民勤县公益林植物多样性与土壤因子的关系
收稿日期: 2024-09-04
修回日期: 2024-11-10
网络出版日期: 2025-01-17
基金资助
甘肃省2024年度重点人才项目;民勤县林业和草原局项目(GSAU-JSFW-2022-123);民勤县林业和草原局项目(GSAU-JSFW-2023-197);甘肃省财政专项(GSCZZ 20160909);甘肃省拔尖领军人才项目(GSBJLJ-2023-09)
Relationship between plant diversity and soil factors in public welfare forests in Minqin County
Received date: 2024-09-04
Revised date: 2024-11-10
Online published: 2025-01-17
以民勤县荒漠区生态公益林中五种典型植物群落沙丘芦苇+芨芨草(Phragmites communis+Achnatherum splendens)、碱蓬+白刺(Suaeda glauca+Nitraria tangutorum)、霸王+白刺(Sarcozygium xanthoxylon+Nitraria tangutorum)、珍珠猪毛菜+梭梭(Salsola passerine+Haloxylon ammodendron)、红砂+梭梭(Reaumuria songarica+Haloxylon ammodendron)为研究对象,通过野外植物群落调查和土壤采样,研究了植物群落结构、植物物种多样性及其与土壤因子之间的关系,结果表明:(1) 民勤县荒漠区生态公益林植物物种组成相对简单,仅有10科19属22种,红砂+梭梭群落物种组成相对丰富。红砂+梭梭群落Margalef丰富度指数(R)、Simpson优势度指数(D)、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H′)为5种植物群落中最大,5种群落Pielou均匀度指数(Jsw)范围为0.55~0.99且五种群落之间无显著差异。(2) 从5种群落土壤理化性质来看,红砂+梭梭群落土壤容重最小、土壤有机碳含量最高。(3) α多样性指数和土壤因子的关系通过冗余分析(Redundancy Analysis,RDA)发现,土壤容重(SBD)、土壤有机碳(SOC)含量对α多样性的解释率较高,分别为56%、14.3%。因此,红砂+梭梭群落的物种丰富度相对较高,土壤理化性质相对较好,能够改善民勤县荒漠区植被生态,对民勤县荒漠区生态公益林植物群落多样性保护和提高具有积极意义。
赵雪梅 , 马维伟 , 张世虎 , 常文华 , 李广 , 赵维军 , 张玉 . 民勤县公益林植物多样性与土壤因子的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025 , 42(1) : 108 -117 . DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2025.01.10
The five typical plant communities in the ecological public welfare forest in the desert area of Minqin County, namely, Phragmites communis+Achnatherum splendens, Suaeda glauca+Nitraria tangutorum, Sarcozygium xanthoxylon+Nitraria tangutorum, Salsola passerine+Haloxylon ammodendron, Reaumuria songarica+Haloxylon ammodendron as research objects, through the field plant community survey and soil sampling, studied the plant community structure, plant species diversity and its relationship with soil factors, the results show that: (1) Minqin County desert area ecological public welfare forests plant species composition is relatively simple, there are only 10 families, 19 genera and 22 species, and the Reaumuria songarica+Haloxylon ammodendron community is relatively rich in species composition. The Margalef richness index (R), Simpson’s dominance index(D), and Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') of the Reaumuria songarica+Haloxylon ammodendron community were the largest among the five plant communities, and the Pielou evenness index (Jsw) of the five communities ranged from 0.55 to 0.99 with no significant difference among the five communities. (2) In terms of soil physicochemical properties of the five communities, the Reaumuria songarica+Haloxylon ammodendron community had the smallest soil bulk density and the highest soil organic carbon content. (3) The relationship between the α-diversity index and soil factors was found by Redundancy Analysis (RDA) that the soil bulk density (SBD) and soil organic carbon (SOC) content explained a higher percentage of α-diversity, which were 56% and 14.3%, respectively. Therefore, the Reaumuria songarica+Haloxylon ammodendron community has relatively high species richness and relatively good soil physicochemical properties, which can improve the vegetation ecology in the desert area of Minqin County, and is of positive significance for the protection and enhancement of plant community diversity in the ecological public welfare forests in the desert area of Minqin County.
Key words: desert plants; species diversity; soil factors; Minqin County
[1] | 郑璐, 王世忠, 卢国珍, 等. 生态公益林经营类型划分体系研究概述[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2014(6): 23-27. |
[Zheng Lu, Wang Shizhong, Lu Guozhen, et al. Research on the management classification system of non-commercial forest[J]. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, 2014(6): 23-27. ] | |
[2] | 孙千惠, 吴霞, 姚小兰, 等. 林分密度对生态公益林群落结构和物种多样性的影响——以新津文峰山马尾松为例[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2018, 36(3): 315-322. |
[Sun Qianhui, Wu Xia, Yao Xiaolan, et al. Effects of stand density on community structure and species diversity of ecological non-commercial forest—A case study on Pinus massoniana in Wenfeng mountain,Xinjin district,Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2018, 36(3): 315-322. ] | |
[3] | 杨凯. 基于森林资源二类调查数据的生态公益林健康评价[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2023. |
[Yang Kai. Health Evaluation of Ecological Public Welfare Forest Based on Forest Management Inventory Data[D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2023. ] | |
[4] | Liu Z, Ma H B, Wang G H, et al. Grazing period management affects the accumulation of plant functional groups, and soil nutrient pools and regulates stoichiometry in the desert steppe of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 368(52): 122213. |
[5] | Ren C J, Zhang W, Zhong Z K, et al. Differential responses of soil microbial biomass, diversity, and compositions to altitudinal gradients depend on plant and soil characteristics[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 142(4): 899-908. |
[6] | 鲁延芳, 占玉芳, 钱万建, 等. 河西走廊中部人工沙漠植被典型群落物种的多样性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(4): 14-18. |
[Lu Yanfang, Zhan Yufang, Qian Wanjian, et al. Species diversity of typical community of artificial desert vegetation in Hexi Corridor[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 14-18. ] | |
[7] | Sun J, Wang N, Niu Z. Effect of soil environment on species diversity of desert plant communities[J]. Plants, 2023, 12(19): 3465. |
[8] | 李亚萍, 蒋进, 宋春武, 等. 莫索湾地区典型沙丘土壤因子与短命植物物种多样性的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(4): 912-919. |
[Li Yaping, Jiang Jin, Song Chunwu, et al. Relationship between soil factors and ephemeral plant species diversity on typical sand dunes in the Mosuowan Region[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018, 35(4): 912-919. ] | |
[9] | Zhang R, Liu T, Zhang J L, et al. Spatial and environmental determinants of plant species diversity in a temperate desert[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 9(2): 124-131. |
[10] | 焦鹏华, 牛健植, 苗禹博, 等. 2001—2020年全球植被对极端气候的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(11): 1-15. |
[Jiao Penghua, Niu Jianzhi, Miao Yubo, et al. Global vegetation response to extreme climate from 2001 to 2020[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(11): 1-15. ] | |
[11] | 汤萃文, 王瑛瑛, 李春霖, 等. 民勤荒漠区不同植物群落土壤微生物生物量碳氮及生态化学计量特征[J]. 林业与生态科学, 2024, 39(2): 190-196. |
[Tang Cuiwen, Wang Yingying, Li Chunlin, et al. Characterization of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and ecological stoichiometry in different plant communities in Minqin Desert Area[J]. Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 2024, 39(2): 190-196. ] | |
[12] | 李媛媛. 土壤容重对植烟土壤特性和烤烟生长发育的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2024. |
[Li Yuanyuan. Effects of Soil Bulk Density on Soil Characteristics and Growth and Development of Flue-cured Tobacco[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2024. ] | |
[13] | 李善家, 王兴敏, 刘海锋, 等. 河西走廊荒漠植物多样性及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(3): 429-438. |
[Li Shanjia, Wang Xingmin, Liu Haifeng, et al. Diversity of desert plants in Hexi Corridor and its response to environmental factors[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(3): 429-438. ] | |
[14] | 马雄忠, 王新平. 阿拉善高原2种荒漠植物根系构型及生态适应性特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(17): 6001-6008. |
[Ma Xiongzhong, Wang Xinping. Root architecture and adaptive strategy of two desert plants in the Alxa Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(17): 6001-6008. ] | |
[15] | 王園博, 赵锐锋, 张丽华, 等. 黑河中游湿地不同植物群落土壤有机碳分布及影响因素[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(5): 833-844. |
[Wang Yuanbo, Zhao Ruifeng, Zhang Lihua, et al. Soil organic carbon and its influencing factors on the different plant communities in the middle reaches of the Heihe River wetland[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(5): 833-844. ] | |
[16] | 李军豪, 陈勇, 杨国靖, 等. 1975—2018年民勤绿洲沙漠化过程及其驱动机制[J]. 中国沙漠, 2021, 41(3): 44-55. |
[Li Junhao, Chen Yong, Yang Guojing, et al. The aeolian desertification process and driving mechanism of Minqin Oasis from 1975 to 2018[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(3): 44-55. ] | |
[17] | 文侠, 贾筱昕, 董丽杰, 等. 沙区在黄河流域生态保护中的作用探讨——以民勤县为例[J]. 森林防火, 2023, 41(2): 86-90. |
[Wen Xia, Jia Xiaoxin, Dong Lijie, et al. Discussion on sandy areas in building a solid ecological protection of the Yellow River basin——Taking Minqin County as an example[J]. Journal of Wildland Fire Science, 2023, 41(2): 86-90. ] | |
[18] | 戴晟懋, 邱国玉, 赵明. 甘肃民勤绿洲荒漠化防治研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2008, 25(3): 319-324. |
[Dai Shengmao, Qiu Guoyu, Zhao Ming. Study on land desertification and its prevention and control measures in the Minqin oasis in Gansu Province[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2008, 25(3): 319-324. ] | |
[19] | 郭方君, 马全林, 张锦春, 等. 石羊河流域荒漠区植被类型、分布和数量特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(11): 1848-1857. |
[Guo Fangjun, Ma Quanlin, Zhang Jinchun, et al. Vegetation types, distribution and quantitative characteristics in the desert area of Shiyang River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(11): 1848-1857. ] | |
[20] | 柴成武, 王理德, 尉秋实, 等. 民勤青土湖区不同年限退耕地土壤颗粒组成和养分变化特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(4): 99-104. |
[Chai Chengwu, Wang Lide, Yu Qiushi, et al. Change characteristics of soil particle composition and nutrient of abandoned farmland in different years in Qingtu Lake Area in Minqin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(4): 99-104. ] | |
[21] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第三版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
[Bao Shidan. Agrochemical Analysis of Soil[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Publishing House, 2000. ] | |
[22] | 毛毛, 蒙仲举, 党晓宏, 等. 巴丹吉林沙漠东缘天然梭梭种群结构与动态特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 971-978. |
[Mao Mao, Meng Zhongju, Dang Xiaohong, et al. Population dynamics of natural Haloxylon ammodendron in the eastern margin of Badain Jaran Desert[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(6): 971-978. ] | |
[23] | 单立山, 苏铭, 张正中, 等. 不同生境下荒漠植物红砂-珍珠猪毛菜混生根系的垂直分布规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(4): 475-486. |
[Shan Lishan, Su Ming, Zhang Zhengzhong, et al. Vertical distribution pattern of mixed root systems of desert plants Reaumuria soongarica and Salsola passerina under different environmental gradients[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42(4): 475-486. ] | |
[24] | 李文静, 吕光辉, 张磊, 等. 干旱区荒漠植物体内潜在水源差异及利用策略分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(8): 1557-1566. |
[Li Wenjing, Lv Guanghui, Zhang Lei, et al. Analysis of potential water source differences and utilization strategies of desert plants in arid regions[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(8): 1557-1566. ] | |
[25] | 依里帆·艾克拜尔江, 李进, 庄伟伟. 两种荒漠豆科植物化学计量特征与生境土壤因子的关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2022, 42(8): 1384-1395. |
[Erfan Akberjan, Li Jin, Zhuang Weiwei. Relationship between habitat soil factor and stoichiometric characteristics of two kinds of desert leguminous plants[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2022, 42(8): 1384-1395. ] | |
[26] | 牧仁, 李新乐, 徐光甫, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠不同生境土壤养分分布[J/OL]. 生态学杂志, [2024-08-21]. 1-12. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1148.Q.20240821.1042.005.html. |
[Mu Ren, Li Xinle, Xu Guangfu, et al. Soil nutrient distributions in different habitats of the Ulanbuh Desert[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, [2024-08-21]. 1-12. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1148.Q.20240821.1042.005.html. ] | |
[27] | 罗雨溪, 孔德兵, 王永欣, 等. 喀斯特槽谷区植被演替对土壤有机碳储量及固碳潜力的影响研究[J]. 绿色科技, 2022, 24(4): 131-135. |
[Luo Yuxi, Kong Debing, Wang Yongxin, et al. Effects of vegetation succession on soil organic carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential in Karstic Troughs and Valleys[J]. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 131-135. ] | |
[28] | 游郭虹, 刘丹, 王艳丽, 等. 高寒草甸植物叶片生态化学计量特征对长期氮肥添加的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(9): 50-62. |
[You Guohong, Liu Dan, Wang Yanli, et al. Response of plant leaf ecological stoichiometric characteristics to long-term nitrogen addition in alpine meadow[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 50-62. ] | |
[29] | Tian H Q, Chen G S, Zhang C, et al. Pattern and variation of C: N: P ratios in China’s soils: A synthesis of observational data[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2010, 98(27): 139-151. |
[30] | 孙雪, 龙永丽, 刘乐, 等. 河西走廊中段荒漠绿洲土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(6): 3353-3363. |
[Sun Xue, Long Yongli, Liu Le, et al. Soil stoichiometry characterization in the Oasis-desert Transition Zone of Linze, Zhangye[J]. Environmental Science, 2023, 44(6): 3353-3363. ] | |
[31] | 马雅莉, 高荣, 刘喜东, 等. 白于山区不同植物群落土壤碳氮磷空间分布及化学计量特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(9): 116-125. |
[Ma Yali, Gao Rong, Liu Xidong, et al. Spatial distribution and stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in different plant communities in Baiyu Mountain Areas[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023, 43(9): 116-125. ] | |
[32] | 陶冶, 吴甘霖, 刘耀斌, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠典型灌木群落土壤化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(2): 305-314. |
[Tao Ye, Wu Ganlin, Liu Yaobin, et al. Soil stoichiometry and their influencing factors in typical shrub communities in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 37(2): 305-314. ] | |
[33] | Cleveland C C, Liptzin D. C: N: P stoichiometry in soil: Is there a “redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85(3): 235-252. |
[34] | 何欣月, 王宁, 刘均阳, 等. 黄土丘陵区植物群落多样性及生物量随土壤水分梯度变化特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1): 31-40. |
[He Xinyue, Wang Ning, Liu Junyang, et al. The variation of plant community diversity and biomass along a soil water gradient in loess hilly region[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(1): 31-40. ] | |
[35] | Conlin T S S, Driessche R. Response of soil CO2 and O2 concentrations to forest soil compaction at the long-term soil productivity sites in central British Columbia[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2000, 80(4): 625-632. |
[36] | 王加旭. 关中农田土壤物理质量退化特征[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2016. |
[Wang Jiaxu. Soil Physical Quality Degradation Characteristics in the Guanzhong Farmland[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2016. ] | |
[37] | 李湘. 土壤容重对白花泡桐生长的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2024. |
[Li Xiang. Effects of Soil Bulk Density on Paulownia fortunei Growth[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2024. ] | |
[38] | 马骏杰, 陈银萍, 牟晓明, 等. 植物多样性对青藏高原东北部高寒草甸土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 高原气象, 2025, 44(1): 56-66. |
[Ma Junjie, Chen Yinping, Mou Xiaoming, et al. Effects of plant diversity on soil organic carbon in alpine meadow in northeastern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2025, 44(1): 56-66. ] | |
[39] | 彭方成, 汤安民, 边华林, 等. 不同水位梯度和植被类型对洞庭湖湿地土壤有机碳储量的影响[J]. 湿地科学, 2023, 21(6): 868-875. |
[Peng Fangcheng, Tang Anmin, Bian Hualin, et al. Influences of different water level gradients and vegetation types on soil organic carbon storage in the Dongting Lake Wetland[J]. Wetland Science, 2023, 21(6): 868-875. ] |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |