北京城郊居民对京津生态工程的支付意愿

干旱区研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 527-533.

北京城郊居民对京津生态工程的支付意愿

马骅¹, 柳慧¹, 龚亚珍², 金建君³, 毛显强⁴

1. 中国石油大学地球科学学院，北京 102249； 2. 中国人民大学环境学院，北京 100872；
3. 北京师范大学资源学院，北京 100875； 4. 北京师范大学环境学院，北京 100875

收稿日期:2012-05-07 修回日期:2012-09-09 出版日期:2013-05-15 发布日期:2013-05-16
作者简介:马骅（1973- ），女，博士，主要研究方向为环境经济、环境政策评估.E-mail： mahua2007@yahoo.cn
基金资助:
EEPSEA-中国小额环境和自然资源经济研究项目(105920-00001003-016)资助

Willingness to Pay of Urban and Suburban Households in Beijing for an Ecological Project in the Surrounding Areas

MA Hua¹, LIU Hui¹, GONG Ya-Zhen², JIN Jian-Jun³, MAO Xian-Qiang⁴

1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. College of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
3. College of Resources Science & Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
4. College of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2012-05-07 Revised:2012-09-09 Published:2013-05-15 Online:2013-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用二分选择式条件估值法，对北京市居民就京津风沙源治理工程生态服务的支付意愿及其城郊居民的支付差异进行了研究。主要结论为：支付意愿均值5 a内每月每户为17.35~39.92元，占家庭月收入均值的0.30%~0.68%；工程受益方的总支付意愿现值低于工程总成本现值；影响“参与支付”决策的主要因素为年龄、收入和受教育水平，其中，收入和受教育水平对远郊城区居民的影响更为显著；影响“支付水平”决策的主要因素为收入和家庭人口；远郊城区居民的平均支付水平虽然低于中心城区居民，但城、郊居民支付水平占其家庭收入的比例接近。

关键词: 条件估值法, 居民, 支付意愿, 京津风沙源治理工程, 生态服务, 北京

Abstract: Contingent valuation method with dichotomous choice elicitation questions was used to estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) of urban and suburban residents in Beijing to the improved ecological services provided by the Beijing and Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project (BTSSCP). The results are that the mean WTP of residents in Beijing was 17.35-39.92 yuan RMB per household per month in 5 years; the total WTP of the benefited residents was less than the cost of the project; age, income and education level were the key factors affecting the respondents’ decision that whether they participated in the market, among which income and education level were more significant to affect suburban residents’participation decision. WTP was significantly related with the residents’income and household size. Although there was a difference of WTP between urban and suburban residents, the proportions of residents’ WTP in their income was similar, i.e. 0.28%-0.70% and 0.36%-0.65% respectively.

Key words: contingent valuation method (CVM), residents willingness to pay (WTP), Beijing and Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project, ecological service, Beijing

马骅, 柳慧, 龚亚珍, 金建君, 毛显强. 北京城郊居民对京津生态工程的支付意愿[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(3): 527-533.

MA Hua, LIU Hui, GONG Ya-Zhen, JIN Jian-Jun, MAO Xian-Qiang. Willingness to Pay of Urban and Suburban Households in Beijing for an Ecological Project in the Surrounding Areas[J]. , 2013, 30(3): 527-533.

参考文献

Xu J T,Yin R S,Li Z,et al.China’s ecological rehabilitation: Unprecedented efforts,dramatic impacts,and requisite policies〔J〕.Ecological Economics,2006,57(4):595-607.
吴涛，彭道黎，谢晨，等.退耕还林政策10年评价:退耕还林工程社会经济效益监测大学生农户问卷调查总报告〔J〕.经济研究参考,2011(67):11-37.
支玲，李怒云，王娟，等.西部退耕还林经济补偿机制研究〔J〕.林业科学，2004,40(2):2-8.
王武林.贵州省退耕还林问题跟踪研究〔J〕.安徽农业科学,2011,39(36):22 776-22 778.
Grosjean P,Kontoleon A．How sustainable are sustainable development programs? The case of the sloping land conversion program in China〔J〕.World Development,2009,1:268-285．
Ma H,Lu Y L,Xing Y,et al.Rural households’ attitude and economic strategies toward the conversion of cropland to forest and grassland program(CCFG):A case study in Qira,China〔J〕.Environmental Management,2009,43(6):1 039-1 047.
禹慧强,赵兵,王晓龙,等.退耕还林地区农民生存状况调查:以宁夏泾源县为例〔J〕.安徽农业科学,2012,40(8):4 953-4 954,4 957.
郭建军，钱贵霞.关于完善草原“禁牧舍饲”政策的调查与建议〔J〕.重庆工学院学报：社会科学版，2008，22(12):1-6.
钱贵霞，郭建军.京津风沙源治理工程及生态经济影响解析〔J〕.农业经济问题，2007(10):54-57.
彭继平.关于京津风沙源治理工程建设的思考〔J〕.林业经济，2007(10):34-36.〔Peng Jiping.Thinking on the current situation of the program of combating desertification in the wind/sand areas affecting Beijing and Tianjin〔J〕.Forestry Economics,2007(10):34-36.〕
Carson R T,Flores N E,Meade N F.Contingent valuation:Controversies and evidence〔J〕.Environmental and Resource Economics,2001,19:173-210.
金建君，王志石.条件价值法在澳门固体废弃物管理经济价值评估中的比较研究〔J〕.地球科学进展,2006,21(6):605-609.
Mitchell R,Carson R.Using Surveys to Value Public Goods:The Contingent Valuation Method〔M〕.Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press,1989.
Crooker J R,Herriges J A.Parametric and semi-nonparametric estimation of willingnesstopay in the dichotomous choice contingent valuation framework〔J〕.Environmental and Resource Economics,2004,27:451-480.
Turnbull B W.The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped,censored and truncated data〔J〕.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1976,38:290-295.
Carson R T,Mitchell R C,Hanemann M,et al.Contingent valuation and lost passive use:Damages from the exxon valdez oil spill〔J〕.Environmental and Resource Economics,2003,25:257-286.
Cragg J G.Some statistical models for limited dependent variable with application to the demand for durable goods〔J〕.Econometrica,1971,39:829-844.
SazSalazar S D,RausellK[AKo¨D]ster P.A doublehurdle model of urban green areas valuation:Dealing with zero responses〔J〕.Landscape Urban Planning,2007,doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.08.008
李国平,郭江.榆林煤炭矿区生态环境改善支付意愿分析〔J〕.中国人口资源与环境,2012,22(3):137-143.
Hanemann W M,Loomis J,Kanninen B.Statistical efficiency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation ［J］.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1991,73:1 255-1 263.
Whittington D.Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries〔J〕.Environmental and Resource Economics,2002,22:323-367.
Cummings R G,Harrison G W,Osborne L L.Can the bias of contingent valuation surveys be reduced? Evidence from the laboratory〔N〕.Economics Working Paper,1995,B9503,College of Business Administration,University of South Carolina.
Atkinson G,Healey A,Mourato S.Valuing the costs of violent crime:A stated preference approach〔J〕.Oxford Economic Papers,2005,57:559-585.
Jin J J,Wang Z S,Liu X M.Valuing blackfaced spoonbill conservation in Macao:A policy and contingent valuation study〔J〕.Ecological Economics，2008,68:328-335.
Champ P,Bishop R,Brown T,et al.Using donation mechanism to value nonuse benefits from public goods〔J〕.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1997,33(2):151-163.
Crooker J R,Herriges J A.Parametric and seminonparametric estimation of willingnesstopay in the dichotomous choice contingent valuation framework〔J〕.Environmental and Resource Economics,2004,27:451-480.
Ayer M,Brunk H D,Ewing G M,et al.An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information〔J〕.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,1955,26:641-647.
Haab T,McConnell K E.Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources:The Economics of Nonmarket Valuation〔M〕.Cheltenham,UK:Edward Elgar,2002.
靳乐山,郭建卿.城乡居民环境保护支付意愿对比研究：以云南纳板河流域为例〔J〕.云南师范大学学报:哲学社会版,2010,42(4):53-58.
Carlsson F,JohanssonStenman O.Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden〔J〕.Applied Economics,2000,32:661-669.
Swanson T,Day B.Valuing water quality in China:Purpose,approach and policy〔J〕.Journal of Environmental Sciences,1999,11:309-316.
Wang Y,Zhang Y.Air quality assessment by contingent valuation in Jinan,China〔J〕.Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90:1 022-1 029.
徐大伟,常亮,侯铁珊,等.基于WTP和WTA的流域生态补偿标准测算:以辽河为例〔J〕.资源科学,2012,34(7):1 354-1 361.
徐晋涛，陶然，徐志刚.退耕还林：成本有效性、结构调整效应与经济可持续性:基于西部三省农户调查的实证分析〔J〕.经济学季刊，2004,4(1):139-162.
张志强，徐中民，程国栋.条件估值法的发展与应用〔J〕.地球科学进展，2003,18(3):454-463.
Aadland D,Caplan A J.Cheap talk reconsidered:New evidence from CVM〔J〕.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2006,60:562-578.
List J A.Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auction experiments〔J〕.American Economic Review,2001,91(5):1 498-1 507.