Arid Zone Research ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 924-932.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2022.03.26
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yuan1,2(),LI Xiaojing1,2(),DUAN Yuxi1,2,LI Bo1,2,WANG Weifeng1,2,LIU Zongqi1,2,FENG Tao1
Received:
2021-07-20
Revised:
2021-09-30
Online:
2022-05-15
Published:
2022-05-30
Contact:
Xiaojing LI
E-mail:lyuan1992@163.com;lixiaojing19880521@163.com
LIU Yuan,LI Xiaojing,DUAN Yuxi,LI Bo,WANG Weifeng,LIU Zongqi,FENG Tao. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil stoichiometry in the eastern Hobq Desert[J].Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(3): 924-932.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Tab. 1
General information of study plots"
样地 类型 | 位置 | 恢复 措施 | 盖度/% | 优势植物 | 草本 | 灌木 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高/cm | 密度 /(株·m-2) | 株高/cm | 密度 /[株·(100m2)-1] | 冠幅/m2 | ||||||
Md | 110°46′46.41″E, 40°04′46.18″N | 无 | 3.3 | 沙蓬(Agriophyllum squarrosum)、 沙竹(Psammochloa villosa) | 9.4 | 10.0 | _ | _ | _ | |
Sf | 110°46′42.50″E, 40°04′43.73″N | 无 | 19.7 | 油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)、猪毛菜(Salsola collina) | 9.2 | 46.0 | 53.2 | 18.0 | 1.2 | |
Ar | 110°47′52.56″E, 40°04′24.22″N | 飞播 | 48.5 | 油蒿、猪毛菜、杨柴(Hedysarum mongolicum)、 | 10.5 | 68.0 | 76.8 | 87.0 | 1.5 | |
Sa | 110°46′28.34″E, 40°04′ 45.99″N | 扦插+飞播 | 60.3 | 沙柳(Salix cheilophila)、油蒿、杨柴、狗尾草(Setaria viridis) | 6.1 | 50.0 | 122.6 | 206.0 | 2.6 |
Tab. 2
Difference characteristics of vegetation biomass in different areas"
样地 类型 | 植物种 | 灌木茎 /(g·m-2) | 灌木叶 /(g·m-2) | 灌木根 /(g·m-2) | 草本地上部分/(g·m-2) | 草本地下部分/(g·m-2) | 凋落物 /(g·m-2) | 地上 生物量 /(g·m-2) | 地下 生物量 /(g·m-2) | 总生物量 /(g·m-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Md | - | - | - | 2.48±1.21b | 0.83±0.81c | - | 2.48d | 0.83d | 3.31d | |
Sf | 油蒿 | 1.24±0.20e | 1.07±0.27d | 0.92±0.30d | 14.42±4.11a | 4.62±2.37a | 10.16±0.32c | 16.73c | 5.54c | 32.43c |
Ar | 油蒿 | 121.97±51.84b | 31.22±17.95b | 34.04±10.70b | 12.36±8.63a | 3.10±2.43b | 34.89±19.87b | 203.84b | 37.14b | 275.87b |
杨柴 | 29.34±6.25c | 8.95±2.46c | 20.47±4.68b | |||||||
Sa | 沙柳 | 366.23±187.38a | 141.81±76.64a | 236.13±116.21a | 0.81±0.19b | 0.32±0.11c | 71.26±39.59a | 581.68a | 236.45a | 889.39a |
油蒿 | 44.66±7.23c | 12.68±5.05c | 27.72±5.62b | |||||||
杨柴 | 11.44±6.16d | 4.05±2.16c | 10.13±3.28c |
Tab. 3
Response of soil C, N, P to environmental factors"
指标 | 因素 | df | 均方 | F | P | 偏η2 | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | 植被恢复 | 3 | 4.186 | 141.409 | <0.001** | 0.930 | 0.927 |
土层深度 | 3 | 0.900 | 30.398 | <0.001** | 0.740 | ||
植被恢复×土层深度 | 9 | 0.308 | 10.421 | <0.001** | 0.746 | ||
N | 植被恢复 | 3 | 0.015 | 132.015 | <0.001** | 0.925 | 0.939 |
土层深度 | 3 | 0.008 | 66.526 | <0.001** | 0.862 | ||
植被恢复×土层深度 | 9 | 0.002 | 16.178 | <0.001** | 0.820 | ||
P | 植被恢复 | 3 | 0.022 | 87.592 | <0.001** | 0.891 | 0.910 |
土层深度 | 3 | 0.014 | 55.240 | <0.001** | 0.838 | ||
植被恢复×土层深度 | 9 | 0.002 | 6.924 | <0.001** | 0.661 |
Tab. 4
Response of soil C, N, P stoichiometric ratio to environmental factors"
指标 | 因素 | df | 均方 | F | P | 偏η2 | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C:N | 植被恢复 | 3 | 106.406 | 17.318 | <0.001** | 0.619 | 0.608 |
土层深度 | 3 | 16.357 | 2.662 | 0.065* | 0.200 | ||
植被恢复×土层深度 | 9 | 19.024 | 3.096 | 0.009** | 0.465 | ||
C:P | 植被恢复 | 3 | 16.311 | 87.361 | <0.001** | 0.891 | 0.87 |
土层深度 | 3 | 2.497 | 13.377 | <0.001** | 0.556 | ||
植被恢复×土层深度 | 9 | 0.555 | 2.971 | 0.011 | 0.455 | ||
N:P | 植被恢复 | 3 | 0.052 | 84.467 | <0.001** | 0.888 | 0.901 |
土层深度 | 3 | 0.026 | 42.394 | <0.001** | 0.799 | ||
植被恢复×土层深度 | 9 | 0.004 | 6.887 | <0.001** | 0.660 |
Tab. 5
Correlation coefficients between soil ecological stoichiometry and biomass"
C | N | P | C:N | C:P | N:P | AGB | UGB | LB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | 1 | 0.986** | 0.995** | 0.856 | 0.996** | 0.969* | 0.976* | 0.998** | 0.939* |
N | 1 | 0.998** | 0.757 | 0.987* | 0.996** | 0.976* | 0.983* | 0.956* | |
P | 1 | 0.801 | 0.995** | 0.988* | 0.978* | 0.993** | 0.951* | ||
C:N | 1 | 0.853 | 0.704 | 0.794 | 0.862* | 0.711 | |||
C:P | 1 | 0.971* | 0.981* | 0.995** | 0.946* | ||||
N:P | 1 | 0.974* | 0.967* | 0.965* | |||||
AGB | 1 | 0.981* | 0.990** | ||||||
UGB | 1 | 0.946* |
[1] |
Sistla S A, Schimel J P. Stoichiometric flexibility as a regulator of carbon and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems under change[J]. New Phytologist, 2012, 196(1): 68-78.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04234.x pmid: 22924404 |
[2] |
Fan H B, Wu J P, Liu W F, et al. Linkages of plant and soil C:N:P stoichiometry and their relationships to forest growth in subtropical plantations[J]. Plant and Soil, 2015, 392(1-2): 127-138.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2444-2 |
[3] | Hessen D O, Elser J J. Elements of ecology and evolution[J]. Munksgaard International Publishers, 2005, 109(1): 3-5. |
[4] |
Bastin J F, Finegold Y, Garcia C, et al. The global tree restoration potential[J]. Science, 2019, 365(6448): 76-79.
doi: 10.1126/science.aax0848 |
[5] | 刘兴诏, 周国逸, 张德强, 等. 南亚热带森林不同演替阶段植物与土壤中N、P的化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 68-75. |
[ Liu Xingzhao, Zhou Guoyi, Zhang Deqiang, et al. N and P stoichiometry of plant and soil in lower subtropical forest successional series in southern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(1): 68-75. ] | |
[6] | 宁志英, 李玉霖, 杨红玲, 等. 沙化草地土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征及其对植被生产力和多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(10): 3537-3546. |
[ Ning Zhiying, Li Yulin, Yang Hongling, et al. Stoichimetry and effects of carbin, nitrogen, and phosphorus in soil of desertified grasslands on community productivity and species diversity[J]. Acta Eccologica Sinica, 2019, 39(10): 3537-3546. ] | |
[7] | 赵海燕, 张剑, 刘冬, 等. 不同沼泽湿地土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(3): 618-626. |
[ Zhao Haiyan, Zhang Jian, Liu Dong, et al. Characteristics and determining factors for ecological stoichiometry of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in different marsh wetlands[J]. Arid Zone Reserch, 2020, 37(3): 618-626. ] | |
[8] | 高德新, 张伟, 任成杰, 等. 黄土高原典型植被恢复过程土壤与叶片生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(10): 3622-3630. |
[ Gao Dexing, Zhang Wei, Ren Chengjie, et al. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soil and leaves during the recovery process of typical vegetation on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(10): 3622-3630. ] | |
[9] | 饶丽仙, 沈艳, 聂明鹤. 宁夏典型草原不同退耕年限草地植物-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(4): 43-52. |
[ Rao Lixian, Shen Yan, Nie Minghe, et al. Effect of grassland restoration duration on plant-soil ecological stoichiometry characteristics in a typical steppe[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(4): 43-52. ] | |
[10] |
周日平. 中国荒漠化分区与时空演变[J]. 地球信息科学学报. 2019, 21(5): 675-687.
doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180676 |
[ Zhou Riping. Zonation and spatiotemporal evolution of China’s desertification[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2019, 21(5): 675-687. ]
doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180676 |
|
[11] | 淑敏, 姜涛, 王东丽, 等. 科尔沁沙地不同林龄樟子松人工林土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(4): 789-795. |
[ Shu Min, Jiang Tao, Wang Dongli, et al. Soil ecological stoichiometry under the planted of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forests with different stand ages in the Horqin Sandy Land[J]. Arid Zone Reserch, 2018, 35(4): 789-795. ] | |
[12] |
陶冶, 张元明. 古尔班通古特沙漠4种草本植物叶片与土壤的化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(3): 659-665.
pmid: 26211045 |
[ Tao Ye, Zhang Yuanming. Leaf and soil stoichiometry of four herbs in the Gurbantunggut Desert[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(3): 659-665. ]
pmid: 26211045 |
|
[13] | 刘源, 段玉玺, 王博, 等. 库布齐东段典型人工固沙林土壤水分时空变化特征[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(1): 1-8. |
[ Liu Yuan, Duan Yuxi, Wang Bo, et al. Spatial and temporal characteristics of soil moisture in typical sand fixation plantations in the eastern Hobq[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2021, 36(1): 1-8. ] | |
[14] |
王博, 段玉玺, 王伟峰, 等. 库布齐东缘沙漠化逆转过程中土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 104-112.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.005 pmid: 31957386 |
[ Wang Bo, Duan Yuxi, Wang Weifeng, et al. Variations of soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in the reversion process of desertification in the eastern Hobq Desert[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 104-112. ]
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.005 pmid: 31957386 |
|
[15] | 郝文芳, 陈存根, 梁宗锁, 等. 植被生物量的研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(2): 175-182. |
[ Hao Wenfang, Chen Cungen, Liang Zongsuo, et al. Research advances in vegetation biomass[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Naturnal Science Edition), 2008, 36(2): 175-182. ] | |
[16] |
苏永中, 张铜会, 赵哈林, 等. 科尔沁沙地不同年代小叶锦鸡儿人工林植物群落特征及其土壤特性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(1): 93-100.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2004.0014 |
[ Su Yongzhong, Zhang Tonghui, Zhao Halin, et al. Characteristics of plant community and soil properties in the plantation chronosequence of Caragana Microphylla in Horqin Sandy Land[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2004, 28(1): 93-100. ]
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2004.0014 |
|
[17] | 钱洲, 俞元春, 俞小鹏, 等. 毛乌素沙地飞播造林植被恢复特征及土壤性质变化[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(4): 102-107. |
[ Qian Zhou, Yu Yuanchun, Yu Xiaopeng, et al. Changes of vegetation characteristics and soil properties in Mu Us Sandy Land by aerial seeding afforestation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(4): 102-107. ] | |
[18] | 宋朝枢. 乌拉特梭梭林自然保护区科学考察集[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2000. |
[ Song Chaoshu. Scientific Servey of Wulate Haloxylon Ammodendron Forst Nature Reserve[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 2000. ] | |
[19] |
王春玲, 郭泉水, 谭德远, 等. 准噶尔盆地东南缘不同生境条件下梭梭群落结构特征研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(7): 1224-1229.
pmid: 16252856 |
[ Wang Chunling, Guo Quanshui, Tan Deyuan, et al. Haloxylon ammodendron community patterns in different habitats along southeastern edge of Zhunger Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(7): 1224-1229. ]
pmid: 16252856 |
|
[20] |
Li C P, Xiao C W. Above-and belowground biomass of ArtemisiaorDosica communities in three contrasting habitats of the Mu Us Desert, northern China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2007, 70(2): 195-207.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.12.017 |
[21] | Comstock J. Ecological communities and processes in a mojave desert ecosystem, Rock Valley, Nevada[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1996, 11(12): 524-525. |
[22] | Havstad K M, Huenneke L F, Schlesinger W H. Structure and Function of a Chihuahuan Desert Ecosystem[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. |
[23] | Houghton R A, Hall F, Goetz S J. Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2009, 114 (3): 1-13. |
[24] |
Gao Y, He N P, Yu G R, et al. Long-term effects of different land use trpes on C, N, and P stoichiometry and storage in subtropical ecosystems: A case study in China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 67(1): 171-181.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.013 |
[25] |
Harris W N, Moretto A S, Distel R A, et al. Fire and grazing in grasslands of the Argentine Caldenal: Effects on plant and soil carbon and nitrogen[J]. Acta Oecologica, 2007, 32(2): 207-214.
doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2007.05.001 |
[26] | 王博, 段玉玺, 王伟峰, 等. 库布齐东段不同植被恢复阶段荒漠生态系统碳氮储量及分配格局[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(7): 2470-2480. |
[ Wang Bo, Duan Yuxi, Wang Weifeng, et al. Carbon and nitrogen storage and distribution patterns of desert ecosystems at different vegetation restoration stages in the eastern Hobq Desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(7): 2470-2480. ] | |
[27] | 李尝君, 曾凡江, 郭京衡, 等. 植被恢复程度与沙地土壤性质--以塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(6): 1061-1067. |
[ Li Changjun, Zeng Fanjiang, Guo Jingheng, et al. Soil properties of different sandylands under different vegetation recovering levels: A case in southern Taklimakan Desert[J]. Arid Zone Reserch, 2015, 32(6): 1061-1067. ] | |
[28] | 刘建康. 毛乌素沙地油蒿群落退化与封育恢复特征及机制研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2019. |
[ Liu Jiankang.Study on Characteristics and Mechanisms of Degradation and Enclosure Restoration about Artemisia ordosica Community in Mu Us Desert[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2019. ] | |
[29] | 董正武, 玉米提·哈力克, 李生宇, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠西南缘柽柳沙包的土壤化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20): 7389-7400. |
[ Dong Zhengwu, Umut Halik, Li Shengyu, et al. Soil stoichiometric characteristics of Tamarix cones in the southwest margin of Gurbantunggut Desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20): 7389-7400. ] | |
[30] | Shuai O Y, Xiang W H, Gou M M, et al. Variations in soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and stoichiometry along forest succession in southern China[J]. Biogeosciences Discussions, 2017, 10(8): 1-27. |
[31] | 刘进辉, 王雪芹, 马洋. 沙漠绿洲过渡带柽柳灌丛沙堆-丘间地系统土壤养分空间异质性[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(4): 979-990. |
[ Liu Jinhui, Wang Xueqin, Ma Yang. Spatial variation of soil nutrients of Tamarix ramosissima nebkhas and interdune areas in a desert-oasis ecotone[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(4): 979-990. ] | |
[32] | 董雪, 辛智鸣, 黄雅茹, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠典型灌木群落土壤化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17): 6247-6256. |
[ Dong Xue, Xin Zhimin, Huang Yaru, et al. Soil stoichiometry in typical shrub communities in the Ulan Buh Desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(17): 6247-6256. ] | |
[33] | 陶冶, 吴甘霖, 刘耀斌, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠典型灌木群落土壤化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(2): 305-314. |
[ Tao Ye, Wu Ganlin, Liu Yaobin, et al. Soil stoichiometry and their influencing factors in typical shrub communities in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 37(2): 305-314. ] | |
[34] | 周晓兵, 陶冶, 吴林, 等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘荒漠绿洲过渡带不同土地利用影响下土壤化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(3): 969-980. |
[ Zhou Xiaobing, Tao Ye, Wu Ling, et al. Soil stoichiometry in different land-use categories in desert-oasis ecotones of the southern Taklimakan Desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 969-980. ] | |
[35] |
Tian H Q, Chen G S, Zhang C, et al. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China’s soils: A synthesis of observational data[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2010, 98(1-3): 139-151.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-009-9382-0 |
[36] |
An H, Li G Q. Effects of grazing on carbon and nitrogen in plants and soils in a semiarid desert grassland, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(3): 341-349.
doi: 10.1007/s40333-014-0049-x |
[37] | 赵志强. 鄂尔多斯几种沙生植物根际自身固氮菌的筛选及对杨柴接种效应研究[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2008. |
[ Zhao Zhiqiang. andIsolation of Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria Study on Effects of Inoculation with Hedysarum fruticosum var. mongolicum in Erdos[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2008. ] | |
[38] |
Cleveland C C, Liptzin D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: Is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85(3): 235-252.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 |
[39] | 张珂, 苏永中, 王婷, 等. 荒漠绿洲区不同种植年限人工梭梭林土壤化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(11):3235-3243. |
[ Zhang Ke, Su Yongzhong, Wang Ting, et al. Soil stoichiometry characteristics of Haloxylon ammodendron with different plantation age in the desert-oasis ecotone, North China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(11):3235-3243. ] |
[1] | LI Min, SUN Jie, CHEN Xue, LIU Jiaqing. Leaf-soil stoichiometry and homeostasis characteristics of desert-related plants [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 104-113. |
[2] | LI Yongguang, YUAN Guanghui. Biophysical effects of the different underlying factors on land the surface temperature in the Qinghai Lake Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 24-35. |
[3] | CAO Ziqi, LU Zhanyuan, REN Yongfeng, ZHAO Xiaoqing, WANG Jianguo, HOU Zhihui, HAN Yunfei, WANG Dengyun, SHANG Xueyan, DUAN Rui. Effects of different nitrogen levels on the apparent soil nutrient balance and tuber yield of Cyperus esculentus farmland [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 71-79. |
[4] | PANG Ye,YUAN Jianyu,YAN Lijuan,DU Mengyin,LI Guang. Effects of conservation tillage on soil nitrogen mineralization in dry wheat fields on the Loess Plateau [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(9): 1446-1456. |
[5] | ZHOU Jing,SUN Yongfeng,DING Jieping,BAI Haojiang,MA Xiang,WANG Xuyang,Luo Yongqing. Changes in vegetation biomass and its relationship with soil carbon during restoration processes in degraded sandy grasslands [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(9): 1457-1464. |
[6] | SUN Danyang,WEI Jianxin,YANG Liao,WANG Jie,TANG Yuqi,Babierjiang DILIXIATI. Study on using deep learning method to retrieve the biomass of natural Picea forest from GEDI data [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(9): 1472-1483. |
[7] | SHEN Cao,REN Zongping,LI Peng,WANG Kaibo,LU Kexin,REN Zhengyan,WEI Xiaoyan. Identification of priority areas for ecological compensation under soil and water conservation in Ningxia [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(9): 1527-1536. |
[8] | MA Jilong, SHI Junhui, WANG Xinying, Aliya BAIDOURELA, LIU Maoxiu, Aijier ABULA. Effects of flood overflow on soil organic carbon and active components of Populus euphratica forest in the middle reaches of the Tarim River [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1248-1257. |
[9] | LI Xiaoyu, JIA Keli, WEI Huimin, CHEN Ruihua, WANG Yijing. Prediction of soil salt content based on the random forest algorithm [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1258-1267. |
[10] | JI Mingxin, FENG Tianjiao, XIAO Huijie, XIN Zhiming, LI Junran, WANG Dong. Effects of different farmland shelterbelts on soil water and nutrient storage in the Hetao Irrigation District [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1268-1279. |
[11] | LI Jiannan, SHI Haibin, MIAO Qingfeng, SHAN Dan, RONG Hao, WEN Yaqin. Effect of environmental factors on the transpiration water consumption of various artificial arbor stands [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1312-1321. |
[12] | LU Yuanbo, YAN Cheng, SONG Chunwu, LI Yajuan, LAI Zhaoyun. Response of plant community distribution in the pre-montane desert grassland on the southern slope of Tianshan Mountain to environmental factors: A case study in Baicheng County [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1346-1357. |
[13] | HAI Long, ZHOU Mei, ZHANG Jiakai, HONG Guangyu, LI Fengzi, FEI Fei. Research on soil respiration and its influence factors on Hedysarum laeve shrubbery of different ages at Mu Us sandy land [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(7): 1107-1116. |
[14] | ZHANG Songan, LIU Xuan, ZHAO Peishan, GAO Guanglei, ZHANG Ying, DING Guodong, LIU Ye, REN Yue. Soil bacterial networks in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations of the Hulunbuir Desert [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(6): 905-915. |
[15] | GUAN Yuqi, LI Guang, PAN Xue, XU Guorong, WEI Xingxing, LIU Hao, WU Jiangqi. Effects of changing rainfall frequency on the soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus ecostochimetrics in the Gahai wet meadow, Gannan [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(6): 916-925. |
|