水土资源

基于SWMM模型的西安市清河流域暴雨洪峰流量模拟

  • 刘春春 ,
  • 刘万青 ,
  • 张悦 ,
  • 王涛 ,
  • 杨波 ,
  • 余雷
展开
  • 1.西北大学城市与环境学院, 陕西 西安 710127;
    2.西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
    3.西安市水利水土保持工作总站, 陕西 西安 710016
刘春春(1993-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与水文模型研究.E-mail:lccxdhg@163.com
刘万青.E-mail:mclwq@sina.com

收稿日期: 2017-06-05

  修回日期: 2017-07-25

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-16

基金资助

陕西省水土保持标准体系修编项目(SZTGK-XA-161203-GC);陕西省水土保持科研示范项目“农村内涝疏导与雨水资源化利用技术研究”(1601)资助

Simulation of Rainstorm Flood Peak Discharge in the Qinghe River Basin in Xi’an Based on SWMM Model

  • LIU Chun-chun ,
  • LIU Wan-qing ,
  • ZHANG Yue ,
  • WANG Tao ,
  • YANG Bo ,
  • YU Lei
Expand
  • 1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences,Northwest University,Xi’an 710127,Shaanxi,China;
    2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University,Yangling 712100,Shaanxi,China;
    3. Xi’an Soil and Water Conservation Station,Xi’an 710016,Shaanxi,China

Received date: 2017-06-05

  Revised date: 2017-07-25

  Online published: 2025-11-16

摘要

为探讨暴雨洪水管理模型(storm water management model,SWMM)在暴雨条件下对山区流域洪峰流量模拟的适用性,以西安市清河流域为例,在SWMM模型中分别构建了传统的集总模式和以DEM、流域水系为子流域划分依据的半分布模式。通过2016年几次典型降雨洪峰流量验证两种模式的可靠性,结果表明:集总模式与实测拟合程度较好,相对误差为6%,确定性系数为0.871。为了进一步检验集总模式的适用性,从径流过程角度去模拟,结果也令人满意,两场降雨的相对误差均为11%,两场降雨的确定性系数和纳什系数均高于0.8,表明有较好的模拟效果。由此说明,基于SWMM模型构建的集总水文模式适合于清河流域的径流模拟。最后,模拟了不同重现期下流域的径流过程。流量峰值出现在降雨开始后约1.5 h,10年一遇以下重现期径流变化相对稳定。该模型对当地水利部门评估极端降雨事件等方面具有一定的应用价值。

本文引用格式

刘春春 , 刘万青 , 张悦 , 王涛 , 杨波 , 余雷 . 基于SWMM模型的西安市清河流域暴雨洪峰流量模拟[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018 , 35(1) : 35 -42 . DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2018.01.05

Abstract

In order to discuss the applicability of storm water management model for flood peak discharge simulation in mountainous area,in this paper the Qinghe River Basin in Xi’an was taken to carry out a case study on flood peak discharge using the traditional lumped model and the semi-distribution model. The semi-distribution model was based on DEM and drainage basin system to develop the SWMM model.Two different modes of hydrological models could be validated by the peak discharge during several typical rainfall episodes in 2016.The results showed that the lumped pattern was in good fitting with the measured values,the relative error was only 6%,and the deterministic coefficient was 0.871.In order to further test the applicability of the lumped model,the results were satisfactory from the perspective of runoff process.The relative errors of the two rainfalls were 11%,and the certainty coefficient and Nash coefficient of the two rainfalls were higher than 0.8,which revealed that the good results were achieved in the simulation.Therefore,the lumped hydrological model based on SWMM is suitable for simulating the runoff discharge in the Qinghe River Basin.At last,the runoff processes in the drainage basin under different recurrence periods were simulated.The flood peak discharge occurred about 1.5 hours after starting rainfall,and the change of runoff discharge will be relatively stable during the following decade.This model has a certain application value to the local water conservancy department in assessing extreme rainfall events.

参考文献

〔1〕 赵东泉,王浩正,盛政,等.城市暴雨管理数字化解决方案〔J〕.中国给水排水,2008,24(20):15-19.〔Zhao Dongquan,Wang Haozheng,Sheng Zheng,et al.Discussion on digital solutions for urban storm management〔J〕.China Water & Wastewater,2008,24(20):15-19.〕
〔2〕 吴建立,孙飞云,董文艺,等.基于 SWMM 模拟的城市内河区域雨水径流和水质分析〔J〕.水利水电技术,2012,43(8):90-94.〔Wu Jianli,Sun Feiyun,Dong Wenyi,et al.SWMM simulation based analysis on rainfall runoff and water qulity within urban inland river area〔J〕.Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2012,43(8):90-94.〕
〔3〕 王秀杰,王丽娜,田福昌,等.GIS 及 SWMM 模型在防洪保护区内涝模拟中的应用〔J〕.水资源与水工程学报,2015,26(6):146-150.〔Wang Xiujie,Wang Li’na,Tian Fuchang,et al.The application of GIS and SWMM models in flood simulation in flood protection reserves〔J〕.Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering,2015,26(6):146-150.〕
〔4〕 张倩,苏保林,袁军营.城市居民小区SWMM降雨径流过程模拟:以营口市贵都花园小区为例〔J〕.北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2012,48(3):276-281.〔Zhang Qian,Su Baolin,Yuan Junying.Simulating rainfall-runoff in urban residential area based on SWMM〔J〕.Journal of Beijing Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2012,48(3):276-281.〕
〔5〕 黄国如,张灵敏,雒翠,等.SWMM模型在深圳市民治河流域的应用〔J〕.水电能源科学,2015,33(4):10-14.〔Huang Guoru,Zhang Lingmin,Luo Cui,et al.Application of SWMM model in Minzhi River Basin of Shenzhen City〔J〕.Hydropower and Energy Science,2015,33(4):10-14.〕
〔6〕 Jennifer R D.Guidance for Rural Watershed Calibration with EPASWMM〔D〕.Colorado:Colorado State University, 2008.
〔7〕 张典.基于SWMM的地下河流域水文过程模拟研究:以重庆青木关岩溶地下河为例〔D〕.重庆:西南大学,2010.〔Zhang Dian.Hydrologic Modeling of Karst Subterranean River Using Storm Water Management Model:A Case Study of Qingmuguan Subterranean River in Chongqing〔D〕.Chongqing: Southwest University,2010.〕
〔8〕 章程,蒋勇军,袁道先,等.利用SWMM模型模拟岩溶峰丛洼地系统降雨径流过程〔J〕.水文地质工程地质,2007(3): 10-14.〔Zhang Cheng,Jiang Yongjun,Yuan Daoxian,et al.Rainfall-runoff simulation of a typical karst fengcong depression system using SWMM model:A case study of the Yaji experimental site in Guilin〔J〕.Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology,2007(3):10-14.〕
〔9〕 陈冬,许模,曾科,等.SWMM模型模拟岩溶隧道涌水量的动态变化过程分析:以中坝隧道为例〔J〕.地下水,2014,36(1):82-84.〔Chen Dong,Xu Mo,Zeng Ke,et al.Analysis of dynamic change process of SWMM model of karst water gushing amount:In dam tunnel as an example〔J〕.Ground Water,2014,36(1):82-84.〕
〔10〕吴月霞.基于SWMM的岩溶泉域水文过程的模拟研究:以重庆金佛山水房泉为例〔D〕.重庆:西南大学,2008. 〔Wu Yuexia.Hydrologic Modeling of Karst Spring Using SWMM Model:A Case Study of Shuifang Spring of Jinfo Mountain in Chongqing〔D〕.Chongqing:Southwest University,2008.〕
〔11〕王海潮,陈建刚,张书函,等.城市雨洪模型应用现状及对比分析〔J〕.水利水电技术,2011,42(11):10-13.〔Wang Haichao,Chen Jiangang,Zhang Shuhan,et al.Application status and comparative analysis of urban storm water models〔J〕.Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2011,42(11):10-13.〕
〔12〕陈虹,李家科,李亚娇,等.暴雨洪水管理模型SWMM的研究及应用进展〔J〕.西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2015,43(12):225-234.〔Chen Hong,Li Jiake,Li Yajiao,et al.Progress on research and application of Storm Water Management Model〔J〕.Journal of Northwest A & F University:Naturnal Sciences Edition,2015,43(12):225-234.〕
〔13〕刘光东,杨毅,吴山.基于SWMM模型的北京市山区清水河流域数值模拟研究〔C〕//中国水利学会.中国水利学会2014学术年会论文集(下册).南京:河海大学出版社,2014:1 094-1 100.〔Liu Guangdong,Yang Yi,Wu Shan.Numerical simulation analysis of Qingshui river basin in Beijing mountainous area based on SWMM〔C〕//Chinese Hydraulic Engineering Society.Chinese Hydraulic Engineering Society 2014 Annual Conference Proceedings (second volume).Nanjing:Hohai University Press,2014:1 094-1 100.〕
〔14〕周毅,余明辉,陈永祥.SWMM子汇水区域宽度参数的估算方法介绍〔J〕.中国给水排水,2014,30((22):61-64.〔Zhou Yi,Yu Minghui,Chen Yongxiang.Estimation of Sub-catchment Width in SWMM〔J〕.China Water & Wastewater,2014,30(22):61-64.〕
〔15〕Smith D,Li J,Banting D.A PCSWMM/GIS-based water balance model for the Reesor Creek watershed[J].Atmospheric Research,2005,77:388-406.
〔16〕唐雄朋,吕海深,卞玉敏,等.DHSVM模型在沱沱河流域的径流模拟适用性分析〔J〕.中国农村水利水电,2016(6):47-50.〔Tang Xiongpeng,Lv Haishen,Bian Yumin,et al.An analysis of adaptability of DHSVM model in runoff simulation of Tuotuo river basin〔J〕.Rural Water and Hydropower in China,2016(6):47-50.〕
〔17〕杜锐.西安市暴雨强度公式的推求研究〔D〕.西安:西安建筑科技大学,2011:27-30.〔Du Rui.Study on the Formula of Storm Strength in Xi’an〔D〕.Xi’an:Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,2011:27-30.〕
〔18〕毕旭,程龙,姚东升,等.西安城区暴雨雨型分析〔J〕.安徽农业科学,2015,43(35):295-297.〔Bi Xu,Chen Long,Yao Dongsheng,et al.Analysis on urban rainstorm pattern of Xi’an〔J〕.Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(35):295-297.〕
〔19〕毕旭,党超琪,程龙,等.西安城区暴雨强度公式编制研究〔J〕.安徽农业科学,2015,43(26):223-225.〔Bi Xu,Dang Chaoqi,Chen Long,et al.Study on compiling rainstorm intensity formula in Xi’an Urban〔J〕.Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(26):223-225.〕
〔20〕Rivas I,Roesne R L A.Spatial discretization of large urban watersheds〔C〕//Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007.Reston:ASCE,2007:1-10.
〔21〕Guo J C Y,Cheng J C Y,Wright L.Field Test on Conversion of Natural Watershed into Kinematic Wave Rectangular Plane〔J〕.Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2012,17(8):944-951.
〔22〕吴险峰,刘昌明.流域水文模型研究的若干进展〔J〕.地理科学进展,2002,21(4):341-348.〔Wu Xianfeng,Liu Changming.Progress in watershed hydrological models〔J〕.Progress in Geography,2002,21(4):341-348.〕
文章导航

/