防渗用膨润土的抗冻特性

干旱区研究 ›› 2012, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 1069-1076.

防渗用膨润土的抗冻特性

周春生^1,2，史海滨¹，于健³

1. 内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院，内蒙古呼和浩特 010018； 2. 内蒙古财经学院资源与环境经济学院，内蒙古呼和浩特 010070； 3. 内蒙古水利科学研究院，内蒙古呼和浩特 010020

收稿日期:2011-10-15 修回日期:2012-06-14 出版日期:2012-11-15 发布日期:2012-11-19
通讯作者: 史海滨. E-mail: shi_haibin@sohu.com
作者简介:周春生(1977-)，男，山东单县人，讲师，博士，主要从事灌区土壤水盐监测方面研究. E-mail: zhouchunsheng121@163.com
基金资助:
国家农业转化资金项目(2008GB2A400046)；国家科技支撑项目(2011BAD29B03)；内蒙古农业大学科技创新团队资助计划

Study on Frost Resistance of Watertight Bentonite

ZHOU Chun-sheng^{1, 2}, SHI Hai-bin¹, YU Jian³

1. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot 010018, Inner Mongolia, China; 2. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences and Economics,  Inner Mongolia Institute of Finance, Huhhot 010070, Inner Mongolia, China; 3. Inner Mongolia Institute of Water Resources Research, Hohhot 010020, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2011-10-15 Revised:2012-06-14 Online:2012-11-15 Published:2012-11-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究防渗用膨润土在寒旱区的适用性，对不同产地的3种膨润土的抗冻特性进行了研究。结果表明：水化液为黄河水31次冻融后，膨润土自由膨胀体积增加了32.8%，溶液电导率（EC）均值增加了27.7%，切应力增加了40.6%，滤出液累积量降低了23.5%，滤失量降低了23.4%，滤饼厚度降低了15.4%。方差分析可知，冻融循环对膨润土自由膨胀体积、溶液EC值、切应力、滤出液累积量均有极显著影响(F＞F_0.01)。冻融后膨润土微观结构参数变化范围为86.02 ~372.12 μm，孔隙以板状及不规则孔隙为主，形态指标F值在0.12~0.40，孔隙表面分维在1.18~1.21。

关键词: 膨润土, 冻融, 滤失量, 流变性, 微观结构

Abstract: In order to investigate the applicability of watertight bentonite in arid and cold areas, the antifreezing properties of three kinds of bentonite, collected from different places, were studied. Results showed that, after Yellow River water was frozen and thawed for 31 timers, the free expansion volume, average EC value and shear stress of bentonite were increased by 32.8%, 27.7% and 40.6%, but the cumulative filtrating volume, filtration loss and thickness of filtered bentonite cake were decreased by 23.5%, 23.4% and 15.4 %, respectively. On the other hand, the results of ANOVA showed that the effects of freezingthawing process on the free expansion volume, EC value of solution, shear stress and cumulative filtrating volume were significant(F＞F_0.01); the microstructure parameters of bentonite varied in a range from 86.02 μm to 372.12 μm, the pores were dominated by the plate and irregular shapes, the F value varied in a range from 0.12 to 0.40, and the fractal dimension of pore surface in a range of 1.18-1.21.

Key words: font-family: 宋体, mso-bidi-font-family: 宋体, mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, bentonite')">mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">bentonite, freezingfont-family: 宋体, mso-bidi-font-family: 宋体, mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, thawing process')">mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">thawing process, ')">filtration loss, ')">rheology, microstructure

周春生, 史海滨, 于健. 防渗用膨润土的抗冻特性[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(6): 1069-1076.

ZHOU Chun-Sheng, SHI Hai-Bin, YU Jian. Study on Frost Resistance of Watertight Bentonite[J]. , 2012, 29(6): 1069-1076.

参考文献

武桂芝,郑西来,林国庆,等.季节性河道渗漏野外试验研究〔J〕.干旱区研究,2011,28(1):74-78.
Mishra A K,Junboum H. Effect of salt of various concentrations on liquid limit,and hydraulic conductivity of different soilbentonite mixtures〔J〕. Environmental Geology,2009,57:1 145-1 153.
Benson1 C H,Abichou T. Forensic analysis of excessive leakage from. lagoons lined with a composite GCL〔J〕.Geosynthetics International,2004,11(3):242-252.周正兵,王钊,王俊奇.离子交换对GCL防渗能力的影响〔J〕.长江科学院院报,2002,19(3):39-42. 
孔维安,郑水林,白春华,等.膨润土在水溶液中的膨胀性能研究〔J〕.非金属矿,2010,33(1):42-44.
孙志明,于健,郑水林,等.离子种类及浓度对土工合成黏土垫用膨润土保水性能的影响〔J〕.硅酸盐学报,2010,38(9):1 826-1 831.
李志斌.土工织物膨润土垫防渗有效性研究及相关机理分析〔D〕.上海:同济大学土木工程学院,2007.
Lorenzetti R J,BarteltHunt S L,Burns S E. Hydraulic conductivities and effective diffusion coefcients of geosynthetic clay liners with organobentonite amendments〔J〕. Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2005,23:385-400.
何俊.基于微观分析的填埋场GCL中运移规律的理论研究〔D〕.南京:河海大学土木工程学院,2006. 〔He Jun. Theoretical Study of Transport Through GCL in Landfill Based on Microscopic Analysis〔D〕. Nanjing: Hohai University School of Civil Engineering,2006. 〕
Dananaj I,Frankovska J,Janotka I. The influence of smectite content on microstructure and geotechnical properties of calcium and sodium bentonites〔J〕. Applied Clay Science,2005,28:223-232.
刘建国,王洪涛,聂永丰.多孔介质中溶质有效扩散系数预测的分形模型〔J〕.水科学进展,2004,15(4): 459-462.
Hewitt R D,Daniel D E. Hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners after freezethaw〔J〕. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,1997,123: 305-313.
陈生水,郑澄锋,杨明昌.新型防渗材料膨润土垫的试验研究〔J〕.水利水运工程学报,2006 (3):34-38.
Kraus J B,Benson C H,Erickson A E,et al. Freezethaw cycling and hydraulic conductity of bentonite barriers〔J〕.Geotechnical and Geoenvirmomental,1997,123(3):229-238.〕
Podgorney R K,Bennett J E. Evaluating the longterm performance of geosynthetic clayLiners exposed to freezethaw〔J〕. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2006,132(2):261-265.
周春生.膨润土防水毯在北方盐渍化地区适用性的实验研究〔D〕. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2007.
周春生,史海滨,于健,等.GCL用于内蒙古河套灌区渠道防渗的使用性研究〔J〕.内蒙古农业大学学报,2010,31(2):253-259.
周春生,史海滨,于健,等.GCL用于寒旱区渠道防渗的实验研究〔J〕.中国农村水利水电,2011(3):44-49.
徐超,李志斌,高彦斌.溶液特征对GCL膨胀和渗透特性的影响〔J〕.同济大学学报:自然科学版,2009,37(1):36-40.
王锦荣,周汉文,吴继光,等.高岭土粒度分布对黏浓度影响的实验研究〔J〕.非金属矿,2010,33(4):5-8,33.
唐朝生,施斌,王宝军.基于SEM土体微观结构研究中的影响因素分析〔J〕.岩土工程学报,2008,30(4):560-565.
Gimenez D,Allmaras R R,Nater E A,et al. Fractal dimendions for volume and surface of interaggregate poresscale effects〔J〕.Geoderma,1997,77(1):19-38.
王成海,刘金刚,陈麒.高岭土分散液流变性的初步研究〔J〕.中国造纸,2007,26(10):9-11.

[1]	刘国松, 朱海丽, 张玉, 刘亚斌, 李国荣. 冻融作用对黄河源区曲流河岸土体抗剪特性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1637-1643.
[2]	张昊琛,萨楚拉,孟凡浩,罗敏,王牧兰,高红豆. 内蒙古地表冻融指数动态变化与驱动因素分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(6): 1996-2008.
[3]	谭明东,王振华,王越,李文昊,宗睿,邹杰. 长期滴灌棉田非灌溉季节土壤盐分累积特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 485-492.
[4]	刘磊,陈军锋,吕棚棚,赵德星,杜琦. 冻融作用下地下水浅埋区土壤盐分及离子变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 448-455.
[5]	王顺科, 李艳红, 李发东, 王金龙. 新疆典型淡水湖和咸水湖芦苇湿地土壤 CO₂、CH₄和N₂O 排放研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(5): 1183-1193.
[6]	吴芹芹, 莫淑红, 程圣东, 李鹏, 李占斌. 黄土区冻融期不同土地利用土壤水分与温度的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(3): 627-.
[7]	乌艺恒, 赵鹏武, 周梅, 魏江生, 冯倩倩. 季节性冻土区土体冻融过程及其对水热因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(6): 1568-1575.
[8]	靳志锋, 虎胆·吐马尔白, 牟洪臣, 马合木江, 李文娟. 土壤冻融温度影响下棉田水盐运移规律[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(4): 623-627.