三种植物基固沙剂对风沙土水分入渗和蒸发的影响

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2025.04.08

干旱区研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 658-667.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2025.04.08

三种植物基固沙剂对风沙土水分入渗和蒸发的影响

刘玥¹(), 郭强², 袁立敏³^,⁴^,⁵, 党晓宏¹(), 蒙仲举¹, 董菁⁶

1.内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院，内蒙古呼和浩特 010010
2.呼和浩特市水资源与河湖保护中心，内蒙古呼和浩特 010020
3.内蒙古自治区林业科学研究院林业和草原科技创新中心，内蒙古呼和浩特 010010
4.内蒙古自治区沙地（沙漠）生态系统与生态工程重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特 010010
5.沙地生物资源保护与培育国家林业和草原局重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特 010010
6.厦门大学王亚南经济研究院，福建厦门 361005

收稿日期:2024-10-23 修回日期:2025-01-25 出版日期:2025-04-15 发布日期:2025-04-10
通讯作者: 党晓宏. E-mail: dangxiaohong1986@126.com
作者简介:刘玥（1999-），女，硕士研究生，主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治方向的研究. E-mail: 15849581688@163.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区科技计划“呼伦贝尔沙地生态修复技术集成与示范” 项目(2022YFDZ0055)

Effects of three plant-based sand-fixing agents on water infiltration and evaporation in aeolian sandy soil

LIU Yue¹(), GUO Qiang², YUAN Limin³^,⁴^,⁵, DANG Xiaohong¹(), MENG Zhongju¹, DONG Jing⁶

1. College of Desert Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, Inner Mongolia, China
2. Hohhot Water Resources and River and Lake Protection Center, Hohhot 010020, Inner Mongolia, China
3. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Forestry Research Institute Forestry and Grassland Science and Technology Innovation Center, Hohhot 010010, Inner Mongolia, China
4. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Key Laboratory of Sandy (Desert) Ecosystem and Ecological Engineering, Hohhot 010010, Inner Mongolia, China
5. Key Laboratory of Conservation and Cultivation of Biological Resources in Sandy Land, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Hohhot 010010, Inner Mongolia, China
6. The Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China

Received:2024-10-23 Revised:2025-01-25 Published:2025-04-15 Online:2025-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植物基固沙剂是一种以全植物成分为主的环保型固沙剂，其能够有效固沙，且不会对土壤产生污染，分解成分对植物生长有促进作用。为明晰植物基固沙剂固结层的物理特性及其对沙质耕地土壤水分运移规律的影响，本文选取3种植物基固沙剂（沙蒿、亚麻、刺槐）及6种施用量（0.5 g·m^-2、1.0 g·m^-2、2.0 g·m^-2、3.0 g·m^-2、4.0 g·m^-2、5.0 g·m^-2）开展水分入渗与蒸发模拟试验，并以喷洒等量纯净水的风沙土为对照（CK）。结果表明：（1）施用植物基固沙剂可改变土壤物理特性，固结层抗压强度表现为：刺槐>亚麻>沙蒿>CK，喷施刺槐、亚麻、沙蒿固沙剂后固结层平均抗压强度分别较CK增加了109.38%、95.06%、58.46%，同种固沙剂抗压强度随其施用量的增加而增加。随着固沙剂用量的增加，土壤容重逐渐增大，最大用量较CK提高3.76%；总孔隙度、饱和持水量、最小持水量均呈现递减趋势，最大较CK降低44.55%、47.65%、53.62%。（2）喷施植物基固沙剂可有效减缓水分的入渗速率，表现为亚麻固沙剂（29.53 min）≈刺槐固沙剂（29.52 min）>沙蒿固沙剂（29.03 min）>CK（26.08 min），随着施用量的增加，刺槐和亚麻固沙剂入渗时间呈现U型变化趋势，沙蒿固沙剂呈现逐渐增大的趋势。（3）喷施植物基固沙剂可有效减缓土壤水分蒸发速率，3种固沙剂均表现出2.0~4.0 g·m^-2施用量效果较为显著。（4）当固沙剂施用量为2.0~4.0 g·m^-2时, 既可保证保水效果又能有效预防水分入渗过慢的问题。该研究为新型固沙剂的探索及在沙质耕地土壤风蚀防治方面提供理论依据。

关键词: 植物固沙剂, 固结层特性, 土壤水分运移, 沙质耕地

Abstract:

Plant-based sand-fixing agents are ecofriendly materials that effectively stabilize sand without polluting the soil, and their decomposition products promote plant growth. This study investigated the physical characteristics of consolidated layers formed by plant-based sand-fixing agents and their effects on soil water movement in sandy farmland using water infiltration and evaporation simulation experiments with three plant-based sand-fixing agents (Artemisia desertorum, flax, and black locust) and six application rates (0.5 g·m^-2, 1.0 g·m^-2, 2.0 g·m^-2, 3.0 g·m^-2, 4.0 g·m^-2, and 5.0 g·m^-2). Wind-sand soil sprayed with the same amount of pure water served as the control (CK). The results showed the following: (1) The soil physical properties were altered. The compressive strength of the consolidated layer was in the order of black locust >flax >Artemisia desertorum>CK. The average compressive strength of the consolidated layer treated with the three agents increased by 109.38%, 95.06%, and 58.46% compared with CK, respectively. The compressive strength of the same agent increased with concentration. Soil bulk density increased with higher application rates, with a maximum increase of 3.76% compared with CK. Meanwhile, the total porosity and saturated and minimum water-holding capacity decreased by up to 44.55%, 47.65%, and 53.62%, respectively, compared with CK. (2) The water infiltration rate was effectively reduced. The infiltration times were as follows: flax (29.53 min)≈black locust (29.52 min) >Artemisia desertorum (29.03 min) >CK (26.08 min). As the application rate increased, the infiltration time showed a U-shaped trend for black locust and flax agents, whereas Artemisia desertorum increased gradually. (3) The soil water evaporation rates were significantly reduced. For all three agents, the application rates of 2.0-4.0 g·m^-2 demonstrated the most pronounced effects. (4) Application rates of 2.0-4.0 g·m^-2 improved water retention and prevented excessively slow water infiltration. This study provides theoretical support for the exploration of new sand-fixing agents and their application in the prevention of wind erosion in sandy farmland soils.

Key words: plant sand fixing agent, characteristics of the consolidated layer, soil water transport, sandy cultivated land

刘玥, 郭强, 袁立敏, 党晓宏, 蒙仲举, 董菁. 三种植物基固沙剂对风沙土水分入渗和蒸发的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(4): 658-667.

LIU Yue, GUO Qiang, YUAN Limin, DANG Xiaohong, MENG Zhongju, DONG Jing. Effects of three plant-based sand-fixing agents on water infiltration and evaporation in aeolian sandy soil[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2025, 42(4): 658-667.

图/表 9

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 40

[1]	王仁德, 邹学勇, 赵婧妍, 等. 北京市平原区农田土壤蚀积特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(1): 20-24, 29.
	[Wang Rende, Zou Xueyong, Zhao Jingyan, et al. Analysis on farmland soil erosion and deposition features in Beijing plain[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(1): 20-24, 29.]
[2]	张越, 陈思宇, 毕鸿儒, 等. 干旱半干旱区农田土壤风蚀特征及参数化研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2022, 42(3): 105-117. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00160
	[Zhang Yue, Chen Siyu, Bi Hongru, et al. Characteristics and parameterization of farmland soil wind erosion in arid and semi-arid areas of China: Progress and challenges[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(3): 105-117.] doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00160
[3]	苑依笑, 王仁德, 常春平, 等. 风蚀作用下农田土壤细颗粒的粒度损失特征及其对土壤性质影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(2): 104-109.
	[Yuan Yixiao, Wang Rende, Chang Chunping, et al. Loss characteristics of fine particles by wind in farmland and its effect on soil properties[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(2): 104-109.]
[4]	韩明会, 李保国, 张丹, 等. 再生农业——基于土地保护性利用的可持续农业[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5): 1003-1016. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.05.012
	[Han Minghui, Li Baoguo, Zhang Dan, et al. Regenerative agriculture-sustainable agriculture based on the conservational land use[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(5): 1003-1016.]
[5]	杨宇. 添加粉碎玉米秸秆对风沙区耕地土壤物理性质及土壤风蚀的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2022.
	[Yang Yu. Effects of Adding Corn Straw to Soil Physical Properties and Soil Wind Erosion in Sand Area[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2022.]
[6]	赖俊华, 张凯, 王维树, 等. 化学固沙材料研究进展及展望[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(4): 644-658. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00032
	[Lai Junhua, Zhang Kai, Wang Weishu, et al. Research advances and prospect in chemical sand-fixing materials[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 37(4): 644-658.] doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00032
[7]	王丹, 宋湛谦, 商士斌. 改性木质素磺酸盐固沙剂的性能及应用研究[J]. 林产化学与工业, 2005, 25(S1): 59-63.
	[Wang Dan, Song Zhanqian, Shang Shibin. Study on performance and application of sandy-soil stabilizer form modified lignosulfonates[J]. Chemistry and Industry of Forest Products, 2005, 25(S1): 59-63.]
[8]	任廷婕, 袁立敏, 高永, 等. 环保型固沙材料的研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2023, 43(3): 1-9.
	[Ren Tingjie, Yuan Limin, Gao Yong, et al. Research progress of environmental friendly sand fixation materials[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(3): 1-9.]
[9]	邱立明, 唐佳芮, 袁榕, 等. 亚麻胶、亚麻木酚素的提取及分离纯化技术研究进展[J]. 粮食与食品工业, 2021, 28(3): 40-43, 47.
	[Qiu Liming, Tang Jiarui, Yuan Rong, et al. Research progress in extraction, separation and purification of linseed gum and linseed lignans[J]. Cereal & Food Industry, 2021, 28(3): 40-43, 47.]
[10]	闫德仁, 曲娜, 薛博, 等. 水溶性亚麻饼粕籽胶固沙剂制备条件研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2021, 47(4): 19-24.
	[Yan Deren, Qu Na, Xue Bo, et al. Study on preparation conditions of water-soluble flax cake seed gum sand-fixing agent[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 47(4): 19-24.]
[11]	姜疆, 谢慧芳, 金永灿. 木质素磺酸盐基生物质固沙材料的部分生物效应[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2012, 35(12): 22-26.
	[Jiang Jiang, Xie Huifang, Jin Yongcan. Bio-effect of sand stabilizing biomass material prepared from lignosulfonates[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 35(12): 22-26.]
[12]	包志鑫, 袁立敏, 贾瑞庭, 等. 固沙剂性能及环保材料发展现状与趋势[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2022, 48(3): 54-58.
	[Bao Zhixin, Yuan Limin, Jia Ruiting, et al. Performance of sand-fixing agent and development status and trend of environmental protection materials[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 48(3): 54-58.]
[13]	王爱娣. 黏土基复合固沙材料性能研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2013.
	[Wang Aidi. Research on the Properties of Clay-based Sand-fixing Composite Material[D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2013.]
[14]	朱震达, 赵兴梁, 凌裕泉, 等. 治沙工程学[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 1998: 117-137.
	[Zhu Zhenda, Zhao Xingliang, Ling Yuquan, et al. Sand Control Engineering[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Press, 1998: 117-137.]
[15]	申闫春, 杨献青, 王芳辉, 等. 丙烯酰胺改性羟丙基纤维素固沙剂的研制[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2018(26): 45-46.
	[Shen Yanchun, Yang Xianqing, Wang Fanghui, et al. Preparation of acrylamide modified hydroxypropyl cellulose sand-fixing agent[J]. Technology Innovation and Application, 2018(26): 45-46.]
[16]	Wang H J, de Vries Frits P, Jin Y C. A win-win technique of stabilizing sand dune and purifying paper mill blac-k-liquor[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2009, 21(4): 488-493.
[17]	侯晓晖, 王煦, 赵文娜, 等. 沙蒿胶及其羧甲基化改性产物的性能评价[J]. 广州化学, 2004, 29(4): 24-28.
	[Hou Xiaohui, Wang Xu, Zhao Wenna, et al. Evaluation on the properties of Artemisia glue and its carboxymethyl-modified products[J]. Guangzhou Chemistry, 2004, 29(4): 24-28.]
[18]	Zaslavsky D. Lignosulfonate-based graft polymers their preparation and uses: US 4276077[P]. 1981-06-30.
[19]	李建法, 宋湛谦. 高分子土壤结构改良材料的研究及应用[J]. 高分子通报, 2003(5): 70-74, 35.
	[Li Jianfa, Song Zhanqian. Development and applications of polymer materials for improving soil structure[J]. Polymer Bulletin, 2003(5): 70-74, 35.]
[20]	李建法. 新型高分子沙土稳定材料的研制与应用[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2003.
	[Li Jianfa. Study on the Preparation and Application of New Polymer Materials for Stabilizing Sandy Soil[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2003.]
[21]	刘军, 张宇清, 秦树高, 等. 不同喷洒浓度沙蒿胶固沙效果试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(5): 149-155.
	[Liu Jun, Zhang Yuqing, Qin Shugao, et al. Sand fixation experiment of Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch. gum with different concentrations[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(5): 149-155.]
[22]	任廷婕. 植物基固沙剂在沙质耕地的应用效应研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2023.
	[Ren Tingjie. Study on the Application Effect of Plant-Based Sand Fixing Agents on Sandy Farmland[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2023.]
[23]	王全九, 邵明安, 郑继勇. 土壤中水分运动与溶质迁移[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2007.
	[Wang Quanjiu, Shao Mingan, Zheng Jiyong. Water Movement and Solute Migration in Soil[M]. Beijing: China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, 2007.]
[24]	闫婷, 闫德仁, 曲娜, 等. 水溶性籽胶固沙剂及应用效果[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2019(5): 109-111.
	[Yan Ting, Yan Deren, Qu Na, et al. Water-soluble seed gum for sand-fixation agent and its application effect[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2019(5): 109-111.]
[25]	刘辉, 王玉伟, 邹继颖, 等. 新型环保固沙剂的性能研究[J]. 吉林化工学院学报, 2020, 37(1): 77-80.
	[Liu Hui, Wang Yuwei, Zou Jiying, et al. Study on performance of new environmental protection stabilizer[J]. Journal of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, 2020, 37(1): 77-80.]
[26]	Meng X, Peng G, Liu B L. Synthesis and sand-fixing property of cationic poly(vinyl acetate-butyl acrylate-DMC) copolymer emulsions[J]. Journal of Macromolecular Science: Part D-Reviews in Polymer Processing, 2013, 52(9): 931-939.
[27]	杨鹏华, 胡广录, 李昊辰, 等. 荒漠-绿洲过渡带典型固沙植物根区土壤优先流特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(1): 127-140. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2025.01.12
	[Yang Penghua, Hu Guanglu, Li Haochen, et al. Characteristics of the soil priority flow in the root zone of typical sand-fixing plants in the desert-oasis transition zone[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2025, 42(1): 127-140.] doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2025.01.12
[28]	胡广录, 刘鹏, 李嘉楠, 等. 黑河中游绿洲边缘三种景观类型土壤水分动态特征及影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(4): 550-565. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.04.03
	[Hu Guanglu, Liu Peng, Li Jianan, et al. Characteristics of soil moisture dynamics and influencing factors of three landscape types at the oasis edge in the middle reaches of the Heihe River[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(4): 550-565.] doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.04.03
[29]	刘敦华, 谷文英, 丁霄霖. 沙蒿胶对面团流变性质的影响及在面包加工中的应用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(S1): 233-236.
	[Liu Dunhua, Gu Wengying, Ding Xiaolin, et al. Effects of Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch gum on the rheological properties of dough and its application to break processing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(S1): 233-236.]
[30]	陈国靖. 宁南黄土丘陵区土壤理化性质对不同植被恢复模式的响应[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2018.
	[Chen Guojing. Responses of Soil Physicochemical Properties to different Vegetation Restoration in the Loess Hilly Region of Southern Ningxia[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2018.]
[31]	Wu Zhiren, Gao Weiming, Wu Zhishen, et al. Synthesis and characterization of a novel chemical sand-fixing material of hydrophilic polyurethane[J]. Journal of the Society of Materials Science, 2011, 60(7): 674-679.
[32]	王志超, 张博文, 倪嘉轩, 等. 微塑料对土壤水分入渗和蒸发的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(8): 4394-4401.
	[Wang Zhichao, Zhang Bowen, Ni Jiaxuan, et al. Effect of microplastics on soil water infiltration and evaporation[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(8): 4394-4401.]
[33]	刘万智, 赵锦梅, 张露韡, 等. 黄土陡坡人工植被下土壤表层的水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024, 44(2): 119-127, 186.
	[Liu Wanzhi, Zhao Jinmei, Zhang Luhua, et al. Soil surface hydrological effects of artificial vegetation on loess steep slopes[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 44(2): 119-127, 186.]
[34]	刘冠亨, 吴冠宇, 李建德, 等. 降雨过程中土壤物理结皮入渗情况及当量孔径的变化研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1608-1614. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.10.07
	[Liu Guanheng, Wu Guanyu, Li Jiande, et al. Equivalent pore size characteristics in the soil physical crust[J]. Aird Zone Research, 2023, 40(10): 1608-1614.]
[35]	Niu Ziru, Su Yongzhong, Li Fangjiao, et al. Effect of attapulgite application on aggregate formation and carbon and nitrogen content in sandy soil[J]. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2023, 15(16): 1-16.
[36]	姚正毅, 韩致文, 赵爱国, 等. 化学固沙结层的力学强度与抗风蚀能力关系[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2009, 23(2): 191-195.
	[Yao Zhengyi, Han Zhiwen, Zhao Aiguo, et al. Study on crusts shear strength and erodibility of three chemical sand stabilizers[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2009, 23(2): 191-195.]
[37]	杨明坤. 纤维素基环保固沙剂的制备与性能研究[D]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2012.
	[Yang Mingkun. Preparation and Sanding-Fixing Properties of Environment Friendly Sand-Fixing Agent Based on Cellulose[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2012.]
[38]	尹应武, 保雄伟, 李德中, 等. 生物基磺酸盐在土壤沙漠化治理中的应用研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(1): 185-192.
	[Yin Yingwu, Bao Xiongwei, Li Dezhong, et al. Application of biomacromolecule sulfonate in soil desertification control[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021(1): 185-192.]
[39]	鲁小珍, 金永灿, 杨益琴, 等. 木质素固沙材料应用于沙漠化地区植被恢复的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(4): 67-71.
	[Lu Xiaozhen, Jin Yongcan, Yang Yiqin, et al. Application of lignin sand-fixer to vegetation restoration in desertificated areas[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(4): 67-71.]
[40]	赵永贵. 保水剂的开发及应用进展[J]. 中国水土保持, 1995(5): 52-54.
	[Zhao Yonggui. Development and application progress of water retaining agent[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 1995(5): 52-54.]

固沙剂名称	编号	提取原料	形态	颜色	应用方式
沙蒿固沙剂	S	沙蒿种子	粉末状	白色	水溶液
亚麻固沙剂	R	亚麻种子或其油渣饼粕	粉末状	白色	水溶液
刺槐固沙剂	F	刺槐果实或种子	粉末状	白色	水溶液

三种植物基固沙剂对风沙土水分入渗和蒸发的影响

Effects of three plant-based sand-fixing agents on water infiltration and evaporation in aeolian sandy soil

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 40

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0