基于地形梯度的青藏高原冰川分布格局及成因
收稿日期: 2023-06-09
修回日期: 2023-11-06
网络出版日期: 2024-03-11
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(41671072);商丘师范学院博士人才引进项目(50018401);商丘市科技创新领军人才项目(SQRC202212005);商丘师范学院黄河故道生态保护和高质量发展项目(2021KYFZ06)
Distribution pattern and causes of glaciers in the Tibetan Plateau based on terrain gradient
Received date: 2023-06-09
Revised date: 2023-11-06
Online published: 2024-03-11
目前,冰川分布与变化的影响机理还存在不确定机制。为探究地形因子对冰川分布格局的影响,本文以第6版Randolph冰川编目数据和NASADEM为数据源,运用均值变点法、分布指数和地理探测器等方法,对青藏高原冰川在地形起伏度、海拔、坡度和坡向等地形梯度上的分布格局及其与地形因子之间的响应关系进行分析。结果表明:(1)青藏高原冰川对坡向、坡度的适宜性较广,对地形起伏度、海拔的选择性较强,且在高地形起伏度、高海拔上呈现优势分布。(2)地形对冰川发育影响较大,各地形因子对冰川空间分布的影响显著不同。海拔和地形起伏度是控制冰川分布的主要因素,且交互探测结果表明二者共同作用对冰川空间分异性影响最大。(3)在海拔和地形起伏度梯度上,喜马拉雅山脉冰川优势分布范围最广,其次是喀喇昆仑山脉,其余10座山脉冰川的优势分布均呈近似正态分布,但不同山脉形态各异。
许宁 , 李治国 , 梁雪悦 , 周晓莹 . 基于地形梯度的青藏高原冰川分布格局及成因[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024 , 41(2) : 230 -239 . DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.02.06
The formation and development of glaciers depend on a combination of topographic conditions and climatic factors, such as precipitation and temperature. However, the mechanisms underlying glacier distribution and variation remain uncertain. Our study aims to explore the relationship between glacier distribution patterns and topographical factors and uncover the driving forces behind them. To accomplish this, we utilized the Randolph Glacier Inventory version 6 and NASADEM for our analysis. Initially, we derived four key topographical factors based on NASADEM: relief degree of land surface (RDLS), altitude, slope, and aspect. Because the calculation of RDLS has scale dependence, the key is to determine the optimal analysis window using the average change-point analysis approach. The identified optimal analysis window size for RDLS evaluation in the study area was a rectangular neighborhood of 36 × 36 pixels, corresponding to an area of approximately 1.17 km2. Subsequently, we examined glacier distribution patterns across various terrains in the Tibetan Plateau using the distribution index. This index elucidates the disparities between actual and standard glacier distributions across various mountain chains, excluding area disturbances. Finally, we employed the geodetector method to quantitatively assess the spatial interplay between glacier distribution patterns and topographical elements. This innovative statistical approach identifies spatially stratified heterogeneity, pinpoints explanatory factors, and evaluates interactive relationships between variables. The results show that: (1) Glacier distribution in the Tibetan Plateau shows strong selectivity for RDLS and altitude, with wide suitability for aspect and slope. The predominant distribution involves large RDLS and high altitudes. (2) Topography significantly influences glacier development, with varied effects of topographic factors on the spatial distribution of glaciers. Altitude and RDLS emerged as dominant factors controlling the distribution of glaciers, followed by slope and aspect. The interactive detection revealed that the combined effect of altitude and RDLS had a dominant impact on spatially stratified glacier heterogeneity. (3) Among altitude and RDLS gradients, the Himalayas Mountains had the most extensive glacier distribution, followed by the Karakoram Mountains. The other ten mountain ranges demonstrated diverse glacier distributions, though they mostly adhered to a normal pattern. This study will serve as a theoretical reference and provide data support for regional hydrology research. It offers vital guidance for appropriate water resource management in arid lands.
[1] | 刘时银, 姚晓军, 郭万钦, 等. 基于第二次冰川编目的中国冰川现状[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(1): 3-16. |
[Liu Shiyin, Yao Xiaojun, Guo Wanqin, et al. The contemporary glaciers in China based on the Second Chinese Glacier Inventory[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(1): 3-16.] | |
[2] | 姚檀栋, 陈发虎, 崔鹏, 等. 从青藏高原到第三极和泛第三极[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(9): 924-931. |
[Yao Tandong, Chen Fahu, Cui Peng, et al. From Tibetan Plateau to Third Pole and Pan-Third Pole[J]. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, 2017, 32(9): 924-931.] | |
[3] | Yao T D, Wu F Y, Ding L, et al. Multispherical interactions and their effects on the Tibetan Plateau’s earth system: A review of the recent researches[J]. National Science Review, 2015, 2(4): 468-488. |
[4] | 冀琴, 董军, 刘睿, 等. 1990—2015年喜马拉雅山冰川变化的遥感监测及动因分析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(3): 486-496. |
[Ji Qin, Dong Jun, Liu Rui, et al. Glacier changes in response to climate change in the Himalayas in 1990-2015[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(3): 486-496.] | |
[5] | 施雅风. 中国冰川与环境:现在、过去和未来[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000. |
[Shi Yafeng. Glaciers and Their Environments in China: The Present, Past and Future[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.] | |
[6] | 孙永, 易朝路, 刘金花, 等. 昆仑山木孜塔格地区冰川发育水汽来源探讨[J]. 地球环境学报, 2018, 9(4): 383-391. |
[Sun Yong, Yi Chaolu, Liu Jinhua, et al. Discussing sources of moisture feeding the glaciers on the Ulugh Muztagh, Kunlun Mountain[J]. Journal of Earth Environment, 2018, 9(4): 383-391.] | |
[7] | 吴坤鹏, 刘时银, 郭万钦. 1980—2015年南迦巴瓦峰地区冰川变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 冰川冻土, 2020, 42(4): 1115-1125. |
[Wu Kunpeng, Liu Shiyin, Guo Wanqin. Glacier variation and its response to climate change in the Mount Namjagbarwa from 1980 to 2015[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2020, 42(4): 1115-1125.] | |
[8] | 王盛, 姚檀栋, 蒲健辰. 祁连山七一冰川物质平衡的时空变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 399-412. |
[Wang Sheng, Yao Tandong, Pu Jianchen. Spatial and temporal variations in mass balance of Qiyi Glacier in Qilian Mountains[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(2): 399-412.] | |
[9] | Wang R J, Ding Y J, Shangguan D H, et al. Influence of topographic shading on the mass balance of the high mountain Asia glaciers[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(7): 1576. |
[10] | 张正勇, 刘琳, 徐丽萍. 冰川分布格局对地理因子响应机制[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(2): 290-296. |
[Zhang Zhengyong, Liu Lin, Xu Liping. Response mechanism of glacial distribution patterns to geographical factors[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 27(2): 290-296.] | |
[11] | 张鲜鹤, 王欣, 刘时银, 等. 基于第二次冰川编目数据的中国冰川高度结构特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 397-406. |
[Zhang Xianhe, Wang Xin, Liu Shiyin, et al. Altitude structure characteristics of the glaciers in China based on the Second Chinese Glacier Inventory[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(3): 397-406.] | |
[12] | 周远刚, 赵锐锋, 张丽华, 等. 博格达峰地区冰川和积雪变化遥感监测及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(6): 169-177. |
[Zhou Yuangang, Zhao Ruifeng, Zhang Lihua, et al. Remote sensing monitoring of the change of glacier and snow cover and its influencing factors in Mount Bogda[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(6): 169-177.] | |
[13] | 黄丹妮, 张震, 张莎莎, 等. 东帕米尔高原冰川运动特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(1): 131-140. |
[Huang Danni, Zhang Zhen, Zhang Shasha, et al. Characteristics of glacier movement in the eastern Pamir Plateau[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(1): 131-140.] | |
[14] | 张廉卿, 许向科, 张骞, 等. 念青唐古拉山西段小冰期以来冰川变化[J]. 地球环境学报, 2019, 10(6): 567-578. |
[Zhang Lianqin, Xu Xiangke, Zhang Qian, et al. Glacier change in the western Nyainqentanglha Range, southern Tibet, since the Little Ice Age[J]. Journal of Earth Environment, 2019, 10(6): 567-578.] | |
[15] | 李林凤, 李开明. 石羊河流域冰川变化与地形因子的关系探究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2019, 41(5): 1026-1035. |
[Li Linfeng, Li Kaiming. Study on the relationship between glacier change and topographic factors in the Shiyang River Basin[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2019, 41(5): 1026-1035.] | |
[16] | 封志明, 李文君, 李鹏, 等. 青藏高原地形起伏度及其地理意义[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1359-1372. |
[Feng Zhiming, Li Wenjun, Li Peng, et al. Relief degree of land surface and its geographical meanings in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1359-1372.] | |
[17] | 王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器:原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. |
[Wang Jinfeng, Xu Chengdong. Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134.] | |
[18] | Zhang G Q, Yao T D, Xie H J, et al. Increased mass over the Tibetan Plateau: From lakes or glaciers?[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2013, 40(10): 2125-2130. |
[19] | RGI Consortium. Randolph Glacier Inventory: A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines, Version 6[DB/OL]. Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2017. |
[20] | 牟建新, 李忠勤, 张慧, 等. 全球冰川面积现状及近期变化—基于2017年发布的第6版Randolph冰川编目[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(2): 238-248. |
[Mu Jianxin, Li Zhongqin, Zhang Hui, et al. The global glacierized area: Current situation and recent change, based on the Randolph Glacier Inventory(RGI 6.0) published in 2017[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2018, 40(2): 238-248.] | |
[21] | Guo W Q, Liu S Y, Xu L, et al. The second Chinese glacier inventory: Data, methods and results[J]. Journal of Glaciology, 2015, 61(226): 357-372. |
[22] | M?lg N, Bolch T, Rastner P, et al. A consistent glacier inventory for Karakoram and Pamir derived from landsat data: Distribution of debris cover and mapping challenges[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2018, 10(4): 1807-1827. |
[23] | Uuemaa E, Ahi S, Montibeller B, et al. Vertical accuracy of freely available global digital elevation models (ASTER, AW3D30, MERIT, TanDEM-X, SRTM, and NASADEM)[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(21): 3482. |
[24] | 宿星, 魏万鸿, 郭万钦, 等. 基于SRTM DEM的地形起伏度对天水市黄土滑坡的影响分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(3): 616-622. |
[Su Xing, Wei Wanhong, Guo Wanqin, et al. Analyzing the impact of relief amplitude to loess landslides based on SRTM DEM in Tianshui Prefecture[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2017, 39(3): 616-622.] | |
[25] | 喻红, 曾辉, 江子瀛. 快速城市化地区景观组分在地形梯度上的分布特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2001, 21(1): 64-69. |
[Yu Hong, Zeng Hui, Jiang Ziying. Study on distribution characteristics of landscape elements along the terrain gradient[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2001, 21(1): 64-69.] | |
[26] | Zhu M L, Yao T D, Yang W, et al. Differences in mass balance behavior for three glaciers from different climatic regions on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2018, 50: 3457-3484. |
[27] | Huang L X, Chen J, Yang K, et al. The northern boundary of the Asian summer monsoon and division of westerlies and monsoon regimes over the Tibetan Plateau in present-day[J]. Science China(Earth Sciences), 2023, 66(4): 882-893. |
[28] | 杨勤业, 郑度. 冈底斯山-念青唐古拉山线自然地理意义的探讨[J]. 地理研究, 1985, 4(2): 36-44. |
[Yang Qinye, Zheng Du. On the significance of the boundary line-the Gandisi-Nyainqentanglha Range[J]. Geographical Research, 1985, 4(2): 36-44.] |
/
〈 | 〉 |