干旱区研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 380-391.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2021.02.09
收稿日期:
2020-07-18
修回日期:
2020-09-23
出版日期:
2021-03-15
发布日期:
2021-04-25
通讯作者:
苏世平
作者简介:
刘小娥(1981-),女,讲师,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治等方面的研究. E-mail:基金资助:
LIU Xiao’e1(),SU Shiping1(),LI Yi1,WANG Wei2
Received:
2020-07-18
Revised:
2020-09-23
Online:
2021-03-15
Published:
2021-04-25
Contact:
Shiping SU
摘要:
为探讨不同类型人工林对土壤理化性质的改良能力,以兰州市南北两山5种典型林分类型(侧柏林、新疆杨林、刺槐林、侧柏刺槐混交林、新疆杨刺槐混交林)为研究对象,对0~80 cm土层的土壤理化性质进行了研究。结果表明:(1) 不同林分类型混交林土壤容重、持水量、孔隙度、土壤含水量、渗透速率均好于纯林;两种混交林和侧柏林土壤pH低于刺槐林和新疆杨林;混交林土壤有机质、全氮、无机氮、全磷大于纯林;全钾、速效钾在不同林分类型之间差异不显著。(2) 在0~80 cm土层范围内,各林分类型随着土壤深度的增加,土壤容重逐渐增加;土壤持水量、孔隙度逐渐降低;土壤含水量、土壤pH均在土层间无显著差异;土壤有机质、全氮、无机氮、速效磷、速效钾随土壤深度的增加逐渐降低,有表聚效应;全磷和全钾在土层间差异不显著。(3) 土壤理化性质相关性分析发现:土壤有机质与土壤全氮、无机氮、全磷、持水量、孔隙度均呈极显著正相关,与土壤容重呈极显著负相关;土壤容重与土壤持水量、孔隙度均呈极显著负相关。混交林较纯林在改善土壤理化性质方面有更好的效果,建议该区域在今后人工林营造中以混交林为主,在现有纯林的抚育管理中可考虑将其改造为混交林。
刘小娥,苏世平,李毅,王维. 黄土高原地区人工林营造——混交林模式生态效益研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2): 380-391.
LIU Xiao’e,SU Shiping,LI Yi,WANG Wei. Study on the ecological benefits of a plantation mixed forest model in the Loess Plateau[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(2): 380-391.
表2
5种林分类型的土壤物理性质多重比较"
林分类型 | 土层/cm | 土壤容重/(g·cm3) | 最大持水量/% | 毛管持水量/% | 田间持水量/% | 毛管孔隙/% | 非毛管孔隙/% | 总空隙度/% | 土壤含水量/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
侧柏 | 0~20 | 1.24 ±0.03c | 50.70 ±1.81a | 37.85 ±1.71a | 31.83 ±1.39a | 46.67 ±0.90a | 6.49 ±0.24a | 53.16 ±1.07a | 7.38 ±0.41a |
20~40 | 1.30 ±0.06bc | 42.57 ±1.69c | 35.67 ±2.45b | 26.84 ±1.93b | 45.92 ±1.18ab | 5.29 ±0.68a | 51.21 ±1.86ab | 6.27 ±0.56a | |
40~60 | 1.42 ±0.05ab | 36.74 ±0.57c | 29.53 ±2.59c | 23.33 ±0.63c | 41.79 ±2.09bc | 5.17 ±0.68a | 46.97 ±1.67bc | 6.17 ±0.54a | |
60~80 | 1.48 ±0.04a | 34.34 ±2.34c | 27.38 ±1.38c | 21.60 ±0.62c | 40.34 ±0.90c | 4.87 ±0.62a | 45.21 ±1.37c | 4.01 ±0.97b | |
新疆杨 | 0~20 | 1.21 ±0.07b | 47.52 ±6.83a | 40.31 ±4.60a | 32.50 ±4.14a | 48.02 ±2.87a | 6.07 ±0.79a | 54.09 ±2.42a | 5.23 ±0.50a |
20~40 | 1.36 ±0.05ab | 43.16 ±6.61a | 32.24 ±1.80ab | 25.43 ±1.73ab | 43.61 ±1.09ab | 5.52 ±1.16a | 49.14 ±1.66ab | 4.74 ±0.18ab | |
40~60 | 1.41 ±0.01a | 38.10 ±2.81a | 29.94 ±0.90b | 24.05 ±1.42b | 42.30 ±0.78ab | 4.98 ±0.24a | 47.29 ±0.54b | 3.87 ±0.48ab | |
60~80 | 1.44 ±0.03a | 36.25 ±1.82a | 29.29 ±1.63b | 23.26 ±1.12b | 41.91 ±1.44b | 4.73 ±0.51a | 46.63 ±0.98b | 3.59 ±0.39b | |
刺槐 | 0~20 | 1.25 ±0.05a | 50.01 ±2.40a | 36.20 ±2.23a | 29.69 ±0.21a | 44.95 ±1.07a | 7.83 ±0.56a | 52.78 ±1.62a | 11.92 ±0.58a |
20~40 | 1.28 ±0.06a | 44.17 ±1.50b | 34.86 ±2.76a | 28.80 ±0.56a | 44.25 ±1.49a | 7.53 ±0.73a | 51.78 ±1.89a | 7.23 ±1.26b | |
40~60 | 1.30 ±0.09a | 39.80 ±1.68bc | 34.45 ±3.45a | 28.58 ±0.52a | 44.26 ±1.41a | 6.72 ±1.98a | 50.99 ±2.88a | 5.59 ±0.81b | |
60~80 | 1.35 ±0.04a | 37.13 ±1.33c | 31.49 ±0.61a | 27.24 ±1.86a | 42.55 ±0.38a | 6.76 ±1.62a | 49.31 ±1.24a | 7.09 ±1.38b | |
侧柏刺槐 | 0~20 | 1.11 ±0.04b | 55.29 ±2.13a | 44.31 ±2.10a | 34.66 ±2.48a | 49.08 ±0.80a | 8.22 ±0.38a | 57.29 ±1.17a | 15.20 ±0.71a |
20~40 | 1.25 ±0.02a | 48.37 ±0.80ab | 36.18 ±0.21b | 28.93 ±0.72ab | 45.33 ±0.91ab | 7.28 ±1.49a | 52.61 ±0.59b | 13.66 ±0.07ab | |
40~60 | 1.31 ±0.04a | 41.67 ±2.39bc | 34.40 ±2.01b | 27.80 ±0.33b | 44.70 ±1.44b | 6.23 ±0.95a | 50.93 ±1.32b | 12.36 ±0.56b | |
60~80 | 1.34 ±0.03a | 37.79 ±3.00c | 32.65 ±1.88b | 26.21 ±2.48b | 43.69 ±1.48b | 5.99 ±0.48a | 49.68 ±1.04b | 9.69 ±0.32c | |
新疆杨刺槐 | 0~20 | 1.05 ±0.02d | 63.93 ±2.14a | 47.17 ±0.65a | 39.11 ±0.70a | 49.63 ±1.10a | 9.60 ±1.70a | 59.23 ±0.69a | 17.00 ±0.28a |
20~40 | 1.16 ±0.02c | 55.60 ±1.12b | 41.27 ±0.78b | 34.31 ±1.38ab | 47.92 ±0.16ab | 7.70 ±0.56ab | 55.62 ±0.64b | 15.13 ±0.58b | |
40~60 | 1.26 ±0.02b | 47.26 ±3.28c | 36.03 ±0.85c | 32.80 ±0.55bc | 45.48 ±0.78b | 6.80 ±0.81ab | 52.28 ±0.52c | 13.62 ±0.15c | |
60~80 | 1.39 ±0.02a | 44.21 ±1.90c | 30.66 ±0.70d | 28.01 ±3.15c | 42.44 ±0.67c | 5.81 ±0.82b | 48.25 ±0.64d | 9.52 ±0.62d | |
0~20 | 1.17±0.04c | 53.49 ±2.90a | 41.17 ±2.03a | 33.56 ±1.60a | 47.67 ±0.85a | 7.64 ±0.63a | 55.31 ±1.26a | 11.35 ±2.24a | |
20~40 | 1.27±0.03bc | 46.77 ±2.43ab | 36.05 ±1.47b | 28.86 ±1.51b | 45.41 ±0.75b | 6.66 ±0.52ab | 52.07 ±1.06b | 9.40 ±2.09a | |
40~60 | 1.34±0.03ab | 40.71 ±1.83bc | 32.87 ±1.31bc | 27.31 ±1.71b | 43.71 ±0.71bc | 5.98 ±0.38b | 49.69 ±1.08bc | 8.32 ±1.95a | |
60~80 | 1.40±0.03a | 37.94 ±1.67c | 30.29 ±0.91c | 25.26 ±1.22b | 42.19 ±0.55c | 5.63 ±0.38b | 47.82 ±0.84c | 6.78 ±1.30a | |
侧柏 | 1.36±0.03a | 41.09±0.84c | 32.61 ±1.50b | 25.90 ±0.25c | 43.68 ±1.03b | 5.46 ±0.35a | 49.14 ±1.11b | 5.96 ±0.08d | |
新疆杨 | 1.30±0.05ab | 42.78±0.89bc | 34.25 ±2.08b | 28.58 ±0.40bc | 44.00 ±0.74ab | 7.21 ±1.19a | 51.21 ±1.80ab | 7.96 ±0.50c | |
刺槐 | 1.35±0.03a | 41.26±1.67c | 32.95 ±1.45b | 26.31 ±1.73bc | 43.96 ±0.78ab | 5.33 ±0.38a | 49.29 ±0.98b | 4.36 ±0.11e | |
侧柏刺槐 | 1.25±0.01ab | 45.78±1.03b | 36.88 ±0.68ab | 29.40 ±1.06b | 45.70 ±0.85ab | 6.93 ±0.70a | 52.63 ±0.14ab | 12.73 ±0.18b | |
新疆杨刺槐 | 1.22±0.01b | 52.75±1.00a | 38.78 ±0.48a | 33.56 ±0.89a | 46.37 ±0.05a | 7.48 ±0.51a | 53.84 ±0.49a | 13.82 ±0.26a |
表3
不同林分类型的土壤化学性质"
林分类型或土层厚度/cm | pH | 有机质 /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 /(g·kg-1) | 无机氮 /(mg·kg-1) | 全磷 /(g·kg-1) | 速效磷 /(mg·kg-1) | 全钾 /(g·kg-1) | 速效钾 /(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 8.23±0.09a | 15.99±1.95a | 0.76±0.06a | 30.95±5.44a | 0.73±0.03a | 6.39±0.39a | 17.90±0.12a | 85.50±0.52a |
20~40 | 8.21±0.07a | 8.32±1.49b | 0.60±0.07ab | 23.00±4.13ab | 0.69±0.03a | 4.51±0.50b | 17.96±0.41a | 74.43±0.79b |
40~60 | 8.10±0.07a | 4.90±0.68bc | 0.47±0.06bc | 16.63±3.08b | 0.68±0.02a | 4.19±0.57b | 18.28±0.30a | 66.58±1.15c |
60~80 | 8.23±0.11a | 3.87±0.46c | 0.31±0.03c | 12.54±3.10b | 0.66±0.02a | 3.88±0.79b | 18.55±0.38a | 57.04±1.00d |
侧柏 | 8.12±0.12bc | 6.24±0.62b | 0.47±0.01d | 14.90±0.06d | 0.63±0.02b | 4.08±0.1bc | 18.52±0.17a | 72.48±1.08a |
新疆杨 | 8.34±0.07ab | 6.11±0.83b | 0.40±0.02e | 12.66±0.38e | 0.69±0.03ab | 5.51±0.21a | 18.17±0.30a | 71.52±1.42a |
刺槐 | 8.36±0.03a | 7.19±0.69b | 0.54±0.01c | 17.72±0.35c | 0.64±0.01b | 5.04±0.35ab | 18.77±0.09a | 70.77±0.68a |
侧柏刺槐 | 8.02±0.02c | 10.14±0.33a | 0.59±0.01b | 25.40±1.80b | 0.75±0.03a | 3.44±0.23c | 17.25±0.34a | 69.34±1.58a |
新疆杨刺槐 | 8.13±0.05bc | 11.67±0.57a | 0.68±0.01a | 33.22±0.71a | 0.73±0.02a | 5.66±0.51a | 18.15±0.19a | 70.34±2.37a |
表4
0~80 cm土壤理化性质参数间的相关系数(Pearson双侧相关)"
土壤参数 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 | X15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1pH | 1 | ||||||||||||||
X2有机质 | -0.428 | 1 | |||||||||||||
X3全氮 | -0.454 | 0.829** | 1 | ||||||||||||
X4无机氮 | -0.492 | 0.903** | 0.947** | 1 | |||||||||||
X5全磷 | -0.310 | 0.755** | 0.401 | 0.533* | 1 | ||||||||||
X6速效磷 | 0.374 | -0.101 | 0.043 | 0.016 | -0.232 | 1 | |||||||||
X7全钾 | 0.490 | -0.455 | -0.228 | -0.371 | -0.730** | 0.391 | 1 | ||||||||
X8速效钾 | -0.079 | -0.368 | -0.233 | -0.273 | -0.234 | 0.155 | 0.271 | 1 | |||||||
X9容重 | 0.402 | -0.753** | -0.812** | -0.723** | -0.467 | 0.004 | 0.243 | 0.235 | 1 | ||||||
X10最大持水量 | -0.358 | 0.814** | 0.897** | 0.868** | 0.483 | 0.202 | -0.300 | -0.284 | -0.763** | 1 | |||||
X11毛管持水量 | -0.442 | 0.755** | 0.797** | 0.748** | 0.483 | 0.029 | -0.269 | -0.203 | -0.981** | 0.775** | 1 | ||||
X12田间持水量 | -0.268 | 0.743** | 0.830** | 0.846** | 0.422 | 0.298 | -0.167 | -0.312 | -0.774** | 0.775** | 0.820** | 1 | |||
X13毛管孔隙度 | -0.501 | 0.685** | 0.668** | 0.678** | 0.509 | -0.011 | -0.304 | -0.079 | -0.865** | 0.652** | 0.934** | 0.769** | 1 | ||
X14非毛管孔隙度 | -0.130 | 0.543* | 0.691** | 0.515* | 0.212 | 0.034 | -0.049 | -0.313 | -0.788** | 0.609* | 0.670** | 0.502 | 0.373 | 1 | |
X15总孔隙度 | -0.395 | 0.746** | 0.819** | 0.726** | 0.446 | 0.011 | -0.224 | -0.228 | -0.999** | 0.762** | 0.977** | 0.777** | 0.852** | 0.804** | 1 |
[1] | 陈晨, 高明, 郑杰炳, 等. 缙云山不同森林植被下土壤理化性状研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,32(3):88-92. |
[ Chen Chen, Gao Min, Zheng Jiebin, et al. Investigation of the physico-chemical properties of the soil under different types of forest vegetation[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2010,32(3):88-92. ] | |
[2] | 魏强, 凌雷, 柴春山, 等. 甘肃兴隆山森林演替过程中的土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(15):4700-4713. |
[ Wei Qiang, Ling Lei, Chai Chunshan, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties in forest succession process in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(15):4700-4713. ] | |
[3] | 陈利, 薛超文, 王小燕, 等. 文昌市5种不同森林类型土壤物理性质分析研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017,45(32):118-120. |
[ Chen Li, Xue Chaowen, Wang Xiaoyan, et al. Study on soil physical properties of five different forest types in Wenchang City[J]. Journal of Anhui Agicultural Science, 2017,45(32):118-120. ] | |
[4] | 杨承栋. 我国人工林土壤有机质的量和质下降是制约林木生长的关键因子[J]. 林业科学, 2016,52(12):1-12. |
[ Yang Chendong. Decline of quantity and quality of soil organic matter is the key factor restricting the growth of plantation in China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016,52(12):1-12. ] | |
[5] | 于福科, 黄新会, 王克勤, 等. 桉树人工林生态退化与恢复研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009,17(2):393-398. |
[ Yu Fuke, Huang Xinhui, Wang Keqin, et al. An overview of ecological degradation and restoration of Eucalyptus plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009,17(2):393-398. ] | |
[6] | 庞学勇, 包维楷, 张咏梅. 岷江上游中山区低效林改造对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2005,25(5):16-20. |
[ Pang Xueyong, Bao Weikai, Zhang Yongmei. Effect of low-quality and benefit forest improvement on soil physical properties in middle-mountain of upper reaches of Minjiang River[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005,25(5):16-20. ] | |
[7] | 肖灵香, 方晰, 项文化, 等. 湘中丘陵区4种森林类型土壤理化性质[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015,35(5):90-97, 108. |
[ Xiao Lingxiang, Fang Xi, Xiang Wenhua, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties of four subtropical forests in hilly region of central Hunan province, China[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015,35(5):90-97, 108. ] | |
[8] | 周婉娟, 石珊奇, 宿少锋, 等. 5种森林类型土壤理化性质分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017,45(13):114-118. |
[ Zhou Wanjuan, Shi Shanqi, Su Shaofeng, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties of five subtropical forests[J]. Journal of Anhui Agicultural Science, 2017,45(13):114-118. ] | |
[9] | 吴庆龙. 兰州南北两山绿化造林工程的适宜性分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2003,10(3):134-136. |
[ Wu Qinglong. The applicability analysis of massive artificial forestation in Lanzhou South-north hills[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2003,10(3):134-136. ] | |
[10] | 李禄军, 蒋志荣, 李正平, 等. 3树种抗旱性的综合评价及其抗旱指标的选取[J]. 水土保持研究, 2006,13(6):253-259. |
[ Li Lujun, Jiang Zhirong, Li Zhengping, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on drought-resistance of three tree species and the choice of drought-resistance indexes[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006,13(6):253-259. ] | |
[11] | 蒋志荣, 梁旭婷, 朱恭, 等. 4树种主要生理指标对模拟水分胁迫的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009,29(3):485-492. |
[ Jiang Zhirong, Liang Xuting, Zhu Gong, et al. Responses of main physiological indexes of four tree species to simulating water stress[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2009,29(3):485-492. ] | |
[12] | 周资行, 李毅, 焦健. 兰州市南北两山不同生境红砂种群数量动态研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011,26(10):1726-1737. |
[ Zhou Zihang, Li Yi, Jiao Jian. Quantity dynamics of Reaumuria soongorica populations from different habitats in the South-north hills in Lanzhou[J]. Journal of Natural Resourse, 2011,26(10):1726-1737. ] | |
[13] | 钟芳, 赵瑾, 孙荣高, 等. 兰州南北两山五类乔灌木林草地土壤养分与土壤微生物空间分布研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010,19(3):94-101. |
[ Zhong Fang, Zhao Jin, Sun Ronggao, et al. Research on soil moisture retention capacity and soil infiltration property of different kinds of artificial forests in Northern Mountain of Lanzhou[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010,19(3):94-101. ] | |
[14] | 陈小红, 段争虎, 宋耀选, 等. 兰州市南北两山人工灌木林地土壤水分动态[J]. 中国沙漠, 2006,26(4):532-535. |
[ Chen Xiaohong, Duan Zhenghu, Song Yaoxuan, et al. Soil water dynamic in planted shrubs in southern and northern mountains of Lanzhou city[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2006,26(4):532-535. ] | |
[15] | 赵克昌, 屈连宝. 兰州南北两山植被恢复策略[J]. 中国沙漠, 2006,26(3):493-497. |
[ Zhao Kechang. Qu Lianbao. Strategy of vegetation restoration in Lanzhou north-south mountains[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2006,26(3):493-497. ] | |
[16] | 张晓梅, 邸利, 史再军, 等. 甘肃泾川中沟小流域不同坡位刺槐人工林土壤水分特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019,36(5):1300-1308. |
[ Zhang Xiaomei, Di Li, Shi Zaijun. Soil moisture content under artificial Robinnia pseudoacacia forest at different slope positions in the Zhonggou minor basin, Jingchuan County, Gansu Province[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019,36(5):1300-1308. ] | |
[17] | 武利玉, 苏世平, 王蕙. 兰州南北两山绿化区植物与植被类型初查[J]. 中国沙漠, 2006,26(4):564-568. |
[ Wu Liyu, Su Shiping, Wang Hui. Preliminary investigation into plant and vegetation types in afforestation region in Southern and Northern Mountains of Lanzhou City[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2006,26(4):564-568. ] | |
[18] | 武田英文, 何存成, 泽田智志, 等. 兰州市南北两山造林树种的生长过程解析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2017,34(4):832-836. |
[ Takeda Hidefumi, He Cuncheng, Sawata Satoshi, et al. Growth of Platycladus orientalis plantation at the north and south mountainside afforestation in Lanzhou[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2017,34(4):832-836. ] | |
[19] | 张万儒, 许本彤. 森林土壤定位研究方法[M]. 中国林业出版社, 1986: 1-45. |
[ Zhang Wanru, Xu Bentong. Study Method of Forest Ssoil[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing Press, 1986: 1-45. ] | |
[20] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999: 474-490. |
[ Lu Rukun. Analysis Methods of Soil Agricultural Chemistry[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1999: 474-490. ] | |
[21] | 熊毅, 李庆逵. 中国土壤(第二版) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1990: 433-443. |
[ Xiong Yi, Li Qingkui. Chinese Soil [M]. 2nd Ed. Beijing: Science Press, 1990: 433-443. ] | |
[22] | 秦娟, 唐心红, 杨雪梅. 马尾松不同林型对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013,22(4):598-604. |
[ Qin Juan, Tang Xinhong, Yang Xuemei. Effects of soil physical and chemical properties on different forest types of Pinus massoniana[J]. Ecology Environment Science, 2013,22(4):598-604. ] | |
[23] | 郭婧, 喻林华, 方晰, 等. 中亚热带4种森林凋落物量、组成、动态及其周转期[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(14):4668-4677. |
[ Guo Jing, Yu Linhua, Fang Xi, et al. Litter production and turnover in four types of subtropical forests in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(14):4668-4677. ] | |
[24] | 薛文鹏, 赵忠, 李鹏, 等. 王东沟不同坡向刺槐细根分布特征研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2003,31(6):227-232. |
[ Xue Wenpeng, Zhao Zhong, Li Peng, et al. Researches on root distribution characteristics of Robiniap seudoacacia stand in Wangdonggou on different site conditions[J]. Journal of Northwest Science Technology University of Agricultural and Forestry (Natural Science Edition), 2003,31(6):227-232. ] | |
[25] | 张毓涛, 胡莎莎, 李吉玫, 等. 新疆3种主要森林类型根系生物量变化特征研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013,36(2):269-276. |
[ Zhang Yutao, Hu Shasha, Li Jimei, et al. Characteristic of root biomass of three main forest types in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2013,36(2):269-276. ] | |
[26] | 钟芳, 王红赤, 李俊年, 等. 兰州市南北两山水热条件对侧柏根系分布的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2006,26(4):559-563. |
[ Zhong Fang, Wang Hongchi, Li Junnian, et al. Influence of water-heat condition on distribution of Platycladus orientalis L. Franco roots in Southern and Northern Mountains of Lanzhou City[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2006,26(4):559-563. ] | |
[27] | 喻明美, 谢正生. 广州市白云山五种森林类型的土壤渗透性研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2011,18(1):153-156. |
[ Yu Mingmei, Xie Zhengsheng. Study on soil permeability capability of five forest types in Baiyunshan scenic spot of Guangzhou[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011,18(1):153-156. ] | |
[28] | 刘道平, 陈三雄, 张金池, 等. 浙江安吉主要林地类型土壤渗透性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007,18(3):493-498. |
[ Liu Daoping, Chen Sanxiong, Zhang Jinchi, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics under main vegetation types in Anji County of Zhejiang province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007,18(3):493-498. ] | |
[29] | 刘广路, 范少辉, 漆良华, 等. 不同类型毛竹林土壤渗透性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2008,22(6):44-46, 56. |
[ Liu Guanglu, Fan Shaohui, Qi Lianghua, et al. Soil Infiltration characteristics of different Phyllostachys pubescens forests[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008,22(6):44-46, 56. ] | |
[30] | 漆良华, 张旭东, 周金星, 等. 湘西北小流域典型植被恢复群落土壤贮水量与入渗特性[J]. 林业科学, 2007,43(4):1-8. |
[ Qi Lianghua, Zhang Xudong, Zhou Jinxin, et al. Soil water holding capacities and infiltration characteristics of vegetation restoration communities in watershed, Northwest Hunan[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2007,43(4):1-8. ] | |
[31] | 赵洋毅, 王玉杰, 王云琦, 等. 渝北水源区水源涵养林构建模式对土壤渗透性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010,30(15):4162-4172. |
[ Zhao Yangyi, Wang Yujie, Wang Yunqi, et al. Effects of structures of plantation forests on soil infiltration characteristics in source water protect areas in Northern Chongqing City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(15):4162-4172. ] | |
[32] | 刘霞, 张光灿, 李雪蕾, 等. 小流域生态修复过程中不同森林植被土壤入渗与贮水特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2004,18(6):1-5. |
[ Liu Xia, Zhang Guangcan, Li Xuelei, et al. Characteristics of soil infiltration and water-holding of different forest vegetation in ecological rehabilitation of small watershed[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2004,18(6):1-5. ] | |
[33] | 符云鹏, 王小翠, 陈雪, 等. 毕节烟区土壤pH值分布状况及与土壤养分的关系[J]. 土壤, 2013,45(1):46-51. |
[ Fu Yunpeng, Wang Xiaocui, Chen Xue, et al. Distribution of soil pH and its relationships with soil nutrients in Bijie tobacco-growing area[J]. Soils, 2013,45(1):46-51. ] | |
[34] | Paul K I, Black A S, Conyers M K. Effect of plant residue return on the development of surface soil pH gradients[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2011,33(1):75-82. |
[35] | 张庆费, 由文辉, 宋永昌. 浙江天童植物群落演替对土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 1999,10(1):19-22. |
[ Zhang Qingfei, You Wenhui, Song Yongchang. Effect of plant community succession on soil chemical properties in Tiantong,Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999,10(1):19-22. ] | |
[36] | 刘永贤, 熊柳梅, 韦彩会, 等. 广西典型土壤上不同林分的土壤肥力分析与综合评价[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(18):5229-5233. |
[ Liu Yongxian, Xiong Liumei, Wei Caihui, et al. Changes of soil fertility and its comprehensive evaluation under different stands in typical types of soils in Guangxi Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(18):5229-5233. ] | |
[37] | 程瑞梅, 肖文发, 王晓荣, 等. 三峡库区植被不同演替阶段的土壤养分特征[J]. 林业科学, 2010,46(9):1-6. |
[ Chen Ruimei, Xiao Wenfa, Wang Xiaorong, et al. Soil nutrient characteristics in different vegetation successional stages of three gorges reservoir area[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010,46(9):1-6. ] | |
[38] | 崔楠, 吕光辉, 刘晓星, 等. 胡杨、梭梭群落土壤理化性质及其相互关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015,32(3):476-482 |
[ Cui Nan, Lyu Guanghui, Liu Xiaoxing, et al. Soil physical-chemical properties of Populus euphratica and Halorylon persicum communities and their relationship[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2015,32(3):476-482. ] | |
[39] | 路翔, 项文化, 任辉, 等. 中亚热带四种森林凋落物及碳氮贮量比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012,31(9):2234-2240. |
[ Lu Xiang, Xiang Wenhua, Ren Hui, et al. Litter biomass and its carbon and nitrogen storage in four subtropical forests in central southern China[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2012,31(9):2234-2240. ] | |
[40] | 多祎帆, 王光军, 闫文德, 等. 亚热带3种森林类型土壤微生物碳、氮生物量特征比较[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(13):14-19. |
[ Duo Yifan, Wang Guangjun, Yan Wende, et al. The Biomass comparison of soil microbial carbon and nitrogen of 3 kinds of forest types in subtropics[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012,28(13):14-19. ] | |
[41] | 苗娟, 周传艳, 李世杰, 等. 不同林龄云南松林土壤有机碳和全氮积累特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(3):625-631. |
[ Miao Juan, Zhou Chuanyan, Li Shijie, et al. Accumulation of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in Pinus yunnanensis forests at different age stages[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014,25(3):625-631. ] | |
[42] | Stribling J M, Cornwell J C. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur dynamics in a low salinity marsh system dominated by Spartina alterniflora[J]. Wetlands, 2001,21(4):629-638. |
[43] | 陈伏生, 曾德慧, 何兴元. 森林土壤氮素的转化与循环[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004,23(5):126-133. |
[ Chen Fusheng, Zeng Dehui, He Xingyuan. Soil nitrogen transformation and cycling in forest ecosystem[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2004,23(5):126-133. ] | |
[44] | 常超, 谢宗强, 熊高明, 等. 三峡库区不同植被类型土壤养分特征[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(11):5978-5985. |
[ Chang Chao, Xie Zongqiang, Xiong Gaoming, et al. Characteristics of soil nutrients of different vegetation types in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009,29(11):5978-5985. ] |
[1] | 赵雨琪, 魏天兴. 1990—2020年黄土高原典型县域植被覆盖变化及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(1): 147-156. |
[2] | 赵侦竹, 马敏劲, 康国强, 曹译丹. 兰州市空气污染物变化及污染持续性特征分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(5): 715-725. |
[3] | 吕锦心, 梁康, 刘昌明, 张仪辉, 刘璐. 无定河流域土地覆被空间分异机制及相关水碳变量变化[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(4): 563-572. |
[4] | 钟晓菲, 张明军, 张宇, 王家鑫, 刘泽琛, 谷来磊. 基于稳定同位素的兰州市南北两山土壤水入渗模式[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1744-1753. |
[5] | 裴宏泽, 赵亚超, 张廷龙. 2000—2020年黄土高原NEP时空格局与驱动力[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1833-1844. |
[6] | 刘欢欢, 陈印, 刘悦, 刚成诚. 基于随机森林模型的黄土高原草地净初级生产力时空格局及未来演变趋势模拟[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(1): 123-131. |
[7] | 安彬,肖薇薇,朱妮,刘宇峰. 近60 a黄土高原地区降水集中度与集中期时空变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1333-1344. |
[8] | 龙志,孙颖琦,郎丽霞,陈兴鹏,张子龙,庞家幸. 黄土高原典型县域碳排放特征与时空格局——以庆城县为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1631-1641. |
[9] | 赵晨光,李慧瑛,鱼腾飞,陈薇宇,谢宗才,张斌武,张军. 腾格里沙漠东北缘人工植被对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1112-1121. |
[10] | 冯强,赵文武,段宝玲. 生态系统服务权衡强度与供需匹配度的关联性分析——以山西省为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1222-1233. |
[11] | 姚宏佳,王宝荣,安韶山,杨娥女,黄懿梅. 黄土高原生物结皮形成过程中土壤胞外酶活性及其化学计量变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 456-468. |
[12] | 杜梦寅,袁建钰,李广,闫丽娟,刘兴宇,祁小平,庞晔. 保护性耕作对黄土高原半干旱区农田土壤N2O排放的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 493-501. |
[13] | 杨丹,王晓峰. 黄土高原气候和人类活动对植被NPP变化的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 584-593. |
[14] | 杨维涛,孙建国,马恒利,黄卓. 地貌形态多尺度综合分类方法[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 638-645. |
[15] | 张耀宗,张勃,张多勇,刘艳艳. 1960—2018年黄土高原地区蒸发皿蒸发时空变化特征及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 1-9. |
|