干旱区研究

干旱区研究 >

2023 , Vol. 40 >Issue 1: 143 - 151

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13866/j.azr.2023.01.15

生态与环境

林分密度和种植点配置对梭梭人工林防风效应的影响

  • 牛丹妮 ,
  • 韩蓉 ,
  • 马瑞 ,
  • 王振亭 ,
  • 刘虎俊 ,
  • 魏林源
展开
  • 1.甘肃农业大学林学院，甘肃 兰州 730070
    2.中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院，甘肃 兰州 730000
    3.甘肃省治沙研究所，甘肃 兰州 730070
牛丹妮（1996-），女，硕士研究生，主要从事荒漠化防治研究. E-mail: ndn0614@126.com

收稿日期: 2022-07-01

  修回日期: 2022-08-06

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-24

基金资助

国家自然科学基金区域创新发展联合基金(U21A2001);国家自然科学基金(31460221);甘肃农业大学导师扶持基金(GAU-QDFC-2020-09)

收起

Effects of density and plant point distribution on shelter efficiency of artificial Haloxylon ammodendron forest

  • Danni NIU ,
  • Rong HAN ,
  • Rui MA ,
  • Zhenting WANG ,
  • Hujun LIU ,
  • Linyuan WEI
Expand
  • 1. College of Forest, Gansu Agriculture University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    2. Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
    3. Gansu Desert Control Research Institute, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China

Received date: 2022-07-01

  Revised date: 2022-08-06

  Online published: 2023-02-24

Fold

摘要

研究不同密度和种植点配置对梭梭人工林防风效应的影响，为优化干旱区防风固沙林结构提供科学依据。以梭梭为原型，利用仿真植物设计了3种密度、4种种植点配置的品字形林带，编号与对应植株的株行距分别为A：17 cm×17 cm，B1：34 cm×17 cm，B2：17 cm×34 cm，C：34 cm×34 cm，通过风洞模拟试验，对林带在密度和种植点位发生变化时的流场和防风效应进行了测定分析。结果表明：（1） A、B1、B2、C林带的风速减速区（U/U0<1）的面积分别占流场总面积的78.06%、70.41%、74.36%和82.80%；弱风区（U/U0<0.4）的面积分别占流场总面积的22.46%、0.73%、5.91%和0；（2） 林分密度越大，冠下平均风速越小，但林带后近地层风速恢复越快，A、B1、B2、C林带的最小风速点分别在带后的11H、15H、15H和20H处（H为树高）；（3） 4个林带防风效应从大到小的排序为A>B2>B1>C，林带防风效应与林分密度间为非线性关系，林带在带后近地层风速降幅的比例关系为A:B:C≈6:3:2。具体造林时，应根据土壤水分承载力确定造林密度，在此基础上，优先选用“小株距，大行距”的种植点配置方式。

关键词： 防风固沙林; 梭梭; 密度; 种植点配置; 流场; 防风效应; 风洞模拟

本文引用格式

牛丹妮 , 韩蓉 , 马瑞 , 王振亭 , 刘虎俊 , 魏林源 . 林分密度和种植点配置对梭梭人工林防风效应的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023 , 40(1) : 143 -151 . DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.01.15

Abstract

This study aimed to study the shelter efficiency of Haloxylon ammodendron windbreak with different density and plant point distribution to provide scientific basis for optimizing the structure of windbreak in arid areas. With the field Haloxylon ammodendron as the prototype, windbreaks with three stand densities and four plant point distributions were designed, and their flow field and shelter efficiency were measured and analyzed by wind tunnel experiments. The corresponding label and “plant spacing × row spacing” of the windbreaks were as follows: A: 17 cm × 17 cm, B1: 34 cm × 17 cm, B2: 17 cm × 34 cm, and C: 34 cm × 34 cm. Results showed that (1) the area of wind speed deceleration region (U/U0 < 1) accounted for 78.06%, 70.41%, 74.36%, and 82.80% of the whole flow field of A, B1, B2, and C windbreaks, respectively; the area of weak wind speed region (U/U0 < 0.4) accounted for 22.46%, 0.73%, 5.91%, and 0%. (2) The higher the stand density, the lower the average wind speed under the canopy, but the faster the wind speed recovered at the leeside of windbreaks. The minimum wind speed was located at 11H, 15H, 15H, and 20H behind the A, B1, B2, and C windbreaks, respectively (H was the tree height). (3) The order of shelter efficiencies of the four windbreaks from large to small was A > B2 > B1 > C. The relationship between shelter efficiency and stand density was nonlinear. The ratio of wind reduction at the near surface was A:B:C≈6:3:2 behind the windbreaks. The density of afforestation should be determined based on the soil water carrying capacity in the practice of forestation. On this basis, the plant point distribution mode of “small plant spacing, large row spacing” should be preferred.

Key words： windbreak and sand fixation forest; Haloxylon ammodendron; density; plant point distribution; flow field; shelter efficiency; wind tunnel test

参考文献

[1] Cheng H, He W, Liu C, et al. Transition model for airflow fields from single plants to multiple plants[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 266-267: 29-42.
[2] Wu X X, Zou X Y, Zhou N, et al. Deceleration efficiencies of shrub windbreaks in a wind tunnel[J]. Aeolian Research, 2015, 16: 11-23.
[3] 马彦军, 李雪琳, 马瑞, 等. 前高后低型防风固沙林防风效应及其对风向的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(5): 28-33, 39.
[3] [Ma Yanjun, Li Xuelin, Ma Rui, et al. Windproof efficiency of shelterbelt in high-low pattern and its response to wind directions[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(5): 28-33, 39.]
[4] Ma R, Li J R, Ma Y J, et al. A wind tunnel study of the airflow field and shelter efficiency of mixed windbreaks[J]. Aeolian Research, 2019, 41: 100544.
[5] Ma R, Wang J H, Qu J J, et al. Effectiveness of shelterbelt with a non-uniform density distribution[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(12): 767-771.
[6] 李雪琳, 马彦军, 马瑞, 等. 不同带宽的防风固沙林流场结构及防风效能风洞实验[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(5): 936-944.
[6] [Li Xuelin, Ma Yanjun, Ma Rui, et al. Wind flow field and windproof efficiency of shelterbelt in different width[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(5): 936-944.]
[7] Ma R, Li J R, Ma Y J, et al. A wind tunnel study of the seasonal shelter efficiency of deciduous windbreaks[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2020, 63(4): 913-922.
[8] Lampartová I, Schneider J, Vyskot I, et al. Impact of protective shelterbelt on microclimate characteristics[J]. Ekologia Bratislava, 2015, 34(2): 101-110.
[9] 袁素芬, 陈亚宁, 李卫红. 干旱区新垦绿洲防护林体系的防护效益分析——以克拉玛依农业综合开发区为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(4): 600-607.
[9] [Yuan Sufen, Chen Yaning, Li Weihong. Protective effect of shelterbelts in new-cultivated oasis of arid area: Case study in Karamay agricultural development region[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2007, 27(4): 600-607.]
[10] 孙琳, 穆桂金, 周杰, 等. 策勒绿洲边缘新疆杨防护林疏透度的季相变化[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(6): 1181-1185.
[10] [Sun Lin, Mu Guijin, Zhou Jie, et al. Seasonal variation of shelterbeit porosity of Populus alba var. pyramdalis at the edge of Cele Oasis in the sourth of Tarim Basin[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2015, 32(6): 1181-1185.]
[11] Perera M. Shelter behind two-dimensional solid and porous fences[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 1981, 8(1-2): 93-104.
[12] Torita H, Satou H. Relationship between shelterbelt structure and mean wind reduction[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 2007, 145(3-4): 186-194.
[13] Tuzet A, Wilson J D. Measured winds about a thick hedge[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 145(3-4): 195-205.
[14] 杨文斌, 董慧龙, 卢琦, 等. 低覆盖度固沙林的乔木分布格局与防风效果[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(17): 5000-5008.
[14] [Yang Wenbin, Dong Huilong, Lu Qi, et al. Pattern of low-covered sand-fixing woodland and its windbreak effect[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(17): 5000-5008.]
[15] 杨红艳, 戴晟懋, 乐林, 等. 不同分布格局低覆盖度油蒿群丛防风效果[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(5): 6.
[15] [Yang Hongyan, Dai Shengmao, Le Lin, et al. Windbreak effects of different scheme Artemisia ordosica shrub for sand-fixation in low cover[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(5): 6.]
[16] 梁海荣, 王晶莹, 卢琦, 等. 低覆盖度乔木两种分布格局内风速流场和防风效果风洞实验[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(6): 1021-1028.
[16] [Liang Hairong, Wang Jingying, Lu Qi, et al. Windbreak effects and wind velocity flow field of low density arbor with tow spatial distribution patterns in wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2009, 29(6): 1021-1028.]
[17] 杨文斌, 李卫, 党宏忠, 等. 低覆盖度治沙理论—原理、模式、与效果[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
[17] [Yang Wenbin, Li Wei, Dang Hongzhong, et al. Theory of Low Coverage Sand Control-Principle Model and Effect[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.]
[18] 翟明普, 马履一. 森林培育学(第4版)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2021.
[18] [Zhai Mingpu, Ma Lvyi. Silviculture[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 2021.]
[19] 李雪宁, 徐先英, 郑桂恒, 等. 石羊河下游人工梭梭林健康评价体系构建及应用研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 872-882.
[19] [Li Xuening, Xu Xianying, Zheng Guiheng, et al. A health evaluation of a Haloxylon ammodendran plantion in the Shiyang River lower reaches[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(3): 872-882.]
[20] 刘贤万. 实验风沙物理与风沙工程学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995.
[20] [Liu Xianwan. Experimental Sandstorm Physics and Sandstorm Engineering[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1995.]
[21] Judd M J, Raupach M R, Finnigan J J. A wind tunnel study of turbulent flow around single and multiple windbreaks, part I: Velocity fields[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1996, 80(1): 127-165.
[22] 赛克, 赵媛媛, 包岩峰, 等. 干旱半干旱区落叶期农田防护林防风效果的风洞试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(5): 157-165.
[22] [Sai Ke, Zhao Yuanyuan, Bao Yanfeng, et al. Wind-tunnel test study of shelter effects of deciduous farmland shelterbelts in arid and semi-arid areas[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(5): 157-165.]
[23] 徐高兴, 徐先英, 王立, 等. 梭梭不同密度与配置固沙效果风洞模拟试验[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(9): 189-195.
[23] [Xu Gaoxing, Xu Xianying, Wang Li, et al. Sand-fix effects of Haloxylon ammodendron forests under the different densities and patterns under wind tunnel test[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources on Environment, 2019, 33(9): 189-195.]
[24] 刘金苗, 李菊艳, 尹忠东, 等. 干枯骆驼刺对风沙流场影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1514-1525.
[24] [Liu Jinmiao, Li Juyan, Yin Zhongdong, et al. Numerical simulation study on the influence of dry Alhagi camelorum on the wind-sand flow field[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(5): 1514-1525.]
[25] 厉静文, Dosmanbetov D A, 郭浩, 等. 不同配置乔灌混交林防风效益的风洞试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(11): 95-102.
[25] [Li Jingwen, Dosmanbetov D A, Guo Hao, et al. Wind tunnel experiment on protection benefits of arbor-shrub mixed forest belts in different configurations[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(11): 95-102.]
[26] Vigiak O, Sterk G, Warren A, et al. Spatial modeling of wind speed around windbreaks[J]. Catena, 2003, 52(3-4): 273-288.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉