水力性状对荒漠植物群落物种多度分布格局的影响

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2023.03.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

干旱引起的植物死亡是陆地生态系统物种组成改变的一个重要原因。水力学性状作为连通植物和水分匮缺间的桥梁，揭示其对物种分布的影响对理解植物干旱适应性、荒漠生态系统植被恢复和管理具有重要的理论意义。以新疆艾比湖湿地自然保护区的木本植物为研究对象，比较物种多度、水力学性状在土壤干旱梯度下的变化特征，并分析水力性状与物种多度分布之间的关系。结果表明，在土壤干旱梯度下，所有物种的多度之和未有显著变化，但在物种层面，不同物种的多度对干旱胁迫响应明显不同；比导率、准稳态导水率和胡伯尔值均随土壤干旱增加呈增加趋势，而枝叶水势不断降低，但干材密度没有显著变化；水力性状在种间的差别随土壤干旱程度发生变化；冗余分析和广义加性模型的结果表明，基于所测水力性状可以解释荒漠木本植物多度分布格局变化的92.8%，其值远高于单个或少数几个性状的组合（13.30%~86.40%）；植物多度随着准稳态导水率、比导率、胡伯尔值和枝叶水势等水力性状的升高而增加，随着干材密度的增加而降低。可见，水力性状与荒漠植物物种多度分布之间存在明显关系，利用水力性状的变化可以预测木本植物多度分布的变化。

关键词: 荒漠植物, 水力性状, 多度分布, 干旱适应策略

Abstract:

Plant death caused by drought is an important cause of species composition changes in terrestrial ecosystems. Revealing the influence of hydraulic triats on species distribution, which is of great theoretical significance for understanding plant drought adaptation, restoration and management of desert vegetation. In this study, the woody plants in the Ebinur Lake Wetland Nature Reserve were selected as subject to compare the variation characteristics of species abundance and hydraulic traits under soil drought gradient and analyze the relationship between hydraulic traits and species abundance distribution. Results showed that the sum of abundance (community density) of all species did not change significantly. However, the responses of different species abundance to drought stress were significantly different. With the increase in soil drought, the specific conductivity, quasi-steady conductivity, and Huber value increased; the water potential of branches and leaves decreased continuously, and the stem wood density did not change significantly. The difference of hydraulic triats among species changed with the degree of drought. Redundancy analysis and generalized additive model showed that 92.8% of the variation of desert woody plant abundance distribution pattern can be explained by the measured hydraulic triats. In addition, plant abundance increased with the quasi-steady conductivity, specific conductivity, Huber value, and water potential of branches and leaves but decreased with the increase in stem wood density. Therefore, the changes of the woody plant abundance distribution can be predicted using the changes of hydraulic traits.

Key words: desert plants, hydraulic traits, abundance distribution, drought adaptation strategies

孙启兴, 杨晓东, 李浡睿, 孔翠翠, 伊力哈穆江·艾尼弯, 周洁, 吕光辉. 水力性状对荒漠植物群落物种多度分布格局的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 412-424.

SUN Qixing, YANG Xiaodong, LI Borui, KONG Cuicui, Elhamjan ANWAR, ZHOU Jie, LYU Guanghui. Effects of hydraulic traits on the species abundance distribution pattern of desert plant communities[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(3): 412-424.

图/表 11

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表2

图7

表3

图8

参考文献 36

[1]	Ding J, Eldridge D J. Community-level responses to increasing dryness vary with plant growth form across an extensive aridity gradient[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 2021, 48(7): 1788-1796. doi: 10.1111/jbi.v48.7
[2]	Hirata A, Kominami Y, Ohashi H, et al. Global estimates of stress-reflecting indices reveal key climatic drivers of climate-induced forest range shifts[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 824: 153697. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153697
[3]	Brodribb T J, Cochard H. Hydraulic failure defines the recovery and point of death in water-stressed conifers[J]. Plant Physiology, 2009, 149(1): 575-584. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.129783 pmid: 19011001
[4]	Nicol J M, Ganf G G, Pelton G A. Seed banks of a southern Australian wetland: The influence of water regime on the final floristic composition[J]. Plant Ecology, 2003, 168(2): 191-205. doi: 10.1023/A:1024430919811
[5]	Huang J, Ma J, Guan X, et al. Progress in semi-arid climate change studies in China[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2019, 36(9): 922-937. doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-8200-9
[6]	Christoffersen B, Meir P, McDowell N G. Linking plant hydraulics and beta diversity in tropical forests[J]. New Phytologist, 2017, 215(1): 12-14. doi: 10.1111/nph.14601 pmid: 28560791
[7]	Tokeshi M. Species abundance patterns and community structure[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 1993, 24: 111-186.
[8]	van Mantgem P J, Stephenson N L, Byrne J C, et al. Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States[J]. Science, 2009, 323(5913): 521-524. doi: 10.1126/science.1165000 pmid: 19164752
[9]	Zhang X N, Yang X D, Li Y, et al. Influence of edaphic factors on plant distribution and diversity in the arid area of Xinjiang, Northwest China[J]. Arid Land Research and Management, 2018, 32(1): 38-56. doi: 10.1080/15324982.2017.1376004
[10]	Lou Y, Kapfer J, Smith P, et al. Abundance changes of marsh plant species over 40 years are better explained by niche position water level than functional traits[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 117: 106639. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106639
[11]	张丽, 董增川, 黄晓玲, 等. 干旱区典型植物生长与地下水位关系的模型研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2004, 24(1): 110-113.
	[Zhang Li, Dong Zengchuan, Huang Xiaoling, et al. Modeling on relation between major plants growth and groundwater depth in arid area[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2004, 24(1): 110-113.]
[12]	杨晓东, 龚雪伟, 朱丽安, 等. 胡杨(Populus euphratica)水分再分配与其伴生种多样性和生态位的关系[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(5): 933-941.
	[Yang Xiaodong, Gong Xuewei, Zhu Li’an, et al. Relationships among Populus euphratica hydraulic redistribution, niche breadth and biodiversity of its companion species in tugai forests[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 37(5): 933-941.]
[13]	McGeoch M A, Latombe G. Characterizing common and range expanding species[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 2016, 43(2): 217-228. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12642
[14]	Villagra M, Campanello P I, Bucci S J, et al. Functional relationships between leaf hydraulics and leaf economic traits in response to nutrient addition in subtropical tree species[J]. Tree Physiology, 2013, 33(12): 1308-1318. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt098 pmid: 24284866
[15]	Brodribb T J, Feild T S, Sack L. Viewing leaf structure and evolution from a hydraulic perspective[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2010, 37(6): FP10010.
[16]	Garnier E. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession[J]. Ecology, 2004, 85: 2630-2637. doi: 10.1890/03-0799
[17]	周洪华, 李卫红. 荒漠河岸林植物木质部导水与栓塞特征及其对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(1): 19-29. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00019
	[Zhou Honghua, Li Weihong. Xylem hydraulic conductivity and embolism properties of desert riparian forest plants and its response to drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(1): 19-29.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00019
[18]	Li L, McCormack M L, Ma C, et al. Leaf economics and hydraulic traits are decoupled in five species-rich tropical-subtropical forests[J]. Ecology Letters, 2015, 18: 899-906. doi: 10.1111/ele.12466 pmid: 26108338
[19]	周洁, 杨晓东, 王雅芸, 等. 梭梭和骆驼刺对干旱的适应策略差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1064-1076. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0338
	[Zhou Jie, Yang Xiaodong, Wang Yayun, et al. Difference in adaptation strategy between Haloxylon ammodendron and Alhagi sparsifolia to drought[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2022, 46(9): 1064-1076.] doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0338
[20]	Yang X D, Zhang X N, LÜ G H, et al. Linking Populus euphratica hydraulic redistribution to diversity assembly in the arid desert zone of Xinjiang, China[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): e109071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109071
[21]	Hubbell S P. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest: That tropical trees are clumped, not spaced, alters conceptions of the organization and dynamics[J]. Science, 1979, 203(4387): 1299-1309. pmid: 17780463
[22]	彭兰, 周晓兵, 陶冶, 等. 干旱对梭梭水力性状及生理生化特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 257-265.
	[Peng Lan, Zhou Xiaobing, Tao Ye, et al. Effects of drought on the hydraulic traits and physio-biochemical characteristics of Haloxylon ammodendron[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42(2): 257-265.]
[23]	Rutter A J, Slatyer R O. Plant-water relationships[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 1968, 5(1): 261. doi: 10.2307/2401293
[24]	Meixner M, Foerst P, Windt C W. Reduced spatial resolution MRI suffices to image and quantify drought induced embolism formation in trees[J]. Plant Methods, 2021, 17(1): 38. doi: 10.1186/s13007-021-00732-7 pmid: 33823898
[25]	Magnani F, Grace J, Borghetti M. Adjustment of tree structure in response to the environment under hydraulic constraints: Structural adjustment under hydraulic constraints[J]. Functional Ecology, 2002, 16: 385-393. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00630.x
[26]	陈丽茹, 李秧秧. 沙柳和柠条茎水力学特性对模拟降雨改变的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(2): 507-514. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201802.017
	[Chen Liru, Li Yangyang. Responses of stem hydraulic traits in Salix psammophila and Caragana korshinskii to manipulated precipitation variation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(2): 507-514.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201802.017
[27]	Hukin D, Cochard H, Dreyer E, et al. Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: Does Populus euphratica Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species?[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2005, 56(418): 2003-2010. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri198 pmid: 15967780
[28]	徐梦琦, 高艳菊, 张志浩, 等. 骆驼刺叶片和根系主要功能性状对水分胁迫的适应[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38: 1559-1569.
	[Xu Mengqi, Gao Yanju, Zhang Zhihao, et al. Adaptation of the main functional trait of Alhagi sparsifolia leaves and roots to soil water stress[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38: 1559-1569.]
[29]	Chimner R A, Cooper D J. Using stable oxygen isotopes to quantify the water source used for transpiration by native shrubs in the San Luis Valley, Colorado U. S. A.[J]. Plant and Soil, 2004, 260(1-2): 225-236. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030190.70085.e9
[30]	He D, Yan E R. Size-dependent variations in individual traits and trait scaling relationships within a shade-tolerant evergreen tree species[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2018, 105(7): 1165-1174. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.2018.105.issue-7
[31]	Carter J L, White D A. Plasticity in the Huber value contributes to homeostasis in leaf water relations of a mallee Eucalypt with variation to groundwater depth[J]. Tree Physiology, 2009, 29(11): 1407-1418. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp076 pmid: 19797243
[32]	Anderegg W R L. Spatial and temporal variation in plant hydraulic traits and their relevance for climate change impacts on vegetation[J]. New Phytologist, 2015, 205: 1008-1014. pmid: 25729797
[33]	Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum[J]. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12(4): 351-366. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x pmid: 19243406
[34]	Sevanto S, Mcdowell N G, Dickman L T, et al. How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2014, 37(1): 153-161.
[35]	杨晓东, 吕光辉, 王银山, 等. 艾比湖湿地自然保护区盐生植物的水分利用效率[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(12): 2341-2346.
	[Yang Xiaodong, LÜ Guanghui, Wang Yinshan, et al. Water use efficiency of halophytes in Ebinur Lake Wetland Nature Reserve of Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal Ecology, 2010, 29(12): 2341-2346.]
[36]	McDowell N, Pockman W T, Allen C D, et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?[J]. New Phytologist, 2008, 178(4): 719-739. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x pmid: 18422905

采样序号	土壤含水量/%	土壤干旱梯度
D0	18.54±0.87	非干旱
D1	12.74±1.25	轻度干旱
D2	9.38±0.80	中度干旱
D3	3.63±0.66	重度干旱

排序轴	第一轴	第二轴
特征值	0.65	0.26
多度与水力性状相关性	0.99	0.99
多度变异的累计百分数/%	64.56	90.46
多度-水力性状关系的累计解释量/%	65.96	92.42

	模型	R²	D_exp/%	GCV
a	s(Ψl_min^*)	0.13	13.30	32.73
b	s(Ψl_min^**)+s(K_s)	0.28	34.00	31.17
c	s(Ψl_min^*)+s(K_s^)+s(Ψl_pd^*)	0.43	51.70	28.07
d	s(Ψl_min^*)+s(K_s^)+s(Ψl_pd^)+s(H_v^)	0.80	75.30	23.43
e	s(Ψl_min^*)+s(K_s^)+s(Ψl_pd^)+s(H_v^)+s(Ψs_min)	0.80	76.50	22.41
f	s(Ψl_min^*)+s(K_s^)+s(Ψl_pd^)+s(H_v^*)+s(Ψs_min)+s(SWD^)	0.81	76.80	19.56
g	s(Ψl_min^*)+s(K_s^)+s(Ψl_pd^)+s(H_v^)+s(Ψs_min^)+s(SWD^)+s(K_wb^)	0.87	86.40	15.62
h	s(Ψl_min^*)+s(K_s^)+s(Ψl_pd^)+s(H_v^)+s(Ψs_min^)+s(SWD^)+s(K_wb^)+s(Ψs_pd^)	0.93	92.80	14.45