不同培肥方式对沙质土地区残次林地土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2021.04.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为评价沙质土地区耕地整治中土壤团聚体的稳定性,在陕北榆林靖边县残次林地整治耕地项目区中设立试验田,采用正交试验方案[L9(3⁴)],分析不同肥料类型及施用量对土壤团聚体的影响。结果表明:与不施肥的农田土壤相比,N肥和有机肥配施可以提高水稳性大团聚体的含量,其中,当施用尿素421.34 kg·hm^-2,不施P肥,氯化钾125 kg·hm^-2,有机肥7.5 t·hm^-2(T7)时,>2 mm的水稳性大团聚体含量分别高于T1(不施N、P、K肥及有机肥)、T2(不施N肥、施用过磷酸钙333.33 kg·hm^-2、氯化钾62 kg·hm^-2、有机肥7.5 t·hm^-2)、T3(不施N肥、施用过磷酸钙675 kg·hm^-2、氯化钾125 kg·hm^-2、有机肥15 t·hm^-2)470.15%、360.24%和210.57%;对其数量分布、土壤团聚体累计含量为10%、30%、60%时所对应的团聚体直径D₁₀、D₃₀、D₆₀、平均重量直径(MWD)、几何平均直径(GMD)和土壤结构系数等有显著影响,其中对0.25~2 mm和>2 mm的水稳性大团聚体有着明显的促进作用,处理T3、T4(尿素198.28 kg·hm^-2、不施P肥、氯化钾62 kg·hm^-2、有机肥15 t·hm^-2)、T5(尿素198.28 kg·hm^-2、过磷酸钙333.33 kg·hm^-2、氯化钾125 kg·hm^-2、不施有机肥)、T6(尿素198.28 kg·hm^-2、过磷酸钙675 kg·hm^-2、不施K肥、有机肥7.5 t·hm^-2)、T7和T8(尿素421.34 kg·hm^-2、过磷酸钙333.33 kg·hm^-2、不施K肥、有机肥15 t·hm^-2)的土壤结构系数(Kctp)1.5~0.67,土壤结构良好。综上,说明N肥和有机肥配施,尤其是当尿素施用量421.34 kg·hm^-2(基施60%、追施40%)、氯化钾施用量125 kg·hm^-2、有机肥施用量7.5 t·hm^-2时能改善残次林地新增耕地土壤团聚体的结构,增强土壤团聚体的抗水分侵蚀能力。

关键词: 残次林地, 水稳定性团聚体, 化肥, 有机肥, 土壤结构

Abstract:

To evaluate the stability of soil aggregates in cultivated land improvements in sandy soil areas, an experimental field was set up in the remnant forest land improvement project area of Jingbian County, Yulin, northern Shaanxi, China. The orthogonal experiment scheme [L9(3⁴)] was used to analyze the effects of different fertilizer types and application rates on soil aggregates. The results showed that compared to non-fertilized farmland soil, the combined application of N fertilizer and organic fertilizer can increase the content of water-stable macro-aggregates. Among them, the content of water-stable macro-aggregates larger than 2 mm was relatively higher when applying the T7 treatment (421.34 kg·hm^-2 urea, no P fertilizer, 125 kg·hm^-2 potassium chloride, and 7.5 t·hm^-2 organic fertilizer) than T1 (no N, P, or K fertilizer, and organic fertilizer), T2 (no N fertilizer, 333.33 kg·hm^-2 superphosphate, 62 kg·hm^-2 potassium chloride, 7.5 t·hm^-2 organic fertilizer), and T3 (no N fertilizer, 675 kg·hm^-2 superphosphate, 125 kg·hm^-2 potassium chloride, 15 t·hm^-2 organic fertilizer). The contents of macro-aggregates over 2 mm were 470.15%, 360.24% and 210.57%, respectively. The quantity distributions when the cumulative content of soil aggregates were 10%, 30%, 60% were D₁₀, D₃₀, D₆₀, respectively. The mean weight diameter, geometric mean diameter, and the soil structure coefficient all had a significant influence, with water-stable large aggregates >2 mm and 0.25-2 mm having obvious promoting effects. The soil structure coefficient (Kctp) of T3, T4 (198.28 kg·hm ^-2 urea, no P fertilizer, 62 kg·hm^-2 potassium chloride, and 15 t·hm^-2 organic fertilizer), T5 (198.28 kg·hm^-2 urea, 333.33 kg·hm^-2 super phosphate, 125 kg·hm^-2 potassium chloride, no organic fertilizer), T6 (198.28 kg·hm^-2 urea, 675 kg·hm^-2 superphosphate, no K fertilizer, 7.5 t·hm^-2 organic fertilizer), T7 and T8 (421.34 kg·hm^-2 urea, 333.33 kg·hm^-2 superphosphate, no K fertilizer, and 15 t·hm^-2 organic fertilizer) were between 1.5 and 0.67, with a good soil structure. In summary, the combined application of N fertilizer and organic fertilizer, especially with the urea application rate of 421.34 kg·hm^-2 (basic application 60%, topdressing 40%), the potassium chloride application rate of 125 kg·hm^-2, and the organic fertilizer application rate of 7.5 t·hm^-2 can improve newly added forest land. The structure of arable soil aggregates enhances the resistance of soil aggregates to water erosion.

Key words: defective forest land, water-stable aggregates, fertilizer, organic fertilizer, soil structure

张露,孟婷婷,胡雅,魏静. 不同培肥方式对沙质土地区残次林地土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 973-979.

ZHANG Lu,MENG Tingting,HU Ya,WEI Jing. Effects on soil aggregate composition and stability under various fertilization regimes of defective forest land in a sandy soil area[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 973-979.

图/表 7

图1

表1

图2

表2

表3

图3

图4

参考文献 23

[1]	国土资源部. 全国耕地后备资源8000万亩下降3000万亩[N/OL]. 央视网, [2016-12-28]. http://news.cctv.com/2016/12/28/ARTI1dNstGtFmn11IEg2TIkH161228.shtml.
	[Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China. The National Reserve Resource of Arable Land Decreased by 30 Million Mu from 80 Million Mu[N/OL]. CCTV, [2016-12-28]. http://news.cctv.com/2016/12/28/ARTI1dNstGtFmn11IEg2TIkH161228.shtml.]
[2]	赵亮, 李虹晔. 新时期实现耕地占补平衡的对策探讨[J]. 国土资源, 2019, 36(8):38-39.
	[ Zhao Liang, Li Hongye. Discussion on countermeasures to realize balance of cultivated land occupation and compensation in the new period[J]. Land & Resources, 2019, 36(8):38-39. ]
[3]	李全宝. 园地和残次林地开发关键问题研究——以江苏省新沂市为例[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2019, 37(6):53-58.
	[ Li Quanbao. Research on crucial problems of development of garden land and relict forest land: A case study of Xinyi City in Jiangsu Province[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China, 2019, 37(6):53-58. ]
[4]	秦川. 陕北风沙草滩区残次林地土地整治效应研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2020, 31(20):3-4.
	[ Qin Chuan. Study on the effect of land reclamation of residual forest land in sandy grassland area in northern Shaanxi[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2020, 31(20):3-4. ]
[5]	罗凡, 张厅, 龚雪蛟, 等. 不同施肥方式对茶树新梢氮磷钾含量及光合生理的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(12):122-129.
	[ Luo Fan, Zhang Ting, Gong Xuejiao, et al. Effects of different fertilization ways on the contents of N, P, K in new shoots and photobiological characters of tea tree[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(12):122-129. ]
[6]	成臣, 吕伟生, 朱博, 等. 秸秆全量还田下磷钾配施对晚粳稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6):244-251.
	[ Cheng Chen, Lyu Weisheng, Zhu Bo, et al. Effects of combined application of phosphorus and potassium on japonica rice yield and quality under total crop residue incorporated during the late-rice cropping seasons[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(6):244-251. ]
[7]	李春越, 常顺, 钟凡心, 等. 种植模式和施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤团聚体及其碳分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1):191-200.
	[ Li Chunyue, Chang Shun, Zhong Fanxin, et al. Effects of fertilization and planting patterns on soil aggregate and carbon distribution in farmland of the Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1):191-200. ]
[8]	曹寒冰, 谢钧宇, 强久次仁, 等. 施肥措施对复垦土壤团聚体碳氮含量和作物产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(18):135-143.
	[ Cao Hanbing, Xie Junyu, QiangJiu Cire, et al. Effects of fertilization regimes on carbon and nitrogen contents of aggregates and maize yield in reclaimed soils[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(18):135-143. ]
[9]	王彦锟. 培肥措施对新整理黄壤烟田土壤熟化的影响[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017.
	[ Wang Yankun. Effect of Fertilizer on the Improvement of Newly Consolidated Tobacco Yellow Field[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017. ]
[10]	Porazinska D L, Duncanb L W, Mcsorley R, et al. Nematode communities as indicators of status and processes of a soil ecosystem influenced by agricultural management practices[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 1999, 13(1):69-86. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(99)00018-9
[11]	Sarkar S, Singh S R, Singh R P. The effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil physical condition and the productivity of a rice-lentil cropping sequence in India[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2003, 140(4):419-425. doi: 10.1017/S0021859603003186
[12]	陈红金, 刘晓霞, 虞轶俊. 发达国家化肥减量政策分析及对我国限量施肥的启示[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(12):2360-2363.
	[ Chen Hongjin, Liu Xiaoxia, Yu Yijun. Analysis of fertilizer reduction policies in developed countries and its implications on fertilization limitation in China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 60(12):2360-2363. ]
[13]	全娇娇. 农户化肥使用存在的问题及减量对策[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2020, 31(14):5-6.
	[ Quan Jiaojiao. Problems in the use of chemical fertilizers for farmers and countermeasures[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2020, 31(14):5-6. ]
[14]	何振嘉, 王启龙. 风沙草滩区盐碱地整治对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 土地开发工程研究, 2020, 5(2):73-78.
	[ He Zhenjia, Wang Qilong. Effects of saline-alkali land regulation on soil physical and chemical properties in sandy beach area[J]. Land Development and Engineering Research, 2020, 5(2):73-78. ]
[15]	陕西省水资源管理办公室. 行业用水定额 DB 61/T 943-2014[S]. 陕西省质量监督局, 2014.
	[Water Resources Management Office of Shaanxi Province. Industry Water Quota DB 61/T 943-2014[S]. Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Quality Supervision, 2014. ]
[16]	Elliott E T. Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1986, 50(3):627-633. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030017x
[17]	Шейн Е В, Гончаров В М. Агрофизика Высшее Обрвазование[M]. Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс, 2006.
[18]	王兴祥, 张桃林, 鲁如坤. 施肥措施对红壤结构的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2001, 9(3):70-72.
	[ Wang Xingxiang, Zhang Taolin, Lu Rukun. Effect of application of fertilizers on soil structure in red soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 2001, 9(3):70-72. ]
[19]	白文娟, 徐华勤, 章家恩. 不同培肥措施对土壤团聚体中微生物特性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(1):24-30.
	[ Bai Wenjuan, Xu Huaqin, Zhang Jia’en. Effects of different manure application on the soil microbial biomass properties within different soil aggregates[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 27(1):24-30. ]
[20]	Cambardella C A, Elliott E T. Particulate soil organic matter across a grassland cultivation sequence[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1992, 56(3):776-783.
[21]	Sodhia G P S, Beria V, Benbi D K. Soil aggregation and distribution of carbon and nitrogen in different fractions under long-term application of compost in rice-wheat system[J]. Soil ＆ Tillage Research, 2009, 103(2):412-418.
[22]	李春越, 常顺, 钟凡心, 等. 种植模式和施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤团聚体及其碳分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1):191-200.
	[ Li Chunyue, Chang Shun, Zhong Fanxin, et al. Effects of fertilization and planting patterns on soil aggregate and carbon distribution in farmland of the Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1):191-200. ]
[23]	曹寒冰, 谢钧宇, 强久次仁, 等. 施肥措施对复垦土壤团聚体碳氮含量和作物产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 39(18):135-143.
	[ Cao Hanbing, Xie Junyu, Qiangjiu Ciren, et al. Effects of fertilization regimes on carbon and nitrogen contents of aggregates and maize yield in reclaimed soils[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 39(18):135-143. ]

试验设计	N肥	P肥	K肥	有机肥	试验设计	N肥	P肥	K肥	有机肥
T1	N1	P1	K1	D1	T6	N2	P3	K1	D2
T2	N1	P2	K2	D2	T7	N3	P1	K3	D2
T3	N1	P3	K3	D3	T8	N3	P2	K1	D3
T4	N2	P1	K2	D3	T9	N3	P3	K2	D1
T5	N2	P2	K3	D1

试验设计	大团聚体		微团聚体
试验设计	>2 mm	0.25~2 mm	0.053~0.25 mm	<0.053 mm
T1	6.7±1.94d	21.4±3.35b	48.7±5.31ab	23.2±2.16a
T2	8.3±3.40d	20.3±3.03b	51.2±3.40a	20.2±4.49ab
T3	12.3±3.75d	33.1±4.84a	41.7±4.44bc	12.9±3.24cd
T4	23.5±3.21b	31.4±1.53a	34.9±3.48cd	10.2±2.14cd
T5	14.6±3.59cd	29.2±5.78ab	46.1±2.96ab	10.1±2.59cd
T6	23.5±3.92b	31.9±4.37a	36.2±2.83c	8.4±1.03d
T7	38.2±3.38a	24.6±3.58ab	27.4±2.77d	9.8±2.57cd
T8	20.9±4.94bc	26.6±4.38ab	42.2±2.89bc	10.3±2.86cd
T9	9.6±2.00d	24.3±2.73ab	50.7±4.30a	15.4±3.56bc

试验设计	拟合方程	R²	D₁₀/mm	D₃₀/mm	D₃₀/mm
T1	y=18.811lnx+85.598	0.9098	0.0180	0.0520	0.2565
T2	y=19.155lnx+84.326	0.8962	0.0206	0.0587	0.2808
T3	y=20.163lnx+81.701	0.9213	0.0286	0.0770	0.3409
T4	y=18.077lnx+65.8	0.9869	0.0456	0.1380	0.7255
T5	y=20.362lnx+75.187	0.9555	0.0407	0.1087	0.4743
T6	y=18.577lnx+65.705	0.9855	0.0499	0.1463	0.7356
T7	y=14.194lnx+53.466	0.9868	0.0468	0.1914	1.5846
T8	y=18.609lnx+69.832	0.9547	0.0401	0.1176	0.5896
T9	y=20.344lnx+76.321	0.9776	0.0384	0.1026	0.4483