基于MRSEI模型的阿勒泰市生态环境时空变化及驱动力分析

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2023.06.16

Abstract

Abstract:

To evaluate the ecological environment of Altay City in Xinjiang in a timely, objective, and quantitative manner, an improved remote sensing ecological index (MRSEI) was constructed based on multi-source remote sensing data. The spatial and temporal variation characteristics were then analyzed by combining a standard deviation ellipse and gravity center migration model. A geographical detector model was used to detect the five indicators, which were greenness, dryness, humidity, temperature, and air quality. (1) From 2015 to 2021, the greenness and humidity indexes of Altay City showed a significant positive correlation with the ecological environment in the region. In contrast, the three indexes for temperature, dryness, and air quality showed significant negative correlations. (2) From 2015 to 2021, the average value of the MRSEI in Altay City increased. The spatial migration ability of ecological index areas I and II was strong, while III-V were relatively stable in the spatial structure. The center of gravity for ecological index areas I-IV moved north, while the center of gravity for area V moved south, indicating that the distribution of the high ecological index in the south of Altay City increased significantly. (3) The dominant factors causing the changes in the eco-environmental quality differed each year. The spatial evolution of eco-environmental quality in Altay is the result of multiple factors. (4) The differences in spatial distribution and the differences between the MRSEI and RSEI data are related to the spatial distribution of AOD, indicating that even if Altay City had improved air quality, AOD would still have an impact on the ecological quality of the spatial distribution. From 2015 to 2021, the ecological environment of Altay City was thus found to be affected by many factors and tended to improve toward the south.

Key words: modified remote sensing ecological index, ecological environment quality, geographical detector, center of gravity migration model, Altay City

LIU Xiao, GUO Peng, QI Jiafeng, DU Wenling, ZHANG Ruqian, ZHANG Kun. Spatio-temporal changes and driving forces in the ecological environment of Altay City determined using an MRSEI model[J].Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(6): 1014-1026.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 5

Fig. 5

Tab. 6

Fig. 6

Tab. 7

Fig. 7

References 48

[1]	生态环境是人类生存和发展的根基[J]. 资源导刊, 2022, 429(8): 4.
	[Ecological environment is the foundation of human survival and development[J]. Resources Guide, 2022, 429(8): 4.]
[2]	耿静, 徐栋, 吴御豪, 等. 海南岛生态环境质量时空变化及其对气候变化与人类活动的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(12): 4795-4806.
	[Geng Jing, Xu Dong, Wu Yuhao, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution of eco-environment quality and the response to climate change and human activities in Hainan Island[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(12): 4795-4806.]
[3]	排日海·合力力, 昝梅, 阿里木江·卡斯木, 乌鲁木齐市生态环境遥感评价及驱动因子分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1484-1496.
	[Pariha Helili, Zan Mei, Alimjan Kasim. Remote sensing evaluation of ecological environment in Urumqi City and analysis of driving factors[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(5): 1484-1496.]
[4]	王静, 周伟奇, 许开鹏, 等. 京津冀地区的生态质量定量评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2667-2676. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201708.008
	[Wang Jing, Zhou Weiqi, Xu Kaipeng, et al. Quantitative assessment of ecological quality in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban megaregion, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(8): 2667-2676.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201708.008
[5]	张学玲, 余文波, 蔡海生, 等. 区域生态环境脆弱性评价方法研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16): 5970-5981.
	[Zhang Xueling, Yu Wenbo, Cai Haisheng, et al. Review of the evaluation methods of regional eco-environmental vulnerability[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(16): 5970-5981.]
[6]	宋慧敏, 薛亮. 基于遥感生态指数模型的渭南市生态环境质量动态监测与分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(12): 3913-3919. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201612.024
	[Song Huimin, Xue Liang. Dynamic monitoring and analysis of ecological environment in Weinan City, Northwest China based on RSEI model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(12): 3913-3919.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201612.024
[7]	方创琳, 周成虎, 顾朝林, 等. 特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(4): 531-550. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201604001
	[Fang Chuanglin, Zhou Chenghu, Gu Chaolin, et al. Theoretical analysis of interactive coupled effects between urbanization and eco-environment in mega-urban agglomerations[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(4): 531-550.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201604001
[8]	张保卫. 基于RSEI模型的生态环境质量评价及系统设计——以郑州市为例[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2018.
	[Zhang Baowei. Eco-environmental Quality Assessment and System Design Based on RSEI Model-A Case Study of Zhenzhou[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2018.]
[9]	王志杰, 代磊. 黔中喀斯特山地城市土地利用/覆被变化及其生态效应评价——以贵阳市花溪区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(9): 3429-3440.
	[Wang Zhijie, Dai Lei. Assessment of land use/cover changes and its ecological effect in karst mountainous cities in central Guizhou Province: Taking Huaxi District of Guiyang City as a case[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(9): 3429-3440.]
[10]	Yan Y, Zhuang Q, Zan C, et al. Using the Google Earth Engine to rapidly monitor impacts of geohazards on ecological ouality in highly susceptible areas[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 132: 108258, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108258. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108258
[11]	Tang P, Huang J, Zhou H, et al. Local and telecoupling coordination degree model of urbanization and the eco-environment based on RS and GIS: A case study in the Wuhan Urban agglomeration[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 75: 103405, 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103405 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103405
[12]	Xiong Y, Xu W, Lu N, et al. Assessment of spatial-temporal changes of ecological environment quality based on Rsei and Gee: A case study in Erhai Lake Basin, Yunnan Province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 125: 107518, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107518 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107518
[13]	徐伟恒, 熊源, 黄邵东, 等. 遥感在生态环境质量监测与评价中的应用现状研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学): 2023, 43(2): 195-204.
	[Xu Weiheng, Xiong Yuan, Huang Shaodong, et al. Review and research progress of the application of remote sensing in ecological environment quality monitoring and evaluation[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Natural Sciences), 2023, 43(2): 195-204.]
[14]	张灿, 徐涵秋, 张好, 等. 南方红壤典型水土流失区植被覆盖度变化及其生态效应评估——以福建省长汀县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(6): 917-928. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.06.003
	[Zhang Can, Xu Hanqiu, Zhang Hao, et al. Fractional vegetation cover change and its ecological effect assessment in a typical reddish soil region of Southeastern China: Changting County, Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(6): 917-928.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.06.003
[15]	孙从建, 李晓明, 张文强, 等. 基于遥感信息的吕梁山贫困区生态安全评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(12): 5352-5360.
	[Sun Congjian, Li Xiaoming, Zhang Wenqiang, et al. Evaluation of ecological security in poverty-stricken region of Lüliang Mountain based on the remote sensing image[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019, 39 (12) : 5352-5360.]
[16]	徐涵秋. 城市遥感生态指数的创建及其应用[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(24): 7853-7862.
	[Xu Hanqiu. A remote sensing urban ecological index and its application[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(24): 7853-7862.]
[17]	张雨斯, 包玉海, 贺忠华. 1990—2021年内蒙古遥感生态环境质量变化及趋势分析——以呼伦贝尔市陈巴尔虎旗为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(2): 326-336.
	[Zhang Yusi, Bao Yuhai, He Zhonghua. Detecting the change and trend of remote sensing ecological quality in Inner Mongolia from 1990-2021: A case study of Chenbarhu Banner of Hulunbuir City[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(2): 326-336.]
[18]	乔雪梅, 刘普幸, 任媛, 等. 基于遥感的黑河流域生态环境变化特征及成因分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(9): 3962-3971.
	[Qiao Xuemei, Liu Puxing, Ren Yuan, et al. Analysis of the characteristics and driving factors of ecological environment changes in Heihe river basin based on remote sensing data[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020, 40(9): 3962-3971.]
[19]	杨羽佳, 张怡, 匡天琪, 等. 利用改进城市遥感生态指数的苏州市生态分析[J]. 测绘科学技术学报, 2021, 38(3): 323-330.
	[Yang Yujia, Zhang Yi, Kuang Tianqi, et al. Ecological analysis of Suzhou City using improved urban remote sensing ecological index[J]. Journal of Geomatics Science and Technology, 2021, 38(3): 323-330.]
[20]	黄锦, 陈勇, 周皓, 等. 基于改进RSEI模型的矿业城市生态环境质量变化研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2022, 42(1): 187-192.
	[Huang Jin, Chen Yong, Zhou Hao, et al. Study on the changes of ecological environment quality of Mining City based on Improved RSEI model[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2022, 42(1): 187-192.]
[21]	徐涵秋, 邓文慧. MRSEI指数的合理性分析及其与RSEI指数的区别[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2022, 37(1): 1-7.
	[Xu Hanqiu, Deng Wenhui. Rationality analysis of MRSEI and its difference with RSEI[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2022, 37(1): 1-7.]
[22]	Liao Weihua, Jiang Weiguo, Huang Ziqian. Spatiotemporal variations of eco-environment in the Guangxi Beibu Gulf Economic Zone based on remote sensing ecological index and granular computing[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022, 32(9): 1813-1830. doi: 10.1007/s11442-022-2024-3
[23]	第五泾渭, 梅家龙, 余翰名, 等. 半干旱地区遥感生态指数的构建及应用[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2022, 34(4): 21-26.
	[Di Wujingwei, Mei Jialong, Yu Hanming, et al. Construction and application of remote sensing ecological index in semi-arid region[J]. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 2022, 34(4): 21-26.]
[24]	徐涵秋. 水土流失区生态变化的遥感评估[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(7): 91-97, 294.
	[Xu Hanqiu. Assessment of ecological change in soil loss area using remote sensing technology[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(7): 91-97, 294.]
[25]	王杰, 马佳丽, 解斐斐, 等. 干旱地区遥感生态指数的改进——以乌兰布和沙漠为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3795-3804. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202011.011
	[Wang Jie, Ma Jiali, Xie Feifei. et al. Improvement of remote sensing ecological index in arid regions: Taking Ulan Buh Desert as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(11): 3795-3804.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202011.011
[26]	范德芹, 邱玥, 孙文彬, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的神府矿区生态环境评价[J]. 测绘通报, 2021(7): 23-28. doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2021.0203
	[Fan Deqin, Qiu Yue, Sun Wenbin, et al. Evaluating ecological environment based on remote sensing ecological index in Shenfu mining area[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021(7): 23-28.] doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2021.0203
[27]	刘英, 党超亚, 岳辉, 等. 改进型遥感生态指数与RSEI的对比分析[J]. 遥感学报, 2022, 26(4): 683-697.
	[Liu Ying, Dang Chaoya, Yue Hui, et al. Comparison between modified remote sensing ecological index and RSEI[J] National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2022, 26(4): 683-697.]
[28]	孟琪, 武志涛, 杜自强, 等. 基于地理探测器的区域植被覆盖度的定量影响——以京津风沙源区为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(2): 826-836.
	[Meng Qi, Wu Zhitao, Du Ziqiang, et al. Quantitative influence of regional fractional vegetation cover based on geodetector model:Take the Beijing-Tianjin sand source region as an example[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(2): 826-836.]
[29]	朱增云, 阿里木江·卡斯木. 基于地理探测器的伊犁谷地生境质量时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(10): 3408-3420. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202010.009
	[Zhu Zengyun, Alimujiang Kasimu. Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality in Yili Valley based on geographical detector and its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020, 39(10): 3408-3420.] doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202010.009
[30]	新疆维吾尔自治区生态环境厅. 新疆维吾尔自治区2020年生态环境状况公报[DB/OL]. https://sthjt.Xinjiang.gov.cn.
	[Geography of Ecological Environment Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2020 ecological environment status bulletin[DB/OL]. https://sthjt.Xinjiang.gov.cn.
[31]	王飞, 李海花, 刘红霞. 阿勒泰市大气污染物的统计特征分析[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2018, 41(3): 44-46.
	[Wang Fei, Li Haihua, Liu Hongxia. Statistical analysis of air pollutants in Altay City[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2018, 41(3): 44-46.]
[32]	Goward Samuel-N, Xue Yongkang, Czajkowski Kevin-P. Evaluating land surface moisture conditions from the remotely sensed temperature/vegetation index measurements: An exploration with the simplified simple biosphere model[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 79(2-3): 225-242. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00275-9
[33]	Artis D A, Carnahan W H. Survey of emissivity variability in thermography of urban areas[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1982, 12(4): 313-329. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(82)90043-8
[34]	Weng Q, Lu D, Schubring J. Estimation of land surface temperature-vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 89(4): 467-483. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005
[35]	Nichol J. Remote sensing of urban heat islands by day and night[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2005, 71(5): 613-621. doi: 10.14358/PERS.71.5.613
[36]	Xu H. A new index for delineating built-up land features in satellite imagery[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008, 29(14): 4269-4276. doi: 10.1080/01431160802039957
[37]	Rikimaru A, Roy P, Miyatake S. Tropical forest cover density mapping[J]. Tropical Ecology, 2002, 43(1): 39-47.
[38]	Lyapustin A, Martonchik J, Wang Y, et al. Multiangle implementation of atmospheric correction(maiac): 1. Radiative transfer basis and look-up tables[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2011, 116: D03210, 10.1029/2010JD014985. doi: 10.1029/2010JD014985
[39]	Paciorek C J, Liu Y, Moreno-macias H, et al. Spatiotemporal associations between goes aerosol optical depth retrievals and ground-level PM_2.5[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(15): 5800-5806. doi: 10.1021/es703181j
[40]	施益强, 陈坰烽, 王坚, 等. 厦门市MODIS气溶胶光学厚度与PM_2.5的时空特征及其相关性[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(5): 334-346.
	[Shi Yiqiang, Chen Jiongfeng, Wang Jian, et al. Spatial and temporal characteristics and correlation of MODIS aerosol optical depth and PM_2.5 concentration over Xiamen City[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2020, 15(5): 334-346.]
[41]	张超, 叶松, 汪杰君, 等. 桂林气溶胶光学厚度与PM_2.5关系特性[C]// 《环境工程》2019年全国学术年会论文集(中册). 北京: 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司, 2019: 235-238.
	Zhang Chao, Ye Song, Wang Jiejun, et al. Relationship between aerosol optical depthh and PM_2.5 in Guilin[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 National Academic Annual Conference of ‘Environmental Engineering’(Volume 2). Beijing: Industrial Building Magazine Co., Ltd., 2019: 235-238.]
[42]	高宇潇, 刘志辉, 王敬哲. 乌鲁木市PM_2.5浓度与MODIS气溶胶光学厚度相关性分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(2): 298-305.
	[Gao Yuxiao, Liu Zhihui, Wang Jingzhe. Correlation analysis of PM_2.5 concentration and MODIS aerosol optical depth in Urumqi City[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2018, 41(2): 298-305.]
[43]	张新蕾, 黄凤荣. 基于大连市MODIS数据的气溶胶光学厚度与PM_2.5和PM₁₀的相关性分析[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2017(6): 59-61.
	[Zhang Xinlei, Huang Fengrong. Correlative analysis of aerosol optical thickness and PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ based on MODIS data of Dalian[J]. Territory & Natural Resources Study, 2017(6): 59-61.]
[44]	李昕. 基于MODIS的AOD反演与PM_2.5时空变化分析与监测——以香港地区为例[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017.
	[Li Xin. MODIS AOD Retrieval and Analysis and Monitoring for Spatio-temporal Variation of PM_2.5: A Case Study in Hong Kong[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2017.]
[45]	秦文, 武云霞, 盛寁, 等. 基于MODIS-AOD产品的南昌市近地面颗粒物定量反演[J]. 广州化工, 2016, 44(23): 125-128.
	[Qin Wen, Wu Yunxia, Sheng Zan, et al. Study on quantitative inversion MODIS-AOD products and surface atmospheric particulate matter concentration in Nanchang City[J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2016, 44(23): 125-128.]
[46]	王伟齐, 臧增亮, 张梅. 北京地区PM_2.5、PM₁₀与卫星AOD的相关性分析(S9)[C]// 第32届中国气象学会年会S9大气成分与天气、气候变化. 北京: 中国气象学会, 2015: 304-306.
	[Wang Weiqi, Zang Zengliang, Zhang Mei. Correlation analysis of PM_2.5, PM₁₀ and satellite AOD in Beijing(S9)[C]// S9 Atmospheric Composition and Weather, Climate Change. Beijing: China Meteorological Society, 2015: 304-306.]
[47]	刘皓宇. 赣南地区土地利用与经济重心迁移特征及影响因素分析[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2018.
	[Liu Haoyu. The Analysis of the Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Land Use and in Gannan and Economic Center of Gravity’s Migration[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2018.]
[48]	王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器:原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
	[Wang Jinfeng, Xu Chengdong. Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010

数据	空间分辨率	时间/年-月-日	数据来源
行政区划	1:1000000	2013	国家地球系统科学数据中心https://www.geodata.cn/
Landsat8 OLI L1	30 m	2015-08-18、2017-08-23、2019-08-13、2021-08-02	地理空间数据云http://www.gscloud.cn/
MCD19 A2	1 km	2015-08-18、2017-08-23、2019-08-13、2021-08-02	美国航空航天局https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/search/
DEM	30 m	-	地理空间数据云http://www.gscloud.cn/

级别	MRSEI值	描述
Ⅴ级	0.8<MRSEI≤1	生态环境状况优秀
Ⅳ级	0.6<MRSEI≤0.8	生态环境状况良好
Ⅲ级	0.4<MRSEI≤0.6	生态环境状况中等
Ⅱ级	0.2<MRSEI≤0.4	生态环境状况较差
Ⅰ级	0≤MRSEI≤0.2	生态环境状况差

图示	判断依据	类型
	q(X1∩X2)<Min[q(X1),q(X2)]	非线性减弱
	Min[q(X1),q(X2)]<q(X1∩X2)<Max[q(X1),q(X2)]	单因子非线性减弱
	Max[q(X1),q(X2)]<q(X1∩X2)<q(X1)+q(X2)	双因子增强
	q(X1∩X2)=q(X1)+q(X2)	独立
	q(X1∩X2)>q(X1)+q(X2)	非线性增强

生态质量分级	2015年		2017年		2019年		2021年
生态质量分级	MRSEI/%	RSEI/%	MRSEI/%	RSEI/%	MRSEI/%	RSEI/%	MRSEI/%	RSEI/%
差	26.88	29.81	28.97	28.45	27.65	27.65	30.50	29.64
较差	34.31	38.52	35.78	36.58	28.40	28.40	25.41	26.44
中等	21.15	17.29	19.51	19.54	23.76	23.76	20.99	19.90
良好	11.01	10.27	9.46	9.76	13.53	13.53	14.53	14.09
优秀	6.65	4.11	6.27	5.67	6.66	6.66	8.57	9.93

MRSEI 等级	2015—2017年		2017—2019年		2019—2021年		2015—2021年
MRSEI 等级	偏移距离/km	方位角/（°）	偏移距离/km	方位角/（°）	偏移距离/km	方位角/（°）	平均偏移距离/km
Ⅰ	9.720	348.5°	0.808	232.0°	5.434	24.9°	2.598
Ⅱ	2.429	96.0°	6.887	198.0°	3.127	39.0°	1.759
Ⅲ	3.747	283.4°	2.342	56.9°	1.799	27.1°	0.243
Ⅳ	3.044	218.9°	2.667	7.9°	3.435	203.0°	0.661
Ⅴ	1.393	167.5°	9.892	187.4°	6.048	294.6°	0.874

Spatio-temporal changes and driving forces in the ecological environment of Altay City determined using an MRSEI model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 48

Related Articles 9

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

MRSEI 等级	2015年			2017年			2019年			2021年
MRSEI 等级	长轴 δx/km	短轴 δx/km	扁率 e	长轴 δx/km	短轴 δx/km	扁率 e	长轴 δx/km	短轴 δx/km	扁率 e	长轴 δx/km	短轴 δx/km	扁率 e
Ⅰ	47.2	42.3	0.10	57.9	33.8	0.42	58.1	32.6	0.44	57.7	33.8	0.41
Ⅱ	59.2	39.2	0.34	57.6	39.4	0.32	57.9	40.3	0.30	55.3	39.9	0.28
Ⅲ	55.2	39.7	0.28	54.2	41.9	0.23	50.0	40.4	0.19	51.0	40.1	0.21
Ⅳ	55.4	38.9	0.30	53.0	39.0	0.26	53.5	39.9	0.25	55.5	39.6	0.29
Ⅴ	49.3	36.7	0.26	48.0	37.9	0.21	46.0	38.4	0.17	49.4	39.5	0.20

指标	2015年	2017年	2019年	2021年
植被指数NDVI	0.58464	0.58555	0.6365	0.57504
建筑-裸土指数NDBSI	-0.45595	-0.48749	-0.50163	-0.4992
湿度WET	0.80562	0.73349	0.49878	0.49149
地表温度LST	-0.83571	-0.36101	-0.7323	-0.39089
空气质量AOD	-0.66934	-0.66743	-0.20122	-0.16055

[1]	HOU Jiaye, LI Jianhua, WANG Jiarong, MA Haitao, QIANG Zekai, FAN Xingang. The evolution of ecological quality in Yanchi County based on the SA-RSEI model [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(6): 1045-1058.
[2]	CHENG Qiulian, LIU Jie, YANG Zhiwei, ZHANG Tianyi, WANG Bin. Spatial distribution and factor analysis of avalanche in the Aerxiangou section of the Duku expressway [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(2): 220-229.
[3]	LI Xinlei, LI Ruiping, WANG Xiuqing, WANG Sinan, WANG Chengkun. Spatiotemporal change and analysis of factors driving forest-grass vegetation coverage in Hetao Irrigation District based on geographical detector [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(4): 623-635.
[4]	MA Haowen, WANG Yongfang, GUO Enliang. Remote sensing monitoring of aeolian desertification in Ongniud Banner based on GEE [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(3): 504-516.
[5]	WANG Lixia,ZHAO Rui,LIU Zhao,ZHANG Shuangcheng,KONG Jinling,YANG Yun. Monitoring and prediction of ecological environmental quality in the Yanhe River Basin based on the remote sensing ecological index [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(3): 943-954.
[6]	XI Wentao,GAO Jing. Spatial heterogeneity of annual precipitation δ¹⁸O over the Tibetan Plateau based on the use of a geographical detector [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(5): 1199-1206.
[7]	WEN Guangchao,ZHAO Meijuan,XIE Hongbo,ZHANG Yi,ZHANG Juan. Analysis of land vegetation cover evolution and driving forces in the western part of the Ili River Valley [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(3): 843-854.
[8]	. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of landscape ecological vulnerability in Shaanxi Province [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(2): 496-505.
[9]	SONG Mei-jie, LUO Yan-yun, DUAN Li-min. Evaluation of Ecological Environment in the Xilin Gol Steppe based on Modified Remote Sensing Ecological Index Model [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(6): 1521-1527.