毛乌素沙地沙柳液流特征及其对环境因子的响应

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2021.03.21

Abstract

Abstract:

The sap flow pattern of Salix psammophila branches with different diameters was monitored long-term in the Mu Us Sand using a Flow32-1K wrapped heat balance sap flow meter. Additionally, the relationship between the sap flow of S. psammophila branches and the meteorological changes of the experimental plots was explored. With the increase in the diameter grade of branches, the diurnal variation of sap flow changed from a broad peak curve to an apparent single peak curve, and the sap flow rate showed an increasing trend. Weather conditions substantially influence sap flow, and the fluctuation of the sap flow rate on rainy days was severe, showing an obvious multi-peak curve. Otherwise, the change in the liquid flow rate on sunny days showed an evident bimodal curve. The mean sap flow rate on rainy days was lower than that on sunny days. With the increase in the diameter grade of branches, the difference of the cumulative sap flow rate between sunny days and rainy days gradually increased. Additionally, the sap flow rate showed a significant positive correlation with surface temperature, atmospheric temperature, saturated water vapor pressure, solar radiation, and wind speed, and it was negatively correlated with air relative humidity. On rainy days, saturated water vapor pressure and relative air humidity had a substantial influence on the sap flow rate. However, on sunny days, solar radiation was an important influence factor on sap flow rate. Based on the monitoring of the sap flow rate of branches and the transpiration consumption characteristics of the S. psammophila community, our study informs the rational utilization of water resources and the optimal control of community structure of S. psammophila.

Key words: Flow32-1K, Salix psammophila, sap flow, meteorological factors, Mu Us Sandy Land

HONG Guangyu,WANG Xiaojiang,LIU Guohou,ZHANG Lei,GAO Xiaowei,LI Zhuofan,LIU Tieshan,LIU Chenming,LI Zihao. Characteristics of Salix psammophila sap flow and its response to environmental factors in Mu Us Sandy Land[J].Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(3): 794-801.

Figures/Tables 6

Tab. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Relationship model between the daily variation of sap flow rate of Salix psammophila and meteorological factors under different weather conditions"

天气	径级/mm	气象因素	回归方程	R²	P
雨天	2~8	T_d	Y=0.291T_d²-13.663T_d+160.266	0.571	0.000
		T	Y=0.004T³-0.135T²+18.531	0.555	0.000
		R	Y=4.493×10^-8R³-4.506×10^-5R²+0.02R+0.424	0.474	0.004
		V	Y=-0.096V³+1.254V²-2.595V+1.702	0.405	0.014
		RH	Y=8.239×10^-5RH³-2.083RH+127.351	0.846	0.000
		VPD	Y=-26.535VPD³+56.810VPD²-23.759VPD+2.605	0.811	0.000
	8~12	T_d	Y=0.483T_d²-17.284T_d+136.185	0.432	0.003
		T	Y=1.042T²-41.534T+414.049	0.766	0.000
		R	Y=1.653×10^-7R³+1×10^-4R²+0.129R+1.249	0.652	0.000
		V	Y=-2.053V³+17.606V²-32.712V+14.635	0.575	0.001
		RH	Y=1×10^-4RH³-9.107RH+574.856	0.794	0.000
		VPD	Y=-141.360VPD³+292.829VPD²-110.013VPD+10.689	0.852	0.000
	12~18	T_d	Y=0.666T_d²-18.453T_d+58.528	0.645	0.000
		T	Y=1.021T²-35.931T+311.823	0.704	0.000
		R	Y=3.862×10^-7R³-0.001R²+0.271R+6.681	0.644	0.000
		V	Y=-1.855V³+18.492V²-33.855V+20.888	0.566	0.001
		RH	Y=1×10^-4RH³-9.568RH+658.587	0.749	0.000
		VPD	Y=-259.123VPD³+481.190VPD²-149.290VPD+14.526	0.814	0.000
	>18	T_d	Y=3.987T_d²-179.034T_d+1999.456	0.628	0.000
		T	Y=1.830T²-65.409T+575.834	0.624	0.000
		R	Y=1.366×10^-6R³-0.002R²+0.595R+6.992	0.552	0.001
		V	Y=-3.002V³+31.071V²-58.411V+32.905	0.526	0.002
		RH	Y=0.001RH³-27.266RH+1740.160	0.875	0.000
		VPD	Y=-519.910VPD³+1009.793VPD²-363.978VPD+34.370	0.875	0.000
晴天	2~8	T_d	Y=0.001T_d³-0.017T_d²+5.116	0.446	0.002
		T	Y=0.039T²-1.765T+20.271	0.719	0.000
		R	Y=-1.429×10^-5R²+0.017R+0.45	0.793	0.000
		V	Y=1.22V³-4.163V²+4.323V+1.269	0.321	0.047
		RH	Y=0.004RH²-0.584RH+21.117	0.678	0.000
		VPD	Y=-0.364VPD³+2.697VPD²-3.910VPD+2.043	0.708	0.000
	8~12	T_d	Y=0.002T_d³-0.092T_d²+36.409	0.167	0.146
		T	Y=0.160T²-5.462T+49.625	0.519	0.000
		R	Y=-1.884×10^-7R³+1×10^-4R²+0.102R+2.661	0.914	0.000
		V	Y=14.756V³-55.446V²+56.987V+14.112	0.186	0.239
		RH	Y=0.018RH²-3.031RH+132.336	0.475	0.001
		VPD	Y=0.771VPD²+11.656VPD-0.604	0.496	0.001
	12~18	T_d	Y=4.115T_d-88.765	0.390	0.001
		T	Y=0.396T²-15.979T+168.795	0.754	0.000
		R	Y=1×10^-4R²+0.183R+9.193	0.866	0.000
		V	Y=-17.493V+20.642	0.187	0.020
		RH	Y=0.047RH²-7.061RH+273.135	0.736	0.000
		VPD	Y=-6.074VPD³+40.004VPD²-48.774VPD+23.7142	0.757	0.000
	>18	T_d	Y=0.010T_d³-0.376T_d²+106.963	0.614	0.000
		T	Y=0.016T³-0.523T²+92.649	0.821	0.000
		R	Y=4.263×10^-7R³-0.001R²+0.509R+14.371	0.761	0.000
		V	Y=13.636V³-32.108V²+32.951V+33.213	0.415	0.012
		RH	Y=0.084RH²-12.24RH+457.489	0.761	0.000
		VPD	Y=3.896VPD³-10.650VPD²+28.711VPD+3.839	0.809	0.000

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

References 25

[1]	Swanson R H. Significant historical developments in thermal methods for measuring sap flow in trees[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 1994,72(1-2): doi: 10. 1016/0168-1923(94)90094-9. doi: 10. 1016/0168-1923(94)90094-9
[2]	Wullschleger S D, Meinzer F C, Vertessy R A. A review of whole-plant water use studies in tree[J]. Tree Physiology, 1998,18(8-9): doi: 10. 1093/treephys/18. 8-9. 499. doi: 10. 1093/treephys/18. 8-9. 499
[3]	于贵瑞, 王秋凤. 植物光合、蒸腾与水分利用的生理生态学[J]. 核农学报, 2010,24(3):579.
	[ Yu Guirui, Wang Qiufeng. Ecophysiology of plant photosynjournal, transpiration, and water use[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2010,24(3):579. ]
[4]	蒋高明. 植物生理生态学的学科起源与发展史[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004,28(2):278-284. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2004.0041
	[ Jiang Gaoming. On the origin and development of ecological plant physiology[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2004,28(2):278-284. ] doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2004.0041
[5]	洪光宇, 王晓江, 刘果厚, 等. 树干液流研究进展[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2020,46(3):50-55.
	[ Hong Guangyu, Wang Xiaojiang, Liu Guohou, et al. Research progress on stem sap flow[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2020,46(3):50-55. ]
[6]	徐世琴, 吉喜斌, 金博文. 典型固沙植物梭梭生长季蒸腾变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015,39(9):890-900. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0085
	[ Xu Shiqin, Ji Xibin, Jin Bowen. Dynamics and responses of sap flow of typical sand binding plants Haloxylon ammodendron to environmental variables[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015,39(9):890-900. ] doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0085
[7]	王卓, 郭月峰, 祁伟, 等. 不同灌水梯度下沙棘液流特征与环境因子的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020,37(4):1018-1025.
	[ Wang Zhuo, Guo Yuefeng, Qi Wei, et al. Relationship between the characteristics of Hippophae rhamnoides fluid flow and environmental factors under different irrigation gradients[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020,37(4):1018-1025. ]
[8]	肖怀娟, 李娟起, 王吉庆, 等. 亚低温与干旱胁迫对番茄植株水分传输和形态解剖结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020,31(8):2630-2636.
	[ Xiao Huaijuan, Li Juanqi, Wang Jiqing, et al. Effects of sub-low temperature and drought stress on water transport and morphological anatomy of tomato plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020,31(8):2630-2636. ]
[9]	赵自国, 赵凤娟, 夏江宝, 等. 地下水矿化度对黄河三角洲柽柳光合及耗水特征的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(12):2588-2600.
	[ Zhao Ziguo, Zhao Fengjuan, Xia Jiangbao, et al. Effects of groundwater salinity on photosynjournal and water consumption of Tamarix chinensis in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(12):2588-2600. ]
[10]	Nadezhdina N, Cermak J, Ceulemans R. Radial patterns of sap flow in woody stems of dominant and understory species: Scaling errors associated with positioning of sensors[J]. Tree Physiology, 2002,22(13): doi: 10. 1093/treephys/22. 13. 907. doi: 10. 1093/treephys/22. 13. 907
[11]	Russell S C, Brett W, Justin D H, et al. The upscaling of transpiration from individual trees to areal transpiration in tree belts[J]. Plant and Soil, 2007,297(1-2): doi: 10. 1007/s11104-007-9420-4. doi: 10. 1007/s11104-007-9420-4
[12]	曹铨, 王自奎, 沈禹颖. 陇东苹果园生草复合体系土壤水分季节动态[J] . 干旱区研究, 2019,36(1):77-84.
	[ Cao Quan, Wang Zikui, Shen Yuying. Seasonal variation of soil moisture content in apple orchard and grass intercropping system in Longdong[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019,36(1):77-84. ]
[13]	徐先英, 孙保平, 丁国栋, 等. 干旱荒漠区典型固沙灌木液流动态变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2008,28(3):895-905.
	[ Xu Xianying, Sun Baoping, Ding Guodong, et al. Sap flow patterns of three main sand-fixing shrubs and their responses to environmental factors in desert areas[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,28(3):895-905. ]
[14]	夏桂敏, 康绍忠, 李王成, 等. 甘肃石羊河流域干旱荒漠区柠条树干液流的日季变化[J]. 生态学报, 2006,26(4):1186-1193.
	[ Xia Guimin, Kang Shaozhong, Li Wangcheng, et al. Diurnal and seasonal variation of stem sap flow for Caragana korshinskii on the arid desert region in Shiyang river basin of Gansu[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006,26(4):1186-1193. ]
[15]	苏文旭, 贾德彬, 冯蕴, 等. 浑善达克沙地杨树水分利用特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020,37(2):357-363.
	[ Su Wenxu, Jia Debin, Feng Yun, et al. Analysis of water use characteristics of poplar trees in Otindag Sandy Land[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020,37(2):357-363. ]
[16]	于红博, 杨劼, 臧春鑫, 等. 皇甫川流域中国沙棘树干液流日变化及其相关因子[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008,27(7):1071-1076.
	[ Yu Hongbo, Yang Jie, Zang Chunxin, et al. Diurnal variation of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp, sinensis Rousi stem sap flow in Huangfuchuan Basin and related environmental factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008,27(7):1071-1076. ]
[17]	刘毅, 金谦, 桂东伟, 等. 新疆南部矮化红枣树干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019,36(5):1146-1152.
	[ Liu Yi, Jin Qian, Gui Dongwei, et al. Characteristics of sap flow of dwarf red jujube trees and the response fo environmental factors in South Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019,36(5):1146-1152. ]
[18]	段广东, 苏雅拉巴雅尔, 裴志永. 毛乌素沙地沙柳人工林经营所面临的问题及科学的应对措施[J]. 农家参谋, 2019(7):130-130.
	[ Duan Guangdong, Suyalabayaer, Pei Zhiyong. Problems and scientific countermeasures of Salix psammophila plantation management in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Adviser of Peasant Families, 2019(7):130-130. ]
[19]	陈国鹏, 赵文智. 毛乌素沙地南缘沙柳(Salix psammophila)丛生枝年龄结构与动态特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2015,35(6):1520-1526.
	[ Chen Guopeng, Zhao Wenzhi. Age structure and dynamics of Salix psammophila branches in southern edge of the Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2015,35(6):1520-1526. ]
[20]	洪光宇, 王晓江, 张雷, 等. 毛乌素沙地杨柴茎流速率动态研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2018,44(4):37-40.
	[ Hong Guangyu, Wang Xiaojiang, Zhang Lei, et al. Dynamic study on stem sap flow rate of Hedysarum fruiacosum var. mongolicum in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2018,44(4):37-40. ]
[21]	海龙, 王晓江, 张文军, 等. 毛乌素沙地人工沙柳(Salix psammophila)林平茬复壮技术[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016,36(1):131-136.
	[ Hai Long, Wang Xiaojiang, Zhang Wenjun, et al. Stumping rejuvenation technology of Salix psammophila artificial shrubbery in the Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2016,36(1):131-136. ]
[22]	裴志永, 郝少荣, 乔敬伟, 等. 毛乌素沙地沙柳枝条茎流特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019,28(1):48-56.
	[ Pei Zhiyong, Hao Shaorong, Qiao Jingwei, et al. Characteristics of stem flow of Salix psammophila’s branch in Mu Us Sand Land[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciencees, 2019,28(1):48-56. ]
[23]	Yue Guangyang, Zhao Halin, Zhang Tonghui, et al. Evaluation of water use of Caragana microphylla with the stem heat-balance method in Horqin Sandy Land, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 2008,148(11):1668-1678.
[24]	Xu Xiaoyan, Tong Ling, Li Fusheng, et al. Sap flow of irrigated Populus alba var. pyramidalis and its relationship with environmental factors and leaf area index in an arid region of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2011,16(2): doi: 10. 1007/s10310-010-0220-y. doi: 10. 1007/s10310-010-0220-y
[25]	吴芳, 陈云明, 于占辉. 黄土高原半干旱区刺槐生长盛期树干液流动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010,34(4):469-476. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.04.013
	[ Wu Fang, Chen Yunming, Yu Zhanhui. Growing season sap-flow dynamics of Robinia pseudoacacia plantation in the semi-arid region of Loess Plateau, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010,34(4):469-476. ] doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.04.013

编号	直径/mm	传感器型号
No.1	5.36	SGA5-WS
No.2	11.47	SGA10-WS
No.3	9.91	SGA10-WS
No.4	10.09	SGA10-WS
No.5	15.47	SGA16-WS
No.6	17.03	SGA16-WS
No.7	19.05	SGA19-WS
No.8	18.82	SGA19-WS
No.9	11.72	SGA10-WS
No.10	16.17	SGA16-WS
No.11	6.69	SGA15-WS
No.12	22.26	SGA19-WS
No.13	22.87	SGA19-WS

天气	径极/mm	T_d	T	R	V	RH	VPD
雨天	2~8	0.394^**	0.559^**	0.720^**	0.337^**	-0.525^**	0.519^**
	8~12	0.505^**	0.739^**	0.851^**	0.309^**	-0.662^**	0.670^**
	12~18	0.551^**	0.745^**	0.783^**	0.443^**	-0.648^**	0.644^**
	>18	0.551^**	0.755^**	0.725^**	0.392^**	-0.679^**	0.667^**
晴天	2~8	0.610^**	0.760^**	0.775^**	0.532^**	-0.695^**	0.755^**
	8~12	0.429^**	0.710^**	0.891^**	0.511^**	-0.611^**	0.661^**
	12~18	0.617^**	0.820^**	0.900^**	0.604^**	-0.746^**	0.790^**
	>18	0.732^**	0.848^**	0.820^**	0.676^**	-0.782^**	0.827^**

Characteristics of Salix psammophila sap flow and its response to environmental factors in Mu Us Sandy Land

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 25

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

天气	径级/mm	回归方程	R²
雨天	2~8	Y=21.157VPD-1.403T+24.252	0.824
	8~12	Y=60.592VPD-15.208	0.790
	12~18	Y=100.361VPD-19.046	0.765
	>18	Y=316.013VPD-16.734T+277.536	0.859
晴天	2~8	Y=2.561VPD-1.343V-0.618	0.744
	8~12	Y=0.068R+6.580	0.773
	12~18	Y=0.043R+25.935VPD-15.313V-2.933	0.913
	>18	Y=102.368VPD+3.358RH-18.844V-296.922	0.854

[1]	LI Hong, LI Zhongqin, CHEN Puchen, PENG Jiajia. Spatio-temporal variation of snow cover in Altai Mountains of Xinjiang in recent 20 years and its influencing factors [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(7): 1040-1051.
[2]	HAI Long, ZHOU Mei, ZHANG Jiakai, HONG Guangyu, LI Fengzi, FEI Fei. Research on soil respiration and its influence factors on Hedysarum laeve shrubbery of different ages at Mu Us sandy land [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(7): 1107-1116.
[3]	SHI Lin,LI Hongyue,ZHAO Yuxing,REN Yuyan,HE Jinjun,YU Fengqaing,Eerdun Hasi. Benefit evaluation of wind prevention and sand fixation under the combined measures of sand barrier in mobile dunes in Mu Us sandy land [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(2): 268-279.
[4]	SANG Jing,WANG Yingbin,QIAN Lianhong,WANG Haimei,WANG Qiyu. Analysis of the relationship between the dynamic snowmelt process of meadow grassland and meteorological factors: Ergun City [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(5): 1428-1436.
[5]	GAO Xiaoyu,TANG Pengcheng,ZHANG Sha,QU Zhongyi,YANG Wei. Drought characteristics and regression models of drought characteristics and response factors of various climatic areas in Inner Mongolia during main crop growing season [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(5): 1410-1427.
[6]	QIANG Yuquan,XU Xianying,ZHANG Jinchun,LIU Hujun,GUO Shujiang,DUAN Xiaofeng. Characteristics of stem sap flow of Haloxylon ammodendron and its response to environmental factors in Qingtu Lake, Minqin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1143-1154.
[7]	HU Jinghua,LIU Jing,BAI Luyi,ZHANG Xin,LAN Pengbo,YUAN Yanan. Straight root tensile properties of Salix psammophila in response to cyclic loading [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(3): 900-907.
[8]	ZHANG Yaozong,ZHANG Bo,ZHANG Duoyong,LIU Yanyan. Spatio temporal patterns of pan evaporation from 1960 to 2018 over the Loess Plateau: Changing properties and possible causess [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(1): 1-9.
[9]	WANG Rongnv. Seasonal variation characteristics of different types of biological soil crust-soil system respiration in Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 961-972.
[10]	YANG Qi,LI Shuheng,LI Jiahao,WANG Jiachuan. Phenology of forest vegetation and its response to climate change in the Qinling Mountains [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 1065-1074.
[11]	CAO Lijun,SUN Huilan,LAN Xiaoli,ZHANG Lele,LU Baobao,LIU Tianyi. Spatio-temporal evolution of the extreme dry and wet events in Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(1): 188-197.
[12]	CHEN Zhi-qing, SHAO Tian-jie, ZHAO Jing-bo, CAO Jun-ji, YUE Da-peng. Spatial-temporal differentiation of near-surface ozone concentration and dominant meteorological factors in Inner Mongolia [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(6): 1504-1512.
[13]	ZHANG Li-Gang, ZENG Fan-Jiang, LIU Zhen, LIU Bo, AN Gui-Xiang, YUAN Na. Sap Flow Characteristics of Three Plant Species and Their Responses to Environmental Factors in an Extremely Arid Region [J]. , 2013, 30(1): 115-121.
[14]	WEI Bao, DING Guo-Dong, WU Bin, ZHANG Yu-Qing. Study on Windbreak Effect of Artemisia ordosica Community over Different Vegetation Coverage [J]. , 2012, 29(2): 213-217.
[15]	LI Miao-ling,ZHOU Hong-fei,SUN Peng-fei. Comparative Study on the Stem-sap Flow Flux of Holoxylon ammodendronin Southern Marginal Zone of the Junggar Basin [J]. , 2012, 29(1): 101-108.