生态与环境

基于LUCC的干旱区人为干扰与生态安全分析——以天山北坡经济带绿洲为例

  • 宋文杰 ,
  • 张清 ,
  • 刘莎莎 ,
  • 杨江宁
展开
  • 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所, 北京 100094
宋文杰(1993-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态安全研究. E-mail:songwenjie2011@163.com
张清.E-mail:zhangqing01@radi.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2017-04-11

  修回日期: 2017-07-12

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-16

基金资助

中国清洁发展机制基金赠款项目(2014106);国家自然科学基金项目(41771392)资助

LUCC-Based Human Disturbance and Ecological Security in Arid Area: A Case Study in the Economic Zone on Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains

  • SONG Wen-jie ,
  • ZHANG Qing ,
  • LIU Sha-sha ,
  • YANG Jiang-ning
Expand
  • Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100094,China

Received date: 2017-04-11

  Revised date: 2017-07-12

  Online published: 2025-11-16

摘要

基于1965—2015年5期LUCC数据,通过人为干扰度和景观脆弱度构建生态安全度,开展长时间序列、大尺度、高精度的天山北坡经济带绿洲人为干扰和生态安全变化研究。结果表明:① 近50 a,人类对天山北坡经济带绿洲的干扰程度逐年增加,现已达到中度偏强的干扰程度,乌鲁木齐、石河子、奎屯、米泉和昌吉的干扰度高于其他地区。② 近50 a,天山北坡经济带绿洲生态安全度呈先增加后减少的趋势,较不安全和临界等级为主要的生态安全等级,该等级区域逐年增多且向西北方向移动,城市建设、绿洲扩张和过度开垦是生态安全降低的主要因素。③ 结构因素、人类因素、政策因素是天山北坡生态安全变化的驱动因素。从整体来看,天山北坡经济带的生态环境仍存在较大隐患,需要在今后的发展中合理利用土地资源,保证该区域的可持续发展。

本文引用格式

宋文杰 , 张清 , 刘莎莎 , 杨江宁 . 基于LUCC的干旱区人为干扰与生态安全分析——以天山北坡经济带绿洲为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018 , 35(1) : 235 -242 . DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2018.01.29

Abstract

Ecological security is closely related to the people’s survival and development.In the context of global warming,the ecological and environmental problems have become increasingly prominent with the frequent human activities.Oases in arid areas are the regions with vulnerable environment and economy.Study on ecological security of oases in arid areas is of great significance to the economic stability and development of oases.Based on the land use/cover data in 1965,1980,1995,2005 and 2015,the study analyzed the temporal and spatial changes in human disturbance and ecological security of oases in the economic zone on northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains in recent 50 years by establishing the ecological security index through human disturbance index and landscape vulnerability index.The results showed that the human disturbance in the study area in recent 50 years was increased year by year and reached to a moderate-strong degree in 2015.The human disturbance degree in Urumqi,Shihezi,Kuytun,Miquan and Changji was higher than that in other regions.The ecological security in the economic zone on northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains tended an increase firstly and then a decrease in recent 50 years.The unsafe level and critical level were dominant in the economic zone on northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains,and the regions with these levels were increased and shifted northwestward.The ecological security level was low in Karamay,Shawan and Manas County.Urban construction,oasis expansion and excessive land reclamation were the main factors in reducing ecological security.Structure,human activities and policy were the driving factors of ecological security change in the study area.Structural and policy factors affected the large-scale pattern of ecological security,and human factors affected the small-scale one,On the whole,the ecological environment in the economic zone on northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains is currently still in a high hidden danger,and it is necessary to make reasonable use of land resources in the future development so as to ensure a sustainable development of the study area.

参考文献

〔1〕 南颖,吉喆,冯恒栋,等.基于遥感和地理信息系统的图们江地区生态安全评价〔J〕.生态学报,2013,33(15):4 790-4 798.〔Nan Ying,Ji Zhe,Feng Hengdong,et al.On eco-security evaluation in the Tumen River region based on RS & GIS〔J〕.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(15):4 790-4 798.〕
〔2〕 迟妍妍,许开鹏,张惠远.浑善达克沙漠化防治区生态安全评价与对策〔J〕.干旱区研究,2015,32(5):1 024-1 031.〔Chi Yanyan,Xu Kaipeng,Zhang Huiyuan.Ecological security assessment and countermeasures of Hunshandake desertification control regions〔J〕.Arid Zone Research,2015,32(5):1 024-1 031.〕
〔3〕 陈星,周成虎.生态安全:国内外研究综述〔J〕.地理科学进展,2005,24(6):8-20.〔Chen Xing,Zhou Chenghu.Review of the studies on ecological security〔J〕.Progress in Geography,2005,24(6):8-20.〕
〔4〕 王涛.干旱区绿洲化、荒漠化研究的进展与趋势〔J〕.中国沙漠,2009,29(1):1-9.〔Wang Tao.Review and prospect of research on oasification and desertification in arid regions〔J〕.Journal of Desert Research,2009,29(1):1-9.〕
〔5〕 彭建,赵会娟,刘焱序,等.区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望〔J〕.地理研究,2017,36(3):407-419.〔Peng Jian,Zhao Huijuan,Liu Yuanxu,et al.Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction〔J〕.Geographical Research,2017,36(3):407-419.〕
〔6〕 王成.从自然干扰看人类干扰的合理性〔J〕.吉林林学院学报,1998,14(4):39-43.〔Wang Cheng.The rationality of human disturbance compared with natural disturbance〔J〕.Journal of Jilin Forestry University,1998,14(4):39-43.
〔7〕 Liang F C,Liu L Q.Quantitative analysis of human disturbance intensity of landscape patterns and preliminary optimization of ecological function regions:A case of Minqing County in Fujian Province〔J〕.Resources Science,2011,33(6):1 138-1 144.
〔8〕 Jalas J.Hemerokorit ja hemerofobit〔J〕.Luonnon Tutkija,1953,57:12-16.
〔9〕 Walz U,Stein C.Indicators of hemeroby for the monitoring of landscapes in Germany〔J〕.Journal for Nature Conservation,2014,22(3):279-289.
〔10〕Sukopp H.Der einfluss des menschen auf die vegetation〔J〕.Plant Ecology,1969,17(1):360-371.
〔11〕陈爱莲,朱博勤,陈利顶,等.双台河口湿地景观及生态干扰度的动态变化〔J〕.应用生态学报,2010,21(5):1 120-1 128.〔Chen Ailian,Zhu Boqin,Chen Liding,et al.Dynamic changes of landscape pattern and eco-disturbance degree in Shuangtai estuary wetland of Liaoning province〔J〕.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2010,21(5):1 120-1 128.〕
〔12〕肖笃宁,陈文波,郭福良.论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容〔J〕.应用生态学报,2002,13(3):354-358.〔Xiao Duning,Chen Wenbo,Guo Fuliang.On the basic concepts and contents of ecological security〔J〕.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2002,13(3):354-358.〕
〔13〕Rogers K S.Ecological security and multinational corporations〔J〕.Environmental Change & Security Project Report,1997,28(3):29-36.
〔14〕倪化勇,郑万模,巴仁基,等.基于水动力条件的矿山泥石流成因与特征:以石棉县后沟为例〔J〕.山地学报,2010,28(4):470-477.〔Ni Huayong,Zheng Wanmo,Ba Renji,et al.Formation and characteristics of mine debris flows based on dynamic conditions〔J〕.Journal of Mountan Science,2010,28(4):470-477.〕
〔15〕秦晓楠,卢小丽,武春友.国内生态安全研究知识图谱:基于Citespace的计量分析〔J〕.生态学报,2014,34(13):3 693-3 703.〔Qin Xiaonan,Lu Xiaoli,Wu Chunyou.The knowledge mapping of domestic ecological security research bibliometric analysis based on Citespace〔J〕.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(13):3 693-3 703.〕
〔16〕杨青生,乔纪纲,艾彬.快速城市化地区景观生态安全时空演化过程分析:以东莞市为例〔J〕.生态学报,2013,33(4):1 230-1 239.〔Yang Qingsheng,Qiao Jigang,Ai Bin.Landscape ecological security dynamics in a fast growing urban district:The case of Dongguan City〔J〕.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(4):1 230-1 239.〕
〔17〕杜巧玲,许学工,刘文政.黑河中下游绿洲生态安全评价〔J〕.生态学报,2004,24(9):1 916-1 923.〔Du Qiaoling,Xu Xuegong,Liu Wenzheng.Ecological security assessment for the oases in the middle and lower Heiher River〔J〕.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,24(9):1 916-1 923.〕
〔18〕魏伟,石培基,雷莉,等.基于景观结构和空间统计方法的绿洲区生态风险分析:以石羊河武威、民勤绿洲为例〔J〕.自然资源学报,2014,29(12):2 023-2 035.〔Wei Wei,Shi Peiji,Lei li,et al.Eco-risk analysis of oasis region based on landscape structure and spatial statistics method:A case study of Wuwei and Minqin Oases〔J〕.Journal of Natural Resources,2014,29(12):2 023-2 035.〕
〔19〕孙才志,闫晓露,钟敬秋.下辽河平原景观格局脆弱性及空间关联格局〔J〕.生态学报,2014,34(2):247-257.〔Sun Caizhi,Yan Xiaolu,Zhong Jingqiu.Evaluation of the landscape patterns vulnerability and analysis of spatial correlation patterns in the lower reaches of Liaohe River Plain〔J〕.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(2):247-257.〕
〔20〕时卉,杨兆萍,韩芳,等.干旱区高山湿地生态风险时空变化:以巴音布鲁克自然遗产地为例〔J〕.干旱区研究,2015,32(3):614-621.〔Shi Hui,Yang Zhaoping,Han Fang,et al.Analysis of ecological risk temporal-spatial change in arid alpine wetland:A case study of Bayanbulak World Natural Heritage site〔J〕.Arid Zone Research,2015,32(3):614-621.〕
〔21〕李秀珍,布仁仓,常禹,等.景观格局指标对不同景观格局的反应〔J〕.生态学报,2004,24(1):123-134.〔Li Xiuzhen,Bu Rencang,Chang Yu,et al.The response of landscape metrics against pattern scenarios〔J〕.Acta Ecologica Sinica ,2004,24(1):123-134.〕
〔22〕刘纪远,匡文慧,张增祥,等.20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局〔J〕.地理学报,2014,69(1):3-14.〔Liu Jiyuan,Kuang Wenhui,Zhang Zengxiang,et al.Spatiotemporal characteristics,patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s〔J〕.Acta Geographical Sinica,2014,69(1):3-14.〕
〔23〕张广朋,徐海量,杜清,等.近20 a叶尔羌河流域生态服务价值对土地利用/覆被变化的响应〔J〕.干旱区研究,2016,33(6):1 303-1 310.〔Zhang Guangpeng,Xu Hailiang,Du Qing,et al.Response of ecosystem service value to land use/cover change in the Yarkant River Basin in recent 20 years〔J〕.Arid Zone Research,2016,33(6):1 303-1 310.〕
〔24〕潘竟虎,石培基,刘英英.干旱区县域土地利用规划环境影响的生态安全评价:以张掖市甘州区为例〔J〕.水土保持通报,2012,32(1):248-252,261.〔Pan Jinghu,Shi Peiji,Liu Yingying.Environmental impacts of land use planning in arid area based on ecological security method:A case study of Ganzhou District,Zhangya City〔J〕.Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,32(1):248-252,261.〕
〔25〕喻锋,李晓兵,王宏,等.皇甫川流域土地利用变化与生态安全评价〔J〕.地理学报,2006,61(6):645-653.〔Yu Feng,Li Xiaobing,Wang Hong,et al.Land use change and eco-security assessment of Huangfu Chuan Watershed〔J〕.Acta Geographical Sinica,2006,61(6):645-653.〕
〔26〕罗格平,张百平.干旱区可持续土地利用模式分析:以天山北坡为例〔J〕.地理学报,2006,61(11):1 160-1 170.〔Luo Geping,Zhang Baiping.Sustainable land use models for arid lands:A case study of the Northern Tianshan Mountain Areas〔J〕.Acta Geographical Sinica,2006,61(11):1 160-1 170.〕
〔27〕李谢辉,李景宜.基于GIS的区域景观生态风险分析:以渭河下游河流沿线区域为例〔J〕.干旱区研究,2008,25(6):899-903.〔Li Xiehui,Li Jingyi.Analyse on regional landscape ecological risk based on GIS:A case study along the lower reaches of the Weihe River〔J〕.Arid Zone Research,2008,25(6):899-903.〕
〔28〕陈鹏,傅世锋,文超祥,等.1989—2010年间厦门湾滨海湿地人为干扰影响评价及景观响应〔J〕.应用海洋学学报,2014,33(2):167-174.〔Chen Peng,Fu Shifeng,Wen Chaoxiang,et al.Assessment of impact on coastal wetland of Xiamen Bay and response of landscape pattern from human disturbance from 1989 to 2010〔J〕.Journal of Applied Oceanography,2014,33(2):167-174.〕
〔29〕曾辉,刘国军.基于景观结构的区域生态风险分析〔J〕.中国环境科学,1999,19(5):454-457.〔Zeng Hui,Liu Guojun.Regional eco-risk analysis based on land-scape structure〔J〕.China Environmental Science,1999,19(5):454-457.〕
文章导航

/