不同盖度沙蒿群丛防风作用研究

干旱区研究 ›› 2012, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 213-217.

不同盖度沙蒿群丛防风作用研究

魏宝¹, 丁国栋^1,2, 吴斌^1,2, 张宇清^1,2

1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室,北京 100083;
2. 宁夏盐池荒漠生态系统定位研究站,宁夏盐池 751500

收稿日期:2011-10-26 修回日期:2011-12-10 出版日期:2012-03-15 发布日期:2012-04-10
通讯作者: 丁国栋. Email：dch1999@263.net
作者简介:魏宝（1988-），男，内蒙古鄂尔多斯人，在读硕士研究生，研究方向为水土保持与荒漠化防治. Email:weibao73@126.com
基金资助:
“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目（2012BAD16B02）；教育部博士点基金项目( 20090014110003)；北京林业大学科技创新计划（TD2011-04）

Study on Windbreak Effect of Artemisia ordosica Community over Different Vegetation Coverage

WEI Bao¹, DING Guo-Dong^1,2, WU Bin^1,2, ZHANG Yu-Qing^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, Ministry of Education, College of Soil 
  and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Yanchi Research Station, Yanchi 751500, China

Received:2011-10-26 Revised:2011-12-10 Online:2012-03-15 Published:2012-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以天然沙蒿群丛为研究对象，初始盖度为60%，人工降低其盖度为50%，40%和30%，用多剖面自计式遥测风速仪连续观测记录沙蒿林内距离地面0.1 m，0.5 m，1.0 m，2.0 m，3.0 m，4.0 m，5.0 m和6.0 m高度处的风速变化。当沙蒿群丛盖度由30%增加到60%，风速廓线变化不明显，风速廓线方程、空气动力学粗糙度、边界层位移厚度和边界层动量损失厚度的值较为接近，没有随盖度呈现出规律性的变化，在这个盖度变化范围内，沙蒿群丛降低风速的作用相似。

关键词: 植被盖度, 沙蒿(Artemisia ordosica）, 防风效应, 风速廓线, 边界层厚度, 盐池, 毛乌素沙地

Abstract: In traditional study, wind velocity, aerodynamic roughness, friction velocity, drag coefficient and other parameters are often used to evaluate the restriction effect of vegetation on wind erosion, but the studies on wind energy dissipation of vegetation using boundary layer displacement thickness and momentum loss thickness are relatively insufficient. In this paper, the windbreak effect of Artemisia ordosica community over different vegetation coverage was quantitatively studied after carrying out a field investigation in southwestern marginal zone of the Mu Us Sandy land. Artemisia ordosica was selected in the study, its initial coverage was 60%, it was artificially decreased down to 50%, 40% and 30%, and the wind velocities at 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 m were recorded. When the coverage of Artemisia ordosica community was increased from 30% to 60%, wind profile did not change significantly, and the values of wind profile equation, aerodynamic roughness, boundary layer displacement thickness and momentum loss thickness were similar. As those parameters did not show a regular change with changing vegetation coverage, it is believed that vegetation coverage and windbreak effect of Artemisia ordosica community are similar.

Key words: 
vegetation coverage')">Mu Us 
vegetation coverage, 
vegetation coverage')">Mu Us 
vegetation coverage, vegetation coverage, [WTBX]Artemisia ordosica;[WTBZ] windbreak effect, wind profile, boundary layer thickness, Yanchi, [WTBX]Artemisia ordosica;[WTBZ] windbreak effect, wind profile, boundary layer thickness, Yanchi, Artemisia ordosica, windbreak effect, wind profile, boundary layer thickness, Yanchi, Mu Us sandy land

魏宝, 丁国栋, 吴斌, 张宇清. 不同盖度沙蒿群丛防风作用研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(2): 213-217.

WEI Bao, DING Guo-Dong, WU Bin, ZHANG Yu-Qing. Study on Windbreak Effect of Artemisia ordosica Community over Different Vegetation Coverage[J]. , 2012, 29(2): 213-217.

参考文献

Van de Ven T A M,Fryrear D W,Spaan W P. Vegetation characteristics and soil loss by wind〔J〕.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1989,44:347-349.

Wolfe S A,Nickling W G.The protective role of sparse vegetation in wind erosion〔J〕. Progress in Physical Geography,1993,17 (1):50-68.

Wolfe S A,Nickling W G.Shear stress partitioning in sparsely vegetated desert canopies〔J〕. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1996,21:607-620.

董治宝,陈渭南,董光荣,等.植被对风沙土风蚀作用的影响〔J〕.环境科学学报,1996,16(4):442-446.

杨文斌,丁国栋,王晶莹,等.行带式柠条固沙林防风效果〔J〕.生态学报,2006,26(12)：4 106-4 112.

高永,邱国玉,丁国栋,等.沙柳沙障的防风固沙效益研究〔J〕.中国沙漠,2004,24(3):365-370.

王蕾,王志,刘连友,等.沙柳灌丛植株形态与气流结构野外观测研究〔J〕.应用生态学报,2005,16(11):2 007-2 011.

王翔宇,丁国栋,吴斌,等.均匀式沙蒿防风阻沙效益模拟试验研究〔J〕.中国水土保持,2010,2(11):42-44.

董治宝,Fryrear D W,高尚玉.直立植物防沙措施粗糙特征的模拟实验〔J〕.中国沙漠,2000,20(3):260-263.

刘小平,董治宝.直立植被粗糙度和阻力分解的风洞实验研究〔J〕.中国沙漠,2002,22(1):82-87.

刘小平,董治宝,王训明.固定沙质床面的空气动力学粗糙度〔J〕.中国沙漠,2003,23(2):111-117.

梅凡民,江珊珊,王涛.粗糙床面风廓线的转折特征及其物理意义〔J〕.中国沙漠,2010,30(2):217-227.

钟卫,孔纪名,杨涛.植被沙障对近地表风沙流特征影响的风洞实验〔J〕.干旱区研究,2009,26(6):872-876.

李生宝,蒋齐.盐池沙地综合治理优化模式的建立及其结构调整〔J〕.农业系统科学与综合研究,1999,15(2):143-148.

Wiggs G F S,Livingstone I,Thomas D S G,et al.Airflow and roughness characteristics over partially vegetated linear dune in the southwest Karahari Desert〔J〕.Earth Surface Process and Landforms,1996,21:19-34.

张鸿雁,张志政,王元.流体力学〔M〕.北京:科学出版社,2004:144-147.

Wasson R J,Nanniga P M.Estimating wind transport of sand on vegetated surfaces〔J〕.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1988,11(4):505-514.

[1]	海龙, 周梅, 张嘉開, 洪光宇, 李凤滋, 费菲. 毛乌素沙地不同林龄杨柴灌木林土壤呼吸及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1107-1116.
[2]	莫秋霞, 宋炜, 卜崇峰, 王春, 王鹤鸣, 李亚红. 油蒿与沙柳灌木地藓结皮发育差异研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 979-987.
[3]	魏亚娟, 党晓宏, 汪季, 韩彦隆, 解云虎, 蔺博. 吉兰泰荒漠绿洲过渡带白刺灌丛沙堆形态示量特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 403-411.
[4]	石麟,李红悦,赵雨兴,任余艳,何金军,于凤强,哈斯额尔敦. 毛乌素沙地流动沙丘不同沙障组合措施的防风固沙效益评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(2): 268-279.
[5]	牛丹妮, 韩蓉, 马瑞, 王振亭, 刘虎俊, 魏林源. 林分密度和种植点配置对梭梭人工林防风效应的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(1): 143-151.
[6]	张正偲,张焱,马鹏飞,潘凯佳,扎多,益西拉姆,仁青桑布. 雅鲁藏布江中游风沙区典型下垫面空气动力学参数研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 997-1005.
[7]	曾红霞,赵成章,王毓芳,李晓雅,赵婷婷,唐玉瑞. 盐池湾高寒湿地景观格局演变及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(6): 1771-1781.
[8]	王荣女. 毛乌素沙地不同类型生物土壤结皮-土壤呼吸的季节变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 961-972.
[9]	洪光宇,王晓江,刘果厚,张雷,高孝威,李卓凡,刘铁山,刘辰明,李梓豪. 毛乌素沙地沙柳液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(3): 794-801.
[10]	张圆浩, 阿拉木萨, 印家旺, 蒋绍妍. 沙丘土壤含水量与地下水埋深时空变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(6): 1427-1436.
[11]	魏翔鸿, 左合君, 闫敏, 贾光普. 尼龙网方格沙障防风效应复变规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(6): 1584-1591.
[12]	毛丽, 苏志珠, 王国玲, 马义娟, 李想. 毛乌素沙地不同土地利用类型的土壤粒度及有机质特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(3): 589-598.
[13]	杨新国, 古君龙, 王兴, 陈林, 王磊, 宋乃平, 曲文杰. 荒漠草原中间锦鸡儿冠层穿透雨的发生与分布特征 [J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(1): 131-138.
[14]	张金玲, 陈海鹏, 程达, 李玉灵. 毛乌素沙地臭柏(Sabina vulgaris Ant.)光抑制响应机制研究意义[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(4): 882-890.
[15]	陈小红, 段争虎, 雒天峰, 谭明亮. 沙漠化逆转过程中不同粒组颗粒养分与全土养分的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(6): 992-997.