干旱区研究

Arid Zone Research >

2018 , Vol. 35 >Issue 4: 954 - 962

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13866/j.azr.2018.04.25

The Study of Two Typical Land Use Model in Manas River Basin

Expand
  • (1.Laboratory of LUCC and global change, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang,China;
    2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China；3.XPCC Surveying & Designing Institute (Group) Co.Ltd, Urumqi 830002, Xinjiang,China;3. XPCC Surveying & Designing Institute (Group) Co.Ltd, Urumqi 830002, Xinjiang,China;)

Received date: 2017-11-15

  Revised date: 2018-03-19

  Online published: 2018-07-19

Fold

Abstract

Xinjiang has two basic management modes, “farm management mode” developmented by Xinjiang Production and Construction Gorps and “local mode” foremd by local goverments. The comparison and analysis of the differences between the two types of two typical land use changes is of great significance to the understanding of the impact of different human activities on land use. This paper takes the Manasi River Basin in Xinjiang as the research area, the corps and the local areas as the research object. Using the land use data set of Manas River Basin is constructed. In this study, we investigated the different between farm management mode and local mode on land use change pattern and landscape pattern by using land use index and Landscape pattern index. The results are as follows: ①The land-use process are some differences in different modes. The difference of the land use change of the corps and the local land is mainly reflected in the cultivated and the construction type. The change of arable land in the Corps is more significant, and the change of local construction land is more significant. ②BINGTUAN is different from the local area. The Corps carry out large-scale unified management of land use mode, with higher land consolidation frequency, land constantly concentrated and landscape pattern tends to be simple. The local model of small scale independent operation is carried out, the scale of land block is limited and the degree of breakage is high. ③compared with the local communities, there are significant differences in land use change degree and landscape pattern. The difference is mainly due to the difference between the corps and the local land management mode. The comparative analysis of the differences in land use change between the corps and the local government plays an important role in the rational use of land and the sustainable development of the region.

Key words： land use model; management model; comparative analysis; landscape pattern; Manas River Basin

Cite this article

HE Ke, WU Shi-xin，ZHOU Hong-fei，YANG Zhong-hui，YANG Yi . The Study of Two Typical Land Use Model in Manas River Basin[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018 , 35(4) : 954 -962 . DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2018.04.25

References

[1] Peng J, Xu Y Q, Cai Y L, et al. The role of policies in land use/cover change since the 1970s in ecologically fragile karst areas of Southwest China: A case study on the Maotiaohe watershed[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2011, 14(4): 408-418.
[2] Turner B L, Skole D, Sanderson S, et al. Land-use and Land-cover Change: Science/Research Plan[M]. Stockholm：International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, 1995.
[3] 刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥, 等. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 3-14. [ Liu Jiyuan, Kuang Wenhui, Zhang Zengxiang, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(1): 3-14. ]
[4] 刘芳, 闫慧敏, 刘纪远, 等. 21世纪初中国土地利用强度的空间分布格局[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1 130-1 143. [LiuFang, Yan Huimin, Liu Jiyuan, et al. Spatial pattern of land use intensity in China in 2000[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(7): 1 130-1 143. ]
[5] 姚远, 丁建丽, 张芳,等. 土地利用变化的人文驱动因子对新疆生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(5):298-304. [ Yao Yuan, Ding Jianli, Zhang Fang, et al. Impact of human driving factors for land use change on ecosystem service values in Xinjiang wei autonomous region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(5):298-304. ]
[6] Turner B L, Lambin E F, Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(52): 20 666-20 671.
[7] 宋文杰, 张清, 刘莎莎,等. 基于LUCC的干旱区人为干扰与生态安全分析——以天山北坡经济带绿洲为例[J]. 干旱区研究,2018,(1):235-242. [ Song Wenjie, Zhang Qing, Liu Shasha, et al. LUCC-based human disturbance and ecological security in arid area:A case study in the economic zone on northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018, 35(1):235-242. ]
[8] 罗格平, 张百平. 干旱区可持续土地利用模式分析——以天山北坡为例[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(11): 1 160-1 170. [ Luo Geping, Zhang Baiping. Sustainable land use models for arid lands:A case study of the northern Tianshan Mountain areas[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(11): 1 160-1 170. ]
[9] 陈曦. 中国干旱区土地利用与土地覆被变化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社，2008: 409-423. [Chen Xi. Land Use and Land Cover Change in Arid Regions of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 409-423. ]
[10] 张飞, 塔西甫拉提·特依拜, 丁建丽,等. 干旱区绿洲土地利用/覆被及景观格局变化特征——以新疆精河县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3):1 251-1 263. [Zhang Fei, Tashpolat Tiyip, Ding Jianli, et al. The change of land use/cover and characteristics of land scape pattern in arid areas oasis: A case study of Jinghe County, Xinjiang Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3):1 251-1 263. ]
[11] 巩杰, 钱彩云, 钱大文. 1977—2013年疏勒河中下游土地利用变化与环境响应[J]. 干旱区研究,2017,34(4):775-781. [Gong Jie, Qian Caiyun, Qian Dawen. Land use change and response of environment in the middle-lower reaches of the shule river basin during the period of 1977-2013[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2017,34(4):775-781. ]
[12] Yan H, Liu F, Liu J, et al. Status of land use intensity in China and its impacts on land carrying capacity[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(4): 387-402.
[13] 张琪, 罗格平, 李龙辉, 等. 基于土地利用/覆被变化表征的现代绿洲演变过程——以天山北坡三工河流域为例[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1 157-1 171. [Zhang Qi, Luo Geping, Li Longhui, et al. Modern oasis evolution analysis based on land-use and land-cover change:A case study in Sangong Rive Basin on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(7): 1 157-1 171. ]
[14] 陈平星. 新疆兵团土地管理系统建设的研究[J]. 中国西部科技, 2012, 11(6):72-73. [Chen Pingxing. Research of land management system in Xinjiang Corps[J]. Science and Technology in Western China, 2012, 11(6):72-73.]
[15] 谢志辉. 新疆兵团行政管理体制改革探析[J]. 中国农垦, 2010(2):32-34. [Xie Zhihui. An analysis of the administrative system reform of the Xinjiang Corps[J]. China State Farms, 2010(2):32-34.]
[16] 齐子鉴. 兵团行政管理体制演变与改革[J]. 兵团党校学报, 2011(4):24-27. [Qi Zijian. The evolution and reform of the administration system of the Corps[J]. Journal of the Party School, 2011(4):24-27.]
[17] 吴娜琳 ,胡晓江, 乔家君. 不同体制下农户农田生产活动差异分析——新疆地方村庄与兵团连队的对比[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(8): 1 469-1 476. [Wu Nalin, Hu Xiaojiang, Qiao Jiajun. Production activity differences of farmland among rural households under different administrative systems：Comparative analysis between local villages in Xinjiang and Xinjiang production and construction Corps [J]. Resources Science, 2012, 34(8): 1 469-1 476. ]
[18] Luo G P, Zhou C H, Chen X, et al. A methodology of characterizing status and trend of land changes in oases: A case study of Sangong River watershed, Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 88(4): 775-783.
[19] 冯异星, 罗格平, 周德成, 等. 近50a土地利用变化对干旱区典型流域景观格局的影响——以新疆玛纳斯河流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(16): 4 295-4 305. [Feng Yixing, Luo Geping, Zhou Decheng, et al. Effects of land use change on landscape pattern of a typical arid watershed in the recent 50 years: A case study on Manas river watershed in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(16): 4 295-4 305. ]
[20] 邬建国. 景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社，2007: 17-170. [Wu Jianguo. Landscape Ecology: Patterns, Processes, Scales and Grades[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007: 17-170]

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉