毛乌素沙地流动沙丘不同沙障组合措施的防风固沙效益评价

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2023.02.11

干旱区研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 268-279.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.02.11 cstr: 32277.14.j.azr.2023.02.11

毛乌素沙地流动沙丘不同沙障组合措施的防风固沙效益评价

石麟¹(),李红悦²,赵雨兴¹,任余艳¹,何金军¹,于凤强³,哈斯额尔敦⁴()

1.鄂尔多斯市林业和草原科学研究所，内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017010
2.北京市广渠门中学，北京 100001
3.鄂尔多斯市林业和草原事业发展中心，内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017010
4.北京师范大学地理科学学部自然资源学院，北京 100875

收稿日期:2022-06-24 修回日期:2022-11-28 出版日期:2023-02-15 发布日期:2023-03-08
通讯作者: 哈斯额尔敦. E-mail:hasi@bnu.edu.cn
作者简介:石麟（1982-），女，硕士，副高级工程师，主要从事荒漠生态学研究. E-mail: shilin_323@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFC0500805);科技兴蒙重大专项课题(KJXM-EEDS-2020006)

Benefit evaluation of wind prevention and sand fixation under the combined measures of sand barrier in mobile dunes in Mu Us sandy land

SHI Lin¹(),LI Hongyue²,ZHAO Yuxing¹,REN Yuyan¹,HE Jinjun¹,YU Fengqaing³,Eerdun Hasi⁴()

1. Ordos Research Institute of Forestry and Grassland Science, Ordos 017010, Inner Mongolia, China
2. Beijing Guangqumen Middle School, Beijing 100001, China
3. Ordos forestry and Grassland Development Center, Ordos 017010, Inner Mongolia, China
4. School of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographic Sciences Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2022-06-24 Revised:2022-11-28 Published:2023-02-15 Online:2023-03-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解毛乌素沙地沙柳再生沙障、聚乳酸(PLA)沙袋沙障和草绳沙障配置固沙植物种组合措施下的防风固沙效益，通过对各类组合措施下不同高度处风速、近地表输沙量、障内蚀积形态的测定，对比分析了不同材料、坡位、规格下几种沙障组合措施的防风固沙效益。结果表明：（1） 1 m×1 m规格沙柳再生沙障、草绳沙障组合措施下降低近地表风速效能最大，可达80.29%、78.49%，3 m×3 m规格的草绳、PLA沙障组合措施下防风效能仅为58.14%、57.88%；（2）输沙率降低率表现为：沙柳>草绳>PLA，且呈随规格增加而减小的趋势，其中沙柳再生沙障组合措施阻沙效果较稳定，其他2种稳定性较差；（3）各类措施下障内微地形主要受NW~NNW风向控制，不同类沙障材料障内形态特征不同，整体以侵蚀为主，草绳沙障组合措施障内相对侵蚀深度最大，PLA沙障措施下次之，沙柳沙障措施下表现为以-10~5 cm区间侵蚀深度范围为主的弱蚀积状态，但相对侵蚀深度范围均呈随规格增大、坡位增加而减小的趋势。综合分析认为，沙柳再生沙障配以撒播固沙植物种的人工固沙植被体系最为稳定，防风固沙效益最优，为毛乌素沙地较为适宜的流动沙丘沙障促进植被恢复治理技术措施，其余组合措施可视沙障材料获取难易、运输条件以及流沙环境和治理目的适当采用。

关键词: 流动沙丘, 沙障, 组合措施, 防风固沙, 毛乌素沙地

Abstract:

The benefits of wind and sand control under the combined measures of sand-fixing plant species with regenerative sand barriers of Salix mongolica, polylactic acid (PLA) sandbags, and straw rope sand barriers in the Mu Us sandy land was studied. The wind speed, near-surface sand transport, and erosion pattern inside the barrier were measured at different heights under various combinations of measures, and the benefits of several sand barrier and combined measures under different materials, slope positions, and specifications were compared and analyzed. The results showed wind speed reduction was highest for the 1 m × 1 m S. mongolica regenerative sand barrier and straw rope sand barrier (up to 80.29% and 78.49%). The effectiveness of wind prevention for the 3 m × 3 m combination of straw rope and PLA sand barriers was 58.14% and 57.88%, respectively. The reduction rate of sand transport was as follows: S. mongolica > straw rope > PLA, and the trend increased with the specification. The sand-blocking effect of S. mongolica regeneration sand barrier combined measures is more stable, while the other two measures are less stable. The microtopography inside the barrier is mainly controlled by the wind direction from NW to NNW under various measures, and the morphological characteristics varies with the type of sand barrier material. The overall erosion is dominant, and the relative depth of erosion in the barrier is the largest for straw rope sand barriers combination, and the PLA barrier is the next, and the S. mongolica regeneration sand barrier is weakly eroded in the range of -10-5 cm, but the relative depth of erosion decreases with the increase of specification and slope. Comprehensive analysis shows that the artificial sand fixation vegetation system of Salix mongolica sand barrier combined with sowing sand fixation plant species is the most stable, with the best benefit of wind prevention and sand fixation, and is a more suitable mobile sand dune sand barrier in Mu Us sandy land. It is a more suitable technical measure for flowing dune sand barriers to promote vegetation restoration in Mu Us sandy land. The other measures can be appropriately adopted according to the difficulty of obtaining sand barrier materials, transportation conditions, quicksand environment, and control.

Key words: mobile dune, sand barrier, combined measures, windbreak and sand fixation, Mu Us sandy land

石麟, 李红悦, 赵雨兴, 任余艳, 何金军, 于凤强, 哈斯额尔敦. 毛乌素沙地流动沙丘不同沙障组合措施的防风固沙效益评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(2): 268-279.

SHI Lin, LI Hongyue, ZHAO Yuxing, REN Yuyan, HE Jinjun, YU Fengqaing, Eerdun Hasi. Benefit evaluation of wind prevention and sand fixation under the combined measures of sand barrier in mobile dunes in Mu Us sandy land[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(2): 268-279.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

图7

表2

参考文献 47

[1]	姚正毅, 陈广庭, 韩致文, 等. 机械防沙体系防沙功能的衰退过程[J]. 中国沙漠, 2006, 26(2): 226-231.
	[Yao Zhengyi, Chen Guangting, Han Zhiwen, et al. Decline mechanism and process of mechanical defense system[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2006, 26(2): 226-231.]
[2]	李滨生. 治沙造林学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1990: 150-198.
	[Li Bingsheng. Afforestation and Desertification Control[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1990: 150-198.]
[3]	顿耀权, 屈建军, 康文岩, 等. 包兰铁路沙坡头段防护体系研究综述[J]. 中国沙漠, 2021, 41(3): 66-74.
	[Dun Yaoquan, Qu Jianjun, Kang Wenyan, et al. Progress and prospect of research on the protective system of Shapotou section of the Baotou-Lanzhou Railway[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(3): 66-74.]
[4]	董智, 刘永茂, 白凤武. 杭锦旗穿沙公路综合防治技术及其效益研究[J]. 内蒙古林学院学报, 1999, 2(2): 19-24.
	[Dong Zhi, Liu Yongmao, Bai Fangwu. Research on the technique and effects of comprehensive control drift sand for crossed desert highway of Hangjin league[J]. Journal of Neimenggu Forestry College, 1999, 2(2): 19-24.]
[5]	高永, 邱国玉, 丁国栋, 等. 沙柳沙障的防风固沙效益研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2004, 24(3): 365-370.
	[Gao Yong, Qiu Guoyu, Ding Guodong, et al. Effect of Salix psammophila checkerboard on reducing wind and stabilizing sand[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2004, 24(3): 365-370.]
[6]	高永, 虞毅, 龚萍, 等. 沙柳沙障[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 10-220.
	[Gao Yong, Yu Yi, Gong Ping, et al. Salix psammophila Sand Barrier[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013: 10-220.]
[7]	刘姝颖, 李宁, 陆小辉. 草方格在防风固沙工程中的应用[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2014, 1(3): 67-68.
	[Liu Shuying, Li Ning, Lu Xiaohui. Application of grass square grid in wind and sand control project[J]. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology, 2014, 1(3): 67-68.]
[8]	曹晓明. 草绳沙障的设置与推广应用[J]. 中国水土保持, 2017, 1(11): 53-60.
	[Cao Xiaoming. Installation and application of grass rope sand barriers[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2017, 1(11): 53-60.]
[9]	常兆丰, 仲生年, 韩福贵, 等. 粘土沙障及麦草沙障合理间距的调查研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2000, 20(4): 455-457.
	[Chang Zhaofeng, Zhong Shengnian, Han Fugui, et al. Research of the suitable row spacing on clay barriers and straw barriers[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2000, 20(4): 455-457.]
[10]	朱震达, 赵兴梁, 凌裕泉, 等. 治沙工程学[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1998: 96-116.
	[Zhu Zhenda, Zhao Xingliang, Ling Yuquan, et al. Engineering Science of Desert Controlling[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Press, 1998: 96-116.]
[11]	李瑞军. 棉秆沙障防风固沙效益比较[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2009.
	[Li Ruijun. Comparative Wind Prevention and Sand-fixation Efficiency of Cotton Haulm Sand Barrier[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2009.]
[12]	蒙仲举, 任晓萌, 高永. 低立式纤维沙袋沙障防风固沙效益研究[J]. 水土保持, 2014, 21(2): 294-301.
	[Meng Zhongju, Ren Xiaomeng, Gao Yong. Effect of the low-fiber sandbag sand-barrier on wind-breaking and sand-fixation[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 21(2): 294-301.]
[13]	王翔宇, 丁国栋, 高函, 等. 带状沙柳沙障的防风固沙效益研究[J]. 水土保持, 2008, 22(2): 42-46.
	[Wang Xiangyu, Ding Guodong, Gao Han, et al. Effect of zonal willow Salix psammophila checkerboard on reducing wind and stabilizing sand[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(2): 42-46.]
[14]	周丹丹. 生物可降解聚乳酸(PLA)材料在防沙治沙中的应用研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2009.
	[Zhou Dandan. A Study on the Application of Biodegradable Polylactic Acid (PLA) Material for Combating Desertification[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2009.]
[15]	袁立敏, 高永. PLA沙障防风效益研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2010, 36(3): 14-18.
	[Yuan Limin, Gao Yong. Windbreak effect of PLA sand barrier[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2010, 36(3): 14-18.]
[16]	周丹丹, 虞毅, 胡生荣, 等. 沙袋沙障凹曲面特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2009, 29(4): 22-29.
	[Zhou Dandan, Yu Yi, Hu Shengrong, et al. Concave surface characteristics of sandbag sand barrier[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 29(4): 22-29.]
[17]	祁延录. 南疆戈壁区机械防沙措施阻沙效益的风洞测试研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2021, 12(4): 892-899.
	[Qi Yanlu. Protection benefits of mechanical sand control measures in Gobi district, southern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2021, 12(4): 892-899.]
[18]	周娜, 张春来, 田金鹭, 等. 半隐蔽式草方格沙障凹曲面形成的流场解析及沉积表征[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(11): 2145-2156. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201411014
	[Zhou Na, Zhang Chunlai, Tian Jinlu, et al. Flow field controlling the concave surface of the semi-buried checkerboards and its characterization by grain sizes of sediments[J]. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(11): 2145-2156.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201411014
[19]	席成, 左合君, 王海兵, 等. 高立式尼龙网沙障防风阻沙特征及其合理配置[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(1): 882-889.
	[Xi Cheng, Zuo Hejun, Wang Haibing, et al. Wind-proof and sand-blocking characteristics of high vertical nylon mesh sand barrier and its rational allocation[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(1): 882-889.]
[20]	朱鹏. 基于风洞模拟的沙区公路双排沙障设置模式优选[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2021.
	[Zhu Peng. Optimization of Double Row Sand Barrier Setting Mode for Highway in Sand Area Based on Wind Tunnel Simulation[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2021.]
[21]	张凯, 王起才, 杨子江, 等. 新建格库铁路HDPE板高立式沙障防风效益数值模拟研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2019, 41(3): 169-175.
	[Zhang Kai, Wang Qicai, Yang Zijiang, et al. Research on numerical simulation on wind protection benefits of HDPE panels with high vertical sand barrier in the newly-built Golmud-korla Railway[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41(3): 169-175.]
[22]	张帅, 丁国栋, 高广磊, 等. 不同年限的草方格沙障对生态恢复的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(5): 13-18.
	[Zhang Shuai, Ding Guodong, Gao Guanglei, et al. Effects of straw checkerboard barrier in different setting years on ecological restoration[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 16(5): 13-18.]
[23]	赵丽娅, 高丹丹, 熊炳桥, 等. 科尔沁沙地恢复演替进程中群落物种多样性与地上生物量的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(12): 4109-4116.
	[Zhao Liya, Gao Dandan, Xiong Bingqiao, et al. Relationship between the aboveground biomass and species diversity of sandy communities during the process of restoring succession in the Horqin Sandy Land, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(12): 4109-4116.]
[24]	任余艳, 胡春元, 贺晓, 等. 毛乌素沙地巴图塔沙柳沙障对植被恢复作用的研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2007, 14(2): 17-19.
	[Ren Yuyan, Hu Chunyuan, He Xiao, et al. The influence of Salix sandy barrier to vegetation restoration in sandy region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 14(2): 17-19.]
[25]	周丹丹, 胡生荣, 韩敏, 等. 沙柳沙障内植被恢复影响因子探究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2008, 15(6): 119-112.
	[Zhou Dandan, Hu Shengrong, Han Min, et al. Research into the vegetation restoration influencing factor of Salix psammophila checkerboard[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 15(6): 119-112.]
[26]	胡春元, 杨茂, 杨存良, 等. 库布齐沙漠穿沙公路沙害综合防治技术[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2002, 16(3): 71-77.
	[Hu Chunyuan, Yang Mao, Yang Cunliang, et al. Integrated techniques of sandy damage control for the crossing highway of crossing Kubuqi Desert[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2002, 16(3): 71-77.]
[27]	包岩峰, 丁国栋, 吴斌, 等. 毛乌素沙地风沙流结构的研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(2): 118-123.
	[Bao Yanfeng, Ding Guodong, Wu Bin, et al. Study on the wind-sand flow structure in Mu Us sandy land[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2013, 27(2): 118-123.]
[28]	罗凤敏, 高君亮, 辛智鸣, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠东北缘起沙风风况及输沙特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(4): 145-1152.
	[Luo Fengmin, Gao Junliang, Xin Zhiming, et al. Characteristics of sand-driving wind regime and sediment transport in northeast edge of Ulan Buh Desert[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(4): 145-1152.]
[29]	李红悦, 哈斯额尔敦. 机械沙障固沙效应及生态效用的研究综述[J]. 北京师范大学学报, 2020, 56(1): 63-67.
	[Li Hongyue, Hasi Eerdun. Sand-fixing effect and ecological effect of mechanical sand barriers: a review[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science), 2020, 56(1): 63-67.]
[30]	Qiu Guoyu, Lee In-Bok, Shimizu Hideyuki, et al. Principles of sand dune fixation with straw checkerboard technology and its effects on the environment[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2004, 56(3): 449-451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00066-1
[31]	Zhang Chunlai, Li Qing, Zhou Na, et al. Field observations of wind profiles and sand fluxesabove the windward slope of a sand dune before and after the establishmentofsemi-buried straw checkerboard barriers[J]. Aeolian Research, 2016, 20(1): 59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2015.11.003
[32]	Mctainsh G H, Lynch A W, Tews E K. Climatic controls upon dust storm occurrence in eastern Aust ralia[ J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1998, 39(1): 457-466. doi: 10.1006/jare.1997.0373
[33]	张克存, 屈建军, 董治宝, 等. 格状沙障内风速波动特征初步研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2006, 23(1): 95-99.
	[Zhang Kecun, Qu Jianjun, Dong Zhibao, et al. Preliminary research on fluctuation characteristics of wind speed over checkerboard sand barriers[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2006, 23(1): 95-99.]
[34]	屈建军, 凌裕泉, 俎瑞平, 等. 半隐蔽格状沙障的综合防护效益观测研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(3): 329-335.
	[Qu Jianjun, Ling Yuquan, Zu Ruiping, et al. Study on comprehensive sand-protecting efficiency of semi-buried checkerboard sand-barriers[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2005, 25(3): 329-335.]
[35]	Bofah K K, Al-Hinai K G, Field tests of porous fences in the regime of sand-laden wind[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 1986, 23(1): 309-319.
[36]	王自龙. 民勤绿洲外围不同下垫面条件下风沙流的观测研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2009.
	[Wang Zilong. Study on Wind-sand Flow under Different Underlying Surface Conditions of Minqin Oasis External[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2009.]
[37]	朴起亨. 几种不同材料机械沙障防风效应研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010.
	[Piao Qiheng. Effects of Different Sand Barriers on Wind-break and Sand Fixation[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010.]
[38]	刘晓波. PLA沙袋格状沙障的合理运用[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2012, 35(5): 46-47, 71.
	[Liu Xiaobo. Rational application of PLA sand-barrier[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design, 2012, 35(5): 46-47, 71.]
[39]	刘瑛心. 试论我国沙漠地区植物区系的发生与形成[J]. 植物分类学报, 1995, 33(2): 131-141.
	[Liu Yingxin. A study on origin and formation of the Chinese desert floras[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 1995, 33(2): 131-141.]
[40]	王振亭, 郑晓静. 草方格沙障尺寸分析的简单模型[J]. 中国沙漠, 2002, 22(3): 229-232.
	[Wang Zhenting, Zheng Xiaojing. A simple model for calculating measurements of straw checkerboard barriers[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2002, 22(3): 229-232.]
[41]	屈建军, 凌裕泉, 井哲帆, 等. 包兰铁路沙坡头段风沙运动规律及其与防护体系的相互作用[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(4): 529-533.
	[Qu Jianjun, Ling Yuquan, Jing Zhefan, et al. Interaction between sand blown activity and protection system in Shapotou section of Baotou-Lanzhou Railway[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2007, 27(4): 529-533.]
[42]	张登山, 吴汪洋, 田丽慧, 等. 青海湖沙地麦草方格沙障的蚀积效应与规格选取[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(5): 627-633. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.05.627
	[Zhang Dengshan, Wu Wangyang, Tian Lihui. et al. Effects of erosion and deposition and dimensions selection of straw-checkerboard barriers in the desert of Qinghai Lake[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(5): 627-633.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.05.627
[43]	党晓宏, 高永, 虞毅, 等. 可降解纤维沙障控制风蚀沙埋的作用规律[J]. 科技通报, 2015, 31(5): 41-52.
	[Dang Xiaohong, Gao Yong, Yu Yi, et al. The affect law on the degradable fiber checkerboard control of wind erosion and sand bury[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2015, 31(5): 41-52.]
[44]	王丽英, 李红丽, 董智, 等. 沙柳方格沙障对库布齐沙漠防风固沙效应的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(5): 115-118.
	[Wang Liying, Li Hongli, Dong Zhi, et al. Effect of Salix psammophila checkerboard sand barrier on wind prevention and sand resistance in Kubuqi Desert[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(5): 115-118.]
[45]	王睿, 周立华, 陈勇, 等. 库布齐沙漠机械防沙措施的防护效益[J]. 干旱区研究, 2017, 34(2): 330-336.
	[Wang Rui, Zhou Lihua, Chen Yong, et al. Wind-blown sand control effect of sand barriers used in the Hobq Desert[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2017, 34(2): 330-336.]
[46]	李雪琳, 马彦军, 马瑞, 等. 不同带宽的防风固沙林流场结构及防风效能风洞实验[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(5): 40-48.
	[Li Xuelin, Ma Yanjun, Ma Rui, et al. Effects of simulation tree bandwidth and seasonal on wind flow field in wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(5): 40-48.]
[47]	梁柯鑫, 王起才, 崔晓宁, 等. 格库铁路不同固沙措施的防护效益[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(5): 300-306.
	[Liang Kexin, Wang Qicai, Cui Xiaoning, et al. An analysis of protection benefits of different sand-fixing measures at Geku Railway[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(5): 300-306.]

沙障组合类型	0.1 m处防风效能/%	0.3 m处防风效能/%	0.5 m处防风效能/%	2 m处防风效能/%
S1	80.29±4.17a	69.79±5.45a	29.18±2.85a	11.22±1.24a
P1	70.85±9.01b	65.40±8.49ab	28.57±4.91a	10.58±2.21a
C1	78.49±4.41a	61.67±9.33b	29.19±3.05a	10.83±1.42a
S3	63.05±3.16a	58.27±3.53a	26.21±1.81a	9.93±1.18a
P3	62.86±4.71a	58.14±4.79a	25.23±3.16a	9.96±1.41a
C3	59.68±3.79b	57.88±3.33a	25.38±1.91a	9.68±0.82a

相对蚀积深度范围分组/%
坡位	规格	-30~-25 cm	-25~-20 cm	-20~-15 cm	-15~-10 cm	-10~-5 cm	-5~0 cm	0~5 cm	5~10 cm	10~15 cm
坡中上	S1	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	25.00	33.33	36.11	8.33	0.00
	P1	0.00	0.00	0.00	11.11	55.56	19.44	16.67	0.00	0.00
	C1	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.78	13.89	30.56	27.78	25.00	0.00
	S3	0.00	3.52	9.77	15.23	17.97	17.97	12.89	13.28	8.59
	P3	4.76	15.87	22.22	6.35	17.46	19.05	14.29	0.00	0.00
	C3	15.63	26.56	25.00	17.19	9.38	3.13	3.13	0.00	0.00
坡下	S1	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	32.00	28.00	40.00	0.00	0.00
	P1	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.78	25.00	61.11	13.89	0.00	0.00
	C1	0.00	0.00	0.00	5.56	47.22	22.22	13.89	8.33	2.78
	S3	2.47	11.11	12.35	14.81	17.28	18.52	14.81	7.41	6.17
	P3	10.94	7.81	15.63	15.63	18.75	12.50	4.69	9.38	4.69
	C3	19.44	29.17	31.94	8.33	1.39	6.94	4.17	0.00	0.00

毛乌素沙地流动沙丘不同沙障组合措施的防风固沙效益评价

Benefit evaluation of wind prevention and sand fixation under the combined measures of sand barrier in mobile dunes in Mu Us sandy land

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	史天艺, 张萌萌, 蒲阳, 刘硕元. 毛乌素沙地植被NDVI动态及对降水的多时空响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(8): 1395-1404.
[2]	宋达成, 马全林, 刘世权, 魏林源, 吴昊, 段晓峰, 郭树江. 民勤黏土沙障-人工梭梭林物种多样性及土壤水分变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(4): 618-628.
[3]	海龙, 周梅, 张嘉開, 洪光宇, 李凤滋, 费菲. 毛乌素沙地不同林龄杨柴灌木林土壤呼吸及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1107-1116.
[4]	莫秋霞, 宋炜, 卜崇峰, 王春, 王鹤鸣, 李亚红. 油蒿与沙柳灌木地藓结皮发育差异研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 979-987.
[5]	闫晴, 李菊艳, 尹忠东, 刘金苗, 柳宏才. 典型株型沙生灌丛对风沙流场影响的数值模拟[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(5): 785-797.
[6]	闫沛迎,屈建军,王理德,肖建华,张圆,王晓红,郭树江. 机械沙障固沙对生物土壤结皮形成发育的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(12): 1931-1937.
[7]	牛丹妮, 韩蓉, 马瑞, 王振亭, 刘虎俊, 魏林源. 林分密度和种植点配置对梭梭人工林防风效应的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(1): 143-151.
[8]	刘金苗,李菊艳,尹忠东,关含笑,张家伟. 干枯骆驼刺对风沙流场影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1514-1525.
[9]	赵鹏,朱淑娟,段晓峰,常兆丰,康才周,王方琳,王昱淇,高德才. 民勤绿洲边缘阻沙带表层土壤粒度空间分布特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1335-1345.
[10]	王荣女. 毛乌素沙地不同类型生物土壤结皮-土壤呼吸的季节变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 961-972.
[11]	张兴鑫,张凯,史博源,崔宝红,赵礼明. 流动沙丘区公路路基风沙流场数值模拟及路面沙害形成机制[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1184-1191.
[12]	席成,左合君,王海兵,闫敏,贾光普. 高立式尼龙网沙障防风阻沙特征及其合理配置[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(3): 882-891.
[13]	祁帅,汪季,党晓宏,魏亚娟,丁奋谦. 3种低立式沙障内表层沉积物粒度特征研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(3): 875-881.
[14]	洪光宇,王晓江,刘果厚,张雷,高孝威,李卓凡,刘铁山,刘辰明,李梓豪. 毛乌素沙地沙柳液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(3): 794-801.
[15]	魏翔鸿, 左合君, 闫敏, 贾光普. 尼龙网方格沙障防风效应复变规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(6): 1584-1591.