黄河源高寒退化草地典型鼠丘土壤风蚀及养分流失规律研究

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2024.04.07

干旱区研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 603-617.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.04.07 cstr: 32277.14.j.azr.2024.04.07

黄河源高寒退化草地典型鼠丘土壤风蚀及养分流失规律研究

越大林¹(), 李国荣¹^,²(), 李进芳¹, 李希来³, 赵健赟¹^,², 朱海丽¹^,², 刘亚斌¹^,², 胡夏嵩¹

1.青海大学地质工程系，青海西宁 810016
2.青藏高原北缘新生代资源环境重点实验室，青海西宁 810016
3.青海大学农牧学院，青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2023-06-30 修回日期:2024-01-10 出版日期:2024-04-15 发布日期:2024-04-26
通讯作者: 李国荣. E-mail: qdliguorong@163.com
作者简介:越大林（2001-），男，硕士研究生，主要从事地质灾害及其防治研究. E-mail: 17782283634@163.com
基金资助:
青海省科技厅基础研究项目(2021-ZJ-701);国家自然科学基金项目(42161068);国家自然科学基金项目(41662023)

Soil wind erosion and nutrient loss in typical rodent mounds in a degraded alpine grassland in the Yellow River source zone

YUE Dalin¹(), LI Guorong¹^,²(), LI Jinfang¹, LI Xilai³, ZHAO Jianyun¹^,², ZHU Haili¹^,², LIU Yabin¹^,², HU Xiasong¹

1. Department of Geological Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, Qinghai, China
2. Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Resource & Environment in Northern Margin of the Tibetan Plateau, Xining 810016, Qinghai, China
3. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, Qinghai, China

Received:2023-06-30 Revised:2024-01-10 Published:2024-04-15 Online:2024-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

黄河源高寒草地啮齿动物活动区存在大量鼠丘，在干燥、大风等气候影响下极易产生土壤风蚀，为阐明鼠丘土壤风蚀侵蚀特征与规律，本研究以黄河源流域不同海拔与植被覆盖度下14个试验区的高原鼠兔和高原鼢鼠鼠丘为研究对象，采用野外模拟风力侵蚀试验装置，对不同风速下各区域鼠丘土壤流失量及其养分流失规律进行分析和讨论。结果表明：（1）鼠丘土壤风蚀量在各区域之间存在显著性差异（P<0.05），风速较小时，2种不同鼠丘土壤流失差异不显著，当风速增加到12 m·s^-1时，高原鼠兔鼠丘土壤流失量>高原鼢鼠鼠丘土壤流失量（P<0.05）；风速从3 m·s^-1增大到12 m·s^-1，2种鼠丘土壤流失的平均增幅分别为238.16%和146.31%。（2）各试验区鼠丘土壤风蚀率总体呈现先快后慢的递减趋势，植被盖度是低风速下影响鼠丘土壤流失的显著因子，且与海拔高度有关。（3）随草地退化程度加剧，土壤全氮含量、碱解氮、速效钾、有机质含量都有明显下降，而全磷、全钾、速效磷呈现上升的趋势。本研究表明黄河源不同区域鼠丘土壤风蚀作用的差异性与土壤含水率、颗粒大小、风速等密切相关。

关键词: 黄河源, 啮齿动物, 鼠丘, 土壤风蚀, 养分流失

Abstract:

Numerous rodent mounds are found in areas with rodent activity in alpine grasslands in the Yellow River source zone, and soil wind erosion easily occurs owing to the dry and windy climate. The present study investigated the characteristics and trends of soil wind erosion in rodent mounds using plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) and plateau zokor (Eospalax baileyi) mounds in 14 test areas at different altitudes and with different vegetation coverage in the Yellow River source basin. Field-simulated wind erosion was used to determine the trends of soil loss and nutrient loss in rodent mounds in different regions under different wind speeds. The results showed a significant difference in the amount of soil loss from wind erosion between the different regions (P<0.05). When the wind speed was low, there was no significant difference in soil loss between the two types of rodent mounds. When the wind speed was increased to 12 m·s^-1, the soil loss in the plateau pika mound was greater than that in the plateau zokor mound (P<0.05). When the wind speed increased from 3 to 12 m·s^-1, the average increase in soil loss in the two types of mounds was 238.16% and 146.31%, respectively. (2) The wind erosion rate of the mound soil in each test area generally showed a decreasing trend with decreasing wind speed. Vegetation coverage was a significant factor affecting the mound soil loss at low wind speeds and was related to altitude. (3) With an increase in grassland degradation levels, the soil total nitrogen content, available nitrogen, available potassium, and organic matter content decreased significantly, whereas total phosphorus, total potassium, and available phosphorus showed an upward trend. This study shows that the difference in soil wind erosion in different regions of the Yellow River source zone is closely associated with soil moisture content, particle size, and wind speed.

Key words: Yellow River source, rodents, rodent mound, soil wind erosion, nutrient loss

越大林, 李国荣, 李进芳, 李希来, 赵健赟, 朱海丽, 刘亚斌, 胡夏嵩. 黄河源高寒退化草地典型鼠丘土壤风蚀及养分流失规律研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(4): 603-617.

YUE Dalin, LI Guorong, LI Jinfang, LI Xilai, ZHAO Jianyun, ZHU Haili, LIU Yabin, HU Xiasong. Soil wind erosion and nutrient loss in typical rodent mounds in a degraded alpine grassland in the Yellow River source zone[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(4): 603-617.

图/表 21

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

表2

图5

图6

图7

表3

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

表4

表5

图13

图14

图15

图16

参考文献 49

[1]	周冰玉, 李志威, 田世民, 等. 黄河源区水源涵养能力研究综述[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2022, 42(4): 87-93.
	[Zhou Bingyu, Li Zhiwei, Tian Shimin, et al. A review on water conservation capacity in Yellow River source region[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2022, 42(4): 87-93.]
[2]	张同作, 江峰, 徐波, 等. 青藏高原濒危兽类保护与管理研究进展[J]. 兽类学报, 2022, 42(5): 490-507. doi: 10.16829/j.slxb.150696
	[Zhang Tongzuo, Jiang Feng, Xu Bo, et al. Research advances in conservation and management of endangered mammals on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 2022, 42(5): 490-507.] doi: 10.16829/j.slxb.150696
[3]	段媛媛, 张静, 王玲玲, 等. 高原鼠兔对高寒草甸植物物种多样性和功能多样性关系的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(11): 25-35. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021444
	[Duan Yuanyuan, Zhang Jing, Wang Lingling, et al. Effects of plateau pika on the relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity in alpine meadow[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 25-35.] doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021444
[4]	Zhang Y M, Liu J K. Effects of plateau zokors (Myospalax fontanierii) on plant community and soil in an alpine meadow[J]. Journal of Mammalogy, 2003, 84(2): 644-651. doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0644:EOPZMF>2.0.CO;2
[5]	Yoshihara Y, Okuro T, Buuveibaatar B, et al. Responses of vegetation to soil disturbance by Sibelian marmots within a landscape and between landscape positions in Hustai National Park, Mongolia[J]. Grassland Science, 2010, 56(1): 42-50. doi: 10.1111/grs.2010.56.issue-1
[6]	Wilkinson M T, Richards P J, Humphreys G S. Breaking ground: Pedological, geological, and ecological implications of soil bioturbation[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2009, 97(1/4): 257-272. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.09.005
[7]	安雪香. 甘肃省肃南县天然草地生态现状调查研究[J]. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 2017, 47(5): 105-108.
	[An Xuexiang. Investigation and research on the ecological status of natural grassland in sunan county, Gansu Province[J]. Gansu Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 2017, 47(5): 105-108.]
[8]	孙飞达, 郭正刚, 尚占环, 等. 高原鼠兔洞穴密度对高寒草甸土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2010, 47(2): 378-383.
	[Sun Feida, Guo Zhenggang, Shang Zhanhuan, et al. Effects of density of burrowing plateau pikas (Ochotona curzoniae) on soil physical and chemical properties of alpine meadow soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(2): 378-383.]
[9]	周雪荣, 郭正刚, 郭兴华. 高原鼠兔和高原鼢鼠在高寒草甸中的作用[J]. 草业科学, 2010, 27(5): 38-44.
	[Zhou Xuerong, Guo Zhenggang, Guo Xinghua. The role of plateau pika and plateau zokor in alpine meadow[J]. Pratacultural Sciences, 2010, 27(5): 38-44.]
[10]	孙飞达, 龙瑞军, 郭正刚, 等. 鼠类活动对高寒草甸植物群落及土壤环境的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2011, 28(1): 146-151.
	[Sun Feida, Long Ruijun, Guo Zhenggang, et al. Effects of rodent activity on plant community and soil environment in alpine meadow[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(1): 146-151.]
[11]	牛榆玲. 高原鼠兔生活习性研究[J]. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2020, 39(2): 82-83.
	[Niu Yuling. Research on the habits of plateau pikas (Ochotona curzoniae)[J]. Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary medicine, 2020, 39(2): 82-83.]
[12]	张兴禄, 李广. 高原鼠兔和高原鼢鼠在高寒草甸生态系统的作用[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(5): 816-822.
	[Zhang Xinglu, Li Guang. Effects of rodents activities on grazing land and ecosystem in alpine meadow[J]. Pratacultural Sciences, 2015, 32(5): 816-822.]
[13]	Pang X P, Guo Z G. Plateau pika disturbances alter plant productivity and soil nutrients in alpine meadows of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, China[J]. The Rangeland Journal, 2017, 39(2): 133-144. doi: 10.1071/RJ16093
[14]	宋梓涵, 李希来, 苏晓雪, 等. 高原鼠兔和高原鼢鼠种群暴发区干扰斑块空间分布格局与演替规律[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(7): 2949-2958.
	[Song Zihan, Li Xilai, Su Xiaoxue, et al. Spatial distribution pattern and succession of disturbance patches formed by plateau pika and plateau zokor in their population outbreak areas in alpine meadow[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(7): 2949-2958.]
[15]	徐高伟, 刘伟, 杨孔, 等. 红原县草场主要害鼠种群密度初步调查[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(1): 217-219.
	[Xu Gaowei, Liu Wei, Yang Kong, et al. Primary investigation of population density of main pest rodents on meadows in Hongyuan County[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(1): 217-219.]
[16]	谈静, 才文代吉, 王海春, 等. 青藏高原高寒草甸鼠丘剥蚀特征及影响因素[J]. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(1): 147-153.
	[Tan Jing, Caiwen Daiji, Wang Haichun, et al. Comparative study on erosion characteristics and influencing factors of pika mound soil in alpine meadow of Oinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42(1): 147-153.]
[17]	Zhang Chunlai, Li Qiang, Shen Yaping, et al. Monitoring of aeolian desertification on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau from the 1970s to 2015 using Landsat images[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 619-620: 1648-1659. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.137
[18]	Teng Yanmin, Zhan Jinyan, Liu Wen, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of wind erosion on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 123: 1-12.
[19]	Sun Huafang, Li Xilai, Jin Liqun, et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on soil labile organic carbon of patchy alpine meadows in the Source Zone of the Yellow River, West China[J]. Catena, 2023, 220(Part B), 106715. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106715
[20]	Duan Chengwei, Li Xilai, Li Chengyi, et al. Positive effects of fungal β diversity on soil multifunctionality mediated by pH in the natural restoration succession stages of alpine meadow patches[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 148: 110122. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110122
[21]	南秋菊, 华珞. 国内外土壤侵蚀研究进展[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 24(2): 86-95.
	[Nan Qiuju, Hua Luo. Recent progress of the soil erosion in the world[J]. Journal of Capital Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2003, 24(2): 86-95.]
[22]	Guo Z L, Huang N, Dong Z B, et al. Wind erosion induced soil degradation in northern China: Status, measures and perspective[J]. Sustainability, 2014, 6(12): 8951-8966. doi: 10.3390/su6128951
[23]	Duan Chengwei, Li Xilai, Li Chengyi, et al. Analysis on the soil physical, chemical, and microbial community properties of different alpine meadow patches in the Source Zone of the Yellow River, West China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 144: 109531. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109531
[24]	蒙仲举. 荒漠草原坡面侵蚀分异规律及防控措施研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2010.
	[Meng Zhongju. Study on Slope Erosion Differentiation Law and Control Measures in Desert Grassland[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2010.]
[25]	张春来, 宋长青, 王振亭, 等. 土壤风蚀过程研究回顾与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(1): 27-41. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.01.0027
	[Zhang Chunlai, Song Changqing, Wang Zhenting, et al. Review and prospect of the study on soil wind erosion process[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2018, 33(1): 27-41.] doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.01.0027
[26]	李振山, 王怡, 贺丽敏. 半干旱区植被风沙动力过程耦合研究: Ⅰ. 模型[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(1): 23-30.
	[Li Zhenshan, Wang Yi, He Limin. Vegetation-erosion process in semiarid region: Ⅰ. Dynamical models[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2009, 29(1): 23-30.]
[27]	巩俐, 王发科, 李积芳, 等. 五道梁地区土壤风蚀变化特征及气象影响因子分析[J]. 青海草业, 2020, 29(3): 59-63.
	[Gong Li, Wang Fake, Li Jifang, et al. Characteristics of soil wind erosion and analysis of meteorological influencing factors in wudaolang Area[J]. Qinghai Prataculture, 2020, 29(3): 59-63.]
[28]	申陆, 田美荣, 高吉喜. 基于RWEQ模型的浑善达克沙漠化防治生态功能区土壤风蚀与主要影响因子分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(6): 90-97.
	[Shen Lu, Tian Meirong, Gao Jixi. Analysis on wind erosion and main factors in desertification control ecological function area of hunshandake using the revised wind erosion equation model[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(6): 90-97.]
[29]	宋胜明, 刘霞, 张荣华, 等. 黄泛风沙区耕地土壤风蚀影响因子的通径分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017, 37(3): 249-253.
	[Song Shengming, Liu Xia, Zhang Ronghua, et al. Path analysis of soil wind erosion influence factors to cultivated land in Yellow River flooded wind sand area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 249-253.]
[30]	邹学勇, 张春来, 程宏, 等. 土壤风蚀模型中的影响因子分类与表达[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(8): 875-889. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.08.0875
	[Zou Xueyong, Zhang Chunlai, Cheng Hong, et al. Classification and representation of factors affecting soil wind erosion in a model[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(8): 875-889.] doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.08.0875
[31]	李斌鹏, 陈新闯, 董智, 等. 不同土壤水分条件对内蒙古荒漠草原地表风蚀影响的风洞模拟研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(9): 126-132.
	[Li Binpeng, Chen Xinchuan, Dong Zhi, et al. Simulation of influence of soil moisture content on near-surface wind erosion in desert steppe of Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(9): 126-132.]
[32]	翟辉, 李国荣, 李进芳, 等. 黄河源区高寒退化草地鼠丘对土壤风蚀作用的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(6): 14-20.
	[Zhai Hui, Li Guorong, Li Jinfang, et al. Effects of rodent mounds on soil wind erosion in alpine degraded grassland of the Yellow River Source Zone[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(6): 14-20.]
[33]	赵国琴, 李广泳, 马文虎, 等. 高原鼠兔扰动对高寒草地植物群落特征的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(8): 2122-2128.
	[Zhao Guoqin, Li Guangyong, Ma Wenhu, et al. Impacts of Ochotona pallasi disturbance on alpine grassland community characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(8): 2122-2128.] pmid: 24380328
[34]	Pang X P, Guo Z G. Plateau pika disturbances alter plant productivity and soil nutrients in alpine meadows of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. The Rangeland Journal, 2017, 39(2): 113-114. doi: 10.1071/RJ16016
[35]	李国荣, 李希来, 李进芳, 等. 黄河源高寒草甸高原鼠兔土丘的土壤风力侵蚀规律[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2): 110-114, 168.
	[Li Guorong, Li Xilai, Li Jinfang, et al. Soil wind erosion law in Ochotona curzoniae mound of alpine meadow in the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(2): 110-114, 168. ]
[36]	翟辉, 李国荣, 李进芳, 等. 黄河源草地退化区2种鼠丘土壤风蚀规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1212-1221.
	[Zhai Hui, Li Guorong, Li Jinfang, et al. Soil wind erosion rule of two types of rodent mounds in a degraded grassland area of the Yellow River source zone[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1212-1221.]
[37]	郑子彦, 吕美霞, 马柱国. 黄河源区气候水文和植被覆盖变化及面临问题的对策建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(1): 61-72.
	[Zheng Ziyan, Lyu Meixia, Ma Zhuguo. Climate,hydrology, and vegetation coverage changes in source region of Yellow River and countermeasures for challenges[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(1): 61-72.]
[38]	Francesco C, Michael L. Energy and momentum conserving model of splash entrainment in sand and snow saltation[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, 44(3): 1601-1609. doi: 10.1002/grl.v44.3
[39]	何晨晨, 吴盈盈, 王振亭. 土壤团聚体与地面碰撞时的临界破碎速度与粒径分布[J]. 中国沙漠, 2023, 43(5): 1-8. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2023.00012
	[He Chenchen, Wu Yingying, Wang Zhenting. Threshold velocity and fragment size distribution for the rupture of soil aggregates colliding with land surface[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(5): 1-8.] doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2023.00012
[40]	王萍, 胡文文, 郑晓静. 沙粒的跃移与悬移[J]. 中国科学(G辑: 物理学力学天文学), 2008, 38(7): 908-918.
	[Wang Ping, Hu Wenwen, Zheng Xiaojing. Saltation and suspension of sand grains[J]. Scientia Sinica(Physica,Mechanica & Astronomica), 2008, 38(7): 908-918.]
[41]	鲍根生, 王宏生, 曾辉, 等. 不同形成时间高原鼢鼠鼠丘土壤养分分配规律[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(7): 1824-1831.
	[Bao Gensheng, Wang Hongsheng, Zeng Hui, et al. The allocation pattern of soil nutrients in plateau zokor mounds of different ages[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(7): 1824-1831.]
[42]	Cheng Y, Xiao P P, Wang Q, et al. Soil nutrient changes induced by the presence and intensity of plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) disturbances in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 106(Part A): 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.029
[43]	张雯娜, 金少红, 于成, 等. 高原鼠兔洞口密度对高山嵩草草甸土壤主要养分含量的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(7): 1593-1601.
	[Zhang Wenna, Jin Shaohong, Yu Cheng, et al. Influence of the density of burrow entrances of plateau pika on the concentration of soil nutrients in a Kobresia pygmaea meadow[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(7): 1593-1601.]
[44]	庞晓攀. 高寒草甸植物生产力与土壤主要养分对高原鼠兔干扰响应的研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
	[Pang Xiaopan. Responses of Plant Productivity and Soil Nutrients of Alpine Meadows to the Disturbance by Plateau Pika[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2021.]
[45]	Cheng H, Liu C C, Zou X, et al. Wind erosion rate for vegetated soil cover: A prediction model based on surface shear strength[J]. Catena, 2020, 187(5): 104398. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104398
[46]	周炎广, 武子丰, 胡日娜, 等. 毛乌素沙地新垦地土壤风蚀特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(1): 138-147.
	[Zhou Yanguang, Wu Zifeng, Hu Rina, et al. Characteristics of soil wind erosion in new reclaimation land of Mu Us sandy land, China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(1): 138-147.]
[47]	刘铁军, 赵显波, 赵爱国, 等. 东北黑土地土壤风蚀风洞模拟试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(2): 67-70.
	[Liu Tiejun, Zhao Xianbo, Zhao Aiguo, et al. An experimental study of wind erosion wind tunnel simulation on the black soil in northeast China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(2): 67-70.]
[48]	Yan Y C, Xin X, Xu X, et al. Quantitative effects of wind erosion on the soil texture and soil nutrients under different vegetation coverage in a semiarid steppe of northern China[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 369(1-2): 585-598. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1606-3
[49]	Tong S C, Li G R, Li J F, et al. Influence of the plateau pika mound numbers on soil water erosion properties in alpine meadows of the Yellow River Source Zone, Western China[J]. Water, 2023, 15(17): 3111.

试验区域	试验点名称	试验区编号	平均海拔/m	平均植被盖度/%
兴海县	兴海01	XH01	3488	65.66
同德县	同德01	TD01	3616	53.50
玛沁县	玛沁01	MQing01	3310	65.20
	玛沁02	MQing02	3751	73.15
	玛沁03	MQing03	4073	48.35
玛多县	玛多01	MD01	4210	55.83
玛多县	玛多02	MD02	4074	57.52
达日县	达日01	DR01	3852	67.38
甘德县	甘德02	GD01	4372	60.61
久治县	久治01	JZ01	3832	42.32
久治县	久治02	JZ02	3608	76.89
玛曲县	玛曲01	MQu01	3513	67.10
玛曲县	玛曲02	MQu02	3640	76.31
河南县	河南01	HN01	3452	86.28

试验区	d₆₀/mm	d₃₀/mm	d₁₀/mm	C_u	C_c	试验区	d₆₀/mm	d₃₀/mm	d₁₀/mm	C_u	C_c
XH01	0.18	0.09	0.05	3.67	0.94	DR01	0.52	0.18	0.10	5.42	0.65
TD01	0.19	0.11	0.08	2.53	0.85	GD01	0.35	0.15	0.08	4.38	0.80
MQing01	0.40	0.14	0.06	6.78	0.83	JZ01	0.17	0.11	0.08	2.21	0.92
MQing02	0.45	0.18	0.09	4.89	0.78	JZ02	0.90	0.30	0.14	6.43	0.71
MQing03	0.23	0.12	0.07	3.24	0.88	MQu01	0.40	0.15	0.07	5.71	0.80
MD01	0.45	0.16	0.08	5.77	0.73	MQu02	0.93	0.23	0.08	11.48	0.70
MD02	0.61	0.20	0.07	8.59	0.92	HN01	0.90	0.23	0.07	13.04	0.85

试验区编号	鼠兔鼠丘/%		鼢鼠鼠丘/%
试验区编号	3 m·s^-1	12 m·s^-1	3 m·s^-1	12 m·s^-1
XH01	0.59	1.06	0.44	1.45
TD01	0.76	2.54	0.99	1.54
MQing01	0.34	1.5	0.4	1.32
MQQing02	0.3	0.73	0.39	0.51
MQing03	1.01	2.73	1.33	1.69
MD01	1.16	2.24	1.07	1.32
MD02	0.59	1.28	0.27	1.11
DR01	0.51	2.89	0.29	1.39
GD01	1.21	2.64	0.84	2.52
JZ01	1.61	3.11	1.69	2.21
JZ02	0.29	0.4	0.14	0.91
MQu01	0.63	1.12	1.22	1.96
MQu02	0.17	0.86	0.12	0.35
HN01	0.17	0.89	0.09	0.97

源	III类平方和	自由度	均方	F	显著性	偏Eta平方
修正模型	1.397^a	3	0.466	8.385	0.004	0.716
截距	5.765	1	5.765	103.804	0.000	0.912
植被盖度	1.094	1	1.094	19.709	0.001	0.663
海拔	0.302	1	0.302	5.434	0.042	0.352
植被盖度×海拔	0.031	1	0.031	0.557	0.473	0.053
误差	0.555	10	0.056	-	-	-
总计	7.459	14	-	-	-	-
修正后总计	1.952	13	-	-	-	-

	全氮/(g·kg^-1)	全磷/(g·kg^-1)	全钾/(g·kg^-1)	碱解氮/(mg·kg^-1)	速效磷/(mg·kg^-1)	速效钾/(mg·kg^-1)	有机质/(g·kg^-1)
原生草地	2.35	1.53	19.35	181.03	8.10	162.34	40.94
草地退化区	2.18	1.56	19.57	171.89	8.37	159.06	36.90
高原鼠兔鼠丘	2.12	1.65	19.71	169.67	10.71	158.26	37.44
高原鼢鼠鼠丘	2.00	1.57	20.07	151.19	8.15	153.16	31.46

黄河源高寒退化草地典型鼠丘土壤风蚀及养分流失规律研究

Soil wind erosion and nutrient loss in typical rodent mounds in a degraded alpine grassland in the Yellow River source zone

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 21

参考文献 49

相关文章 7

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘国松, 朱海丽, 张玉, 刘亚斌, 李国荣. 冻融作用对黄河源区曲流河岸土体抗剪特性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1637-1643.
[2]	翟辉,李国荣,李进芳,朱海丽,赵健赟,刘亚斌,陈文婷,胡夏嵩. 黄河源草地退化区2种鼠丘土壤风蚀规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1212-1221.
[3]	郭茵,雷加强,范敬龙,王海峰,吕振涛. 近20 a蒙古国土壤风蚀变化特征及主要影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1200-1211.
[4]	杨馥铖,刘昌义,胡夏嵩,李希来,付江涛,卢海静,申紫雁,许桐,闫聪,何伟鹏. 黄河源区不同退化程度高寒草地理化性质及复合体抗剪强度研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 560-571.
[5]	申紫雁,刘昌义,胡夏嵩,周林虎,许桐,李希来,李国荣. 黄河源区高寒草地不同深度土壤理化性质与抗剪强度关系研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2): 392-401.
[6]	刘彩红,王朋岭,温婷婷,余迪,白文蓉. 1960—2019年黄河源区气候变化时空规律研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2): 293-302.
[7]	李丹华，文莉娟，隆霄，陈世强，刘卫平，卢国阳. 黄河源区玛曲3次积雪过程能量平衡特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(6): 1327-1335.