分析[J]. 森林工程, 2009,25(2):18-21.
	[ Zhao Chen, Han Bing, Kang Jun. Review on research progress of mixed forest[J]. Forest Engineering, 2009,25(2):18-21. ]
[38]	Breuste J H. Decision making, planning and design for the conservation of indigenous vegetation within urban development[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004,68(4):439-452. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00150-6
[39]	张日升, 宋鸽. 章古台地区樟子松人工林林下草本植物群落动态[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(1):233-238, 243.
	[ Zhang Risheng, Song Ge. Dynamics of herbaceous communities under Pinus Sylvestris var. Mongolica plantations in Zhanggutai area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,39(1):233-238, 243.]

目标层	准则层及权重	指标层	指标分级标准			指标层权重
目标层	准则层及权重	指标层	良好	一般	差	指标层权重
植物群落生态效果综合评价A	植物适应性B₁ 0.27	植物生长状况C₁	树冠没有缺损,叶色正常	部分树冠缺损,叶色基本正常	树冠缺损较大,叶色不正常	0.20
	植物适应性B₁ 0.27	病虫害发生状况C₂	零星发生	局部发生	严重发生	0.07
	群落结构B₂ 0.22	植被覆盖率C₃	≥0.4	0.2~0.4	≤0.2	0.11
		群落密度C₄/（株·hm^-2）	500~1500,均匀分布	≥1500 群落纷杂	≤500, 群落稀疏	0.03
		乔灌比例C₅	乔灌草三层,乔灌比≥1:1.5	乔灌草二层, 1:1~1:1.5	乔灌草二层, ≤1:1	0.02
		乔灌木更替幼苗数C₆^[21] /（株·hm^-2）	≥5000	2000~5000	≤2000	0.05
	生态功能B₃ 0.37	三维绿量C₇^[22]/（m³·m^-2）	≥2	0.5~2	≤0.5	0.27
		植物群落多样性C₈	≥2	1~2	≤1	0.05
		群落物种丰富度C₉/种	≥20	10~20	≤10	0.05
	景观功能B₄ 0.09	景观地域性C₁₀	乡土物种比例≥60%	30%~60%	≤30%	0.06
		植被观赏特性C₁₁	有4种及以上观赏类型	有2~3种	有1种	0.02
		色调对比状况C₁₂	浓绿,层次分明,季相变化明显	淡绿,不分明, 有季相变化	暗绿,不分明, 无季相变化	0.02
	经济成本B₅ 0.05	种植成本C₁₃/（元·m^-2）	≤40	40~100	≥100	0.01
	经济成本B₅ 0.05	管护成本C₁₄/（元·m^-2）	≤30	30~60	≥60	0.04

序号	样地号	模糊综合评价			综合评分	序号	样地号	模糊综合评价			综合评分
序号	样地号	良好	一般	差	综合评分	序号	样地号	良好	一般	差	综合评分
1	样地17	0.81	0.11	0.08	4.46	15	样地6	0.20	0.62	0.18	3.05
2	样地15	0.53	0.47	0.00	4.04	16	样地8	0.16	0.67	0.16	3.00
3	样地14	0.50	0.49	0.01	3.98	17	样地27	0.16	0.66	0.19	2.94
4	样地19	0.51	0.45	0.05	3.92	18	样地20	0.09	0.65	0.26	2.67
5	样地22	0.40	0.59	0.01	3.77	19	样地11	0.15	0.50	0.36	2.58
6	样地16	0.39	0.60	0.01	3.75	20	样地26	0.12	0.52	0.35	2.54
7	样地3	0.44	0.49	0.07	3.75	21	样地4	0.10	0.58	0.33	2.54
8	样地1	0.40	0.48	0.13	3.57	22	样地23	0.14	0.48	0.38	2.52
9	样地10	0.37	0.49	0.14	3.45	23	样地21	0.09	0.49	0.42	2.34
10	样地13	0.29	0.63	0.07	3.44	24	样地7	0.11	0.43	0.46	2.31
11	样地9	0.29	0.64	0.07	3.43	25	样地25	0.14	0.37	0.49	2.31
12	样地5	0.27	0.66	0.07	3.39	26	样地18	0.14	0.32	0.54	2.21
13	样地2	0.33	0.50	0.17	3.33	27	样地24	0.07	0.38	0.55	2.04
14	样地12	0.20	0.74	0.06	3.28

样地号	植物群落优化配置类型	优化配置种植模式
样地17	樟子松-白滨藜-粉苞菊+伊犁绢蒿	纯林种植,株行距3 m×3 m
样地15	白榆-中亚沙棘-粉苞菊+准噶尔铁线莲	行列式混交,白榆与中亚沙棘1:1种植,株行距3 m×4 m
样地14	裂叶榆-中亚沙棘-粉苞菊+顶羽菊	行列式混交,裂叶榆与中亚沙棘1:1种植,株行距3 m×4 m
样地19	沙枣-白滨藜-粉苞菊	纯林种植,株行距3 m×4 m

Plant community allocation modes of protection greenbelt in an arid gravel desert region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 39

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Alayi HANATI, LIU Yanxia, LAN Haiyan. Research progress on the mechanism of formation, absorption and utilization of condensed water on leaf trichomes of desert plants [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 114-123.
[2]	ZHANG Lijuan, DU Han, YUN Fengze, MA Yinghui, ZHANG Xinqiang, Awaguli TUERSUN, MA Zhenghai. Analysis of the microbial diversity of the surface snow from Glacier No. 1 at the headwaters of Urumqi River, Tianshan Mountains [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(4): 670-680.
[3]	ZHAO Mingtao, WANG Chaoqun, LIANG Meiqi, HE Tonghui. Response of species diversity of typical submerged plant communities to sediment in Yinchuan Plain wetlands [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(11): 1815-1823.
[4]	PANG Haiwei,YU Dian,REN Chengbao,ZHANG Yu,ZHENG Caizhi,GUO Jiacheng,BIAN Zhen,SANG Guoqing. Remote sensing classification characteristics of typical plant communities in the semi-arid areas of eastern Ningxia [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(6): 1930-1941.
[5]	Pariha Helili,ZAN Mei,Alimjan Kasim. Remote sensing evaluation of ecological environment in Urumqi City and analysis of driving factors [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(5): 1484-1496.
[6]	ZHANG Peng,LI Ying,WANG Yelin,SONG Chengcheng,GAO Fanglei,XIE Lina,MA Chengcang. The positive effect of Caragana breviflora shrubs on plant communities and soil microbial communities in the Inner Mongolia desert region [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(2): 421-428.
[7]	ZHU Tian-zhu, DU Hong-ru, ZHANG Xiao-lei, WANG Bo-li. Delimitation of Urban Growth Boundary in Arid Oasis Based on Evaluating the Suitability of Construction and Development: A Case Study in Urumqi City [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(5): 1318-1324.
[8]	LI Kai-Ming, CHEN Shi-Feng, KANG Ling-Fen, LI Zhong-Qin, LI Sheng-De, WEN Qiang. Comparative research on Chinese continental glacier and temperate glacier changes:Taking Urumqi glacier No.1 and Baishui glacier No.1 as example [J]. , 2018, 35(01): 12-19.
[9]	YANG Xiaodong,LV Guanghui,HE Xueming,LI Yan,ZHANG Xueni,WANG Xiyuan,LIU Weiguo. Variation of Soil Enzyme Activity among Four Typical Plant Communities in the Ebinur Lake Wetland Nature Reserve,Xinjiang [J]. , 2017, 34(6): 1278-1285.
[10]	LI Dong, YANG Zhao-ping, SHI Hui, LUAN Fu-ming,WANG Zhao-guo. Tourism Climate and Its Comfort Degree in Urumqi [J]. , 2014, 31(3): 404-409.
[11]	JIANG Shi-gao,SHANG Zhen-yan, NIU De-cao,ZHANG Bao-lin,ZHANG Si-lian, FU Hua. Relationship between Grassland Plant Diversity and Foliar C∶N∶P Stoichiometry on the Western Slope of the Helan Mountain [J]. , 2014, 31(3): 523-529.
[12]	TANG Hong, XIA Fu-Qiang, YANG De-Gang. Exploitation and Utilization Potentials of Water Resources in Arid Oasis City—A Case Study in Urumqi [J]. , 2013, 30(6): 973-980.
[13]	LI Cheng-Xiu, LI Xiao-Yan, YANG Tai-Bao, LI Yue-Tan-. Structure and Species Diversity of Meadow Community along the Shaliu River in the Qinghai Lake Basin [J]. , 2013, 30(6): 1028-1035.
[14]	A De-Li-·Mai-Di, LIU Yan-Yan, GU Li-Nu-尔, KONG Xiao-Xin, NA Bi-Wu-La. Poisonous Plants in Natural Grasslands in Urumqi County and Their Control Measures [J]. , 2013, 30(6): 1044-1048.
[15]	GONG Heng-Rui. Causes Related to Change of Evaporation from 20 cm Pans in the  Urumqi-Changji Region during the Period of 1981-2010 [J]. , 2013, 30(5): 815-821.