河套灌区不同配置农田防护林对田间土壤水分和养分储量的影响

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2023.08.07

干旱区研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 1268-1279.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.08.07

河套灌区不同配置农田防护林对田间土壤水分和养分储量的影响

冀明欣¹(),冯天骄^1,²(),肖辉杰¹,辛智鸣³,李俊然⁴,王栋¹

1.北京林业大学水土保持学院，北京 100083
2.山西吉县森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站，山西吉县 042200
3.内蒙古磴口荒漠生态系统国家定位观测研究站，内蒙古磴口 015200
4.香港大学地理系，香港 999077

收稿日期:2023-01-28 修回日期:2023-04-05 出版日期:2023-08-15 发布日期:2023-08-24
通讯作者: 冯天骄. E-mail: fengtianjiao1991@bjfu.edu
作者简介:冀明欣(1998-)，女，硕士研究生，主要从事林业生态工程研究. E-mail: 1741992673@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划政府间国际科技创新合作专项(2019YFE0116500);国家自然科学基金(31870706);国家自然科学基金(41901021);天津市科技计划项目(21YFSNSN00170)

Effects of different farmland shelterbelts on soil water and nutrient storage in the Hetao Irrigation District

JI Mingxin¹(),FENG Tianjiao^1,²(),XIAO Huijie¹,XIN Zhiming³,LI Junran⁴,WANG Dong¹

1. School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Jixian National Forest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Jixian 042200, Shanxi, China
3. Inner Mongolia Dengkou Desert Ecosystem National Observation Research Station, Dengkou 015200, Inner Mongolia, China
4. Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China

Received:2023-01-28 Revised:2023-04-05 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-08-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

农田防护林作为提高生态环境效益的有效农业管理方式，对改善土壤理化性质、改善生态环境，提高作物产量具有重要意义。在河套灌区选择三种典型农田防护林（4行林带、5行林带和8行林带）测量了2019—2021年生长季农田内距防护林0.3 H、0.7 H、1 H、2 H、3 H和4 H处0~100 cm的土壤性质和防护林与农田的植被属性，测算了土壤水分储量（SMS）和土壤养分储量[碳储量(SCS)、氮储量(SNS)和磷储量(SPS)]。结果表明：（1）不同防护林系统水平方向上的土壤容重和土壤黏粒含量差异显著，在垂直方向上土壤属性均有显著差异。（2）防护林具有较好的保水性和养分供应功能，其中4行林带的土壤水分储量和养分储量高于其他林带，分别为SMS 237.44 mm、SCS 544.93 g·m^-2、SNS 953.72 g·m^-2和SPS 859.04 g·m^-2。（3） 4行林带的整体长势比较好，其平均树高为30.06 m，胸径为0.41 m，且4行防护林的作物产量最高，为15.75 t·hm^-2。（4）冗余分析结果显示，不同防护林系统中，环境因子与生态系统功能之间存在密切关系，土壤特性与土壤水分和养分储量关系密切，另外，植被属性与SNS和SPS基本呈负相关。综上所述，4行林带的水分养分供给能力最强，本研究结果可为生态脆弱地区的防护林建设和生态修复提供有效的理论依据。

关键词: 农田防护林, 土壤性质, 植被属性, 生态系统功能, 农田管理

Abstract:

As an effective agricultural management method for improving ecological and environmental benefits, the farmland shelterbelt system is crucial in improving soil physical and chemical properties, the ecological environment, and crop yield. This study clarifies the effects of this system on ecosystem functions and provides a guide for the ecological restoration of fragile ecosystems. In the Hetao Irrigation District, three typical farmland shelterbelts (four-, five-, and eight-line patterns) were selected to measure soil properties at a 0-100 cm depth and vegetation properties of shelterbelts and farmland at different distances (0.3 H, 0.7 H, 1 H, 2 H, 3 H, and 4 H) from the shelterbelts during the growing seasons from 2019 to 2021. Soil moisture storage (SMS) and soil nutrient storage [soil carbon storage (SCS), soil nitrogen storage (SNS), and soil phosphorus storage (SPS)] were measured. The results showed that (1) the soil bulk density and clay content of different shelterbelts differed significantly in the horizontal direction, while the soil properties differed significantly in the vertical direction. (2) The shelterbelts had enhanced water retention and nutrient supply functions, and the soil water and nutrient reserves of the four-line pattern were higher than those of the five- and eight-line patterns (SMS = 237.44 mm; SCS = 544.93 g·m^-2; SNS = 953.72 g·m^-2; SPS = 859.04 g·m^-2). (3) The average tree height and DBH of the four-row shelterbelt were 30.06 m and 0.41 m, respectively. Additionally, the four-row shelterbelt had the maximum crop yield of 15.75 t·hm^-2. (4) Redundancy analysis showed that a close relationship existed between environmental factors and ecosystem functions in the different shelterbelts, soil characteristics were closely related to soil water and nutrient reserves, and vegetation attributes were negatively correlated with SNS and SPS. In conclusion, the four-line pattern demonstrated the strongest capacity for water and nutrient supply. The results of this study provide a sufficient theoretical basis for shelterbelt construction and ecological restoration in ecologically fragile areas.

Key words: farmland shelterbelt, soil properties, vegetation attribute, ecosystem function, farmland management

冀明欣, 冯天骄, 肖辉杰, 辛智鸣, 李俊然, 王栋. 河套灌区不同配置农田防护林对田间土壤水分和养分储量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(8): 1268-1279.

JI Mingxin, FENG Tianjiao, XIAO Huijie, XIN Zhiming, LI Junran, WANG Dong. Effects of different farmland shelterbelts on soil water and nutrient storage in the Hetao Irrigation District[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(8): 1268-1279.

图/表 7

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

表2

图5

参考文献 42

[1]	Brandle J R, Hodges L, Zhou X H. Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2004, 61- 62(1-3): 65-78.
[2]	Mazurek R, Zaleski T. Shelterbelt as Factor Affecting Physical Properties of Adjacent Farmland Soils[R]. 2nd International Symposium of Soil Physics, 2017.
[3]	李广毅, 周心澄, 王忠林, 等. 毛乌素沙地生态经济型防护林体系结构研究(技术总报告)[J]. 水土保持研究, 1995, 2(2): 2-35.
	[ Li Guangyi, Zhou Xincheng, Wang Zhonglin, et al. Study on structure of eco-economical type of protection forest system to maowusu sandy land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995, 2(2): 2-35. ]
[4]	刘新春, 赵勇钢, 刘小芳, 等. 晋西黄土区人工林细根与土壤水碳的耦合关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(21): 7987-7995.
	[ Liu Xinchun, Zhao Yonggang, Liu Xiaofang, et al. Coupling fine roots with soil moisture and organic carbon in artificial forests in loess region of western Shanxi Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(21): 7987-7995. ]
[5]	Campi P, Palumbo A D, Mastrorilli M. Effects of tree windbreak on microclimate and wheat productivity in a Mediterranean environment[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2009, 30(3): 220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.10.004
[6]	李程远. 林带对黑土坡耕地土壤养分空间分布及有效性的的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2021.
	[ Li Chengyuan. Effects of Shelterbelt on Spatial Distribution and Avail Ability of Soil Nutrients in Black Soil Slope Farmland[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2021. ]
[7]	侍世玲, 任晓萌, 张晓伟, 等. 库布齐沙漠沙枣防护林土壤养分及化学计量特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 469-476.
	[ Shi Shiling, Ren Xiaomeng, Zhang Xiaowei, et al. Soil nutrients and stoichiometric characteristics of the Elaeagnus angustifolia shelterbelt in the Hobq Desert[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(2): 469-476. ]
[8]	黄少辉, 杨军芳, 杨云马, 等. 长期应用养分专家管理模式提高小麦玉米轮作氮肥利用率及土壤有机碳固存[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(2):154-161. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191841
	[ Huang Shaohui, Yang Junfang, Yang Yunma, et al. Long-term nutrient expert management improves nitrogen use efficiency and enhances soil organic carbon sequestration in wheat-maize rotation system[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(2): 154-161. ] doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191841
[9]	Wu Y W, Wang Q, Wang Z, et al. Impact of poplar shelterbelt plantations on surface soil properties in northeastern China[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2018, 48: 559-567. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0294
[10]	Muthuri C W, Ong C K, Black C R, et al. Tree and crop productivity in Grevillea, Alnus and Paulownia-based agroforestry systems in semi-arid Kenya[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 2005, 212(1-3): 0-39.
[11]	Shen Q, Gao G Y, Hu W, et al. Spatial-temporal variability of soil water content in a cropland-shelterbelt-desert site in an arid inland river basin of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 540: 873-885. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.005
[12]	周晓兵, 陶冶, 吴林, 等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘荒漠绿洲过渡带不同土地利用影响下土壤化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(3): 969-980.
	[ Zhou Xiaobing, Tao Ye, Wu Lin, et al. Soil stoichiometry in different land-use categories in desert-oasis ecotones of the southern Taklimakan Desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 969-980. ]
[13]	Deng C L, Zhang B Q, Cheng L Y, et al. Vegetation dynamics and their effects on surface water-energy balance over the Three-North Region of China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 275: 79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.05.012
[14]	哈斯尔, 郑嗣蕊, 涂伊南, 等. 陕北固沙林恢复过程中土壤碳氮组分库特征与固存效应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(4): 835-843.
	[ Ha Sier, Zheng Sirui, Tu Yinan, et al. Sequestration efficiency and component characteristics of soil carbon and nitrogen contents during restoration of sand-fixing forests in North Shaanxi Province[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(4): 835-843. ]
[15]	Cao J, He X, Chen Y, et al. Leaf litter contributes more to soil organic carbon than fine roots in two 10-year-old subtropical plantations[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 704: 135341. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135341
[16]	史晓亮, 李颖, 邓荣鑫. 基于RS和GIS的农田防护林对作物产量影响的评价方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(6): 175-181.
	[ Shi Xiaoliang, Li Ying, Deng Rongxin. Evaluation method for effect of farmland shelterbelts on crop yield based on RS and GIS[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2016, 32(6): 175-181. ]
[17]	Bogunovic I, Telak L J, Pereira P. Experimental comparison of runoff generation and initial soil erosion between vineyards and croplands of eastern croatia: A case study[J]. Air, Soil and Water Research, 2020(13): 1-9.
[18]	赵清贺, 刘倩, 马丽娇, 等. 黄河中下游典型河岸带土壤性质空间变异及其对环境的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(12): 3795-3802.
	[ Zhao Heqing, Liu Qian, Ma Lijiao, et al. Spatial variation in riparian soil properties and its response to environmental factors in typical reach of the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(12): 3795-3802. ]
[19]	Han F P, Ren L L, Zhang X C. Effect of biochar on the soil nutrients about different grasslands in the Loess Plateau[J]. Catena, 2016, 137: 554-562. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.11.002
[20]	Rivest D, Lorente M, Olivier A, et al. Soil biochemical properties and microbial resilience in agroforestry systems: Effects on wheat growth under controlled drought and flooding conditions[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2013, 463: 51-60.
[21]	Zhang Y K, Xiao Q L, Huang M B. Temporal stability analysis identifies soil water relations under different land use types in an oasis agroforestry ecosystem[J]. Geoderma, 2016, 271: 150-160. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.023
[22]	Yang B, Wang R, Xiao H, et al. Spatio-temporal variations of soil water content and salinity around individual Tamarix ramosissima in a semi-arid saline region of the upper Yellow River, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10: 101-114. doi: 10.1007/s40333-017-0072-9
[23]	朱甜甜, 朱玉伟, 张云, 等. 伊犁河谷农田防护林生物量及碳储量研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(9): 298-302.
	[ Zhu Tiantian, Zhu Yuwei, Zhang Yun, et al. Study on biomass and carbon storage of farmland shelterbelt in Yili Valley[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(9): 298-302. ]
[24]	孙家兴, 赵雨森, 辛颖. 黑土区不同林龄杨树农田防护林土壤养分变化[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(3): 59-62, 90.
	[ Sun Jiaxing, Zhao Yusen, Xin Ying. Soil nutrient changes of different stage of poplar farmland shelter belts in black soil region[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2018, 46(3): 59-62, 90. ]
[25]	何春霞, 郑宁, 张劲松, 等. 农林复合系统水热生态特征研究进展[J]. 中国农业气象, 2016, 37(6): 633-644.
	[ He Chunxia, Zheng Ning, Zhang Jinsong, et al. Research advances on hydrological and thermal characteristics of agroforestry system[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2016, 37(6): 633-644. ]
[26]	王栋. 内蒙古河套灌区农田防护林对田间土壤水分的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2021.
	[ Wang Dong. Effects of Shelterbelts on Farmland Soil Water in Hetao Irrigation Area of Inner Mongolia[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2021. ]
[27]	Yang S, Bai Y, Alatalo J M, et al. Spatio-temporal changes in water-related ecosystem services provision and trade-offs with food production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020: 125316.
[28]	王栋, 肖辉杰, 辛智鸣, 等. 不同配置农田防护林对田间土壤水分空间变异的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5): 223-230.
	[ Wang Dong, Xiao Huijie, Xin Zhiming, et al. Effect of different configurations of farmland shelterbelt system on spatital variation of soil moisture content[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(5): 223-230. ]
[29]	马亮. 干旱区滴灌枣-棉间作系统蒸发蒸腾量及地下竞争关系研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2018.
	[ Ma Liang. Study on the Evapotranspiration and the Underground Competition Relationship of Jujube-contton Intercropping System under Drip Irrigation in Arid Area[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2018. ]
[30]	程昊天, 孔涛, 姜涛, 等. 辽西北沙地苹果-花生间作系统土壤养分空间分布特征及间作效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(6): 43-50.
	[ Cheng Haotian, Kong Tao, Jiang Tao, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of soil nutrients and intercropping effect in sandy land apple-peanut intercropping system in North west Liaoning Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 43-50. ]
[31]	Hou Q, Brandle J, Hubbard K, et al. Alteration of soil water content consequent to root-pruning at a windbreak/crop interface in Nebraska, USA[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2003, 57: 137-147. doi: 10.1023/A:1023977316170
[32]	曹琦. 不同间作模式对枣园小气候及作物产量的影响[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2019.
	[ Cao Qi. Effects of Different Intercropping Patterns on Microclimate and Crop Yield in Jujube Garden[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2019. ]
[33]	赵阳, 乔杰, 王炜炜, 等. 泡桐林网系统内小麦产量对光合有效辐射分布的响应[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(5): 647-655.
	[ Zhao Yang, Qiao Jie, Wang Weiwei, et al. Response of wheat yield to light distribution in intercropped Paulownia fortuneii shelterbelt and wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(5): 647-655. ]
[34]	胡海波, 贾西川. 我国平原农区林带胁地效应及其控制措施研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(2): 234-240.
	[ Hu Haibo, Jia Xichuan. Review on negative effects and its control measures of forest belt in plain agricultural areas of China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2021, 45(2): 234-240. ]
[35]	王宁庚, 左忠, 潘占兵. 宁夏引黄灌区农田防护林网胁地情况调查研究[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2016, 57(11): 22-25, 22.
	[ Wang Ninggeng, Zuo Zhong, Pan Zhanbing. Research on farmland shelterbelts in yellow river irrigation area in ningxia[J]. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 57(11): 22-25, 22. ]
[36]	陈作州, 张宇清, 吴斌, 等. 根障对农田林网内土壤水分和小麦产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(1): 71-77, 89.
	[ Chen Zuozhou, Zhang Yuqing, Wu Bin, et al. Effect of root barrier on soil moisture and wheat yield within farmland shelternet[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2012, 30(1):71-77, 89. ]
[37]	Zhao W, Hu G, Zhang Z, et al. Shielding effect of oasis-protection systems composed of various forms of wind break on sand fixation in an arid region: A case study in the Hexi Corridor, Northwest China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2008, 33: 119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.02.010
[38]	尚白军, 吴书普, 周智彬, 等. 新疆莫索湾垦区150团防护林防护效益分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2021, 19(5): 45-52.
	[ Shang Baijun, Wu Shupu, Zhou Zhibin, et al. Analysis on protection benefit of shelterbelt in regiment 150 of Mosuowan, Xinjiang[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 19(5): 45-52. ]
[39]	邹鑫, 朱习爱, 陈春峰, 等. 农林复合系统的水土保持效益[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 382-392.
	[ Zou Xin, Zhu Xi’ai, Chen Chunfeng, et al. Soil and water conservation benefits of agroforestry systems[J]. Journal of Yunnan University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2020, 42(2): 382-392. ]
[40]	Qiao Y, Fan J, Wang Q. Effects of farmland shelterbelts on accumulation of soil nitrate in agro-ecosystems of an oasis in the Heihe River Basin, China[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 235: 182-192. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.021
[41]	Lang M, Li P, Ti C P, et al. Soil gross nitrogen transformations are related to land-uses in two agroforestry systems[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2019, 127: 431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.12.022
[42]	Shi X, Li Y, Deng R. A method for spatial heterogeneity evaluation on landscape pattern of farmland shelterbelt networks: A case study in midwest of Jilin Province, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21: 48-56. doi: 10.1007/s11769-011-0440-x

样地	树种分配	树高/m	林带长/m	树间间距	林龄/a	农田作物
4行	3行小美旱杨+1行沙枣	30.06	340	2.5 m×1.5 m	30	玉米
5行	4行二白杨+1行小美旱杨	23.85	340	2.0 m×1.5 m	33	玉米
8行	8行新疆杨	25.42	340	2.0 m×1.5 m	33	玉米

样地	防护林						农田
样地	树高/m	胸径/m	冠层大小/m²	树冠体积/m³	枝下高/m	FRBD /(g·cm^-2)	植被盖度/%	个体株高/cm	作物产量 /(t·hm^-2)
4行	30.06±0.49A	0.41±0.02B	8.70±1.07A	68.97±8.70A	1.82±0.41A	1.31±0.04A	85.73±0.81A	134.52±10.87A	15.75±0.99A
5行	23.85±0.71C	0.48±0.05B	4.47±0.59B	43.99±4.02B	1.09±0.58B	1.24±0.13A	86.13±1.15A	129.12±10.89A	9.29±1.09B
8行	25.42±0.82B	0.34±0.04A	6.91±0.92A	77.41±13.31A	2.02±0.21A	1.09±0.16A	84.27±0.46A	130.86±10.21A	15.64±0.81A

河套灌区不同配置农田防护林对田间土壤水分和养分储量的影响

Effects of different farmland shelterbelts on soil water and nutrient storage in the Hetao Irrigation District

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 42

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	于东伟, 雷泽勇, 赵国军, 张岩松, 于德良, 白津宁, 李尧. 樟子松固沙林土壤理化特性对林分密度的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(1): 134-141.
[2]	苗仁辉, 蒋德明, 王永翠. 科尔沁沙质草地封育过程中的植被变化及其机制[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(2): 264-270.