典型草原禁牧条件下土壤水分对降雨模式的响应

干旱区研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 1359-1367.

典型草原禁牧条件下土壤水分对降雨模式的响应

徐冉¹，张圣微^1,2,3, 朱仲元^1,2，张鹏¹，高露¹

#br#

收稿日期：2019-01-07；修订日期：2019-04-02

基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目（51779116，51669018）资助

作者简介：徐冉（1994-），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为水文过程与生态效应. E-mail:1772871341@qq.com

通讯作者：张圣微. E-mail：zsw@imau.edu.cn

1.内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院，内蒙古呼和浩特010018; 2. 内蒙古自治区水资源保护与利用重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特 010018 3.内蒙古自治区农牧业大数据研究与应用重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特 010018

收稿日期:2019-01-07 修回日期:2019-04-02 出版日期:2019-11-15 发布日期:2019-11-15
通讯作者: 张圣微
作者简介:徐冉（1994-），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为水文过程与生态效应. E-mail:1772871341@qq.com

Response of Soil Moisture Content to Rainfall Patterns in Typical Steppe under Grazing Prohibition

XU Ran¹, ZHANG Sheng-wei^{1, 2,3}, ZHU Zhong-yuan^{1, 2}, ZHANG Peng¹, GAO Lu¹

1. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, Inner Mongolia, China ;
2.Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Water Resources of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010018, Inner Mongolia, China;
3. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Key Laboratory of Big Data Research and Application of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Hohhot 010018, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2019-01-07 Revised:2019-04-02 Online:2019-11-15 Published:2019-11-15
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金项目（51779116，51669018）资助

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过在锡林郭勒草原设置禁牧和放牧试验点，对气象、植被、土壤要素和5 cm、10 cm、15 cm、30 cm层土壤水分进行监测分析，揭示典型草原禁牧条件下降雨和土壤水分的变化及转化规律，结果表明：禁牧3 a后土壤垂向异质性增强，降雨过程中各土层土壤含水量差异显著，放牧区则相反；土壤水分对降雨响应的滞后时间随土层深度增加而增加，相对于禁牧区，放牧区浅层土壤（5 cm、10 cm）持水性能较弱，入渗完成用时较短；5 mm以下的降雨对禁牧和放牧区土壤水分均无明显补给作用，当降雨连续均匀且强度不超过5 mm·h^-1时最有利于入渗，放牧区入渗深度达到15 cm和30 cm层分别需要7.9 mm和大于25 mm的降雨，而禁牧区大于5 mm的降雨就可以入渗到30 cm土层；强度5~6 mm·h^-1的独立降雨只能入渗到表层土壤中（5 cm），强度大于15 mm·h^-1的降雨在禁牧区能通过大孔隙快速入渗到30 cm及更深层土壤，放牧区则表层入渗较快（0~5 cm），深层入渗较慢，会形成地表径流甚至洪水灾害。该研究的结果可以为草地生态水文过程研究和制定合理的放牧政策提供参考。

关键词: 锡林郭勒草原, 降雨模式, 土壤含水量, 降雨入渗, 内蒙古

Abstract: The meteorological, vegetation and soil factors as well as the soil moisture content in depths of 5-, 10-, 15- and 30-cm layers were monitored and analyzed. The purposes were to analyze and reveal the change of rainfall patterns and soil moisture content under grazing prohibition in the Xilin Gol typical steppe in Inner Mongolia. The results showed that the vertical heterogeneity of soil moisture content was increased after implementing the grazing prohibition for 3 years, the difference of soil moisture content in each soil layer was significant during rainfall process in the grazing prohibition sites, while the situation was opposite in the grazing areas. The lag time of soil moisture response to rainfall increased with the increase of soil depth. Compared with the grazing prohibition sites, the water holding capacity of shallow soil (5 cm and 10 cm in depth) in the grazing areas was weaker, and the infiltration time was shorter. There was no obvious replenishment effect of rainfall on soil moisture when the rainfall was less than 5 mm in both the grazing areas and grazing prohibition sites, and it was the most advantageous for the rainwater infiltration when rained continuously and uniformly and the rainfall intensity did not exceed 5 mm·h^-1. Rainwater could infiltrate into 15- and 30-cm soil layers when rainfall was 7.9 mm and more than 25 mm respectively in the grazing areas, but it could infiltrate into 30-cm soil layer when rainfall was more than 5 mm in the grazing prohibition sites. Rainwater could infiltrate into topsoil (5 cm) only when the intensity of an independent rainfall was 5-6 mm·h^-1, and it could infiltrate rapidly into 30-cm soil layer or deeper through the macropores when the rainfall intensity was higher than 15 mm·h^-1in the grazing prohibition sites. In the grazing areas, rainwater could infiltrate rapidly into topsoil (0-5 cm) but slowly into deep soil to form surface runoff and even flood disasters. The study results could be referred in researching the grassland ecohydrological process and formulating a rational grazing policy.

Key words: Xilin Gol Steppe')">

Xilin Gol Steppe, rainfall pattern, soil moisture content, rainwater infiltration, Inner Mongolia

徐冉, 张圣微, 朱仲元, 张鹏, 高露. 典型草原禁牧条件下土壤水分对降雨模式的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(6): 1359-1367.

XU Ran, ZHANG Sheng-wei, ZHU Zhong-yuan, ZHANG Peng, GAO Lu. Response of Soil Moisture Content to Rainfall Patterns in Typical Steppe under Grazing Prohibition[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(6): 1359-1367.

参考文献 18

[1]	Kang L,Han X G,Zhang Z B,et al.Grassland ecosystems in China:Review of current knowledge and research advancement[J].The Royal Society,2007,362(1 482):997-1 008.
[2]	邹慧，高光耀，傅伯杰.干旱半干旱草地生态系统与土壤水分关系研究进展[J].生态学报,2016,36(11):3 127-3 136.[Zou Hui,Gao Guangyao,Fu Bojie.The relationship between grassland ecosystem and soil water in arid and semiarid areas:A review[J].Acta Ecologic Sinica,2016,36(11):3 127-3 136.]
[3]	Liang Y,Han G,Zhou H,et al.Grazing intensity on vegetation dynamics of a typical steppe in Northeast Inner Mongolia[J].Rangeland Ecology & Management,2009,62(4):328-336.
[4]	Yan R,Xin X,Yan Y,et al.Impacts of differing grazing rates on canopy structure and species composition in Hulunber meadow steppe[J].Rangeland Ecology & Management,2015,68(1):54-64.
[5]	La Pierre K J,Yuan S,Chang C C,et al.Explaining temporal variation in aboveground productivity in a mesic grassland:The role of climate and flowering[J].Journal of Ecology,2011,99:1 250-1 262.
[6]	Ruppert J C,Harmoney K,Henkin Z,et al.Quantifying drylands’ drought resistance and recovery:The importance of drought intensity,dominant life history and grazing regime[J].Global Change Biology,2015,21(3):1 258-1 270.
[7]	Hu Z,Li S,Guo Q,et al.A synthesis of the effect of grazing exclusion on carbon dynamics in grasslands in China[J].Global Change Biology,2016,22(4):1 385-1 393.
[8]	Koerner S E,Collins S L.Interactive effects of grazing,drought,and fire on grassland plant communities in north America and south Africa[J].Ecology,2014,95(1):98-109.
[9]	Xie Rui,Wu Xiuqin.Effects of grazing intensity on soil organic carbon of rangelands in Xilin Gol League,Inner Mongolia,China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(11):1 550-1 560.
[10]	Yao S X,Zhao C C,Zhang T H,et al.Response of the soil water content of mobile dunes to precipitation patterns in Inner Mongolia,Northern China[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2013,97:92-98.
[11]	Petrie M D,Collins S L,Litvak M E,et al.The ecological role of small rainfall events in a desert grassland[J].Ecohydrology,2015,8(8):1 614-1 622.
[12]	李凤霞，李晓东，周炳荣，等.放牧强度对三江源典型高寒草甸生物量和土壤理化特征的影响[J].草业科学，2015,32(1):11-18.[Li Fengxia,Li Xiaodong,Zhou Bingrong,et al.Effects of grazing intensity on biomass and soil physical and chemical characteristics in alpine meadow in the source of three rivers[J].Pratacultural Science,2015,32(1):11-18.]
[13]	Archer N A L,Otten W,Schmidt S,et al.Rainfall infiltration and soil hydrological characteristics below ancient forest,planted forest and grassland in a temperate northern climate[J].Ecohydrology,2016,9(4):585-600. 
[14]	Sun Dongmei,Li Xiaomin,Feng Ping,et al.Stability analysis of unsaturated soil slope during rainfall infiltration using coupled liquidgassolid threephase model[J].Water Science and Engineering,2016,9(3):183-194.
[15]	Lee E,Kumar P,BarronGfford G A,et al.Impact of hydraulic redistribution on multispecies vegetation water use in a semiarid savanna ecosystem:An experimental and modeling synthesis[J].Water Resources Research,2018,54(7):4 009-4 027.
[16]	Li Fang,Zhao Wenzhi,Liu Hu.The response of aboveground net primary productivity of desert vegetation to rainfall pulse in the temperate desert region of Northwest China[J].PLOS ONE,2013,8(9):e73003,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073003.
[17]	王颜莉，刘立超，高艳红，等.人工固沙植被区土壤水分动态及空间分布[J].中国沙漠，2015,35(4):942-950.[Wang Yanli,Liu Lichao,Gao Yanhong,et al.Dynamic and spatial distribution of soil moisture in an artificially re-vegetated desert area[J].Journal of Desert Research,2015,35(4):942-950.]
[18]	李小英，段争虎.黄土高原土壤水分与植被相互作用研究进展[J].土壤通报，2012,43(6):1 508-1 514.[Li Xiaoying,Duan Zhenghu.Review on the interaction between soil moisture and vegetation on the Loess Plateau[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2012,43(6):1 508-1 514.]