呼伦贝尔草原风蚀坑土壤水分异质效应研究

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2022.05.24

干旱区研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1598-1606.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2022.05.24 cstr: 32277.14.AZR.20220524

呼伦贝尔草原风蚀坑土壤水分异质效应研究

袁立敏^1,^2,³(),杨制国^1,⁴,薛博^1,²,高海燕^1,³,韩照日格图⁵

1.内蒙古自治区林业科学研究院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010010
2.内蒙古多伦浑善达克沙地生态系统国家定位观测研究站,内蒙古锡林郭勒 027300
3.内蒙古自治区沙地（沙漠）生态系统与生态工程重点实验室,内蒙古呼和浩特 010010
4.沙地生物资源保护与培育国家林业局重点实验室,内蒙古呼和浩特 010010
5.呼伦贝尔市林业和草原科学研究所,内蒙古呼伦贝尔 021008

收稿日期:2022-03-26 修回日期:2022-06-02 出版日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2022-10-25
作者简介:袁立敏（1982-）,男,研究员,博士,主要从事荒漠土壤资源利用与保护研究. E-mail: nmgyuanlm@163.com
基金资助:
内蒙古科技计划项目(2022YFDZ0055);中国科学院“西部之光”项目(2019)

Heterogeneity of soil moisture of blowouts in HulunBuir grassland

YUAN Limin^1,^2,³(),YANG Zhiguo^1,⁴,XUE Bo^1,²,GAO Haiyan^1,³,HAN Zhaorigetu⁵

1. Inner Mongolia Academy of Forestry, Hohhot 010010, Inner Mongolia, China
2. Inner Mongolia Duolun Hunshandake Sand Ecosystem Research Station, Xilingol 027300, Inner Mongolia, China
3. Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Desert Ecological System, Hohhot 010010, Inner Mongolia, China
4. Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Sandy Land Biological Resources Conservation and Cultivation, Hohhot 010010, Inner Mongolia, China
5. Academy Institute of Forestry and Grassland of HulunBuir, HulunBuir 021008, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2022-03-26 Revised:2022-06-02 Published:2022-09-15 Online:2022-10-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

风蚀坑是沙质草原常见的一种风蚀地貌,是草地沙化的一种重要表现形式,其对草原植被破坏性强。本文选择呼伦贝尔草原处于活跃发展阶段的风蚀坑为研究对象,并以周边草地为对照,对风蚀坑内外不同位置、不同深度的土壤含水量进行研究。结果表明：（1）风蚀坑造成草原土壤水分的“破口”效应,导致其周边近20 m范围草地土壤含水量显著降低,且在沙坑边缘0~3 m范围内形成了一条“干燥带”,其土壤含水量比对照低45.15%;（2）沙坑内土壤含水量较对照降低44.44%,但沙坑下风向积沙区土壤含水量与对照无显著差异;（3）风蚀坑的沙坑及积沙区不同深度的土壤含水量异质性较大,变异系数C_V可达到50%以上,且随着土层深度的增加,土壤含水量呈现先增大后减小的趋势;（4）经过雨季,风蚀坑的积沙区有一定的“储水”作用,而沙坑及边缘区却呈现出严重的“失水”效应,土壤处于极度干燥状态,为沙坑的风蚀扩张提供了条件。

关键词: 风蚀坑, 土壤侵蚀, 土壤含水量, 空间尺度, 呼伦贝尔草原

Abstract:

Blowout is an important manifestation of grassland desertification that is a common for a wind erosion landform in sandy grassland and is highly destructive to grassland vegetation. The blowouts that were in the active development stage of HulunBuir grassland were the object of this research, and the surrounding grassland was the control in which the soil moisture was measured in different locations and different depth. The results show the following: (1) Blowouts caused the“crevasse”effect of soil moisture in grassland that lead to a significant decrease in the soil of the surrounding grassland in a range of nearly 20 m. A close proximity to the pit results in lower soil moisture, A“dry zone”was formed in the range of 0-3 m at the edge of the pit, and the soil moisture was reduced by 45.15% compared with the control. (2) Soil moisture of the pit decreased by 44.44%, and no significant difference was observed in the soil moisture between the surrounding sand accumulation area and the lightly overlying sand area compared to the control. (3) There was a great difference in soil moisture of the pit in the soil layers and sand accumulation area. C_v could reach more than 50%. As soil depth increased, the soil moisture increased first and then decreased. (4) The sand accumulation area of blowouts could realize a certain“water storage”effect after the rainy season, the pit and edge zone had a serious“water loss”effect. The soil was extremely dry soil provided conditions for the expansion and morphological development of blowouts.

Key words: blowout, soil erosion, soil moisture, space scale, HulunBuir grassland

袁立敏,杨制国,薛博,高海燕,韩照日格图. 呼伦贝尔草原风蚀坑土壤水分异质效应研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1598-1606.

YUAN Limin,YANG Zhiguo,XUE Bo,GAO Haiyan,HAN Zhaorigetu. Heterogeneity of soil moisture of blowouts in HulunBuir grassland[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(5): 1598-1606.

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 42

[1]	庄燕美, 哈斯. 沙丘风蚀坑的形态及动力过程的研究进展[J]. 干旱区地理, 2005, 28(5): 632-637.
	[Zhuang Yanmei, Ha Si. Progress of the study on shapes and dynamical process of blowouts on dunes[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2005, 28(5): 632-637. ]
[2]	朱震达, 陈广庭. 中国土地沙质荒漠化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994.
	[Zhu Zhenda, Chen Guangting. Sandy Desertification in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1994. ]
[3]	孙禹, 杜会石, 刘美萍, 等. 风蚀坑形态-动力学研究进展[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(7): 898-904. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.07.898
	[Sun Yu, Du Huishi, Liu Meiping, et al. A review on morphodynamic processes of blowouts[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(7): 898-904. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.07.898
[4]	张德平, 王效科, 哈斯, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙质草原风蚀坑研究(1)-形态、分类、研究意义[J]. 中国沙漠, 2006, 26(6): 894-902.
	[Zhang Deping, Wang Xiaoke, Ha Si, et al. HulunBuir sandy grassland blowouts(I): Geomorphology, classification, and significances[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2006, 26(6): 894-902. ]
[5]	Sun Yu, Hasi Eerdun, Liu Meiping, et al. Airflow and sediment movement within an inland blowout in HulunBuir sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Aeolian Research, 2016, 22: 13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.05.002
[6]	闫德仁. 浑善达克沙地风蚀坑形态特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(4): 637-642. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.04.019
	[Yan Deren. Impact factors and morphological characteristics of blowouts in Hunshandake sand land[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(4): 637-642. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.04.019
[7]	孙禹, 杜会石, 哈斯额尔敦, 等. 固定沙丘风蚀坑风沙动力学观测研究[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(9): 1562-1570. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201609008
	[Sun Yu, Du Huishi, Hasi Eerdun, et al. Aeolian dynamical process of blowout on the fixed dune[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(9): 1562-1570. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201609008
[8]	胡日娜, 哈斯额尔敦, 浩毕斯哈拉图, 等. 浑善达克沙地东南缘固定沙丘风蚀坑动态变化[J]. 中国沙漠, 2019, 39(1): 34-43.
	[ Hurina, Hasi Eerdun, Haobisi Halatu, et al. Dynamic change s of blowouts on fixed sand dunes in the southeastern fringe of Otindag Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(1): 34-43. ]
[9]	Malakouti M J, Lewis D T, Stubbendieck J. Effect of grasses and soil properties on wind erosion in sand blowouts[J]. Journal of Range Management, 1978, 31(6): 417-420 doi: 10.2307/3897198
[10]	张德平, 孙宏伟, 王效科, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙质草原风蚀坑研究(Ⅱ):发育过程[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(1): 20-24, 170-171.
	[Zhang Deping, Sun Hongwei, Wang Xiaoke, et al. HulunBuir sandy grassland blowouts(II): Process of development and landscape evolution[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2007, 27(1): 20-24, 170-171. ]
[11]	阎旭, 张德平, 夏显东, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙质草原风蚀坑形态发育模式分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(2): 212-217.
	[Yan Xu, Zhang Deping, Xia Xiandong, et al. Morphology and development model of blowouts in HulunBuir sandy grassland, China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2009, 29(2): 212-217. ]
[12]	Jungerius P D. A simulation model of blowout development[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1984, 9: 509-512. doi: 10.1002/esp.3290090604
[13]	Gares P A, Nordstrom K F. A cyclic model of foredune blowout evolution f or a leeward coast: Island Beach, NJ[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1995, 85: 1-20.
[14]	Hesp P A, Walker I J. Three-dimensional aeolian dynamics within a bowl blowout during offshore winds: Greenwich Dunes, Prince Edward Island,Canada[J]. Aeolian Research, 2011, 3: 389-399 doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2011.09.002
[15]	张德平, 王效科, 孙宏伟, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙质草原风蚀坑研究(Ⅳ)——人类活动的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(2): 214-220.
	[Zhang Deping, Wang Xiaoke, Sun Hongwei, et al. HulunBuir sandy grassland blowouts: Influence of human activities[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 27(2): 214-220. ]
[16]	周炎广, 陈惠中, 管超, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙地风蚀坑粒度特征及其环境意义[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(4): 724-733.
	[Zhou Yanguang, Chen Huizhong, Guan Chao, et al. Grain size characteristics of the blowout and its environmental significance in the HulunBuir Sandy Land China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(4): 724-733. ]
[17]	Du H S, Hasi E, Yang Y, et al. Landscape pattern change and driving force of blowout distribution in the HulunBuir Sandy Grassland[J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2012, 4(5): 431-438. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1226.2012.00431
[18]	Smyth T A G, Jackson D W T, Cooper J A G. High resolution measured and modelled three-dimensional airflow over a coastal bowl blowout[J]. Geomorphology, 2012, 177-178: 62-73.
[19]	王帅, 哈斯. 呼伦贝尔沙质草原区域风况及风蚀坑形态特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2008, 15(3): 74-76.
	[Wang Shuai, Ha Si. Wind regime and blowouts geomorphology in HulunBuir sandy grassland[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 15(3): 74-76. ]
[20]	李双权, 哈斯, 杜会石, 等. 沙质草地碟形风蚀坑形态-气流相互作用[J]. 中国沙漠, 2012, 32(5): 1201-1209.
	[Li Shuangquan, Ha Si, Du Huishi, et al. Interaction between airflow and shape of saucer blowout in sandy grassland[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2012, 32(5): 1201-1209. ]
[21]	王帅, 哈斯, 张军, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙质草原槽形风蚀坑表面气流及其意义[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(5): 745-749.
	[Wang Shuai, Ha Si, Zhang Jun, et al. Geomorphological significance of air flow over saucer blowout of the HulunBuir sandy grassland[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2007, 27(5): 745-749. ]
[22]	薛博, 袁立敏, 黄海广, 等. 沙障对风蚀坑种子库特征的影响研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2020, 46(3): 13-18.
	[Xue Bo, Yuan Limin, Huang Haiguang, et al. Effects of sand barriers on characteristics of seed bank in blowout[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science ＆ Technology, 2020, 46(3): 13-18. ]
[23]	曲娜, 杜敏, 袁立敏, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙化风蚀坑生物工程治沙技术效果[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2013, 39(2): 25-27, 46.
	[Qu Na, Du Min, Yuan Limin, et al. Effect of biological engineering on sand control in blowouts of HulunBuir[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science ＆ Technology, 2013, 39(2): 25-27, 46. ]
[24]	曲娜, 闫婷, 黄海广, 等. 活化风蚀坑沙障固沙技术及植被恢复[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2020, 46(1): 1-7.
	[Qu Na, Yan Ting, Huang Haiguang, et al. Sand fixation technology and vegetation restoration of activated blowouts sand barrier[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science ＆ Technology, 2020, 46(1): 1-7. ]
[25]	黄海广, 闫德仁, 胡小龙, 等. 浑善达克沙地固定沙丘活化风蚀坑治理技术[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2018, 44(4): 18-24.
	[Huang Haiguang, Yan Deren, Hu Xiaolong, et al. Treatment technology of fixed dune activated blowouts in Otindag Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science ＆ Technology, 2018, 44(4): 18-24. ]
[26]	闫德仁, 黄海广, 胡小龙, 等. 风蚀坑土壤风蚀控制与植被恢复技术[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2019, 45(1): 1-4, 33.
	[Yan Deren, Huang Haiguang, Hu Xiaolong, et al. Techniques of soil wind erosion control and vegetation restoration in blowouts[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science ＆ Technology, 2019, 45(1): 1-4,33. ]
[27]	徐汝汝, 安庆, 赵启, 等. 柴达木盆地东缘风蚀坑不同位置风成沉积物粒度特征分析[J]. 成都师范学院学报, 2019, 35(9): 91-97.
	[Xu Ruru, An Qing, Zhao Qi, et al. Grain size characteristics of aeolian sediments at different location of blowouts in the eastern margin of Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu Normal University, 2019, 35(9): 91-97. ]
[28]	Fraser G S, Bennett S W, Olyphant, et al. Windflaw circulation patterns in a coastal dune blowout[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 1998, 14(2): 451-460.
[29]	张惜伟, 汪季, 高永, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙质草原风蚀坑表层土壤粒度特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2017, 34(2): 293-299.
	[Zhang Xiwei, Wang Ji, Gao Yong, et al. Characteristics of surface soil grain size in wind erosion pits in HulunBuir Sandy grassland[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2017, 34(2): 293-299. ]
[30]	王中原, 罗万银, 董治宝, 等. 共和盆地高寒草原风蚀坑表层沉积物粒度特征及动力学意义[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(1): 7-16.
	[Wang Zhongyuan, Luo Wanyin, Dong Zhibao, et al. Grain size characteristics and dynamic significance of surface sediments in blowouts of alpine steppe in Gonghe Basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 37(1): 7-16. ]
[31]	刘小平, 董治宝. 湿沙的风蚀起动风速实验研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2002, 22(2): 1-4.
	[Liu Xiaoping, Dong Zhibao. Experimental study on wind erosion initiation of wet sand[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002, 22(2): 1-4. ]
[32]	移小勇, 赵哈林, 赵学勇, 等. 不同风沙土含水量因子的抗风蚀性[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(4): 684-687.
	[Yi Xiaoyong, Zhao Halin, Zhao Xueyong, et al. Erodibility of aeolian soils in moisture content[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2006, 43(4): 684-687. ]
[33]	闫德仁. 呼伦贝尔沙地[M]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学出版社, 2010.
	[Yan Deren. HulunBuir Sandy Land[M]. Hohht: Inner Mongolia University Press, 2010. ]
[34]	张萍, 哈斯, 王帅, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙质草原风蚀坑积沙区的植被分带性[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(2): 237-244.
	[Zhang Ping, Ha Si, Wang Shuai, et al. Zonation of vegetation on depositional area of blowout in HulunBuir Grassland[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(2): 237-244. ]
[35]	林聪. 呼伦贝尔市近57年干燥度变化特征分析[J]. 新农业, 2020(22): 13-14.
	[Lin Cong. Characteristics of dryness change in Hulunbuir in recent 57 years[J]. New Agriculture, 2020(22): 13-14. ]
[36]	王明莹. 呼伦贝尔天然草地野生菊科牧草资源及资源评价[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2011, 42(4): 116-124.
	[Wang Mingying. Wild composite herbage resources and resource evaluation in HulunBuir natural grassland[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2011, 42(4): 116-124. ]
[37]	张惜伟, 汪季, 高永, 等. 近15年呼伦贝尔沙质草原植被覆盖变化对气候因子的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 62-69.
	[Zhang Xiwei, Wang Ji, Gao Yong, et al. Response of vegetation cover to climatic factors in HulunBuir Sandy in recent 15 years[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(1):62-69. ]
[38]	张绍云, 董玉祥. 海岸沙地风蚀坑形态-动力学研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(10): 1028-1037. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2019.10.1028
	[Zhang Shaoyun, Dong Yuxiang. Research progress on morph dynamics of coastal sandy blowout[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2019, 34(10): 1028-1037. ] doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2019.10.1028
[39]	Hesp P A, Walker I J. Three-dimensional aeolian dynamics within a bowl blowout during offshore winds: Greenwich Dunes, Prince Edward Island,Canada[J]. Aeolian Research, 2011, 3: 389-399. doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2011.09.002
[40]	车雪华, 罗万银, 邵梅, 等. 青海共和盆地不同发育阶段风蚀坑表面气流场与形态反馈研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(1): 95-109. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2021.009
	[Che Xuehua, Luo Wanyin, Shao Mei, et al. Form-flow feedback within blowouts at different developing stages in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai Province[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2021, 36(1): 95-109. ] doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2021.009
[41]	Wu Gaolin, Lui Yu, Yang Zheng, et al. Root channels to indicate the increase in soil matrix water infiltration capacity of arid reclaimed mine soils[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 546: 133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.047
[42]	张璐, 朱仲元, 张圣微, 等. 半干旱草原型流域土壤水分变异及其影响因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(13): 124-132.
	[Zhang Lu, Zhu Zhongyuan, Zhang Shengwei, et al. Analysis of soil moisture variation and its influencing factors in semi-arid steppe watershed[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(13): 124-132. ]

风蚀坑编号	沙坑面积/hm²	沙坑最大深度/m	沙坑宽度/m	沙坑长度/m	风蚀坑面积/hm²
1号	0.82	6.65	96.96	153.68	13.47
2号	1.02	10.25	109.61	188.18	21.72
3号	0.88	5.52	103.43	128.66	14.46
4号	0.65	7.78	60.92	101.65	4.57
5号	1.04	15.36	88.62	210.76	6.71

呼伦贝尔草原风蚀坑土壤水分异质效应研究

Heterogeneity of soil moisture of blowouts in HulunBuir grassland

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 42

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	邱春霞, 刘晓宏, 李豆, 张佳淼, 李朋飞. 机载LiDAR和模糊推理系统在黄土高原土壤侵蚀监测中的应用[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(8): 1331-1342.
[2]	万佳怡, 矢佳昱, 张华敏, 李兰晖, 丁明军. 三江源区不同覆被类型高寒草甸土壤水分变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(8): 1343-1353.
[3]	郑柳娜, 江红南, 孙梦婷. 基于遥感影像的新疆渭干河—库车河三角洲土壤水盐与植被覆盖度的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(7): 1131-1139.
[4]	包志鑫, 袁立敏, 武红燕, 鲁海涛, 韩照日格图. 呼伦贝尔草原风蚀坑植物分布空间异质效应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(7): 1185-1194.
[5]	董彭蓓, 任宗萍, 李鹏, 王凯博, 贺国凯, 王璞. 土地利用变化下宁夏生态系统服务权衡协同关系研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(6): 1032-1044.
[6]	王勃, 张建军, 赖宗锐, 赵炯昌, 胡亚伟, 杨周, 李阳, 卫朝阳. 土壤含水量对探地雷达探测植物根系构型精度的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(3): 456-466.
[7]	姚春艳, 刘洪鹄, 刘竞. 长江源区1980—2020年水沙变化规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(5): 726-736.
[8]	石建周, 刘贤德, 田青, 于澎涛, 王彦辉. 六盘山半干旱区华北落叶松林坡面土壤含水量的降雨响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(4): 594-604.
[9]	张雨斯, 包玉海, 贺忠华. 1990—2021年内蒙古遥感生态环境质量变化及趋势分析——以呼伦贝尔市陈巴尔虎旗为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(2): 326-336.
[10]	郑欣如, 王树森, 王博, 张欣, 刘静, 胡晶华, 李诗文, 袁亚楠, 王丫博. 采煤沉陷区模拟土壤侵蚀胁迫对黑沙蒿生理生长特性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1806-1814.
[11]	赵蒙恩,闫庆武,刘政婷,王文铭,李桂娥,吴振华. 鄂尔多斯市土壤侵蚀时空演变及影响因子分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(6): 1819-1831.
[12]	杨慧,张泽,张兰,闫兴富. 柠条种子萌发对不同温度和土壤含水量的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(6): 1875-1884.
[13]	李泽厚,李蕊希,张舒斌,王崇斌,郑明明,董叶卿,吴雪. 多枝柽柳叶片结构和化学性状对土壤水分变化的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1486-1495.
[14]	王佳,田青,王理德,何洪盛,宋达成,郭春秀. 民勤青土湖区不同年限退耕地对土壤水分与物种多样性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 605-614.
[15]	宋良翠,马维伟,李广,龙永春,常文华. 水分对尕海湿地退化演替土壤氮矿化的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 165-175.