毛乌素沙地沙柳液流特征及其对环境因子的响应

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2021.03.21

干旱区研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 794-801.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2021.03.21

毛乌素沙地沙柳液流特征及其对环境因子的响应

洪光宇^1,²(),王晓江²,刘果厚¹(),张雷²,高孝威²,李卓凡²,刘铁山²,刘辰明²,李梓豪²

1.内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010011
2.内蒙古自治区林业科学研究院,内蒙古呼和浩特010010

收稿日期:2020-12-09 修回日期:2021-02-26 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-06-17
通讯作者: 刘果厚
作者简介:洪光宇（1985- ）,女,在读博士,助理研究员,研究方向为沙地水资源管理与应用. E-mail: nmghgy@163.com
基金资助:
内蒙古科技重大专项(2019ZD007);内蒙古科技重大专项(201601061);内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2019MS03036);内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2018MS03036);国家自然科学基金项目(31960284)

Characteristics of Salix psammophila sap flow and its response to environmental factors in Mu Us Sandy Land

HONG Guangyu^1,²(),WANG Xiaojiang²,LIU Guohou¹(),ZHANG Lei²,GAO Xiaowei²,LI Zhuofan²,LIU Tieshan²,LIU Chenming²,LI Zihao²

1. College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, Inner Mongolia, China
2. Inner Mongolia Forestry Research Institute, Hohhot 010010, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2020-12-09 Revised:2021-02-26 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-06-17
Contact: Guohou LIU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

应用Flow32-1K包裹式热平衡液流仪,对毛乌素沙地沙柳不同径级枝条液流进行长期监测,同步观测试验样地气象变化,分析沙柳枝条液流变化规律并建立与环境因子关系模型。结果表明：（1）沙柳枝条随着径级的增加液流日变化从宽峰曲线到明显的单峰曲线,并且液流速率呈增大趋势;天气条件对液流影响较大,雨天液流速率波动较剧烈,呈明显的多峰曲线;晴天时液流速率变化呈明显的双峰曲线,雨天沙柳枝条液流速率及日液流量均比晴天低,随着径级增大,晴天和雨天日累计液流量差值逐渐变大。（2）液流速率与地表温度、大气温度、饱和水汽压差、太阳辐射和风速呈极显著正相关关系,与空气相对湿度呈极显著负相关关系。（3）雨天环境因子中饱和水汽压差和空气相对湿度对液流速率的影响较大,拟合结果平均R²在0.8以上;晴天太阳辐射强度是控制沙柳枝条液流速率的重要因子,拟合结果平均R²在0.85以上。通过对沙柳枝条液流速率进行监测,分析沙柳群落的蒸腾消耗特征,为沙地水资源合理利用与群落结构优化调控提供数据支撑。

关键词: Flow32-1K包裹式热平衡液流仪, 沙柳, 液流, 气象因子, 毛乌素沙地

Abstract:

The sap flow pattern of Salix psammophila branches with different diameters was monitored long-term in the Mu Us Sand using a Flow32-1K wrapped heat balance sap flow meter. Additionally, the relationship between the sap flow of S. psammophila branches and the meteorological changes of the experimental plots was explored. With the increase in the diameter grade of branches, the diurnal variation of sap flow changed from a broad peak curve to an apparent single peak curve, and the sap flow rate showed an increasing trend. Weather conditions substantially influence sap flow, and the fluctuation of the sap flow rate on rainy days was severe, showing an obvious multi-peak curve. Otherwise, the change in the liquid flow rate on sunny days showed an evident bimodal curve. The mean sap flow rate on rainy days was lower than that on sunny days. With the increase in the diameter grade of branches, the difference of the cumulative sap flow rate between sunny days and rainy days gradually increased. Additionally, the sap flow rate showed a significant positive correlation with surface temperature, atmospheric temperature, saturated water vapor pressure, solar radiation, and wind speed, and it was negatively correlated with air relative humidity. On rainy days, saturated water vapor pressure and relative air humidity had a substantial influence on the sap flow rate. However, on sunny days, solar radiation was an important influence factor on sap flow rate. Based on the monitoring of the sap flow rate of branches and the transpiration consumption characteristics of the S. psammophila community, our study informs the rational utilization of water resources and the optimal control of community structure of S. psammophila.

Key words: Flow32-1K, Salix psammophila, sap flow, meteorological factors, Mu Us Sandy Land

洪光宇,王晓江,刘果厚,张雷,高孝威,李卓凡,刘铁山,刘辰明,李梓豪. 毛乌素沙地沙柳液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(3): 794-801.

HONG Guangyu,WANG Xiaojiang,LIU Guohou,ZHANG Lei,GAO Xiaowei,LI Zhuofan,LIU Tieshan,LIU Chenming,LI Zihao. Characteristics of Salix psammophila sap flow and its response to environmental factors in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(3): 794-801.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

表2

表3

不同天气条件下沙柳液流日变化与气象因子的关系模型"

天气	径级/mm	气象因素	回归方程	R²	P
雨天	2~8	T_d	Y=0.291T_d²-13.663T_d+160.266	0.571	0.000
		T	Y=0.004T³-0.135T²+18.531	0.555	0.000
		R	Y=4.493×10^-8R³-4.506×10^-5R²+0.02R+0.424	0.474	0.004
		V	Y=-0.096V³+1.254V²-2.595V+1.702	0.405	0.014
		RH	Y=8.239×10^-5RH³-2.083RH+127.351	0.846	0.000
		VPD	Y=-26.535VPD³+56.810VPD²-23.759VPD+2.605	0.811	0.000
	8~12	T_d	Y=0.483T_d²-17.284T_d+136.185	0.432	0.003
		T	Y=1.042T²-41.534T+414.049	0.766	0.000
		R	Y=1.653×10^-7R³+1×10^-4R²+0.129R+1.249	0.652	0.000
		V	Y=-2.053V³+17.606V²-32.712V+14.635	0.575	0.001
		RH	Y=1×10^-4RH³-9.107RH+574.856	0.794	0.000
		VPD	Y=-141.360VPD³+292.829VPD²-110.013VPD+10.689	0.852	0.000
	12~18	T_d	Y=0.666T_d²-18.453T_d+58.528	0.645	0.000
		T	Y=1.021T²-35.931T+311.823	0.704	0.000
		R	Y=3.862×10^-7R³-0.001R²+0.271R+6.681	0.644	0.000
		V	Y=-1.855V³+18.492V²-33.855V+20.888	0.566	0.001
		RH	Y=1×10^-4RH³-9.568RH+658.587	0.749	0.000
		VPD	Y=-259.123VPD³+481.190VPD²-149.290VPD+14.526	0.814	0.000
	>18	T_d	Y=3.987T_d²-179.034T_d+1999.456	0.628	0.000
		T	Y=1.830T²-65.409T+575.834	0.624	0.000
		R	Y=1.366×10^-6R³-0.002R²+0.595R+6.992	0.552	0.001
		V	Y=-3.002V³+31.071V²-58.411V+32.905	0.526	0.002
		RH	Y=0.001RH³-27.266RH+1740.160	0.875	0.000
		VPD	Y=-519.910VPD³+1009.793VPD²-363.978VPD+34.370	0.875	0.000
晴天	2~8	T_d	Y=0.001T_d³-0.017T_d²+5.116	0.446	0.002
		T	Y=0.039T²-1.765T+20.271	0.719	0.000
		R	Y=-1.429×10^-5R²+0.017R+0.45	0.793	0.000
		V	Y=1.22V³-4.163V²+4.323V+1.269	0.321	0.047
		RH	Y=0.004RH²-0.584RH+21.117	0.678	0.000
		VPD	Y=-0.364VPD³+2.697VPD²-3.910VPD+2.043	0.708	0.000
	8~12	T_d	Y=0.002T_d³-0.092T_d²+36.409	0.167	0.146
		T	Y=0.160T²-5.462T+49.625	0.519	0.000
		R	Y=-1.884×10^-7R³+1×10^-4R²+0.102R+2.661	0.914	0.000
		V	Y=14.756V³-55.446V²+56.987V+14.112	0.186	0.239
		RH	Y=0.018RH²-3.031RH+132.336	0.475	0.001
		VPD	Y=0.771VPD²+11.656VPD-0.604	0.496	0.001
	12~18	T_d	Y=4.115T_d-88.765	0.390	0.001
		T	Y=0.396T²-15.979T+168.795	0.754	0.000
		R	Y=1×10^-4R²+0.183R+9.193	0.866	0.000
		V	Y=-17.493V+20.642	0.187	0.020
		RH	Y=0.047RH²-7.061RH+273.135	0.736	0.000
		VPD	Y=-6.074VPD³+40.004VPD²-48.774VPD+23.7142	0.757	0.000
	>18	T_d	Y=0.010T_d³-0.376T_d²+106.963	0.614	0.000
		T	Y=0.016T³-0.523T²+92.649	0.821	0.000
		R	Y=4.263×10^-7R³-0.001R²+0.509R+14.371	0.761	0.000
		V	Y=13.636V³-32.108V²+32.951V+33.213	0.415	0.012
		RH	Y=0.084RH²-12.24RH+457.489	0.761	0.000
		VPD	Y=3.896VPD³-10.650VPD²+28.711VPD+3.839	0.809	0.000

表3

表4

参考文献 25

[1]	Swanson R H. Significant historical developments in thermal methods for measuring sap flow in trees[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 1994,72(1-2): doi: 10. 1016/0168-1923(94)90094-9. doi: 10. 1016/0168-1923(94)90094-9
[2]	Wullschleger S D, Meinzer F C, Vertessy R A. A review of whole-plant water use studies in tree[J]. Tree Physiology, 1998,18(8-9): doi: 10. 1093/treephys/18. 8-9. 499. doi: 10. 1093/treephys/18. 8-9. 499
[3]	于贵瑞, 王秋凤. 植物光合、蒸腾与水分利用的生理生态学[J]. 核农学报, 2010,24(3):579.
	[ Yu Guirui, Wang Qiufeng. Ecophysiology of plant photosynjournal, transpiration, and water use[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2010,24(3):579. ]
[4]	蒋高明. 植物生理生态学的学科起源与发展史[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004,28(2):278-284. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2004.0041
	[ Jiang Gaoming. On the origin and development of ecological plant physiology[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2004,28(2):278-284. ] doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2004.0041
[5]	洪光宇, 王晓江, 刘果厚, 等. 树干液流研究进展[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2020,46(3):50-55.
	[ Hong Guangyu, Wang Xiaojiang, Liu Guohou, et al. Research progress on stem sap flow[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2020,46(3):50-55. ]
[6]	徐世琴, 吉喜斌, 金博文. 典型固沙植物梭梭生长季蒸腾变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015,39(9):890-900. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0085
	[ Xu Shiqin, Ji Xibin, Jin Bowen. Dynamics and responses of sap flow of typical sand binding plants Haloxylon ammodendron to environmental variables[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015,39(9):890-900. ] doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0085
[7]	王卓, 郭月峰, 祁伟, 等. 不同灌水梯度下沙棘液流特征与环境因子的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020,37(4):1018-1025.
	[ Wang Zhuo, Guo Yuefeng, Qi Wei, et al. Relationship between the characteristics of Hippophae rhamnoides fluid flow and environmental factors under different irrigation gradients[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020,37(4):1018-1025. ]
[8]	肖怀娟, 李娟起, 王吉庆, 等. 亚低温与干旱胁迫对番茄植株水分传输和形态解剖结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020,31(8):2630-2636.
	[ Xiao Huaijuan, Li Juanqi, Wang Jiqing, et al. Effects of sub-low temperature and drought stress on water transport and morphological anatomy of tomato plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020,31(8):2630-2636. ]
[9]	赵自国, 赵凤娟, 夏江宝, 等. 地下水矿化度对黄河三角洲柽柳光合及耗水特征的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(12):2588-2600.
	[ Zhao Ziguo, Zhao Fengjuan, Xia Jiangbao, et al. Effects of groundwater salinity on photosynjournal and water consumption of Tamarix chinensis in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(12):2588-2600. ]
[10]	Nadezhdina N, Cermak J, Ceulemans R. Radial patterns of sap flow in woody stems of dominant and understory species: Scaling errors associated with positioning of sensors[J]. Tree Physiology, 2002,22(13): doi: 10. 1093/treephys/22. 13. 907. doi: 10. 1093/treephys/22. 13. 907
[11]	Russell S C, Brett W, Justin D H, et al. The upscaling of transpiration from individual trees to areal transpiration in tree belts[J]. Plant and Soil, 2007,297(1-2): doi: 10. 1007/s11104-007-9420-4. doi: 10. 1007/s11104-007-9420-4
[12]	曹铨, 王自奎, 沈禹颖. 陇东苹果园生草复合体系土壤水分季节动态[J] . 干旱区研究, 2019,36(1):77-84.
	[ Cao Quan, Wang Zikui, Shen Yuying. Seasonal variation of soil moisture content in apple orchard and grass intercropping system in Longdong[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019,36(1):77-84. ]
[13]	徐先英, 孙保平, 丁国栋, 等. 干旱荒漠区典型固沙灌木液流动态变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2008,28(3):895-905.
	[ Xu Xianying, Sun Baoping, Ding Guodong, et al. Sap flow patterns of three main sand-fixing shrubs and their responses to environmental factors in desert areas[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,28(3):895-905. ]
[14]	夏桂敏, 康绍忠, 李王成, 等. 甘肃石羊河流域干旱荒漠区柠条树干液流的日季变化[J]. 生态学报, 2006,26(4):1186-1193.
	[ Xia Guimin, Kang Shaozhong, Li Wangcheng, et al. Diurnal and seasonal variation of stem sap flow for Caragana korshinskii on the arid desert region in Shiyang river basin of Gansu[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006,26(4):1186-1193. ]
[15]	苏文旭, 贾德彬, 冯蕴, 等. 浑善达克沙地杨树水分利用特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020,37(2):357-363.
	[ Su Wenxu, Jia Debin, Feng Yun, et al. Analysis of water use characteristics of poplar trees in Otindag Sandy Land[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020,37(2):357-363. ]
[16]	于红博, 杨劼, 臧春鑫, 等. 皇甫川流域中国沙棘树干液流日变化及其相关因子[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008,27(7):1071-1076.
	[ Yu Hongbo, Yang Jie, Zang Chunxin, et al. Diurnal variation of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp, sinensis Rousi stem sap flow in Huangfuchuan Basin and related environmental factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008,27(7):1071-1076. ]
[17]	刘毅, 金谦, 桂东伟, 等. 新疆南部矮化红枣树干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019,36(5):1146-1152.
	[ Liu Yi, Jin Qian, Gui Dongwei, et al. Characteristics of sap flow of dwarf red jujube trees and the response fo environmental factors in South Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019,36(5):1146-1152. ]
[18]	段广东, 苏雅拉巴雅尔, 裴志永. 毛乌素沙地沙柳人工林经营所面临的问题及科学的应对措施[J]. 农家参谋, 2019(7):130-130.
	[ Duan Guangdong, Suyalabayaer, Pei Zhiyong. Problems and scientific countermeasures of Salix psammophila plantation management in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Adviser of Peasant Families, 2019(7):130-130. ]
[19]	陈国鹏, 赵文智. 毛乌素沙地南缘沙柳(Salix psammophila)丛生枝年龄结构与动态特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2015,35(6):1520-1526.
	[ Chen Guopeng, Zhao Wenzhi. Age structure and dynamics of Salix psammophila branches in southern edge of the Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2015,35(6):1520-1526. ]
[20]	洪光宇, 王晓江, 张雷, 等. 毛乌素沙地杨柴茎流速率动态研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2018,44(4):37-40.
	[ Hong Guangyu, Wang Xiaojiang, Zhang Lei, et al. Dynamic study on stem sap flow rate of Hedysarum fruiacosum var. mongolicum in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2018,44(4):37-40. ]
[21]	海龙, 王晓江, 张文军, 等. 毛乌素沙地人工沙柳(Salix psammophila)林平茬复壮技术[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016,36(1):131-136.
	[ Hai Long, Wang Xiaojiang, Zhang Wenjun, et al. Stumping rejuvenation technology of Salix psammophila artificial shrubbery in the Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2016,36(1):131-136. ]
[22]	裴志永, 郝少荣, 乔敬伟, 等. 毛乌素沙地沙柳枝条茎流特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019,28(1):48-56.
	[ Pei Zhiyong, Hao Shaorong, Qiao Jingwei, et al. Characteristics of stem flow of Salix psammophila’s branch in Mu Us Sand Land[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciencees, 2019,28(1):48-56. ]
[23]	Yue Guangyang, Zhao Halin, Zhang Tonghui, et al. Evaluation of water use of Caragana microphylla with the stem heat-balance method in Horqin Sandy Land, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 2008,148(11):1668-1678.
[24]	Xu Xiaoyan, Tong Ling, Li Fusheng, et al. Sap flow of irrigated Populus alba var. pyramidalis and its relationship with environmental factors and leaf area index in an arid region of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2011,16(2): doi: 10. 1007/s10310-010-0220-y. doi: 10. 1007/s10310-010-0220-y
[25]	吴芳, 陈云明, 于占辉. 黄土高原半干旱区刺槐生长盛期树干液流动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010,34(4):469-476. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.04.013
	[ Wu Fang, Chen Yunming, Yu Zhanhui. Growing season sap-flow dynamics of Robinia pseudoacacia plantation in the semi-arid region of Loess Plateau, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010,34(4):469-476. ] doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.04.013

编号	直径/mm	传感器型号
No.1	5.36	SGA5-WS
No.2	11.47	SGA10-WS
No.3	9.91	SGA10-WS
No.4	10.09	SGA10-WS
No.5	15.47	SGA16-WS
No.6	17.03	SGA16-WS
No.7	19.05	SGA19-WS
No.8	18.82	SGA19-WS
No.9	11.72	SGA10-WS
No.10	16.17	SGA16-WS
No.11	6.69	SGA15-WS
No.12	22.26	SGA19-WS
No.13	22.87	SGA19-WS

天气	径极/mm	T_d	T	R	V	RH	VPD
雨天	2~8	0.394^**	0.559^**	0.720^**	0.337^**	-0.525^**	0.519^**
	8~12	0.505^**	0.739^**	0.851^**	0.309^**	-0.662^**	0.670^**
	12~18	0.551^**	0.745^**	0.783^**	0.443^**	-0.648^**	0.644^**
	>18	0.551^**	0.755^**	0.725^**	0.392^**	-0.679^**	0.667^**
晴天	2~8	0.610^**	0.760^**	0.775^**	0.532^**	-0.695^**	0.755^**
	8~12	0.429^**	0.710^**	0.891^**	0.511^**	-0.611^**	0.661^**
	12~18	0.617^**	0.820^**	0.900^**	0.604^**	-0.746^**	0.790^**
	>18	0.732^**	0.848^**	0.820^**	0.676^**	-0.782^**	0.827^**

毛乌素沙地沙柳液流特征及其对环境因子的响应

Characteristics of Salix psammophila sap flow and its response to environmental factors in Mu Us Sandy Land

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

天气	径级/mm	回归方程	R²
雨天	2~8	Y=21.157VPD-1.403T+24.252	0.824
	8~12	Y=60.592VPD-15.208	0.790
	12~18	Y=100.361VPD-19.046	0.765
	>18	Y=316.013VPD-16.734T+277.536	0.859
晴天	2~8	Y=2.561VPD-1.343V-0.618	0.744
	8~12	Y=0.068R+6.580	0.773
	12~18	Y=0.043R+25.935VPD-15.313V-2.933	0.913
	>18	Y=102.368VPD+3.358RH-18.844V-296.922	0.854

[1]	李虹, 李忠勤, 陈普晨, 彭加加. 近20 a新疆阿尔泰山积雪时空变化及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1040-1051.
[2]	海龙, 周梅, 张嘉開, 洪光宇, 李凤滋, 费菲. 毛乌素沙地不同林龄杨柴灌木林土壤呼吸及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1107-1116.
[3]	莫秋霞, 宋炜, 卜崇峰, 王春, 王鹤鸣, 李亚红. 油蒿与沙柳灌木地藓结皮发育差异研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 979-987.
[4]	康利刚, 曹生奎, 曹广超, 杨羽帆, 严莉, 王有财. 青海湖沙柳河流域蒸散发时空变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 358-372.
[5]	石麟,李红悦,赵雨兴,任余艳,何金军,于凤强,哈斯额尔敦. 毛乌素沙地流动沙丘不同沙障组合措施的防风固沙效益评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(2): 268-279.
[6]	高晓瑜,汤鹏程,张莎,屈忠义,杨威. 内蒙古各气候区主要作物生长季干旱特征及其与响应因子回归模型[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1410-1427.
[7]	强玉泉,徐先英,张锦春,刘虎俊,郭树江,段晓峰. 民勤青土湖梭梭茎干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1143-1154.
[8]	胡晶华,刘静,白潞翼,张欣,兰鹏波,袁亚楠. 沙柳直根抗拉特性对循环荷载的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 900-907.
[9]	王荣女. 毛乌素沙地不同类型生物土壤结皮-土壤呼吸的季节变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 961-972.
[10]	杨琪,李书恒,李家豪,王嘉川. 秦岭森林植被物候及其对气象因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1065-1074.
[11]	曹丽君,孙慧兰,兰小丽,张乐乐,卢宝宝,刘天弋. 新疆天山极端干湿事件时空演变特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(1): 188-197.
[12]	陈志青, 邵天杰, 赵景波, 曹军骥, 岳大鹏. 内蒙古地区近地面臭氧浓度时空分异及主导气象因子探讨[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(6): 1504-1512.
[13]	买买提阿布都拉·依米尔, 布帕提曼·艾拜都拉, 陈天宇, 玛依拉·麦麦提, 赵玉倩. 新疆和田绿洲空气质量状况与气象条件的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(1): 46-57.
[14]	毛丽, 苏志珠, 王国玲, 马义娟, 李想. 毛乌素沙地不同土地利用类型的土壤粒度及有机质特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(3): 589-598.
[15]	范连连, 李耀明, Nataliia Terekhina, 马学喜, 马杰. 冷荒漠草本植物数量特征对不同水分输入和气象因子的响应 [J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(1): 139-146.