黄河上游生态脆弱区复合生态系统韧性时空分异——以宁夏为例

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2023.02.14

Abstract

Abstract:

Improving the disturbance resistance and restoration of ecologically fragile areas is an important part of ecological civilization construction. The key factors affecting ecological resilience were diagnosed with the help of coupling coordination model, correlation analysis, and obstacle model. Based on the economic, social, and natural multidimensional perspective of composite ecosystem resilience assessment model, using entropy method and GIS spatial analysis, in 2009-2019 Ningxia composite ecosystem resilience difference analysis was done. The results show that: (1) The resilience of Ningxia’s composite ecosystem is on the rise, but the overall level is low, and economic resilience grows the fastest. High economic resilience is densely distributed in the north, and high social resilience is centered in the city. High natural resilience is mainly distributed in the east, south, west, and north corners, and the northern composite ecosystem is more resilient than that in the central and southern regions. (2) The coupling degree of the composite ecosystem in Ningxia is relatively high, but the coordination degree is relatively low. The coupling and coordination degree improves slowly during the research period, and most districts and counties are still in a state of serious and moderate imbalance. (3) The economic structure shows a strong positive correlation with the economic potential, infrastructure, the improvement of people’s livelihood, and the natural environment. Population, environmental stress, and economic vitality in the criterion layer have a significant impact on the composite ecosystem’s resilience, while the index layer’s total energy consumption and the number of workers in the transportation, storage, and postal sectors have a significant impact on the resilience of the majority of districts and counties. In the future, it is necessary to actively play the positive synergistic effect of various influencing factors to rapidly improve the resilience of the composite ecosystem in Ningxia, to effectively help the ecological protection and the construction of a high-quality pilot zone in the Yellow River.

Key words: resilience of composite ecosystems, coupling coordination degree, correlation analysis, obstacle degree model, eecological fragile areas, upper reaches of the Yellow River

YANG Hang, HOU Jingwei, MA Caihong, YANG Chen, WANG Yanjuan. Spatio-temporal differentiation of the composite ecosystem resilience in the ecologically fragile area in the upper reaches of the Yellow River: A case study in Ningxia[J].Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(2): 303-312.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

Tab. 6

Fig. 5

References 25

[1]	中华人民共和国环境保护部. 全国生态脆弱区保护规划纲要. [EB/OL](2008-9-29)[2022-07-26].http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2008-10/09/content_1116192.htm.
	[Ministry of Environmental Protection, PRC. The outline of the national plan for the protection of ecologically fragile areas[EB/OL](2008-9-29)[202-07-26]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2008-10/09/content_1116192.htm.]
[2]	张云霞, 张金茜, 巩杰. 半干旱区湖盆景观格局脆弱性及其影响因素——以凉城县为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1259-1269.
	[Zhang Yunxia, Zhang Jinxi, Gong Jie. Landscape pattern vulnerability and its influencing factors on a semi-arid lake basin: A case study of Liangcheng County[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1259-1269.]
[3]	王聪, 伍星, 傅伯杰, 等. 重点脆弱生态区生态恢复模式现状与发展方向[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7333-7343.
	[Wang Cong, Wu Xing, Fu Bojie, et al. Ecological restoration in the key ecologically vulnerable regions: Current situation and development direction[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7333-7343.]
[4]	张行, 梁小英, 刘迪, 等. 生态脆弱区社会—生态景观恢复力时空演变及情景模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1450-1466. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201907013
	[Zhang Xing, Liang Xiaoying, Liu Di, et al. The resilience evolution and scenario simulation of social-ecological landscape in the fragile area[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(7): 1450-1466.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201907013
[5]	贾慧, 陈海, 毛南赵, 等. 高度敏感生态脆弱区景观可持续性评价[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(6): 1277-1286. doi: 10.18402/resci.2018.06.17
	[Jia Hui, Chen Hai, Mao Nanzhao, et al. Landscape sustainable development in highly sensitive ecological fragile areas[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40 (6): 1277-1286.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2018.06.17
[6]	Walker B, Hollin C S, Carpenter S R, et al. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology & Society, 2004, 9(2): 3438-3447.
[7]	Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 1973, 4(1): 1-23.
[8]	Holling C S, Gunderson L. Resilience and Adaptive Cycles[M]. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems.Island Press, 2001: 25-62.
[9]	李连刚, 张平宇, 谭俊涛, 等. 韧性概念演变与区域经济韧性研究进展[J]. 人文地理, 2019, 34(2): 1-7, 151.
	[Li Liangang, Zhang Pingyu, Tan Juntao, et al. Review on the evolution of resilience concept and research progress on regional economic resilience[J]. Human Geography, 2019, 34(2): 1-7, 151.]
[10]	孙阳, 张落成, 姚士谋. 基于社会生态系统视角的长三角地级城市韧性度评价[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2017, 27(8): 151-158.
	[Sun Yang, Zhang Luocheng, Yao Shimou. Evaluating resilience of prefecture cities in the Yangtze River delta region from a socio-ecological perspective[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(8): 151-158.]
[11]	孙鸿鹄, 甄峰. 居民活动视角的城市雾霾灾害韧性评估——以南京市主城区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(5): 788-796. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.05.010
	[Sun Honghu, Zhen Feng. Evaluation of urban haze disaster resilience from the perspective of residents’ activity: A case study of the main urban area of Nanjing City[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(5): 788-796.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.05.010
[12]	白立敏. 基于景观格局视角的长春市城市生态韧性评价与优化研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2019.
	[Bai Limin. Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Ecological Resilience in Changchun based on Landscape Pattern[D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2019.]
[13]	夏楚瑜, 董照樱子, 陈彬. 城市生态韧性时空变化及情景模拟研究——以杭州市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(1): 116-126.
	[Xia Chuyu, Dong Zhaoyingzi, Chen Bin. Spatio-temporal analysis and simulation of urban ecological resilience: A case study of Hangzhou[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(1): 116-126.]
[14]	王少剑, 崔子恬, 林靖杰, 等. 珠三角地区城镇化与生态韧性的耦合协调研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 973-991. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
	[Wang Shaojian, Cui Zitian, Lin Jingjie, et al. Coupling relationship between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 973-991.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
[15]	修春亮, 魏冶, 王绮. 基于“规模—密度—形态”的大连市城市韧性评估[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(12): 2315-2328. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812004
	[Xiu Chunliang, Wei Ye, Wang Qi. Evaluation of urban resilience of Dalian City based on the perspective of “Size-Density-Morphology”[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(12): 2315-2328.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812004
[16]	彭翀, 林樱子, 顾朝林. 长江中游城市网络结构韧性评估及其优化策略[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1193-1207. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201806010
	[Peng Chong, Lin Yingzi, Gu Chaolin. Evaluation and optimization strategy of city network structural resilience in the middle reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Geographic Research, 2018, 37(6): 1193-1207.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201806010
[17]	刘志敏, 叶超. 社会—生态韧性视角下城乡治理的逻辑框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 95-103. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.009
	[Liu Zhimin, Ye Chao. A logical framework of rural-urban governance from the perspective of social-ecological resilience[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 95-103.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.009
[18]	宁夏回族自治区人民政府. 宁夏回族自治区自然资源保护和利用“十四五”规划. [EB/OL](2021-9-21)[2022-07-26].https://www.nx.gov.cn/zwgk/qzfwj/202109/t20210924_3045970.html.
	[The People’s Government of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. The 14th Five-Year Plan for the Protection and utilization of natural resources in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. [EB/OL](2021-9-21)[2022-07-26].https://www.nx.gov.cn/zwgk/qzfwj/202109/t20210924_3045970.html.]
[19]	王松茂, 牛金兰. 山东半岛城市群城市生态韧性的动态演化及障碍因子分析[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(8): 51-61.
	[Wang Songmao, Niu Jinlan. Dynamic evolution and obstacle factors of urban ecological resilience in Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(8): 51-61.]
[20]	王晓峰, 马雪, 冯晓明, 等. 重点脆弱生态区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7344-7355.
	[Wang Xiaofeng, Ma Xue, Feng Xiaoming, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics of trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in key vulnerable ecological areas in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7344-7355.]
[21]	孙桂丽, 陆海燕, 郑佳翔, 等. 新疆生态脆弱性时空演变及驱动力分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 258-269.
	[Sun Guili, Lu Haiyan, Zheng Jiaxiang, et al. Spatio-temporal variation of ecological vulnerability in Xinjiang and driving force analysis[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(1): 258-269.]
[22]	朱媛媛, 汪紫薇, 顾江, 等. 基于“乡土—生态”系统韧性的红色旅游资源利用空间格局优化研究——以大别山革命老区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(7): 1700-1717. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210706
	[Zhu Yuanyuan, Wang Ziwei, Gu Jiang, et al. The spatial optimization of red tourism resources utilization based on the resilience of “ruralism-ecology” system: A case study of Dabie Mountains Old Revolutionary Base Area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(7): 1700-1717.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210706
[23]	马慧强, 杨俊, 李哲. 太原市城市复合生态系统调节服务时空格局演化及驱动机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(3): 463-472. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.03.011
	[Ma Huiqiang, Yang Jun, Li Zhe. Evolution and driving mechanism of temporal and spatial patterns of regulation services of urban complex ecosystem in Taiyuan[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(3): 463-472.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.03.011
[24]	王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 等. 国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 793-810. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210319
	[Wang Shujia, Kong Wei, Ren Liang, et al. Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(3): 793-810.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210319
[25]	刘海龙, 唐飞, 丁娅楠, 等. 山西省县域高质量发展与生态系统服务耦合的时空演变特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1234-1245.
	[Liu Hailong, Tang Fei, Ding Yanan, et al. Temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of the coupling between county high-quality development and ecosystem services in Shanxi Province[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1234-1245.]

目标层	准则层	指标层		属性	权重
经济韧性（A1）	经济结构（B1）	非私营企业平均工资/元	（C1）	+	0.0357
		规模以上工业企业数/个	（C2）	+	0.0367
		社会消费品零售额/10⁸元	（C3）	+	0.0392
	经济活力（B2）	财政预算收入/10⁸元	（C4）	+	0.0382
		地区生产总值/10⁸元	（C5）	+	0.0388
		人均可支配收入/元	（C6）	+	0.0362
	经济潜力（B3）	第三产业比重/%	（C7）	+	0.0353
		教育投入/10⁴元	（C8）	+	0.0388
		一般公共预算支出/10⁸元	（C9）	+	0.0364
社会韧性（A2）	基础设施（B4）	床位数量/张	（C10）	+	0.0387
		交通仓储邮政业人数/人	（C11）	+	0.0390
		水利环境基础设施投入/10⁴元	（C12）	+	0.0382
	民生改善（B5）	农作物产量/(kg·hm^-2)	（C13）	+	0.0354
		在岗职工数/人	（C14）	+	0.0390
		自来水受益村/个	（C15）	+	0.0370
	人口要素（B6）	常住人口数/人	（C16）	+	0.0379
		人口增长率/%	（C17）	+	0.0351
		卫生技术人员数/个	（C18）	+	0.0392
自然韧性（A3）	环境压力（B7）	工业二氧化硫排放量/t	（C19）	-	0.0321
		生活废水排放量/10⁴t	（C20）	-	0.0320
		生活烟尘排放量/t	（C21）	-	0.0322
	生态治理（B8）	废气处理设施/套	（C22）	+	0.0382
		工业固体垃圾综合利用量/t	（C23）	+	0.0388
		生活污水处理吨数/t	（C24）	+	0.0379
	自然环境（B9）	草地/hm²	（C25）	+	0.0367
		降水量/mm	（C26）	+	0.0376
		综合能源消费量/吨标准煤	（C27）	-	0.0395

协调等级	区间	协调等级	区间
极度失调	[0, 0.1)	勉强协调	[0.5, 0.6)
严重失调	[0.1, 0.2)	初级协调	[0.6, 0.7)
中度失调	[0.2, 0.3)	中级协调	[0.7, 0.8)
轻度失调	[0.3, 0.4)	良好协调	[0.8, 0.9)
濒临失调	[0.4, 0.5)	优质协调	[0.9, 1]

年份	耦合度	协调度	耦合协调度	年份	耦合度	协调度	耦合协调度
2010	0.9870	0.0205	0.1423	2016	0.9878	0.0285	0.1678
2011	0.9928	0.0225	0.1494	2017	0.9903	0.0313	0.1761
2012	0.9950	0.0243	0.1554	2018	0.9807	0.0336	0.1814
2013	0.9936	0.0258	0.1601	2019	0.9743	0.0338	0.1815
2014	0.9961	0.0268	0.1634	2020	0.9732	0.0359	0.1870
2015	0.9966	0.0278	0.1664

	B1	B2	B3	B4	B5	B6	B7	B8	B9
B1	1
B2	0.992^**	1
B3	0.812^**	0.772^**	1
B4	0.861^**	0.839^**	0.925^**	1
B5	0.907^**	0.922^**	0.613^*	0.713^*	1
B6	-0.257	-0.259	-0.142	-0.335	-0.427	1
B7	-0.4	-0.31	-0.584	-0.324	-0.213	-0.116	1
B8	0.629^*	0.675^*	0.177	0.337	0.785^**	-0.531	0.111	1
B9	0.859^**	0.883^**	0.723^*	0.826^**	0.889^**	-0.295	-0.149	0.611^*	1

年份	B1	B2	B3	B4	B5	B6	B7	B8	B9
2010	0.1267	0.1363	0.1061	0.1109	0.1090	0.1392	0.0157	0.1329	0.1232
2015	0.1094	0.1405	0.1106	0.1103	0.1159	0.1429	0.0148	0.1280	0.1275
2020	0.0981	0.1383	0.0866	0.1157	0.1256	0.1424	0.0189	0.1403	0.1342
最大值	0.1273	0.1420	0.1120	0.1148	0.1238	0.1429	0.0175	0.1409	0.1305
平均数	0.1136	0.1396	0.1066	0.1113	0.1157	0.1401	0.0143	0.1328	0.1259
变异系数	0.0825	0.0103	0.0548	0.0180	0.0396	0.0130	0.0972	0.0359	0.0211

Spatio-temporal differentiation of the composite ecosystem resilience in the ecologically fragile area in the upper reaches of the Yellow River: A case study in Ningxia

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 25

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

排序	2010年		2015年		2020年
排序	障碍因素	障碍度	障碍因素	障碍度	障碍因素	障碍度
1	C27	0.0502	C27	0.0515	C27	0.0534
2	C3	0.0497	C6	0.0501	C11	0.0533
3	C18	0.0487	C8	0.0501	C14	0.0522
4	C5	0.0482	C3	0.0497	C18	0.0514
5	C11	0.0474	C18	0.0497	C3	0.0514

[1]	ZHENG Liuna, JIANG Hongnan, SUN Mengting. Correlations between soil water content, salinity, and fractional vegetation cover in the Ugan-Kuqa River Delta Oasis of Xinjiang ascertained based on remote sensing images [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(7): 1131-1139.
[2]	SHAO Jie, YANG Xinjie, CHEN Xiqing, TENG Chao, YI Jinjun, DONG Meiling, ZHANG Zechen, CAO Jun, ZHU Ning, XIAO Deng, SUN Siyuan, LYU Fei. Hydrochemical characteristics and control factors of surface water in the Yigong Lake Basin, Tibet [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(2): 250-260.
[3]	HUI Rong, TAN Huijuan, HUANG Lei, LI Xinrong. Characteristics of nutrient and enzyme activity in salt-affected soils of the Qaidam Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(11): 1776-1784.
[4]	NIU Zilu, WANG Lei, QI Tuoye, ZHANG Yijing, SHEN Jianxiang, YANG Zhuqing, WANG Entian, JIANG Shuting. Soil salinization characteristics in irrigation region of Yellow River of Hongsipu, Ningxia [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(11): 1785-1796.
[5]	YAO Jia,CHEN Qihui,LI Qiongfang,CUI Gang,ZHANG Liangjing. Spatial and temporal variability of evapotranspiration and influencing factors in the Ili River-Balkhash Lake Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(5): 1564-1575.
[6]	LIU Hailong,TANG Fei,DING Ya’nan,ZHANG Yu,GUO Xiaojia,TAN Jingbai,CHENG Yue. Temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of the coupling between county high-quality development and ecosystem services in Shanxi Province [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1234-1245.
[7]	YANG Fucheng,LIU Changyi,HU Xiasong,LI Xilai,FU Jiangtao,LU Haijing,SHEN Ziyan,XU Tong,YAN Cong,HE Weipeng. Study on physical and chemical properties and shear strength characteristics of root-soil composite system with different degradation degrees of alpine grassland in the source region of the Yellow River [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(2): 560-571.
[8]	CHENG Mengyuan,CAO Guangchao,ZHAO Meiliang,DIAO Erlong,HE Qixin,GAO Siyuan,QIU Xunxun,CHENG Guo. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics and influencial factors of soil moisture in the Xiangride-Qaidam River Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(2): 615-624.
[9]	FENG Zhuangzhuang,SHI Haibin,MIAO Qingfeng,LI Jiannan,SUN Wei,DAI Liping. Prediction of reference crop evapotranspiration in Xilinguole grassland based on multivariate time series model [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(6): 1650-1658.
[10]	MA Xiaomei,DU Bingchenxi,CHNEG Yongxiang,WU Ling. Analysis of vegetation variation trend and correlative factors in Junggar Basin [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(5): 1401-1410.
[11]	CUI Zhenzhen,MA Chao,CHEN Dengkui. Spatiotemporal variation of vegetation in the Horqin Sandy Land and its response to climate change from 1982-2015 [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(2): 536-544.
[12]	CHEN Deng-kui, MA Chao, WANG Xia-bing, LIU Chang. Variation of NDVI and its response to climate change in Hoh Xil during the period of 1982-2015 [J]. , 2018, 35(6): 1410-1417.
[13]	涂文霞，叶茂，徐海量，白元. Radial Growth of Populus euphratica and the Effect  of Runoff in the Tarim River Basin [J]. , 2014, 31(3): 508-515.
[14]	ZHANG Yan-fang, LI Xin-qiao. Correlation between Industrial Carbon Emission and Its Affecting Factors—A Study Based on Empirical Analysis of Panel Data from the Five Provinces and Autonomous Regions in Northwest China [J]. , 2014, 31(3): 424-430.
[15]	CHEN Xiao-Hong, DUAN Zheng-Hu, LUO Tian-Feng, TAN Ming-Liang. Relationship between Particulate Nutrient Content and Nutrient Content in Bulk Soil during Reversal of Desertification [J]. , 2013, 30(6): 992-997.