伊犁绢蒿（Seriphidium transiliense）个体功能性状对短期禁牧的可塑性响应

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, the phenotypic traits, biomass and allocation ratio of Seriphidium transiliense in the sagebrush deserts in Manas County, Hutubi County and Ashili Township of Changji City in Xinjiang were measured so as to understand the response mechanism of grazing exclusion. The response of individual functional traits of S. transiliense to short-term grazing exclusion was different from the different experiment plots, most of the traits, such as the plant height, aboveground biomass, leaf number and leaf biomass in Hutubi and Manas plots, were increased significantly (P<0.05), yet most of the functional traits in Changji plot were increased but not significantly. Compared with the control, the plant height, aboveground biomass, leaf number, stem biomass and leaf biomass of S. transiliense were significantly increased by 21.32%, 48.97%, 104.50%, 50.18% and 100.00% respectively (P<0.05), while the taproot diameter, first-grade branch number and third-grade branch number were decreased significantly, but there were no significant changes in the second-grade branch number, reproductive biomass and biomass allocation ratio (P<0.05). There was a significant linkage effect between the phenotypic traits and biomass allocation of S. transiliense, and the short-term grazing exclusion could significantly change the correlation of individual functional traits. In short, the short-term grazing exclusion could promote the recovery of individual functional traits of S. transiliense and facilitate the regeneration of degenerated sagebrush desert grassland.

Key words: short-term grazing enclosure, Seriphidium transiliense, functional trait, phenotypic trait, biomass allocation, Xinjiang

JIANG Sha-sha, SUN Zong-jiu, CUI Yu-xuan, DONG Yi-qiang. Response of short-term grazing exclusion to individual functional traits of Seriphidium transiliense[J].Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(6): 1528-1536.

References 35

[1]	方精云,杨元合,马文红,等.中国草地生态系统碳库及其变化[J].中国科学:生命科学,2010,40(7):566-576.[Fang Jingyun,Yang Yuanhe,Ma Wenhong，et al.Ecosystem carbon stocks and their changes in China’s grasslands[J]. Scientia Sinica(Vitae),2010,40(7):566-576.]
[2]	侯向阳,尹燕亭,丁勇.中国草原适应性管理研究现状与展望[J].草业学报,2011,20(2):262-269.[Hou Xiangyang,Yin Yanting,Ding Yong.An overview and prospects for grassland adaptive management in China[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2011,20(2):262-269.]
[3]	肖金玉,蒲小鹏,徐长林.禁牧对退化草地恢复的作用[J].草业科学,2015, 32(1):138-145.[Xiao Jinyu,Pu Xiaopeng,Xu Changlin.Effects of grazing prohibition on restoration of degraded grassland[J].Pratacultural Science,2015,32(1):138-145.]
[4]	米文宝,谢应忠.生态恢复与重建研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):49-53,77.[Mi Wenbao,Xie Yingzhong.The comprehensive summarization of ecological restoration and reconstruction[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(2):49-53,77.]
[5]	赵凌平,白欣,谭世图,等.不同年限封育对黄土高原典型草原地上植被的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(1):27-35.[Zhao Lingping,Bai Xin,Tan Shitu,et al.Effects of different enclosure durations on aboveground vegetation in typical steppe on Loess Plateau[J].Pratacultural Science,2018,35(1):27-35.]
[6]	初晓辉,谢勇,单贵莲,等.放牧和封育对青藏高原南缘亚高山草甸群落结构及物种多样性的影响[J].草地学报,2017,25(5):939-945.[Chu Xiaohui,Xie Yong,Shan Guilian,et al.Effect of management patterns on community structure and species diversity of subalpine meadow of the southern margin of Tibetan Plateau[J].Acta Agrestia Sinica,2017,25(5):939-945.]
[7]	Cheng J,Wu G L,Zhao L P,et al.Accumulative effects of 20-year fencing on above-and below-ground biomass of typical steppe communities in arid areas of the Loess Plateau,China[J].Plant Soil & Environment,2011,57(1):40-44.
[8]	周瑶,马红彬,贾希洋,等.不同恢复措施对宁夏典型草原土壤碳氮储量的影响[J].草业学报,2017,26(12):236-242.[Zhou Yao,Ma Hongbin,Jia Xiyang,et al.Effects of different restoration measures on storage of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in typical steppe of the Loess Hilly area in Ningxia[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2017,26(12):236-242.]
[9]	孙磊,刘玉,武高林,等.藏北退化草地群落生物量与土壤养分的关系[J].草业科学,2016,33(6):1 062-1 069.[Sun Lei,Liu Yu,Wu Gaolin,et al.The relationships between community biomass and soil nutrients in the Northern Tibet degradation grassland[J].Pratacultural Science,2016,33(6):1 062-1 069.]
[10]	张晶,左小安,杨阳,等.科尔沁沙地草地植物群落功能性状对封育和放牧的响应[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):261-268.[Zhang Jing,Zuo Xiaoan,Yang Yang,et al.Response of plant community functional traits in different grasslands to enclosure and grazing in Horqin Sandy Land[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2017,33(24):261-268.]
[11]	郑伟,于辉.围栏封育对伊犁绢蒿种群构件生长和生物量分配的影响[J].草地学报,2013,21(1):42-49.[Zheng Wei,Yu Hui.Effects of enclosure on growth biomass allocation of Seriphidium transiliense modules in a sagebrush desert grassland[J].Acta Agrestia Sinica,2013,21(1):42-49.]
[12]	Díaz S,Cabido M.Vive la différence:Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2001,16(11):646-655.
[13]	Moor H,Rydin H,Hylander K,et al.Towards a traitbased ecology of wetland vegetation[J].Journal of Ecology,2017,105:1 623-1 635.
[14]	Símová I,Violle C,Svenning J C,et al.Spatial patterns and climate relationships of major plant traits in the New World differ between woody and herbaceous species[J].Journal of Biogeography,2018,45:895-916.
[15]	张杰,李敏,敖子强,等.基于CNKI的植物功能性状研究进展文献计量分析[J].江西科学,2018,36(2):314-318,330.[Zhang Jie,Li Min,Ao Ziqiang,et al.Bibliometrieal analysis of plant functional traits research based on CNKI from 1955-2017[J].Jiangxi Science,2018,36(2):314-318,330.]
[16]	朱进忠,靳瑰丽,孙宗玖,等.伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地退化生态系统研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2013:1-15.[Zhu Jinzhong,Jin Guili,Sun Zongjiu,et al.Study on Degraded Ecosystem of Seriphidium transiliense Desert Grassland[M].Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press,2013:1-15.]
[17]	靳瑰丽,朱进忠,刘洪来,等.退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地主要植物生理生态适应性研究[J].草地学报,2011,19(1):26-30,37.[Jin Guili,Zhu Jinzhong,Liu Honglai,et al.Study on physiology/ecology adaptation of main plant in degraded Seriphidium transiliense desert rangeland[J].Acta Agrestia Sinica,2011,19(1):26-30,37.]
[18]	刘长娥,安沙舟,孙宗玖,等.围栏封育对新疆伊犁绢蒿草地的影响[J].草业科学,2008,25(10):10-14.[Liu Chang’e,An Shazhou,Sun Zongjiu,et al.Influence of fencing on Seriphidium transiliense pasture in Yili region of Xinjiang[J].Pratacultural Science,2008,25(10):10-14.]
[19]	李坤,董乙强,安沙舟,等.短期封育对伊犁绢蒿荒漠群落特征的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(5):978-983.[Li Kun,Dong Yiqiang,An Shazhou,et al.Effect of shortterm fencing on Seriphidium transiliense community characteristics[J].Pratacultural Science,2018,35(5):978-983.]
[20]	孙宗玖,安沙舟,李培英.封育方式下伊犁绢蒿可塑性贮藏营养物质的动态变化[J].草业科学,2008,25(10):70-74.[Sun Zongjiu,An Shazhou,Li Peiying.Effect of different enclosure models on flexible nutrition of Seriphidium transiliense[J].Pratacultural Science,2008,25(10):70-74.]
[21]	董乙强,孙宗玖,安沙舟,等.禁牧对中度退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地土壤养分的影响[J].草业科学,2016,33(8):1 460-1 468.[Dong Yiqiang,Sun Zongjiu,An Shazhou,et al.Effects of grazing exclusion on soil nutrition in moderate degraded desert grassland of Seriphidium transiliense[J].Pratacultural Science,2016,33(8):1 460-1 468.]
[22]	杨静,孙宗玖,杨合龙,等.封育年限对蒿类荒漠土壤有机碳组分及其碳、氮特征的影响[J].草业科学,2016,33(4):564-572.[Yang Jing,Sun Zongjiu,Yang Helong,et al.Effects of enclosure period on carbon and nitrogen characteristics and components of soil organic carbon in Artemisia desert[J].Pratacultural Science,2016,33(4):564-572.]
[23]	何龙,安沙舟,靳瑰丽,等.退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地高光谱特征分析[J].草地学报,2014,22(2):271-276.[He Long,An Shazhou,Jin Guili,et al.Analysis on high spectral characteristics of degraded Seriphidium transiliense grassland[J].Acta Agrestia Sinica,2014,22(2):271-276.]
[24]	杨红飞,李建龙,穆少杰,等.新疆三种主要草地植被类型的高光谱反射特征研究[J].草业学报,2012,21(6):258-266.[Yang Hongfei,Li Jianlong,Mu Shaojie,et al.Analysis of hyperspectral reflectance characteristics of three main grassland types in Xinjiang[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2012,21(6):258-266.]
[25]	靳瑰丽.伊犁绢蒿荒漠退化草地植物生态适应对策的研究[D].乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学,2009.[Jin Guili.Study on the Plant Ecological Adaptation Strategy of Degraded Seriphidium transiliense Grassland[D].Urumqi:Xinjiang Agriculture University,2009.]
[26]	Niu K,Zhang S,Zhao B,et al.Linking grazing response of species abundance to functional traits in the Tibetan alpine meadow[J].Plant and Soil,2009,330:215-223.
[27]	Louault F,Pillar V D,Aufrère J,et al.Plant traits and functional types in response to reduced disturbance in a semi-natural grassland[J].Journal of Vegetation Science,2005,16(2):151-160.
[28]	王炜,梁存柱,刘钟龄,等.草原群落退化与恢复演替中的植物个体行为分析[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(3):268-274.[Wang Wei,Liang Cunzhu,Liu Zhonglin,et al.Analysis of the plant individual behavior during the degradation and restoring succession in steppe community[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2000,24(3):268-274.]
[29]	张峰,杨阳,乔荠瑢,等.利用方式对大针茅草原植物多样性、功能性状及地上生物量的影响[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(1):1-8.[Zhang Feng,Yang Yang,Qiao Jirong,et al.Effects of utilization ways on species diversity,functional traits and aboveground biomass in Stipe grandis steppe[J].Chinese Journal of Grassland,2019,41(1):1-8.]
[30]	石明明,牛得草,王莹,等.围封与放牧管理对高寒草甸植物功能性状和功能多样性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(6):1 216-1 225.[Shi Mingming,Niu Decao,Wang Ying,et al.Effect of fencing and grazing management on the plant functional traits and functional diversity in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau[J].Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2017,37(6):1 216-1 225.]
[31]	罗黎鸣,苗彦军,潘影,等.不同干扰强度对拉萨河谷草甸草原群落特征和功能性状的影响[J].草地学报,2015,23(6):1 161-1 166.[Luo Liming,Miao Yanjun,Pan Ying,et al.Effects of disturbance intensity on the community characteristics and functional traits of meadow steppe at a valley of the Lhasa River Basin[J].Acta Agrestia Sinica,2015,23(6):1 161-1 166.]
[32]	李西良,侯向阳,吴新宏,等.草甸草原羊草茎叶功能性状对长期过度放牧的可塑性响应[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(5):440-451.[Li Xiliang,Hou Xiangyang,Wu Xinhong,et al.Plastic response of stem and leaf functional traits in Leymus chinensis to long-term grazing in a meadow steppe[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2014,38(5):440-451.]
[33]	石红霄,侯向阳,师尚礼,等.放牧对三江源区高寒草甸主要植物表型特征的影响[J].草原与草坪,2015,35(3):8-12.[Shi Hongxiao,Hou Xiangyang,Shi Shangli,et al.Effect of grazing on the phenotypic characteristics of dominant plants in alpine meadow in Three Headwater Source region[J].Grassland and Turf,2015,35(3):8-12.]
[34]	李西良,刘志英,侯向阳,等.放牧对草原植物功能性状及其权衡关系的调控[J].植物学报,2015,50(2):159-170.[Li Xiliang,Liu Zhiying,Hou Xiangyang,et al.Plant functional traits and their tradeoffs in response to grazing:A review[J].Chinese Bulletin of Botany,2015,50(2):159-170.]
[35]	Corner E J H.The durian theory or the origin of the modern tree[J].Annals of Botany,1949,13:367-414.

Response of short-term grazing exclusion to individual functional traits of Seriphidium transiliense

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 35

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SUN Linlin, LIU Qiong, HUANG Guan, CHEN Yonghang, WEI Xin, GUO Yulin, ZHANG Taixi, GAO Tianyi, XU Yunhong. Analysis of surface solar radiation under different cloud conditions in Xinjiang and the surrounding “Belt and Road” regions [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(9): 1480-1490.
[2]	JIAN Zhengbo, LUO Hao, SHAN Nana. A study on the spatial and temporal evolution and carbon effects of production-living-ecological in Xinjiang under carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(7): 1238-1248.
[3]	LIU Huaqing, WANG Bo, JIA Yanyan, XIE Xinran, ZHANG Wei. Characterization of the freezing injury to Juglans regia at different slope positions in the West Tianshan valley of Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(6): 1079-1088.
[4]	MA Yuanzhi, QIN Xiaolin, LING Hongbo, YAN Junjie, ZHANG Guangpeng. Spatio-temporal characteristics and trends of area changes in the small and medium-sized lakes in Xinjiang, China, from 1991 to 2020 [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(6): 905-916.
[5]	ZHANG Haozhe, XUE Yayong, MA Yuanyuan, XUE Guoxuan. Carbon sequestration potential of oasis ecosystem in Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(6): 998-1009.
[6]	XU Chaojie, DOU Yan, MENG Qilin. Prediction of the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index in the Xinjiang region using the EMD-GWO-LSTM model [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(4): 527-539.
[7]	SI Qi, FAN Haoran, DONG Wenming, LIU Xinping. Landscape ecological risk assessment and prediction for the Yarkant River Basin, Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(4): 684-696.
[8]	BAO Jiayu, LI Xianglong, HU Qiwen, LI Tao. Spatiotemporal characteristics of carbon emissions from energy consumption and the approach to energy structure adjustment in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(3): 490-498.
[9]	YAO Junqiang. Change in atmospheric and surface water resource in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(2): 181-190.
[10]	WU Mingjiang, QIU Juan, ZHENG Feng, LING Xiaobo, WANG Xinyu, YANG Yang, YANG Jiaxin, LIU Liqiang. Study on shrub species diversity and niche of wild fruit forest in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(12): 2094-2109.
[11]	XU Yunhong, LIU Qiong, CHEN Yonghang, WEI Xin, LIU Xin, ZHANG Taixi, SHAO Weiling, YANG Hequn, ZHANG Chengming. Impact of land cover variations on surface albedo in Xinjiang and its surrounding Central Asian region [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(10): 1649-1661.
[12]	JIN Chenyang, DU Hongru. Characteristics of spatial and temporal changes and zoning of cultivated land resilience in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(10): 1778-1788.
[13]	LI Xiaofeng, HUI Tingting, LI Yaoming, MAO Jiefei, WANG Guangyu, FAN Lianlian. Effects of different grazing management strategies on plant diversity in the mountain grassland of Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 124-134.
[14]	WANG Xiang, LYU Haishen, ZHU Yonghua, GUO Chenyu. Application and comparison of two channel flood routing methods in Xinjiang mountainous areas [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1240-1247.
[15]	WANG Chao, MA Zhancang, PAN Chengnan, WU Xingyue, SONG Wendan, YAN Ping. New records of Amaranthus in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1280-1288.