水分胁迫及复水过程4种牧草形态及其生理特征表达

Abstract

Abstract: Grassland is one of the main vegetation types in semiarid area. Research on the response and mechanism of forage to soil moisture content is of great significance for the sustainable utilization of water resources and the construction of ecological environment in this area. In this study, four grass species, response of forage morphology, water physiology, photosynthetic and physiological characteristics to water stress and water recovery process in the Loess Plateau were analyzed. The results showed that: ① Under water stress, the aboveground morphological indexes (i.e., the single leaf area and shoot dry weight) of the grass species were in a decrease trend, but the underground ones (i.e., the root dry weight and root-shoot ratio) were in an increase trend. After re-watering, the forage morphological characteristics were obviously recovered, and an over compensation of Elymus nutans Griseb. and Lolium multiflorum Lam. occurred; ② Under water stress, the water physiological characteristics of forage were significantly decreased, but they were gradually recovered after re-watering and resumed to the level of the control group after 2~3 weeks. These 2 species of leguminous forage could maintain a high water potential and had a strong water conservation capability, which belonged to a delayed dehydration by increasing water potential, and these 2 species of forages belonged to an enduring dehydration by developing low water potential under water stress; ③ Under water stress, the photosynthetic physiological characteristics of forage were also in a significant decrease trend, and the short-term water stress could temporarily improve the photosynthetic capacity of forage; the photosynthetic characteristics of legumes and grasses were different in sensitivity and adaptation mechanism to drought. Leguminous forage closed the stomata in time to avoid drought so as to reduce water loss, while grasses sacrificed leaf water to keep stomata open to maintain normal plant growth.

Key words: forage; water stress, re-watering, morphological characteristic, physiological characteristic

ZHANG Jing-ge, TIAN Fu-ping, MIAO Hai-tao, HUANG Ze, WU Gao-lin. Expressions of Morphological and Physiological Features of 4 Forage Species under Water Stress and Re-watering Process[J].Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(1): 193-201.

References 21

[1]	Cranston L M,Kenyon P R,Morris S T,et al.Morphological and physiological responses of plantain (Plantagolanceolata) and chicory (Cichoriumintybus) to water stress and defoliation frequency[J].Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science,2016,202(1):13-24.
[2]	Mwendia S W,Yunusa I,Whalley R,et al.Use of plant water relations to assess forage quality and growth for two cultivars of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) subjected to different levels of soil water supply and temperature regimes[J].Crop and Pasture Science,2014,64(10):1 008-1 019.
[3]	靳军英,张卫华,袁玲.三种牧草对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J].草业学报,2015,24(10):157-165.[Jin Junying,Zhang Weihua,Yuan Ling.Physiological responses of three forages to drought stress and evaluation of their drought resistance[J].Pratacultural Science,2015,24(10):157-165.]
[4]	Luo H H,Zhang Y L,Zhang W F.Effects of water stress and re-watering on photosynthesis,root activity,and yield of cotton with drip irrigation under mulch[J].Photosynthetica,2016,54(1):65-73.
[5]	Devnarain N,Crampton B G,Chikwamba R,et al.Physiological responses of selected African sorghum landraces to progressive water stress and re-watering[J].South African Journal of Botany,2016,103:doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.008.
[6]	Weiner J.Allocation,plasticity and allometry in plants[J].Perspectives in Plant Ecology,Evolution and Systematics,2004,6(4):207-215.
[7]	陈斐,王润元,王鹤龄,等.干旱胁迫下春小麦干物质积累和分配及其模拟[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(6):1 418-1 425.[Chen Fei,Wang Runyuan,Wang Heling,et al.Dry matter accumulation and distribution of spring wheat under drought stress[J].Arid Zone Research,2017,34(6):1 418-1 425.]
[8]	Dasgupta P,Das B S,Sen S K.Soil water potential and recoverable water stress in drought tolerant and susceptible rice varieties[J].Agricultural Water Management,2015,152:doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.12.013.
[9]	Hartemink N,Jongejans E,De K H.Flexible life history responses to flower and rosette bud removal in three perennial herbs[J].Oikos,2004,105(1):159-167.
[10]	Luttschwager D,Ewald D,Alia L A.Consequences of moderate drought stress on the net photosynthesis,water-use efficiency and biomass production of three poplar clones[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2016,38(1):27.
[11]	郝树荣,郭相平,张展羽.水分胁迫及复水对水稻冠层结构的补偿效应[J].农业机械学报,2010,41(3):52-55.[Hao Shurong,Guo Xiangping,Zhang Zhanyu.Compensation effects of water stress and rewatering on the structure of rice canopy[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2010,41(3):52-55.]
[12]	李芳兰,包维楷,吴宁.白刺花幼苗对不同强度干旱胁迫的形态与生理响应[J].生态学报,2009,29(10):5 406-5 416.[Li Fanglan,Bao Weikai,Wu Ning.Morphological and physiological responses of current Sophora davidii seedlings to drought stress[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2009,29(10)：5 406-5 416.]
[13]	Bingham I J.Soil-root-canopy interactions[J].Annals of Applied Biology,2001,138(2):243-251.
[14]	Jackson R B,Sperry J S,Dawson T E.Root water uptake and transport:Using physiological processes in global predictions[J].Trends in Plant Science,2000,5(11):482-488.
[15]	Liu J,Xie X,Du J,et al.Effects of simultaneous drought and heat stress on Kentucky blue grass[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2008,115(2):190-195.
[16]	杜建雄,侯向阳,刘金荣.草地早熟禾对干旱及旱后复水的生理响应研究[J].草业学报,2010,19(2):31-38.[Du Jianxiong,Hou Xiangyang,Liu Jinrong.A study on physiological response to drought and re-watering treatments in Kentucky blue grass[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2010,19(2):31-38.]
[17]	曹铁森,许明宪,王维友.水分胁迫对梨幼树叶水势的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报：自然科学版,1992,20(1)：91-94.[Cao Tiesen,Xu Mingxian,Wang Weiyou.Effects of water stress on leaf water potential in young pear trees[J].Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition),1992,20(1):91-94.]
[18]	万里强,李向林,石永红,等.PEG胁迫下4个黑麦草品种生理生化指标响应与比较研究[J].草业学报,2010,19(1):83-88.[Wan Liqiang,Li Xianglin,Shi Yonghong,et al.A study on the response and on the comparison of physiological and biochemical indexes of four Lolium perenne varieties under PEG stress[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2010,19(1)：83-88.]
[19]	徐炳成,山仑,李凤民.半干旱黄土丘陵区五种植物的生理生态特征比较[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(5):990-996.[Xu Bingcheng,Shan Lun,Li Fengmin.Comparison of ecophysiological characteristics of seven plant species in semiarid loess hilly-gully region[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2007,18(5):990-996.]
[20]	可静,李进,吕海英,等.不同条件下黑果枸杞叶片气孔开度和超微结构的变化[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(6):1 362-1 370.[Ke Jing,Li Jin,Lü Haiying,et al.Change of stomatal aperture and ultrasturcture on Lycium ruthenicum Murr.leaves under different conditions[J].Arid Zone Research,2017,34(6):1 362-1 370.]
[21]	杨司睿,范井伟,孙永强,等.罗布泊腹地人工植被梭梭的光学特性及其对干旱胁迫的响应[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(2):379-386.[Yang Sirui,Fan Jingwei,Sun Yongqiang,et al.Photosynthetic characteristics and response of Haloxylon ammodendron to drought stress in hinterland of the Lop Nur[J].Arid Zone Research,2018,35(2):379-386.]

Expressions of Morphological and Physiological Features of 4 Forage Species under Water Stress and Re-watering Process

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 21

Related Articles 2

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	YAN Qiaofang, SHAN Lishan, XIE Tingting, WANG Hongyong, SHI Yating. Morphological characteristics of the leaves and roots of Caroxylon passerinum seedlings in response to drought-induced stress [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(1): 92-103.
[2]	WEI Yajuan, DANG Xiaohong, WANG Ji, HAN Yanlong, XIE Yunhu, LIN Bo. Morphological characteristics of Nitraria tangutorum nebkhas in Jilantai desert-oasis ecotone [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(3): 403-411.