水土资源

降雨过程中土壤物理结皮入渗情况及当量孔径的变化研究

  • 刘冠亨 ,
  • 吴冠宇 ,
  • 李建德 ,
  • 王健 ,
  • 杨琴侠 ,
  • 薛冬
展开
  • 1.西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院,陕西 杨凌 712100
    2.陕西省水利水电工程咨询中心,陕西 西安 710000
    3.黄河勘测规划设计研究院有限公司,河南 郑州 450000
    4.韩城市水土保持工作站,陕西 韩城 714000
刘冠亨(2001-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀方面的研究. E-mail: lgh18291278923@163.com

收稿日期: 2023-03-01

  修回日期: 2023-06-04

  网络出版日期: 2023-11-01

基金资助

科技兴蒙行动重点专项(2022EEDSKXM005-01);国家自然科学基金项目(42377332)

Equivalent pore size characteristics in the soil physical crust

  • Guanheng LIU ,
  • Guanyu WU ,
  • Jiande LI ,
  • Jian WANG ,
  • Qinxia YANG ,
  • Dong XUE
Expand
  • 1. College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
    2. Shanxi Water Conservancy & Electricity Engineering Consultant Center, Xi’an 710000, Shaanxi, China
    3. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Henan 450000, Zhengzhou, China
    4. Hancheng District Soil and Water Conservation Workstation, Hancheng 714000, Shaanxi, China

Received date: 2023-03-01

  Revised date: 2023-06-04

  Online published: 2023-11-01

摘要

土壤物理结皮的孔径的大小直接影响土壤水分下渗和气体交换。因此,本研究通过人工模拟降雨,选择塿土为研究对象,采用微型盘式入渗仪进行入渗试验,研究土壤物理结皮在不同降雨强度下的入渗情况以及孔径变化情况。结果表明:(1)在-0.5 cm压力水头下,结构结皮的吸渗率随着降雨历时先减小,在20 min时增大,沉积结皮的吸渗率随着降雨历时的延长一直减小;(2)两类结皮随着降雨过程的进行,大孔隙(孔径>0.5 mm)占比开始减小,中等孔隙(孔径介于0.3~0.5 mm)占比增加,结构结皮在20 min时小孔隙(孔径<0.3 mm)占比有所减小,沉积结皮中等孔隙的占比在10 min后保持不变;(3)两类结皮的平均孔径均随降雨历时的延长而减小。负压水头增大过程中,土壤结皮有效吸渗能力减小,当土壤结皮发育完全后,吸渗率趋于稳定。

本文引用格式

刘冠亨 , 吴冠宇 , 李建德 , 王健 , 杨琴侠 , 薛冬 . 降雨过程中土壤物理结皮入渗情况及当量孔径的变化研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023 , 40(10) : 1608 -1614 . DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.10.07

Abstract

Pore size in the soil physical crust directly affects soil water infiltration and gas exchange. However, few studies have investigated the changes in pore size within the soil physical crust during rainfall events. This study has utilized Lou soil as the research object and artificial rainfall simulations, with microdisk infiltration apparatus to study the infiltration of the soil physical crust under different rainfall intensities and the pore size changes. The results show that under the pressure head of -0.5 cm, the infiltration rate of the structural crust decreases with the rainfall duration and then increases after 20 min. As rainfall progresses, the proportion of large pores in the two types of crusts begins to decrease, and the proportion of medium pores increases. The proportion of small pores in the structural crust decreases at 20 min, and the proportion of medium pores in the sedimentary crust remains unchanged at 10 min. The average pore size for the two types of crusts was found to decrease with the extension of the rainfall duration. During the increase in the negative pressure head, the effective infiltration capacity of the soil crust decreased. When the soil crust developed completely, the infiltration rate tended to be stable.

参考文献

[1] 许海超, 李子君, 林锦阔, 等. 燕山土石山区降雨和下垫面条件对坡面侵蚀产沙的影响[J]. 山地学报, 2016, 34(1): 46-53.
[1] [Xu Haichao, Li Zijun, Lin Jinkuo, et al. Influences of rainfall and underlying surface conditions on soil erosion and sediment yield in Yanshan rocky mountain area[J]. Mountain Research, 2016, 34(1): 46-53.]
[2] 李桂芳, 郑粉莉, 卢嘉, 等. 降雨和地形因子对黑土坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(4): 147-154, 182.
[2] [Li Guifang, Zheng Fenli, Lu Jia, et al. Effects of rainfall and topography on soil erosion processes of black soil hillslope[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(4): 147-154, 182.]
[3] 陈琳, 王健, 霍春平, 等. 坡耕地土壤物理结皮分层颗粒组成特征研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(4): 985-992.
[3] [Chen Lin, Wang Jian, Huo Chunping, et al. Study on particle distribution characteristics of soil physical crust profile in sloping farmland[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023, 60(4): 985-992.]
[4] 吴发启, 范文波. 坡耕地土壤结皮形成的影响因素分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(1): 33-36.
[4] [Wu Faqi, Fan Wenbo. Analysis on factors affecting soil crust formation on slope farmland[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002, 16(1): 33-36.]
[5] 路培. 土壤结皮形成机制及空间分布对侵蚀的影响研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018.
[5] [Lu Pei. Formation of Soil Crust and its Effects of Different Spatial Distributions of Physical Soil Crusts on Runoff and Erosion[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2018.]
[6] 李浩宏, 王占礼, 申楠, 等. 土壤结皮研究进展[J]. 人民黄河, 2015, 37(10): 92-98.
[6] [Li Haohong, Wang Zhanli, Shen Nan, et al. Research progress of soil crust[J]. Yellow River, 2015, 37(10): 92-98.]
[7] 吴秋菊, 吴佳, 王林华, 等. 黄土区坡耕地土壤结皮对入渗的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(2): 303-311.
[7] [Wu Qiuju, Wu Jia, Wang Linhua, et al. Effects of soil crusts on infiltration in slope land in the loess area[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(2): 303-311.]
[8] 杨昌, 王健, 李建德, 等. 土壤表层结皮失水裂缝形态发育规律研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(10): 103-108, 124.
[8] [Yang Chang, Wang Jian, Li Jiande, et al. Formation of crusts and initiation and development of cracks in them following soil wetting and drying[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2021, 40(10): 103-108, 124.]
[9] 李志熙, 白岗栓, 邹超煜, 等. 自然生草对渭北旱塬苹果园土壤孔隙和水分入渗的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(5): 146-156.
[9] [Li Zhixi, Bai Gangshuan, Zou Chaoyu, et al. Effects of self-sown grass on soil porosity and soil infiltration in apple orchard in Weibei dry plateau[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2022, 27(5): 146-156.]
[10] 夏青, 何丙辉. 土壤物理特性对水力侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持应用技术, 2006(5): 12-15.
[10] [Xia Qing, He Binghui. Effect of soil physical properties on water erosion[J]. Technology of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006(5): 12-15.]
[11] 单奇华, 李卫正, 俞元春, 等. 南京城市林业土壤可蚀性及影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(2): 47-50.
[11] [Shan Qihua, Li Weizheng, Yu Yuanchun, et al. Erodibility of urban forest soil in nanjing[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 2008, 32(2): 47-50.]
[12] 丁绍兰, 王振, 赵串串, 等. 青海黄土丘陵区沟蚀侵蚀模数与其影响因子关系分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(6): 60-65.
[12] [Ding Shaolan, Wang Zhen, Zhao Chuanchuan, et al. The relationship between the erosion modulus and the influence factors in the loess hilly and gully area[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2012, 26(6): 60-65.]
[13] 李建德, 王健, 徐飞飞, 等. 不同负压设置对微型盘式入渗仪测定结皮入渗性能的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(7): 78-85.
[13] [Li Jiande, Wang Jian, Xu Feifei, et al. Effect of suction in the infiltrometer on water infiltration into crusted soils[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2022, 41(7): 78-85.]
[14] 卜崇峰, 石长春, 蔡强国. 土壤结皮几种分析测算指标的应用评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(2): 240-243.
[14] [Bu Chongfeng, Shi Changchun, Cai Qiangguo. Evaluation on calculation on index for soil crust development[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(2): 240-243.]
[15] 付秋萍, 王全九, 樊军. Philip公式确定吸渗率时间尺度研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(4): 65-70.
[15] [Fu Qiuping, Wang Quanjiu, Fan Jun. Study on the time scales of soil sorptivety determined by Philip equation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2009, 27(4): 65-70.]
[16] 马金龙, 许欢欢, 王兵, 等. 黄土高原坡耕地土壤物理结皮对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(1): 45-49.
[16] [Ma Jinlong, Xu Huanhuan, Wang Bing, et al. Effect of soil physical crust on runoff and sediment yield on sloping farmland of the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(1): 45-49.]
[17] 付广军, 廖超英, 孙长忠. 毛乌素沙地土壤结皮对水分运动的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(1): 7-10.
[17] [Fu Guangjun, Liao Chaoying, Sun Changzhong. The Effects of soil crust to water movement in Maowusu Sand Land[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2010, 25(1): 7-10.]
[18] 王荣女. 毛乌素沙地不同类型生物土壤结皮-土壤呼吸的季节变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 961-972.
[18] [Wang Rongnv. Seasonal variation characteristics of different types of biological soil crust-soil system respiration in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Aird Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 961-972.]
[19] 许志平, 邵天杰, 张连凯, 等. 黄土区不同土地利用类型下砂质壤土地表CO2通量变化特征——以清凉寺沟流域为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1000-1009.
[19] [Xu Zhiping, Shao Tianjie, Zhang Liankai, et al. Study on the change of surface CO2 flux in sandy loamy soil under different land use types: An example from the Qingliangsi ditch watershed[J]. Aird Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 1000-1009.]
[20] 蔡强国. 流域产沙模型概述[J]. 中国水土保持, 1990(6): 16-20, 64-65.
[20] [Cai Qiangguo. Review on the modelling of sediment yield from watershed[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 1990(6): 16-20, 64-65.]
文章导航

/