干旱区研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 779-788.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2018.04.04

• 水土资源及其利用 • 上一篇    下一篇

地下防渗对滴灌棉花产量和水分利用率的影响

胡治强, 侯振安, 闵伟, 冶军, 吴颜   

  1. 石河子大学农学院资源与环境科学系,新疆 石河子 832003
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-29 修回日期:2018-01-08 出版日期:2018-07-15 发布日期:2025-11-18
  • 通讯作者: 侯振安. E-mail: hzatyl@163.com
  • 作者简介:胡治强(1992–),男,硕士研究生,从事土壤水氮高效利用研究. E-mail: huzhiqiang1004@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    兵团中青年科技创新领军人才计划(2016BC001)

Effects of Subsurface Impermeable Film on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Drip-irrigated Cotton Field

HU Zhi-qiang, HOU Zhen-an, MIN Wei, YE Jun, WU Yan   

  1. Department of Resources and Environmental Science,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832003,Xinjiang,China
  • Received:2017-09-29 Revised:2018-01-08 Published:2018-07-15 Online:2025-11-18

摘要: 过量灌溉导致土壤水分深层渗漏是滴灌农田水分无效损失的重要途径,地下防渗可有效减少土壤水分深层渗漏,提高农田水分利用效率。2015—2016年通过田间试验研究不同灌水量下地下防渗对滴灌棉田水分平衡、棉花产量及水分利用率的影响。采用灌水量和地下防渗2因素3水平(3×3)试验设计,其中,3个灌水量水平为340、440 mm和540 mm;3个地下防渗处理分别为:对照(无防渗)、地下防渗埋深40 cm和60 cm。结果表明:地下防渗处理(埋深40,60 cm)0~60 cm土壤含水量和净贮水量显著高于对照。随灌水量增加,土壤水分深层渗漏损失量显著增加。灌水量340 mm条件下,地下防渗对水分渗漏量影响不显著。灌水量440 mm和540 mm条件下,地下防渗埋深40 cm、60 cm处理水分渗漏损失量较对照分别减少64%、72%和38%、76%。低灌水量下(340 mm),地下防渗处理(埋深40,60 cm)棉田蒸散量显著低于对照;而高灌水量下(540 mm),地下防渗埋深60 cm处理棉田蒸散量显著高于对照。中、低灌水量下(440,340 mm),地下防渗处理棉花干物质重、产量、水分利用率和经济效益均显著高于对照;但地下防渗埋深40 cm和60 cm处理间差异不显著。高灌水量下(540 mm),地下防渗埋深60 cm显著提高棉花干物质重、产量、水分利用率和经济效益,地下防渗埋深40 cm处理与对照无显著差异。因此,中、低灌水量(440,340 mm)地下防渗埋深40 cm或60 cm均较适宜,而高灌水量(540 mm)采用地下防渗埋深60 cm较为适合。

关键词: 膜下滴灌, 地下防渗, 灌水量, 棉花产量, 水分利用率

Abstract: Over irrigation leads to deep percolation,which is one of the main pathways of water loss from drip irrigation field.Subsurface water retention technology (SWRT) can be used to effectively reduce the deep percolation and improve the water use efficiency.The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of irrigation volume and SWRT on soil moisture balance,cotton yield and water use efficiency in a drip-irrigated cotton field.The experimental was designed as 3×3 factorial with three irrigation volumes (340,440,and 540 mm) and three SWRT treatments (contrast,40 cm deep membrane and 60 cm deep membrane).Results showed that the soil moisture content (0-60 cm) and net soil water storage were significantly increased under the treatments of 40 cm and 60 cm deep membranes compared with that of contrast.Deep water percolation loss in soil layer deeper than 1 m was significantly increased with the increase of irrigation volume.Under 340 mm irrigation,there was no significant difference in deep water percolation loss among three SWRT treatments.Under 440 mm and 540 mm irrigation,the deep water percolation losses in the plots with 40 cm and 60 cm deep membranes were reduced by 64% and 72%,and 38% and 76%,respectively compared with those of contrast.Both the treatments of 40 cm and 60 cm deep membranes reduced significantly the evapotranspiration in the 340 mm irrigated plots.However,in the 540 mm irrigated plots,the 60 cm deep membrane treatment increased significantly the evapotranspiration compared with the contrast.In the 340 mm and 440 mm irrigated plots,the dry matter weight,yield,water use efficiency and economic benefits of cotton were significantly higher in the 40 cm and 60 cm deep membrane treatments than those in the contrast.But there were no significant differences between the 40 cm deep and 60 cm deep membrane treatments.In the 540 mm irrigated plots,the treatment of 60 cm deep membrane increased significantly the cotton dry matter weight and yield,water use efficiency and economic benefits.There was no significant difference between the 40 cm deep membrane and the contrast.Therefore,both the 40 cm and 60 cm deep membranes were suitable under low and moderate irrigation volumes (340 mm and 440 mm),and the SWRT of 60 cm deep membrane was preferable under high irrigation volume (540 mm).

Key words: drip irrigation, subsurface water retention technology, irrigation amount, cotton yield, water use efficiency